Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Scott-Algara

Publications and source records attributed to D Scott-Algara.

29 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

T and B cell human responses to European bat lyssavirus after post-exposure rabies vaccination.

T and B cell human responses to European bat lyssavirus (EBL1) induced by post-exposure rabies vaccination (PM virus vaccine) were evaluated by measuring plasmatic titres of EBL1-specific neutralizing antibodies; specific EBL1-binding antibodies; and proliferation indices of peripheral blood lymphocytes stimulated in vitro with EBL1. These parameters for vaccination efficacy were compared with those obtained with vaccine-related viruses (CVS and ERA) and with a non-vaccine-related virus. Mokola virus, the last implicated in vaccination failures. Twenty-two patients exposed to rabies risk who received a reduced rabies post-exposure vaccination were involved in the study. On day 21, vaccine induced CVS-specific neutralizing antibodies in all patients; but EBL1-specific neutralizing antibodies were induced in only 73% of patients. No vaccine had Mokola-specific neutralizing antibodies. Patients having EBL1-specific neutralizing antibodies were usually those in whom vaccination induced high titres of CVS-specific neutralizing antibodies. On day 21, peripheral blood lymphocytes of 86% of patients could be restimulated in vitro with vaccine, 43% with EBL1 and 45% with Mokola. Patients exhibiting a high vaccine-specific proliferation response more likely developed an EBL1- or a Mokola-specific proliferative response. No correlation was found between T and B cell responses. Rabies vaccination induced neither T nor B cell EBL1-specific responses in 22% of patients.

Adult↗

Serial study of CD5+ and CD5- B cell subpopulations in 335 HIV seropositive patients.

B cell subpopulations, as defined by double-labelling techniques with CD5 and CD19 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), were serially studied in 335 HIV-1 seropositive patients. At the time of the first consultation, no important modifications in either CD5+ or CD5- subpopulations were observed, whatever the stage of the disease. However, in 18 out of the 335 patients (5.37%), a sharp increase in B cells exceeding 20% and 300/mm3 was observed. This increase in B cells was mainly accounted for CD5-CD19+ B cell subpopulations and was associated with: (i) evolution of the disease, since only four patients presented it at their first consultation (one lymphadenopathy-associated syndrome (LAS) and three AIDS); (ii) advanced stages of disease since, at the time of B cell augmentation, two patients were staged as LAS, four as ARC and 12 as AIDS; (iii) a high incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) since three out of the 18 patients presented a histologically confirmed NHL and three others a clinical pattern compatible with this diagnosis. However, in three patients with B hyperlymphocytosis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies of immunoglobulin gene rearrangement revealed the existence of a polyclonal expansion of B cells. These results justify inclusion of a pan-B cell marker in routine phenotypic studies of HIV-infected individuals, as well as the search for NHL among patients presenting this abnormality.

Antigens, CD↗

Extensive analysis of lymphocyte subsets in normal subjects by three-color immunofluorescence.

In the present work, 30 normal controls were studied with 11 combinations of 3 monoclonal antibodies in order to define CD20, CD4, CD8, CD16 and CD56 subsets as well as their activation status. Our results indicated that among B cells, CD5- cells predominated (about 92%), the minor CD5+ fraction showed variations between individuals but sometimes was as high as 20% in B cells; the CD45RA+CD29- subset (naive cells) accounted for 31.56 +/- 10.03% in CD4 cells, as compared to CD4+CD29+CD45RA- (memory cells) (46.54 +/- 10.35%), while CD4+CD29+CD45RA+ (transition cells between naive and memory state) represented 9.6 +/- 5.3% as compared to double-negatives (12.3 +/- 5.24%). Some uncertainties persist in defining CD8 subsets. NK CD8 cells accounted for about 20% of total CD8 according to CD16 and CD56 expression. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes could be delineated by S6F1 (76.22 +/- 11.28% within CD8 cells), though this marker appeared to be expressed by both cytotoxic and NK cells. Phenotypic definition of suppressive CD8 cells remains uncertain despite the fact that suppressor activity was found among CD8 lymphocytes expressing CD11b and probably CD57. NK cells coexpressed CD16 and CD56 markers in about 5% of all lymphocytes, while NK cells expressing CD16 alone accounted about 6%. Exclusive expression of CD56 was found in about 5%. Finally, while activated cells characterized by DR expression represented about 4% of CD4 and 9% of CD8 cells, CD25 appeared to be poorly represented among CD4, CD8 and CD20.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Establishment of long term cell lines from 2 patients with large granular lymphocyte lymphocytosis displaying an unusual phenotype.

