Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Tautz

Publications and source records attributed to D Tautz.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

A morphogenetic gradient of hunchback protein organizes the expression of the gap genes Krüppel and knirps in the early Drosophila embryo.

Segmentation of the Drosophila embryo depends on a hierarchy of interactions among the maternal and zygotic genes in the early embryo. The anterior region is organized maternally by the bicoid (bcd) gene product, which forms a concentration gradient in the anterior half of the embryo. The gap genes are also involved in establishing the body plan, with hunchback (hb) being expressed both maternally and zygotically. Zygotic expression of hb is directly activated by the bcd gene product, leading to a subdivision of the embryo into an anterior half expressing zygotically provided hb protein and a posterior half that does not. A similar effect on maternally provided hb protein is caused by the gene nanos, which represses the translation of maternally provided transcripts in the posterior half. This regulation of hb protein is a prerequisite for abdomen development, because the presence of hb protein in the posterior half represses posterior segmentation. This repression mechanism suggests that posterior segmentation might not directly depend on maternal positional cues, but be solely organized at the zygotic level. Here we report further evidence to support this hypothesis and show that the hb protein itself is crucially involved in organizing abdominal segmentation. Differential concentrations of hb protein determine the anterior and posterior borders of expression of the gap gene Krüppel (Kr) and the anterior border of the gap gene knirps (kni), thus defining three positional values. These regulatory pathways are controlled in a redundant way, in part by bcd and in part by the maternal hb gene product.

Animals↗

Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers.

Short simple sequence stretches occur as highly repetitive elements in all eukaryotic genomes and partially also in prokaryotes and eubacteria. They are thought to arise by slippage like events working on randomly occurring internally repetitive sequence stretches. This predicts that they should be generally hypervariable in length. I have used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) process to show that several randomly chosen simple sequence loci with different nucleotide composition and from different species show extensive length polymorphisms. These simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLP) may be usefully exploited for identity testing, population studies, linkage analysis and genome mapping.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Posterior segmentation of the Drosophila embryo in the absence of a maternal posterior organizer gene.

Maternal hunchback activity suppresses the genetic pathway for abdomen formation in the Drosophila embryo. The active component of the posterior group of maternal genes, nanos, acts as a specific repressor of hunchback in the posterior region. Absence of both repressors results in normal embryos, indicating that posterior segmentation may not directly require maternal determinants.

Abdomen↗

Comparison of the gap segmentation gene hunchback between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis reveals novel modes of evolutionary change.

We have cloned and sequenced a large portion of the hunchback (hb) locus from Drosophila virilis. Comparison with the Drosophila melanogaster hb sequence shows multiple strong homologies in the upstream and downstream regions of the gene, including most of the known functional parts. The coding sequence is highly conserved within the presumptive DNA-binding finger regions, but more diverged outside of them. The regions of high divergence are correlated with regions which are rich in short direct repeats (regions of high 'cryptic simplicity'), suggesting a significant influence of slippage-like mechanisms in the evolutionary divergence of the two genes. Staining of early D.virilis embryos with an hb antibody reveals conserved and divergent features of the spatial expression pattern at blastoderm stage. It appears that the basic expression pattern, which serves as the gap gene function of hb, is conserved, while certain secondary expression patterns, which have separate functions for the segmentation process, are partly diverged. Thus, both slippage driven mutations in the coding region, which are likely to occur at higher rates than point mutations and the evolutionary divergence of secondary expression patterns may contribute to the evolution of regulatory genes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback.

We have developed a non-radioactive in situ hybridization technique for the localization of RNA in whole mount Drosophila embryos. After fixation, whole embryos are hybridized in situ with a DNA probe which has been labeled with digoxygenin. The hybridization products are detected by using a phosphatase-coupled antibody against digoxygenin. In parallel experiments, embryos can be treated with an antibody directed against the corresponding protein product to allow the detection of its distribution using standard immunochemical techniques. We have used this approach to compare the spatial and temporal distribution patterns of the RNA and protein products of the segmentation gene hunchback (hb) during the early stages of embryogenesis. This comparison revealed translational control of the maternally derived hb mRNA, which was difficult to detect by conventional techniques. The non-radioactive in situ hybridization method is as sensitive as conventional methods, but is faster and easier to perform. This may make it a useful tool for a variety of other systems.

Animals↗

Regulation of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback by two maternal morphogenetic centres.

