Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Stehelin

Publications and source records attributed to D Stehelin.

125 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Three new types of viral oncogene of cellular origin specific for haematopoietic cell transformation.

The RNAs of seven replication-defective leukaemia virus (DLV) strains contain three types of unique sequences, which correlate with the capacity of a given virus strain to transform erythroblasts, macrophage-like cells and myeloblasts, respectively. These sequences, termed erb, mac and myb, have their counterparts in the normal DNA of avian and mammalian species. Our results indicate that DLVs represent recombinants between a common 'vector' related to a chicken endogenous virus and one of three types of cellular gene possibly involved in haematopoietic differentiation.

Avian Leukosis Virus↗

The distribution of endogenous chicken retrovirus sequences in the DNA of galliform birds does not coincide with avian phylogenetic relationships.

The chicken is a domesticated form of Red Jungle-fowl (Gallus gallus), which belongs to the Pheasant family (Phasianidae) within the order Galliformes. Domestic chickens carry the genome of the endogenous retrovirus RAV-O as DNA sequences integrated into host chromosomes transmitted through the germ line. We have examined the presence and distribution of RAV-O-related sequences in the DNA of Red Junglefowl and other closely related species of Junglefowl, as well as more distantly related Pheasants and Quail. DNA sequences homologous to RAV-O were analyzed by molecular hybridization in liquid and after electrophoresis of restriction endonuclease fragments. The presence of RAV-O-related sequences in avian DNA does not correlate with phylogenetic relationships. Under stringent conditions of hybridization in liquid, DNA sequences homologous to RAV-O cDNA were detected at high levels (greater than 80% homology( only in the genomes of the domestic chicken and its phylogenetic ancestor, the Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus). The DNA of two other species of Gallus (G. sonnerati, Sonnerat's Junglefowl and G. varius, Green Junglefowl), of Ring-necked Pheasant and of Japanese Quail contained sequences with less than 10% homology to RAV-O cDNA. Under conditions permitting mismatching, however, Ring-necked Pheasant DNA hybridized up to 50% of the RAV-O cDNA, and Quail DNA 24%, whereas the extent of hybridization to Sonnerat's and Green Junglefowl DNA was not markedly increased. Analysis of restriction enzyme digests revealed several distinct fragments of DNA hybridizing to chick retrovirus cDNA in both Red Junglefowl and domestic chicken, and multiple fragments in DNA from two species of Phasianus. No fragments with sequences related to chicken retroviruses were found, however, in digests of DNA prepared from Sonnerat's, Ceylonese and Green Junglefowl, from two other Pheasant genera (Chrysolophus and Lophura), or from one Quail genus (Coturnix). Thus the DNA of three Junglefowl species closely related to Gallus gallus lacked RAV-O sequences while the DNA of more distantly related Phasianus species showed significant homology. These results show that RAV-O-related sequences have not diverged together with the normal host genes during the evolution of the Phasianidae. Although RAV-O sequences are endogenous in all domestic chickens and Red Junglefowl studied thus far, it appears that the RAV-O genome has been introduced relatively recently into the germ line of Gallus gallus, following speciation but before domestication, and independently of the related sequences found in members of the genus Phasianus.

Alpharetrovirus↗

Genesis of a virus-transforming gene.

The gene src responsible for neoplastic transformation of fibroblasts by avian sarcoma viruses was apparently derived from highly conserved nucleotide sequences in the normal avian genome. The cellular homologue of src is unlinked to the genome of an endogenous virus in chicken cells and functions in an unknown manner during normal cell metabolism.

Alpharetrovirus↗

Aspects of the encapsidation of simian virus 40 deoxyribonucleic acid.

Growing subcloned CV1-cells were infected with simian virus 40, and the time course of virus formation was determined. When infected cells were fractionated into cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, most of the progeny virus particles were recovered in the cytoplasmic extract and not in the nuclei. This result was independent of the technique used for the preparation of nuclei and of the time after infection at which the extracts were prepared. Leakage of the virions from the nucleus occurred during the course of cell fractionation, suggesting that the nuclear membrane of the infected cells is damaged. Virions were found to accumulate in a nonlinear fashion, at the time when the number of viral deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecules increases linearly with time after infection. This suggests that the size of the intracellular pool of capsid proteins increases constantly during the late phase of virus replication. Progeny viral DNA to become encapsidated is withdrawn at random from the pool of replicated DNA molecules.

Animals↗

Replication of simian virus 40 deoxyribonucleic acid: analysis of the one-step growth cycle.

The time course of replication of simian virus 40 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was investigated in growing monolayer cultures of subcloned CV1 cells. At multiplicities of infection of 30 to 60 plaque-forming units (PFU)/cell, first progeny DNA molecules (component 1) were detected by 10 hr after infection. During the following 10 to 12 hr, accumulation of virus DNA proceeded at ever increasing rates, albeit in a non-exponential fashion. The rate of synthesis then remained constant, until approximately the 40th hour postinfection, when DNA replication stopped. Under these conditions, the duration of the virus growth cycle was approximately 50 hr. The time needed for the synthesis of one DNA molecule was found to be approximately 15 min. At multiplicities of infection of 1 or less than 1 PFU/cell, the onset of the linear phase of DNA accumulation was delayed, but the final rate of DNA synthesis was the same, independent of the input multiplicity. This was taken as a proof that templates for the synthesis of viral DNA multiply in the cell during the early phase of replication. However, the probability for every replicated DNA molecule to become in turn replicative decreased constantly during that phase. This could be accounted for by assuming a limited number of replication sites in the infected cell.