Two long-term cell lines obtained from two cases of large granular lymphocyte lymphocytosis (LGLL) displaying an unusual phenotype are reported here. Patient n. 1 was CD2+ CD3- CD16+ CD8+ CD56- CD57- CD29+ CD45RA+, whereas patient n. 2 was CD2-CD3+ CD8+ CD16+ CD56- CD57+ CD29+ CD45RA+. The cells were large granular lymphocytes by light and electron microscopic criteria and displayed strong antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and NK activity. Northern blot analysis revealed aberrant transcripts of TCR beta chains for patient n. 1, and full length TCR alpha and beta transcripts for patient n. 2. In both cases, we were able to establish a long term cell line which functionally revealed strong ADCC and NK activity. Functional implications of these 2 subpopulations are discussed.

Aged↗

Specific inhibition of hybrid resistance in F1 hybrid mice pretreated with parent-strain spleen cells. III. Study of the mechanism.

The rejection of H-2b parental bone marrow graft by lethally irradiated F1 recipients, that is known as hybrid resistance (HR), is a multistep process. In a first step a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-sensitive T cell recognizes the parental bone marrow cells and stimulates a macrophage-like cell to secrete IFN-alpha/beta (recognition phase). IFN-alpha/beta in turn activates a cyclophosphamide-sensitive NK-like cell that is the effector cell for HR (effector phase). In a previous paper we described that HR is specifically abrogated by the pretreatment of the F1 recipient with H-2b parental spleen cells. This abrogation is due to a Thy-1+CD5+CD4+CD8- nylon adherent suppressor cell of F1 origin. The aim of the present work was to study during which of the different phases of HR the activity of the suppressor cell is exerted. Our results showed that abrogation of HR in (C57BL/6 x C3H)F1 (B6C3F1) hybrids pretreated with B6 spleen cells results from: 1) the suppression of the 5-FU-sensitive T cell; 2) the suppression of the cyclophosphamide-sensitive NK-like cell; and 3) the disappearance of a humoral factor that is present in the serum of normal B6C3F1 hybrids and which seems to be involved in the effector phase of HR. The 5-FU-sensitive T cell is the only target of Thy-1+CD5+CD4+CD8- suppressor cell. The mechanisms responsible for the suppression of the NK-like effector cell and the disappearance of the humoral factor are discussed.

Animals↗

Specific inhibition of hybrid resistance in F1 hybrid mice pretreated with parent-strain spleen cells. II. Evidence for an Hh-1 antigen-specific tolerization.