Segmentation in the inset embryo is initiated by maternally provided information, which is stored in the developing oocyte. In Drosophila, the genes necessary for this process have been genetically characterized. The anterior segmented region is organized by the bicoid (bcd) gene product. The posterior segmented region is organized by several interacting gene products, among them the oskar (osk) gene product. The first zygotic group of genes, which are thought to respond to the spatial cues provided by the maternal genes, are the gap genes, whose members include hunchback (hb), Krüppel (Kr) and knirps (kni). To elucidate the role played by the maternal genes in expression of the gap gene hb, antibodies were raised against a fusion protein and were used for the cytological localization of the hb gene product in wild-type and mutant embryos. The hb protein is predominantly located in the nucleus. Its spatial expression includes the formation of an anterior-posterior gradient during the early cleavage stages and a strong zygotic expression in the anterior half of the embryo. Analysis of embryos mutant for the maternal genes affecting the anterior-posterior segmentation pattern shows that the formation of the early gradient is controlled by the osk group of genes, whereas efficient activation of the zygotic anterior expression domain is dependent on bcd activity.

Animals↗

Differential regulation of the two transcripts from the Drosophila gap segmentation gene hunchback.

The Drosophila gap gene hunchback (hb) is required for the establishment of the anterior segment pattern of the embryo, and also for a small region of the posterior segment pattern. The hb gene encodes two transcripts from two promoters which show a differential regulation, although they code for the same protein product. The 3.2-kb transcript is expressed during oogenesis and forms an anterior-posterior gradient during the early stages of development. The first zygotic expression of hb during cleavage stages 11-12 is due to the 2.9-kb transcript. Its expression is under the control of the anterior pattern organizer gene bicoid (bcd) and it appears to be necessary and sufficient for the anterior segmentation. The 3.2-kb transcript is expressed again at syncytial blastoderm stage in the anterior yolk nuclei, as well as in an anterior stripe which is posteriorly adjacent to the domain of the 2.9-kb transcript, and as a posterior stripe. Using hb-promoter/lacZ fusion gene constructs in combination with germ line transformation, we have delimited a regulatory region for the 2.9-kb transcript to approximately 300 bp upstream of the site of transcription initiation and show that this region is sufficient to confer the full regulation by bcd.

Animals↗

Complete sequences of the rRNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

In this, the first of three papers, we present the sequence of the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes of Drosophila melanogaster. The gene regions of D. melanogaster rDNA encode four individual rRNAs: 18S (1,995 nt), 5.8S (123 nt), 2S (30 nt), and 28S (3,945 nt). The ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeat of D. melanogaster is AT rich (65.9% overall), with the spacers being particularly AT rich. Analysis of DNA simplicity reveals that, in contrast to the intergenic spacer (IGS) and the external transcribed spacer (ETS), most of the rRNA gene regions have been refractory to the action of slippage-like events, with the exception of the 28S rRNA gene expansion segments. It would seem that the 28S rRNA can accommodate the products of slippage-like events without loss of activity. In the following two papers we analyze the effects of sequence divergence on the evolution of (1) the 28S gene "expansion segments" and (2) the 28S and 18S rRNA secondary structures among eukaryotic species, respectively. Our detailed analyses reveal, in addition to unequal crossing-over, (1) the involvement of slippage and biased mutation in the evolution of the rDNA multigene family and (2) the molecular coevolution of both expansion segments and the nucleotides involved with compensatory changes required to maintain secondary structures of RNA.

Animals↗

Evolution of the secondary structures and compensatory mutations of the ribosomal RNAs of Drosophila melanogaster.

