Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Schwender

Publications and source records attributed to D Schwender.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Midlatency auditory evoked potentials predict movements during anesthesia with isoflurane or propofol.

To determine threshold values, sensitivity, and specificity of midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) for prediction of spontaneous intraoperative movements, 40 patients undergoing elective laparotomy were studied. Continuous epidural analgesia was used in all patients. To maintain general anesthesia, the patients in Group 1 (n = 20) received isoflurane (0.4-1.2 vol%), and the patients in Group 2 (n = 20) received propofol (3-5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) intravenously). Spontaneous movements were documented intraoperatively. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded continuously until the end of anesthesia. Latencies of the peaks V, Na, Pa, Nb, and P1 (ms) and amplitudes Na/Pa, Pa/Nb, and Nb/P1 (microV) were measured. Changes of MLAEP latencies and amplitudes during anesthesia were similar in both groups. Anesthesia led to statistically significant increases in the latencies of Na, Pa, Nb, and P1 and decreases in the amplitudes of Na/Pa, Pa/Nb, and Nb/P1 compared with the awake state. Before and during spontaneous movement observed intraoperatively or during emergence from anesthesia, the latencies of the peaks Na, Pa, Nb, and P1 decreased, and the amplitudes Na/Pa, Pa/Nb, Nb/P1 increased significantly. A threshold value of 60 ms of Nb proved to be most predictive of movement during anesthesia. MLAEP recording seems to be a promising method to monitor the level of anesthesia as defined by spontaneous movement during anesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Monitoring intraoperative awareness. Vegetative signs, isolated forearm technique, electroencephalogram, and acute evoked potentials].

Several methods have been developed to quantify central anaesthetic effects and monitor awareness during general anaesthesia. The most important of these are the PRST score, calculated from changes in blood pressure, heart rate, sweating, and tear production, the isolated forearm technique, where the patient is allowed to move during surgery, the processed electroencephalogram (EEG) and the derived parameters median frequency (MF) and spectral-edge frequency (SEF), and mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP). In clinical practice, the application of individual doses of anaesthetics is generally guided by autonomic vegetative clinical signs such as changes in blood pressure, heart rate, sweating, and tear production, quantified as the PRST score. Unfortunately, these parameters are not very reliable with regard to predicting the suppression of consciousness and awareness, especially when high-dose opioids are used in patients with cardiovascular medications and a variety of accompanying diseases. The PRST score probably indicates mainly the autonomic responses to painful stimuli, and seems to be useful in guiding the individual use of analgesics. The isolated forearm technique is a useful test of the patient's responsiveness during general anaesthesia, and thus an instrument for investigating the incidence of awareness during different anaesthetic regimens and when muscle relaxants are employed. A disadvantage is that it can only be used for 20 to 30 min because of pressure-induced nerve blocks or lesions. It can not be employed when long-term relaxation is necessary and consciousness and awareness are to be monitored continuously. The processed EEG and the derived parameters MF and SEF are important scientific tools to quantify central effects of many anaesthetics and opioid analgesics that allow the development of pharmacodynamic-pharmacokinetic models of anaesthetic action. MF has proven to be useful in monitoring closed-loop feedback of intravenous drug administration. Unfortunately, until now there have been no clinical studies that document the usefulness of MF or SEF with regard to predicting intraoperative arousal or awareness. To the contrary, some experimental data failed to predict imminent arousal and response to surgical incision or verbal commands by MF or SEF. Therefore, the EEG seems to be of limited value for monitoring awareness, consciousness, or memory formation during anaesthesia. MLAEP are suppressed in a dose-dependent fashion by many general anaesthetics and correlate with wakefulness, awareness, and explicit and implicit memory during anaesthesia and seem to be a promising method of monitoring awareness during anaesthesia. Nevertheless, future studies will have to determine threshold values for the different MLAEP parameters for intraoperative awareness and explicit and implicit recall of intraoperatively presented information for the different commonly used anaesthetics. Only then will it be possible to determine the usefulness of the method in clinical practice.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1996

Spectral edge frequency of the electroencephalogram to monitor "depth" of anaesthesia with isoflurane or propofol.

