Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Thorin

Publications and source records attributed to D Thorin.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1988

Oxidative and non-oxidative glucose metabolism in non-obese type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients.

Insulin resistance is a common feature of Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. This defect in insulin-mediated glucose metabolism could result from a defect in either glucose oxidation or non-oxidative glucose disposal. To examine this question, euglycaemic insulin clamp studies were performed in 16 normal weight Type 2 and 11 age-matched control subjects. In Type 2 diabetic patients the fasting plasma glucose concentration, 8.39 +/- 0.50 mmol/l, was allowed to decline (over 54 +/- 6 min) to 5.33 +/- 0.11 mmol/l before starting the insulin clamp. Total body glucose uptake was significantly decreased in Type 2 diabetic patients vs control subjects (148 +/- 15 vs 264 +/- 25 mg/min.m2, p less than 0.001). Both total glucose oxidation (59 +/- 6 vs 89 +/- 6 mg/min.m2, p less than 0.005) and non-oxidative glucose disposal (89 +/- 15 vs 179 +/- 24 mg/min.m2, p less than 0.005) were significantly reduced in the Type 2 diabetic patients. Basal glucose oxidation was also reduced in the Type 2 diabetic patients (22 +/- 3 vs 38 +/- 5 mg/min.m2, p less than 0.01). In conclusion, during the postabsorptive state and under conditions of euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemia, impairment of glucose oxidation and non-oxidative glucose disposal both contribute to the insulin resistance observed in normal weight Type 2 diabetic patients. Since lipid oxidation was normal in this group of diabetic patients, excessive non-esterified fatty acid oxidation cannot explain the defects in glucose disposal.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed1988

Effect of propofol on cerebrospinal fluid pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in patients undergoing craniotomy.

The effects of propofol on cerebrospinal fluid pressure, mean arterial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure and heart rate were studied during induction, tracheal intubation and skin incision in 23 patients scheduled for elective craniotomy. Premedication consisted of midazolam 0.1 mg/kg intramuscularly and metoprolol 1 mg/kg orally. Measurements were made or derived at time zero and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3 minutes after an induction dose of propofol 1.5 mg/kg. A continuous infusion of propofol was started at time zero at a rate of 100 mg/kg/minute. Fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg was added before tracheal intubation, application of the pin head holder and skin incision. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure and mean arterial pressure decreased significantly 2 minutes after propofol alone, by 32% and 10% respectively, while a cerebral perfusion pressure above 70 mmHg was maintained. Heart rate did not change. Propofol combined with moderate dose of fentanyl, obtunded the usual cerebrospinal fluid and arterial pressure responses to intubation and other noxious stimuli. Thus propofol seems to be a suitable intravenous anaesthetic agent for induction and maintenance in neuroanaesthesia.

Anesthesia, Intravenous↗
PubMed1986

The effect of selective beta adrenergic blockade on glucose-induced thermogenesis in man.

We have previously shown that the increase in energy expenditure following glucose/insulin infusion is, in large part, mediated by the sympathetic nervous system and that this sympathetic component can be blocked by the nonselective beta-1, beta-2 antagonist propranolol. To examine which beta adrenergic receptor mediates this thermogenic response, we performed euglycemic insulin clamp studies in eight healthy control subjects with and without metoprolol at a dose known to block only the beta-1 adrenergic receptor. Basal glucose oxidation and energy expenditure were similar in the control and metoprolol groups. During the last hour of the insulin clamp study, glucose oxidation (3.06 +/- 0.25 v 2.92 +/- 0.21 mg/kg X min), total body glucose uptake (8.17 +/- 0.70 v 7.13 +/- 0.49 mg/kg X min), and nonoxidative glucose uptake (5.11 +/- 0.60 v 4.21 +/- 0.44 mg/kg X min) were not different in the control compared to the metoprolol group. However, the increment in energy expenditure was inhibited by 64% during metoprolol infusion (0.04 +/- 0.01 v 0.11 +/- 0.02 kcal/min, P less than 0.01). Glucose/insulin-induced thermogenesis was similarly reduced by metoprolol (2.56 +/- 0.81 v 5.04 +/- 0.74%, P less than 0.01). These results are quantitatively quite similar to those observed with propranolol. We conclude that the beta adrenergic nervous system and, specifically, the beta-1 receptor mediates the thermogenic response to glucose/insulin infusion.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Effect of beta and alpha adrenergic blockade on glucose-induced thermogenesis in man.