This paper examines the effects of DNA sequence evolution on RNA secondary structures and compensatory mutations. Models of the secondary structures of Drosophila melanogaster 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and of the complex between 2S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNAs have been drawn on the basis of comparative and energetic criteria. The overall AU richness of the D. melanogaster rRNAs allows the resolution of some ambiguities in the structures of both large rRNAs. Comparison of the sequence of expansion segment V2 in D. melanogaster 18S rRNA with the same region in three other Drosophila species and the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans) allows us to distinguish between two models for the secondary structure of this region. The secondary structures of the expansion segments of D. melanogaster 28S rRNA conform to a general pattern for all eukaryotes, despite having highly divergent sequences between D. melanogaster and vertebrates. The 70 novel compensatory mutations identified in the 28S rRNA show a strong (70%) bias toward A-U base pairs, suggesting that a process of biased mutation and/or biased fixation of A and T point mutations or AT-rich slippage-generated motifs has occurred during the evolution of D. melanogaster rDNA. This process has not occurred throughout the D. melanogaster genome. The processes by which compensatory pairs of mutations are generated and spread are discussed, and a model is suggested by which a second mutation is more likely to occur in a unit with a first mutation as such a unit begins to spread through the family and concomitantly through the population. Alternatively, mechanisms of proofreading in stem-loop structures at the DNA level, or between RNA and DNA, might be involved. The apparent tolerance of noncompensatory mutations in some stems which are otherwise strongly supported by comparative criteria within D. melanogaster 28S rRNA must be borne in mind when compensatory mutations are used as a criterion in secondary-structure modeling. Noncompensatory mutation may extend to the production of unstable structures where a stem is stabilized by RNA-protein or additional RNA-RNA interactions in the mature ribosome. Of motifs suggested to be involved in rRNA processing, one (CGAAAG) is strongly overrepresented in the 28S rRNA sequence. The data are discussed both in the context of the forces involved with the evolution of multigene families and in the context of molecular coevolution in the rDNA family in particular.

Animals↗

Evolutionary divergence of promoters and spacers in the rDNA family of four Drosophila species. Implications for molecular coevolution in multigene families.

The organization and sequence of the rDNA multigene family of four Drosophila species (melanogaster, orena, virilis and hydei) have been compared in order to understand the quality and quantity of the differences which are involved with interspecific divergence of promoters and the polymerase I complexes (molecular coevolution). Each species has an intergenic spacer (IGS) made up of subrepeats which contain duplications of the promoter. Major structural and point-mutational differences exist, most of which have been spread by unequal crossingover through the family and species. Structural differences involve the types, lengths and copy-number of the IGS subrepeats, and the lengths and position of "unique" regions between blocks of repeats. The 240 base-pair repeat array shared by D. melanogaster and D. orena has been replaced by a 220 base-pair repeat, and the 95 and 330 base-pair arrays are absent altogether in D. virilis and D. hydei. The length of the "unique" region between the 240/220 base-pair arrays and the start of transcription varies, with the unusual situation of the last of the 220 repeats ending at the external transcribed spacer (ETS) boundary in D. virilis. Other structural differences involve regions of high cryptic simplicity arising from slippage in D. virilis and D. hydei IGSs. Sequence analysis of IGS and the ETSs indicates that the rDNA is not uniformly divergent throughout its length. Apart from the genes, there are regions of relatively high conservation covering the promoter regions and at some but not all potential RNA processing sites. The conserved promoter regions are more extensive within each pair of species D. melanogaster versus D. orena and D. virilis versus D. hydei, in keeping with their phylogenetic distances. Slippage-like mechanisms are involved with large numbers of deletions/insertions that make up the ETS differences between the species. Patterns of shared mutations between IGS subrepeats indicate stages of transition during rDNA differentiation by continual homogenization. The simultaneous operation of different turnover mechanisms, at different periodicities and rates, generates a complex picture of reorganization, some of which would influence the process of molecular coevolution in the family.

Animals↗

Conservation and divergence in multigene families: alternatives to selection and drift.

It is generally assumed that conservation and divergence of DNA signify function (selection) and no function (drift), respectively. This assumption is based on the view that a mutation is a unique event on a single chromosome, the fate of which depends on selection or drift. Knowledge of the rates, units and biases of widespread mechanisms of non-reciprocal DNA exchange, in particular within multigene families, provides alternative explanations for conservation and divergence, notwithstanding biological function. Such mechanisms of DNA turnover cause continual fluctuations in the copy-number of variant genes in an individual and, hence, promote the gradual and cohesive spread of a variant gene throughout a family (homogenization) and throughout a population (fixation). The dual processes (molecular drive) of homogenization and fixation are inextricably linked. Data are presented of the expected stages of transition in the spread of variant repeats by molecular drive in some non-genic families of DNA, seemingly not under the influence of selection. When a molecularly driven change in a given gene family is accompanied by the coevolution (mediated by selection) of other DNA, RNA or protein molecules that interact with the gene family then biological function is observed to be maintained despite sequence divergence. Conversely, the mechanics of DNA turnover and a turnover bias in favour of ancestral sequences can dramatically retard the rate of sequence change, in the absence of function. Examples of the maintenance of function by molecular coevolution and conservation of sequences in the absence of function, are drawn mainly from the rDNA multigene family.