To determine threshold values, sensitivity and specificity of the spectral edge frequency (SEF) of the electroencephalogram (EEG) that indicate intraoperative movements, we studied 49 patients undergoing, elective laparotomy. Extradural analgesia was used in all patients. To maintain general anaesthesia, patients in group 1 (n = 23) received 0.4-1.2 vol% isoflurane and patients in group 2 (n = 24) propofol 3-5 mg kg-1 h-1 i.v. During operation and emergence from anaesthesia, spontaneous purposeful movements were documented. The EEG was recorded continuously in the awake state until the end of anaesthesia. Power spectral analysis calculated the SEF and power in the delta, theta, alpha and beta bands and the delta ratio. Adequate anaesthesia caused a statistically significant decrease in SEF from 16 to 12 Hz. Power in the beta band decreased and power in the theta band and total power increased compared with the awake state. Before and during movements observed in the intraoperative period or during emergence from general anaesthesia, SEF increased from 12 to 18 Hz, the power in beta band increased and theta power decreased compared with the state of adequate anaesthesia. A threshold value of SEF 14 Hz to predict movements during anaesthesia had a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 82%.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Midlatency auditory evoked potentials during anaesthesia with increasing endexpiratory concentrations of desflurane.

BACKGROUND: Under general anaesthesia with the volatile anaesthetics halothane, enflurane and isoflurane, midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) are suppressed dose-dependently. Therefore, MLAEP have been used to measure depth of anaesthesia and to indicate intraoperative awareness. Desflurane is a new volatile anaesthetic and its effect on MLAEP have not been studied previously. METHODS: We have studied MLAEP during general anaesthesia with increasing endexpiratory concentrations of desflurane in 12 patients scheduled for elective gynaecological surgery. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded in the awake state and during anaesthesia with endexpiratory steady state concentrations of 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 6.0 vol % of desflurane on vertex (positive) and mastoids on both sides (negative). Latencies of the peaks V, Na, Pa, Nb, Pl (ms) and amplitudes Na/Pa, Pa/Nb and Nb/Pl (micro V) were measured. RESULTS: In the awake state, MLAEP had high peak-to-peak amplitudes and a periodic waveform. During general anaesthesia with increasing endexpiratory concentration of desflurane, the latency of the brainstem response V increased only slightly. In contrast, MLAEP showed a marked dose-dependent and statistically significant increase in latencies of Na, Pa, Nb and Pl and decrease in amplitudes of Na/Pa, Pa/Nb and Nb/Pl. Under 6.0 vol % of desflurane MLAEP were severely attenuated or even abolished. CONCLUSION: Based on these observations, endexpiratory concentrations of > or = 4.5 vol % desflurane should suppress awareness phenomena such as auditory perceptions during anaesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Fluoride-induced nephrotoxicity: factor fiction?].

In the 1960s, the widespread use of the inhalational anaesthetic methoxyflurane was associated with a significant occurrence of postoperative renal dysfunction. This was attributed to hepatic biotransformation of methoxyflurane and subsequent release of inorganic fluoride ions into the circulation. Based upon the clinical experience with methoxyflurane, serum fluoride concentrations exceeding 50 mumol/l were considered to be nephrotoxic. Without further reevaluation, this 50 mumol/l threshold was subsequently applied to other fluorinated anaesthetics as well. Enflurane and even isoflurane may, when used during prolonged operations, also yield anorganic fluoride levels in excess of 50 mumol/l. Nevertheless, no cases of renal dysfunction attributable to prolonged use of these anesthetics have been reported. About 4% of the new inhalational anaesthetic sevoflurane is metabolized, and fluoride concentrations exceeding those after enflurane are frequently measured. Numerous studies have examined the nephrotoxic potential of sevoflurane degradation products. However, fluoride-related toxicity has been observed neither in animal nor in clinical studies, including prolonged administration and patients with pre-existing renal disease. New insights into the intrarenal metabolisation of volatile anaesthetics may well explain the absence of nephrotoxicity after sevoflurane. The threshold for fluoride nephrotoxicity of 50 mumol/l, still given in many medical text-books, can no longer be applied as an indicator of nephrotoxicity after isoflurane, enflurane or sevoflurane. Therefore, the elevated serum fluoride concentrations consistently recorded following anaesthesia with sevoflurane are devoid of clinical significance.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗
PubMed1996

[Intraoperative awareness and auditory evoked potentials].

Midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) are suppressed dose-dependently during anaesthesia with a variety of general anaesthetics. Therefore, MLAEP have been proposed to measure depth of anaesthesia and to indicate intraoperative awareness. Several studies give evidence of a close relationship between MLAEP and motor signs of wakefulness, intraoperative awareness, and explicit and implicit memory functions during general anaesthesia. Summarising these data, one may conclude that there is a close hierarchical relation between cognitive function, memory and wakefulness during anaesthesia, and MLAEP latencies. A short Nb latency below 45 ms is consistent with conscious awareness and unimpaired memory function with explicit recall and adequate response to commands. When Nb latency increases to 45-50 ms, it may be associated with conscious awareness. Patients still respond to commands, but memory formation is impaired and explicit recall is lost. A further increase of Nb latencies seems to be consistent with unconscious awareness, characterised by implicit memory of intraoperative events; 60 ms seems to be the threshold value for motor signs of wakefulness during anaesthesia. With a further increase of MLAEP latency during anaesthesia, conscious awareness and memory formation, explicit and implicit recall, response to commands, and spontaneous purposeful movements during anaesthesia are blocked. The new volatile anaesthetic sevoflurane leads to a dose-dependent increase in MLAEP peak latencies and a decrease in MLAEP amplitudes. At about 1.5 vol.% end-expiratory sevoflurane concentration, MLAEP are significantly suppressed and Nb latency is in the range of 68-80 ms. Therefore, from the present data and those from the literature, one may expect that sevoflurane at concentrations greater than 1.5 vol.% for general anaesthesia would be able to suppress awareness phenomena such as purposeful movements, auditory perception, intraoperative wakefulness and awareness, memory formation, and explicit and implicit recall of intraoperative events.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗
PubMed1995

[Acoustic evoked potentials mid-latency following anesthesia with sufentanil].

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have studied mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) during general anaesthesia with sufentanil in ten patients scheduled for elective major urological surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with sufentanil 2-3 micrograms/kg; for maintenance of anaesthesia a further bolus of sufentanil (1-2 micrograms/kg) 10 min before the start of surgery (skin incision) was given. MLAEP were recorded before and 10 min after the last sufentanil bolus on the vertex (positive) and mastoids on both sides (negative). Latencies of the peaks V, Na, Pa, Nb, and Pl (ms) and amplitudes Na/Pa, Pa/Nb, and Nb/Pl (microV) were measured. RESULTS: In the awake state, MLAEP had high peak-to-peak amplitudes and a periodic wave form. During general anaesthesia with sufentanil the brainstem response V was stable. There was a marked increase in latency and a decrease in the amplitude of Nb and Pl. In contrast, for the early cortical potentials Na and Pa only small increases in latencies and decreases in amplitudes were observed. Na and Pa showed a similar pattern to that in awake patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is no substantial difference of sufentanil's effect on MLAEP compared with the opioids alfentanil, fentanyl, and morphine. Because Na, Pa, and Nb are generated in the primary auditory cortex of the temporal lobe, it must be concluded that during general anaesthesia with sufentanil primary cortical processing of auditory stimuli may be preserved.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

[Awareness during general anesthesia. Definition, incidence, clinical relevance, causes, avoidance and medicolegal aspects].