After intravenous glucose/insulin infusion there is an increase in oxygen consumption and energy expenditure that has been referred to as thermogenesis. To examine the contribution of the beta and alpha adrenergic nervous system to this thermogenic response, 12 healthy volunteers participated in three studies: (a) euglycemic insulin (plasma insulin approximately 100 microunits/ml) clamp study (n = 12); (b) insulin clamp study after beta adrenergic blockade with intravenous propranolol for 1 h (n = 12); (c) insulin clamp study after alpha adrenergic blockade with phentolamine for 1 h (n = 5). During the control insulin clamp study total glucose uptake, glucose oxidation and nonoxidative glucose uptake averaged 7.85 +/- 0.47, 2.62 +/- 0.22, and 5.23 +/- 0.51 mg/kg X min. After propranolol infusion, insulin-mediated glucose uptake was significantly reduced, 6.89 +/- 0.41 (P less than 0.02). This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in glucose oxidation (1.97 +/- 0.19 mg/kg X min, P less than 0.01) without any change in nonoxidative glucose metabolism. Phentolamine administration had no effect on total glucose uptake, glucose oxidation, or nonoxidative glucose disposal. The increments in energy expenditure (0.10 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.03 +/- 0.01 kcal/min) and glucose/insulin-induced thermogenesis (4.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.5%) were reduced by 70% during the propranolol/insulin clamp study. The increments in energy expenditure (0.12 +/- 0.03 kcal/min) and thermogenesis (5.0 +/- 1.5%) were not affected by phentolamine. These results indicate that activation of the beta adrenergic receptor plays an important role in the insulin/glucose-mediated increase in energy expenditure and thermogenesis. In contrast, the alpha adrenergic receptor does not appear to participate in this response.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Glucose disposal in obese non-diabetic and diabetic type II patients. A study by indirect calorimetry and euglycemic insulin clamp.

Insulin resistance is a characteristic finding in obesity and in non insulin dependent (Type II) diabetes mellitus. However, the interaction between diabetes and obesity has been poorly characterized and the metabolic disturbances contributing to the defect in insulin-mediated glucose uptake have not been defined. To examine these questions euglycemic and hyperinsulinemic clamp studies (40 mU/m2/min) were performed in 10 control non-obese subjects, 10 non diabetic obese subjects, 8 normal weight Type II diabetics, and 12 obese Type II diabetics. During the insulin clamp study total body glucose uptake in the obese non diabetics (157 +/- 18 mg/m2.min, p less than 0.01), the normal weight diabetics (159 +/- 21, p less than 0.01) and the obese diabetics (125 +/- 11, p less than 0.001) was significantly reduced compared to the non-obese non diabetic control group (249 +/- 22 mg/m2.min). The impairment in total body glucose uptake was the result mainly of a defect in non-oxidative glucose disposal. Indeed non-oxidative glucose disposal was blunted by 50% in the obese groups (p less than 0.01), somewhat less significantly in the non-obese diabetic group (p less than 0.05) but more when obesity and diabetes mellitus were combined (p less than 0.001). Total glucose oxidation was significantly diminished (p less than 0.01) in both diabetic groups but not in the obese non diabetic group when compared to lean control. A significant inverse correlation between the fasting free fatty acids levels and total glucose uptake (r = -0.453, p less than 0.001) and total glucose oxidation (r = -0.446, p less than 0.001) during the clamp was observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Hyperosmolarity does not contribute to transient radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lidocaine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In addition to major neurologic injury, local anesthesia toxicity may also include less severe but more common neurologic side effects. The authors recently observed symptoms suggestive of transient radicular irritation in one third of patients after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lidocaine, whereas evidence of neurologic symptoms was lacking with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. The purpose of this prospective double-blinded study was to evaluate if the high osmolarity of hyperbaric 5% lidocaine solution might contribute to the development of transient radicular irritation. METHODS: Forty-four patients undergoing brief gynecologic procedures under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive 1.5 mL of one of three study drugs: 5% lidocaine in 7.5% dextrose (drug A), 0.5% bupivacaine in 8.25% dextrose (drug B), or 5% lidocaine in 2.7% dextrose (drug C). Drug C was prepared by the pharmacy (University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland) with an osmolarity similar to that of drug B. Drugs A and B were commercially available. Patients were evaluated on postoperative day 1 for symptoms of transient radicular irritation by an anesthesiologist who was unaware of the drug given or details of the anesthetic technique. RESULTS: Symptoms suggestive of transient radicular irritation were observed with a similar high incidence in patients receiving both lidocaine preparations, but in no patient receiving hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that transient radicular irritation did not result from the marked hyperosmolarity of the hyperbaric 5% lidocaine. However, because lidocaine and bupivacaine were not administered at equipotent dosages, the relative potential for both drugs to induce transient radicular irritation remains to be determined.

Adult↗