Lethally irradiated F1 mice reject bone marrow graft from H-2b parents. In a previous paper we showed that pretreatment of F1 hybrid with H-2b parental spleen cells abrogates this hybrid resistance (HR) to parental bone marrow growth by inducing a Thy-1+Lyt-1+2- nylon-adherent suppressor cell. We studied the mechanism of induction of this suppressor cell. Two hypotheses were tested; both were based on the observation that parental spleen cells when injected into a F1 hybrid, recognize the alloantigens of the opposite parent and proliferate; the proliferation of these Hh-1+ cells may result in an overload of the pretreated F1 hybrids with Hh-1 Ag, and in the development of a graft-vs-host reaction that is followed by a non-specific immunodeficiency (GVHID). Thus abrogation of HR could be due to either a tolerization with high doses of Hh-1 Ag or the GVHID. Our results show that abrogation of HR does not correlate with the GVHID because 1) it is induced after pre-treatment with H-2b parental cells only, whereas GVHID is observed after injection with cells from either of the two parents; and 2) it is induced in several conditions where GVHID does not occur; after pre-treatment with 1000-rad-irradiated or T-cell depleted or only class I incompatible spleen cells or with spleen cells from nude parents as well as after pre-treatment with H-2b bone marrow cells. HR is overcome by the injection of H-2Db homozygous or of cross-reactive H-2Ds homozygous cells only. However, although pretreatment with H-2Db homozygous spleen cells is necessary, it is not sufficient for an efficient overcoming of HR. Indeed enhancement of H-2b bone marrow growth after pre-treatment with 1000-rad-irradiated, T-cell depleted or nude parent spleen cells is very short-lasting and never reaches the level observed after pre-treatment with normal spleen cells. We conclude that inhibition of HR in F1 hybrids pretreated with parental spleen cells is not a consequence of a GVHID but of a specific tolerization with Hh-1 Ag; however, the HR is inhibited more consistently when inoculum used for the pretreatment contains fully immunocompetent T cells. The role of the immunocompetent parental T cells in abrogation of HR is discussed.

Animals↗

Specific resistance to local graft-versus-host reaction in F1 hybrids pretreated intravenously with parent-strain spleen cells. Role of cytotoxic T lymphocytes directed against receptors for the major histocompatibility complex.

Pretreatment of B6D2F1 hybrids by injection of B6 spleen cells by subcutaneous or intravenous routes induces specific resistance to the local graft versus host reaction provoked by s.c. engraftment of B6 spleen cells. This resistance has been attributed to the presence in the pretreated F1 hybrids of cytotoxic T lymphocytes directed against receptors that recognize the D2 alloantigens (anti-D2-receptor CTL). However, this hypothesis would seem to be challenged, at least partially, by our previously published results showing that a) when tested before induction of GVHR, the anti-D2-receptor CTL are detectable in F1 hybrids pretreated only by the s.c. route but not by the i.v. route; and b) specific resistance to GVHR observed in i.v.-pretreated F1 hybrids is mediated by a nylon-adherent, Thy-1-, radioresistant (2000 rads) suppressor cell of B6 origin that does not manifest any anti-D2-receptor CTL activity. However, these results did not allow us to exclude the possibility of the presence, in the i.v.-pretreated F1 hybrids, of anti-D2-receptor precursor CTL that could be reactivated during the GVHR by the D2-receptors expressed on the proliferating clone of grafted B6 cells, then differentiate to the receptor-specific CTL effectors that control the development of the GVHR. That is why we have studied in the present work the CTL activity developed against D2-receptors after induction of GVHR in either normal or resistant F1 hybrids. Our results show that F1 hybrids protected against GVHR by i.v. pretreatment with B6 cells or by a transfer of nylon-adherent spleen cells from i.v.-pretreated syngeneic F1 mice do not manifest enhanced anti-D2-receptor CTL activity. When considered along with our previous observations, these results favor our hypothesis that anti-D2-receptor CTL are not involved in the specific resistance to GVHR observed in the i.v.-pretreated F1 hybrids.

Animals↗

Specific suppression of the in vitro parent anti-hybrid reaction. I. Characterization of a suppressor cell induced in hybrids by pretreatment with parent-strain spleen cells.

Spleen cells from B6D2F1 hybrid mice pretreated with 5 X 10(7) B6 spleen cells iv 7 days earlier (B6-pretreated B6D2F1) exhibit a reduced capacity to stimulate the in vitro proliferative and anti-D2 CTL responses of B6 spleen cells. This inability of B6-pretreated B6D2F1 spleen cells to stimulate B6 spleen cells efficiently is due neither to the absence of stimulating cells bearing the D2 alloantigens nor to the destruction of B6 responding cells, but to the presence in the B6-pretreated B6D2F1 cell population of a suppressor mechanism, since the addition of B6-pretreated B6D2F1 spleen cells to a culture of normal B6 responding and irradiated B6D2F1-stimulating spleen cells can suppress the B6 anti-B6D2F1 response. This suppression is mediated by a nylon adherent, Thy-1-negative cell of parent-strain origin which is radioresistant at 2000 R. This suppressor cell is not induced by the injection to B6D2F1 hybrids of spleen cells from the other parent strain (D2) or an allogeneic strain (C3H). It does not suppress either the response of the other parent (D2) or an allogeneic strain (C3H) to B6D2F1 antigens, or the response of B6 cells to an allogeneic strain (C3H).