The possibility that a patient during general anaesthesia is aware of the operation going on and aware of severe pain that might be remembered postoperatively must be very alarming to patients and anaesthetists alike. Furthermore, there is experimental evidence showing that conscious recall of intraoperative events is only the tip of an iceberg; it seems very probable that there is even a higher incidence of unconscious perception during general anaesthesia. Therefore, the following stages of intraoperative awareness must be distinguished: (1) conscious awareness with explicit recall and with severe pain; (2) conscious awareness with explicit recall but no complaints of pains; (3) conscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall; (4) subconscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall; (5) no awareness. The incidence of conscious awareness with explicit recall and severe pain has been estimated at less frequent than 1/3000 general anaesthetics. Conscious awareness with explicit recall but no complaints of pain has been reported in the literature with an incidence of 05-2%. With 7-72%, conscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall shows a very wide range of variation and its occurrence probably depends on the anaesthetic drugs used. Subconscious awareness with possible implicit recall has an incidence of up to 80%, but there are many methodological problems in demonstrating implicit memory of intraoperative events. Reports of intraoperative awareness do not come exclusively from cardiac surgery and obstetrics, but also from all other operative specialties. Postoperatively, patients who experience intraoperative awareness may develop a so-called post-traumatic stress syndrome. Symptoms involve re-experiencing the event awake or in dreams, sleep disturbances, depression, avoidance of stimuli associated with the event. The probability of the development of the post-traumatic stress syndrome seems to coincide with the experience of severe pain. When a patient complains of intraoperative awareness postoperatively the anaesthesiologist should discuss the event frankly with the patient. When the symptoms of the post-traumatic stress syndrome persist a psychotherapy should follow. Causes for intraoperative awareness may be: equipment failure, too-light anaesthesia, e.g. for a caesarean section or for emergency surgery in severely injured or polytraumatized patients, during cardiac surgery, bronchoscopy of difficult intubation. There is interindividual variability in anaesthetic effect; for example, chronic drug or alcohol abuse or overweight may make increased anaesthetic doses necessary. They are at risk for intraoperative awareness. Some general anaesthetics or anaesthetic procedures, e.g. the combination of a relaxant and N2O, opioid mono-anaesthetics, or opioids combined with benzodiazepines, seem to involve a higher risk of intraoperative awareness than do volatile anaesthetics. The bases of litigation are medical malpractice, breach of contract by the anaesthesiologist or lack of informed consent from the patient. Therefore, patients who are at risk of intraoperative awareness should be given detailed information on this special risk before the operation.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1995

Anesthesia with increasing doses of sufentanil and midlatency auditory evoked potentials in humans.

Our interest focused on the question whether sufentanil differs from alfentanil, fentanyl, and morphine with regard on its effects on midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP). Therefore, we studied MLAEP during general anesthesia with increasing doses of sufentanil in 16 patients scheduled for elective major urologic surgery. Anesthesia was induced with sufentanil (1 microgram/kg every 7 min to a total dose of 3 micrograms/kg). In 8 of 16 patients, further incremental doses of sufentanil were given to a total dose of 5 micrograms/kg. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded before and 5 min after every sufentanil dose on vertex (positive) and mastoids on both sides (negative). Latencies of the peaks V, Na, Pa, Nb, and P1 (ms), and amplitudes Na/Pa, Pa/Nb, and Nb/P1 (microV) were measured. In the awake state, MLAEP had high peak-to-peak amplitudes and a periodic waveform. During general anesthesia the brainstem response V was stable to increasing doses of sufentanil. There was a marked statistically significant increase in latency and decrease in amplitude of Nb and P1 after 1-2 micrograms/kg sufentanil, which remained stable under further sufentanil application. In contrast, the early cortical potentials Na and Pa increased only slightly in latencies. This increase was statistically significant at 4 micrograms/kg for Na and at 3 and 4 micrograms/kg for Pa. For the amplitudes Na/Pa and Pa/Nb there was only a slight and statistically insignificant reduction. After the largest dose of sufentanil (3-5 micrograms/kg) Na and Pa showed a similar pattern as in awake patients. We conclude that sufentanil does not differ essentially from alfentanil, fentanyl, and morphine with regard on its effects on MLAEP.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1995

The effects of anesthesia with increasing end-expiratory concentrations of sevoflurane on midlatency auditory evoked potentials.