Animals↗

Relationship between replication of simian virus 40 DNA and specific events of the host cell cycle.

The relationship between replication of simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA and the various periods of the host-cell cycle was investigated in synchronized CV(1) cells. Cells synchronized through a double excess thymidine procedure were infected with SV40 at the beginning or the middle of S, or in G(2). The first viral progeny DNA molecules were in all instances detected approximately 20 h after release from the thymidine block, independent of the time of infection. The length of the early, prereplicative phase of the virus growth cycle therefore depended upon the period of the cell cycle at which the cells were infected. Infection with SV40 was also performed on cells obtained in early G(1) through selective detachment of cells in metaphase. As long as the cells were in G(1) at the time of infection, the first viral progeny DNA molecules were detected during the S period immediately following, whereas if infection took place once the cells had entered S, no progeny DNA molecule could be detected until the S period of the next cell cycle. These results suggest that the infected cell has to pass through a critical stage situated in late G(1) or early S before SV40 DNA replication can eventually be initiated.

Animals↗

A putative second cell-derived oncogene of the avian leukaemia retrovirus E26.

The acute avian leukaemia retroviruses AMV and E26 both induce myeloblastosis in vivo and transform myeloblasts in vitro. Both viruses contain the oncogene v-myb first described for AMV. Unlike AMV, E26 has the additional capacity to induce erythroblastosis in vivo and to transform erythroblasts. Previous analyses indicated that the genome of E26 also contained nucleotide sequences distinct from v-myb and unrelated to viral replicative genes. Using a molecularly cloned E26 provirus, we have now identified a novel nucleotide sequence designated v-ets (for E-twenty-six specific) of approximately 1.5 kilobase pairs (kbp) located next to v-myb. v-ets possesses all the structural characteristics of a putative new oncogene: it has a conserved cellular counterpart c-ets which is transcribed in some normal chicken cells as a major 7.5-kb polyadenylated RNA. Although our results now await elucidation of their biological significance, we propose that v-ets could be a new oncogene accounting for the additional transforming properties of E26, or potentiating the transforming properties of the v-myb oncogene.

Animals↗

Chromosomal localization of the human proto-oncogene c-ets.

E26 is an acute leukaemia avian retrovirus which induces myeloblastosis and erythroblastosis in vivo and transforms erythroblasts and myeloblasts in vitro. It contains the oncogene v-myb (ref. 4), first described for avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV), as well as a second specific nucleotide sequence, v-ets located 3' to v-myb (refs 5,6). We have reported that v-ets has a cellular counterpart (c-ets) in chicken and human DNA. Now, using two independent methods--hybridization with human c-ets probe of sorted chromosomes and in situ hybridization--we report the localization of the ets locus on human chromosome 11 at bands q23-q24. This finding may be important, as specific breakpoints around this position have been reported for human malignancies such as acute monocytic leukaemia and Ewing's sarcoma.

Base Sequence↗

Expression of the transcription factor c-Ets1 correlates with the occurrence of invasive processes during normal and pathological development.

The protein encoded by the c-ets1 proto-oncogene is a member of a new family of transcription factors. Cellular regulatory sequences responsive to the c-Ets1 proteins include a urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) gene enhancer, the stromelysin 1 and the collagenase 1 gene promoters. During normal as well as pathological development, the expression of c-ets1 is associated with the occurrence of invasive processes, either in invading cells or in the invaded tissue. Since these invasive processes are thought to require the remodeling of the extracellular matrix, we investigate the relationships between c-Ets1 and the expression patterns of transcripts encoding the matrix-degrading proteases uPA, stromelysin 1 and collagenase 1, in embryos and in solid tumors.

Animals↗

[Does the c-ets 1 oncogene participate in the regulation of tumor angiogenesis?].

Does the c-ets 1 protooncogene take part in the regulation of tumor angiogenesis? The formation of new blood vessels is an essential process in embryonic development and wound healing, for tumor growth and metastasis. In situ hybridization studies have revealed that the protooncogene c-ets 1 is expressed in endothelial cells at the beginning of blood vessel formation, in normal and pathological conditions. C-ets 1 encodes a transcription factor, a protein which binds specifically to DNA and which regulates the transcription of genes containing these specific binding sequences in their promotors. Thus in vitro experiments suggest that c-ets 1 may activate the transcription of genes encoding collagenase 1, stromelysine 1 and urokinase plasminogen activator, proteases involved in extracellular matrix degradation. A working hypothesis is that c-ets 1 takes part in regulating angiogenesis by controlling the transcription of these genes whose activity is necessary for the migration of endothelial cells from preexisting capillaries. This hypothesis is discussed with respect to current experimental evidences and to the complexity of the regulatory network controlling gene transcription and extracellular matrix degradation.

Cell Movement↗