Animals↗

Transcription of the tandem array of ribosomal DNA in Drosophila melanogaster does not terminate at any fixed point.

Transcription termination of the polymerase I transcribed rRNA genes is thought to occur at or closely behind the end of the 28S gene coding region. We show here that this is not the case for Drosophila melanogaster. Nuclease S1 mapping of total RNA and a nuclear ;run-on' assay reveal that there is no defined point of termination throughout the whole spacer separating the two genes. Since the rRNA genes in D. melanogaster are organized in tandem arrays, this implies that readthrough transcription of one unit can occur up to, and possibly through, the promoter of the next unit. Readthrough transcription might be a component of transcription enhancement in a tandem array of genes.

Journal Article↗

Conservation of major nuclease S1-sensitive sites in the non-conserved spacer region of ribosomal DNA in Drosophila species.

We have analysed nuclease S1-sensitive sites in cloned ribosomal DNA repeats from Drosophila melanogaster, D. hydei and D. virilis. All species contain major S1-sensitive sites in the spacer near the region of transcription termination, albeit with somewhat different positions and sensitivities. The same sites are also sensitive to the single-strand specificity of Bal31 nuclease at neutral pH. Additional major sites exist at each end of the intervening sequence within the 28 S gene of non-transcribed intervening-sequence-positive ribosomal DNA units of D. hydei. Only minor sites, however, were detected in the Pol I promoter regions. This is in contrast to Pol II transcribed genes, where S1 hypersensitivity becomes apparent at the 5' ends during gene expression. We have sequenced and mapped the S1 sites in the D. hydei spacer. They consist mainly of alternating A and T nucleotides that could form small cruciform structures. Cross-hybridization at low stringencies between the relevant S1-sensitive spacer regions of the three species indicates that the sites lie within very divergent sequences. We discuss the potential functional significance of S1 sites in rDNA spacers and intervening sequences, and the manner in which they might be maintained during rDNA sequence divergence.

Animals↗

Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes.

Simple sequences are stretches of DNA which consist of only one, or a few tandemly repeated nucleotides, for example poly (dA) X poly (dT) or poly (dG-dT) X poly (dC-dA). These two types of simple sequence have been shown to be repetitive and interspersed in many eukaryotic genomes. Several other types have been found by sequencing eukaryotic DNA. In this report we have undertaken a systematical survey for simple sequences. We hybridized synthetical simple sequence DNA to genome blots of phylogenetically different organisms. We found that many, probably even all possible types of simple sequence are repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. We propose therefore that they arise by common mechanisms namely slippage replication and unequal crossover and that they might have no general function with regards to gene expression. This latter inference is supported by the fact that we have detected simple sequences only in the metabolically inactive micronucleus of the protozoan Stylonychia, but not in the metabolically active macronucleus which is derived from the micronucleus by chromosome diminution.

Animals↗

Simple DNA sequences of Drosophila virilis isolated by screening with RNA.

We isolated clones from different types of genomic Drosophila virilis libraries by screening with mRNA labelled in vitro. The DNA regions of the clones showing cross-hybridization with the RNA were sequenced. All of them contained different types of simple sequences, which most probably were solely responsible for the hybridization. We show that simple sequences and their transcription are not a phenomenon that is restricted to Drosophila. Simple sequences can be detected in all eucaryotes and at least three types (poly[d(G--T)] X poly[d(C--A)], poly[d(G--A)] X poly-[d(C--T)] and poly(dA) X poly(dT] are also widely transcribed.

Animals↗

An optimized freeze-squeeze method for the recovery of DNA fragments from agarose gels.

A procedure for quick and simple elution of DNA from agarose gels is presented. After electrophoresis, bands of interest are cut out of the gel and the slices are equilibrated in a neutral salt buffer. The slices are then frozen and centrifuged through a filtration assembly whereby the DNA-containing buffer is squeezed out. The method is simple, quick, and suitable for the safe handling of small amounts of DNA (less than 1 microgram). The isolated DNA is susceptible to any enzymatic reaction and also to chemical sequencing. The method is most useful for rapid preparation of specifically end-labeled DNA fragments (e.g., for sequencing), but may also be utilized for any other preparative applications.

Bacteriophage lambda↗