We studied midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) during general anesthesia with increasing end-expiratory concentrations of sevoflurane in 12 patients scheduled for elective gynecologic surgery. After oral premedication with 20 mg clorazepate dipotassium, anesthesia was induced with etomidate (0.2 mg/kg intravenously [IV]). Vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) was given for neuromuscular block, and controlled ventilation with sevoflurane in 100% O2 was instituted. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded in the awake state and during anesthesia with end-expiratory steady-state concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 vol% of sevoflurane on vertex (positive) and mastoids on both sides (negative). Latencies of peaks V, Na, Pa, Nb, and P1 (ms) and amplitudes of Na/Pa, Pa/Nb, and Nb/P1 (microV) were measured. In the awake state, MLAEP had high peak-to-peak amplitudes and a periodic waveform. During general anesthesia with increasing end-expiratory concentrations of sevoflurane, the latency of the brainstem response V increased slightly. In contrast, MLAEP showed marked dose-dependent, statistically significant increases in the latencies of Na, Pa, Nb, and P1 and decreases in the amplitudes of Na/Pa, Pa/Nb, and Nb/P1. Under 2 vol% of sevoflurane, MLAEPs were severely attenuated or abolished. Based on these observations, > or = 1.5 vol% sevoflurane should suppress phenomena such as auditory perceptions, intraoperative wakefulness, and awareness.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Mid-latency auditory evoked potentials and wakefulness during caesarean section.

We investigated intra-operative wakefulness and mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) in 20 patients undergoing elective Caesarean section under general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone 5 mg kg-1 i.v. and succinylcholine 1-1.5 mg kg-1 i.v. After delivery, a balanced anaesthetic technique was maintained using fentanyl 0.2-0.3 mg i.v., enflurane 0.4-1.0 vol% end-expired concentration and 50% N2O in oxygen. Purposeful movements were interpreted as signs of inadequate anaesthesia and intra-operative wakefulness. They were recorded as either spontaneous movements or in response to one of two audio tapes (tape A: sound of a crying baby; tape B: classical music). Post-operatively, intra-operative dreams, hallucinations and detailed reports about intra-operative events were evaluated. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded online before and during general anaesthesia. Twenty spontaneous purposeful movements were observed in 12 patients, seven before or during delivery and 13 after delivery. Four purposeful movements were observed after presentation of the sound of a crying baby but only one after classical music. Dreams and hallucinations were reported by nine patients. Two patients reported experiencing surgical manipulations. In the awake state MLAEPs had great peak-to-peak amplitudes and a periodic waveform. Under adequate levels of general anaesthesia MLAEPs showed a marked increase in latency and decrease in amplitude or were even suppressed completely. This increase in latencies and decrease in amplitude of MLAEP was absent in patients who reported intraoperative events and during spontaneous or provoked motor reactions.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1994

[Anesthesia with flunitrazepam/fentanyl and isoflurane/fentanyl. Unconscious perception and mid-latency auditory evoked potentials].