Animals↗

Specific and nonspecific resistance to local graft-versus-host reaction in F1 hybrids pretreated intravenously with parent-strain spleen cells. I. Two distinct mechanisms.

B6D2F1 hybrid mice pretreated i.v. with 5 X 10(7) spleen cells from B6 donors seven days earlier (B6-pretreated B6D2F1 hybrids) develop resistance to local GVHR induced by the subcutaneous injection of spleen cells of either B6 (GVHR-B6) or D2 (GVHR-D2) origin. This resistance has specific and a nonspecific components that concern the GVHR-B6 and the GVHR-D2, respectively. The two types of resistance to GVHR are neither induced under the same conditions nor mediated by the same mechanism. Specific resistance to GVHR is observed in B6D2F1 hybrids pretreated with unseparated, anti-Lyt-1.2+C' treated or 1000 rads-irradiated B6 cells, but not in B6D2F1 hybrids pretreated with anti-Thy-1.2+C' or anti Lyt-2.2+C'-treated B6 cells. In contrast, nonspecific resistance to GVHR is induced only by pretreatment with unseparated B6 cells. Treatment of B6 cells with anti-Thy-1.2, anti-Lyt-1.2, or anti-Lyt-2.2 moAb plus C', or their irradiation at 1000 rads completely abolishes their capacity to induce the nonspecific resistance to GVHR. Moreover, specific resistance to GVHR can be transferred to normal B6D2F1 mice by injection of nylon-adherent, anti-Thy-1.2+C'-treated or 2000-rads-irradiated, but not unseparated or nylon-nonadherent, B6-pretreated B6D2F1 spleen cells. Treatment of nylon-adherent B6-pretreated B6D2F1 cells with anti H-2d antiserum plus C' does not affect their capacity to transfer specific resistance to GVHR. Nonspecific resistance to GVHR can be transferred by unseparated, anti-Lyt-1.1+C' or anti Lyt-2.1+C'-treated, but not by anti-Thy-1.2+C' anti-Lyt-1.2+C', anti-Lyt-2.2+C'-treated or 2000-rads-irradiated B6-pretreated B6D2F1 spleen cells. Both types of resistance are observed in B6D2F1 hybrids pretreated with more than 2.5 X 10(7) B6 spleen cells.

Animals↗

Suppression of the in vitro parent antihybrid reaction by spleen cells from F1 hybrids pretreated with spleen cells from the opposite parent strain.

Spleen cells from B6C3F1 hybrid mice pretreated i.v. with 5 X 10(7) C3H spleen cells seven days earlier (C3H-pretreated B6C3F1) suppress the in vitro B6 anti-B6C3F1 proliferative and cytotoxic responses, when they are added to cultures of B6 responding and B6C3F1 stimulating spleen cells. This suppression is mediated by a Thy-1+Lyt-1+2+ cell of C3H origin that is radiosensitive at 2000 rads. This suppressor cell is not induced by the injection to B6C3F1 hybrids of spleen cells from the other parent strain (B6) or an allogeneic strain (D2). It does not suppress either the response of the other parent (C3H) or an allogeneic strain (D2) to B6C3F1 antigens, or the response of B6 cells to an allogeneic strain (D2). Its induction depends upon the number and the subpopulation of C3H spleen cells injected since suppression is observed after the injection of more than 2.5 X 10(7) C3H cells, and the suppression inducing cells have the phenotype Thy-1+Lyt-1+2+. This phenomenon is not limited to the C3H-B6C3F1 genetic combination, since it has been observed in all parent hybrid combinations tested to date.

Animals↗