There is a high incidence of intraoperative awareness during cardiac surgery. Mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) reflect the primary cortical processing of auditory stimuli. In the present study, we investigated MLAEP and explicit and implicit memory for information presented during cardiac anaesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Institutional approval and informed consent was obtained in 30 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia was induced in group I (n = 10) with flunitrazepam/fentanyl (0.01 mg/kg) and maintained with flunitrazepam/fentanyl (1.2 mg/h). The patients in group II (n = 10) received etomidate (0.25 mg/kg) and fentanyl (0.005 mg/kg) for induction and isoflurane (0.6-1.2 vol%)/fentanyl (1.2 mg/h) for maintenance of general anaesthesia. Group III (n = 10) served as a control and patients were anaesthetized as in I or II. After sternotomy an audiotape that included an implicit memory task was presented to the patients in groups I and II. The story of Robinson Crusoe was told, and it was suggested to the patients that they remember Robinson Crusoe when asked what they associated with the word Friday 3-5 days postoperatively. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded awake and during general anaesthesia before and after the audiotape presentation on vertex (positive) and mastoids on both sides (negative). Auditory clicks were presented binaurally at 70 dBnHL at a rate of 9.3 Hz. Using the electrodiagnostic system Pathfinder I (Nicolet), 1000 successive stimulus responses were averaged over a 100 ms poststimulus interval and analyzed off-line. Latencies of the peak V, Na, Pa were measured. V belongs to the brainstem-generated potentials, which demonstrates that auditory stimuli were correctly transduced. Na, Pa are generated in the primary auditory cortex of the temporal lobe and are the electrophysiological correlate of the primary cortical processing of the auditory stimuli. RESULTS. None of the patients had an explicit memory of intraoperative events. Five patients in group I, one patient in group II, and no patients in group III showed implicit memory of the intraoperative tape message. They remembered Robinson Crusoe spontaneously when they were asked their associations with Friday. In the awake state AEP peak latencies were in the normal range. During general anaesthesia in group I, the peaks Na, Pa did not increase in latency or decrease in amplitude before and after the audiotape presentation. The primary cortical complex Na/Pa could be identified as in the awake state. In contrast, in group II Na, Pa showed a marked increase in latency and a decrease in amplitude or were completely suppressed. CONCLUSIONS. During general anaesthesia auditory information can be processed and remembered postoperatively by an implicit memory function, when the electrophysiological conditions of primary cortical stimuli processing is preserved. Implicit memory can be observed more often when high-dose opioid analgesia is combined with receptor-binding agents like the benzodiazepines than under non-specific anaesthetics like isoflurane. Non-specific anaesthetics seem to provide a more effective suppression of auditory stimuli processing than receptor-specific agents.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Mid-latency auditory evoked potentials and circulatory response to loud sounds.

We investigated in 60 patients scheduled for elective aorto-coronary bypass grafting if loud sounds by themselves can induce cardiovascular responses and if these could be related to mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP). Anaesthesia was induced in group I (n = 20) with flunitrazepam-fentanyl 0.01 mg kg-1 and maintained with flunitrazepam-fentanyl 1.2 mg h-1. Patients in groups II (n = 20) and III (n = 20) received etomidate 0.25 mg kg-1 and fentanyl 0.005 mg kg-1 for induction and 0.6-1.2 vol% isoflurane and fentanyl 1.2 mg h-1, or propofol 4-8 mg kg-1 h-1 and fentanyl 1.2 mg h-1 for maintenance of general anaesthesia. After preparation of the sternum the operation was stopped for several minutes. Then, as a loud auditory stimulus, the sound of the running sternotomy saw was presented to the patients by putting the saw inverted on the sternum for several seconds. Heart rate (HR), arterial pressure (SAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance and MLAEP were measured in the awake state, before and after presentation of the sound. Latencies of the peak V, Na, Pa, Nb and P1 were measured. In group I there were statistically significant increases in HR (63.5-70.2 beat min-1), SAP (123.9-146-5 mm Hg) and PCWP (9.2-11.7 mm Hg) after presentation of the sound. These haemodynamic changes were not observed in patients in groups II and III. In the awake state, AEP had high peak -to-peak amplitudes and a periodic waveform.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗
PubMed1994

Midlatency auditory evoked potentials and explicit and implicit memory in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: A high incidence of intraoperative awareness during cardiac surgery has been reported. Midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) have been used recently as an indicator of awareness. In the current study, memory for information presented during anesthesia was investigated using MLAEP as one experimental indicator in 45 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. METHODS: In all patients general anesthesia was maintained using high-dosage fentanyl (1.2 mg.h-1). In addition, the patients of group 1 (n = 10) received flunitrazepam (1.2 mg.h-1), the patients of group 2 (n = 10) isoflurane (0.6-1.2 vol%), and the patients of group 3 (n = 10) propofol (4-8 mg.kg-1.h-1). Group 4 (n = 15) served as a control, and those patients were assigned randomly to one of the anesthetic regimes. After sternotomy and before cardiopulmonary bypass, an audiotape, which included an implicit memory task, was presented to the patients of groups 1-3. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded while the patients were awake and during general anesthesia immediately before and after the audiotape presentation. Latencies of the brain stem peak V and the early cortical potentials Na and Pa were measured. RESULTS: Three to 5 days postoperatively no patient had a clear explicit memory of intraoperative events. However, there were statistically significant differences in the incidence of implicit recall among the groups. Five patients in the flunitrazepam-fentanyl group, 1 patient in the isoflurane-fentanyl group, 1 patient in the propofol-fentanyl group, and no patient in the control group showed an implicit memory of the intraoperative tape message. In the awake state, MLAEP showed high peak-to-peak amplitudes and a periodic waveform. In the patients with implicit memory postoperatively, MLAEP continued to show this pattern during general anesthesia. The early cortical potentials Na and Pa did not increase in latency or decrease in amplitude before or after the audiotape presentation. In contrast, in the patients without implicit memory, MLAEP waveform was severely attenuated or abolished. Na and Pa showed marked increases in latencies and decreases in amplitudes or were completely suppressed. In 9 patients, including all patients (7 of 9) with implicit memory, Pa latency increased less than 12 ms, and 21 of 23 patients without implicit memory showed a Pa latency increase of greater than 12 ms during anesthesia and the audiotape presentation. Therefore, the Pa latency increase of greater or less than 12 ms may provide sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 77% in distinguishing patients with implicit memory from patients without implicit memory postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: When the early cortical potentials of MLAEP are preserved during general anesthesia, auditory information may be processed and remembered postoperatively by an implicit memory task.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Midlatency auditory evoked potentials and purposeful movements after thiopentone bolus injection.

The effect of thiopentone on the middle latency auditory evoked potentials was investigated in 12 patients during induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1. 100% oxygen was administered throughout the induction, and when the patient moved purposefully a further bolus (2 mg.kg-1) was given, and anaesthesia continued in the normal way. The middle latency auditory evoked potentials were elicited before and during the induction. Binaural clicks (70 dB above normal hearing threshold) were presented at a rate of 9.3 per s. Averages of 1000 responses were analysed off line, and a fast Fourier transformation of the middle latency auditory evoked potentials were used to calculate the power spectrum of the averages. Awake, the patients had large peak to peak amplitudes and a normal waveform. The power spectra showed a high energy between 30-40 Hz. After induction the latencies of waves Na, Pa, Nb and P1 and the amplitudes of the waves Na/Pa, Pa/Nb, and Nb/P1 were decreased or completely attenuated. Both effects lasted for 4 min. When movement occurred (after 4-6 min), the values returned to awake. The second bolus repeated the changes.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Motor signs of wakefulness during general anaesthesia with propofol, isoflurane and flunitrazepam/fentanyl and midlatency auditory evoked potentials.

Auditory evoked potentials have been used as an indicator of awareness. In the present study we combined epidural analgesia with three techniques of general anaesthesia. Motor signs of intra-operative wakefulness were documented and assessed along with cardiovascular changes and with midlatency auditory evoked potentials. Thirty patients undergoing elective laparotomy were studied as follows: first continuous epidural analgesia was used in all patients to block painful sensation to the level of T5. Intravenous general anaesthesia was induced with propofol (2.5 mg.kg-1 b.w., group 1, n = 10), thiopentone (5 mg.kg-1 b.w., group 2, n = 10) or etomidate (0.2 mg.kg-1 b.w., group 3, n = 10) and maintained with a propofol (3-5 mg.kg-1, group 1), isoflurane (0.4-0.8 Vol%, group 2), flunitrazepam and fentanyl (0.005 mg.kg-1 b.w.) bolus injection every 20 to 30 s (group 3). Heart rate and arterial pressure were recorded continuously. Purposeful movements of the limbs, eye-opening or other movements as well as coughing were documented as motor signs of intra-operative wakefulness. Auditory evoked potentials were recorded in the awake state, after induction and during maintenance of general anaesthesia. Motor signs of intra-operative wakefulness occurred statistically significantly more often in the patients of the flunitrazepam/fentanyl group than in those of the propofol and isoflurane group. There was no correlation between wakefulness and cardiocirculatory parameters. In the awake patients midlatency auditory evoked potentials had high peak to peak amplitudes and a periodic waveform.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