Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Schwartzman

Publications and source records attributed to D Schwartzman.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

ICD-antiarrhythmic drug and ICD-pacemaker interactions.

Antiarrhythmic drugs and separate bradycardia pacing systems are prescribed commonly in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Adverse effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on ICD function and adverse interactions between ICDs and pacemakers have been documented. The effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on the defibrillation threshold (DFT) in patients has not been well assessed. Most studies have been performed in animal models in which cardiac function was normal and drug doses were supraphysiologic. In addition, most studies have utilized monophasic defibrillation shock waveforms and epicardial lead systems. Despite the lack of clinical data applicable to current defibrillation systems, it appears that chronic amiodarone administration causes a significant DFT increase. In addition, antiarrhythmic drugs can influence antitachycardia pacing and tachycardia sensing. Defibrillation shocks can cause transient failure of pacemaker sensing and pacing, and cause spurious pacemaker reprogramming. Pacemaker function can result in ICD oversensing, leading to inappropriate therapy, or cause ICD undersensing, potentially resulting in failure to deliver therapy during ventricular fibrillation. The susceptibility of an ICD to undersensing appears related to the amplitude of the pacing stimulus artifact recorded by the ICD rate-sensing circuit and to the characteristics of the fibrillation electrogram. Preliminary data suggest that undersensing of ventricular fibrillation by current ICDs is an unlikely event.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗
PubMed1996

Conduction block in the inferior vena caval-tricuspid valve isthmus: association with outcome of radiofrequency ablation of type I atrial flutter.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to 1) correlate conduction block in the isthmus of the right atrium between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid annulus with the efficacy of catheter ablation of type I atrial flutter, and 2) characterize the effects of ablative lesions on the properties of isthmus conduction. BACKGROUND: There are few data on the mechanism of persistent suppression of recurrence of atrial flutter by catheter ablation. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with type I atrial flutter underwent catheter mapping and ablation. Radiofrequency lesions were applied in the isthmus. Transisthmus conduction before and after the lesions was assessed during atrial pacing in sinus rhythm from the medial and lateral margins of the isthmus at cycle lengths of 600, 400 and 300 ms and the native flutter cycle length. Isthmus conduction block was defined using multipolar recording techniques. There were three treatment groups: group 1 = radiofrequency energy applied during flutter, until termination (n = 14); group 2 = radiofrequency energy applied during atrial pacing in sinus rhythm from the proximal coronary sinus at a cycle length of 600 ms, until isthmus conduction block was observed (n = 14); and group 3 = radiofrequency energy applied until an initial flutter termination, after which further energy was applied during atrial pacing in sinus rhythm until isthmus conduction block was observed (n = 7). RESULTS: In group 1, after the initial flutter termination, isthmus conduction block was observed in 9 of the 14 patients. In each of these nine patients, flutter could not be reinitiated. In each of the remaining five patients, after the initial flutter termination, isthmus conduction was intact and atrial flutter could be reinitiated. Ultimately, successful ablation in each of these patients was also associated with isthmus conduction block. In groups 2 and 3, isthmus conduction block was achieved during radiofrequency energy application, and flutter could not subsequently be reinitiated. Before achieving conduction block, marked conduction slowing or intermittent block, or both, was observed in some patients. In some patients, isthmus conduction block was pacing rate dependent. In addition, recovery from conduction block was common in the laboratory and had a variable time course. At a mean follow-up interval of 10 months (range 1 to 21), the actuarial incidence of freedom from type I flutter was 80% (recurrence in three patients at 7 to 15 months). CONCLUSIONS: Isthmus conduction block is associated with flutter ablation success. Conduction slowing or intermittent block, or both, in the isthmus can occur before achieving persistent block. Recovery of conduction after achieving block is common. Follow-up has revealed a low rate of flutter recurrence after achieving isthmus conduction block, whether the block was achieved in conjunction with termination of flutter.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The results of atrial flutter ablation in patients with and without a history of atrial fibrillation.

To determine the impact of atrial flutter radiofrequency catheter ablation on recurrence of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation, 32 patients with atrial flutter (18 with a history of atrial fibrillation) were followed for a mean of 8.6 months; atrial flutter has not recurred after 1 (26 patients) or 2 (5 patients) successful ablation procedures. Atrial flutter did not appear proarrhythmic for atrial fibrillation, with only 1 of 15 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation developing the arrythmia in the absence of an alcohol binge or cocaine use.

Atrial Fibrillation↗
PubMed1996

Factors associated with successful implantation of nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems.

Two hundred forty-three consecutive patients underwent attempted implantation of nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead (NTL) systems. The importance of clinical and lead-related factors were analyzed regarding their relation with implantation failure caused by an unacceptably high defibrillation threshold (DFT). Overall, 33 (14%) of 243 patients failed NTL implantation. Patients undergoing attempted implantation of NTL systems with monophasic shock waveforms (monophasic group, n = 145) had an incidence of failed implantation of 22% (n = 32) versus an incidence of 1% (n = 1) among patients undergoing attempted implantation by using biphasic shock waveforms (biphasic group, n = 98; odds ratio, 26.9; p < 0.001). The incidence of success and simplicity of implantation of NTL systems was markedly improved in patients undergoing NTL implantation by using biphasic shock waveforms. Clinical factors could be used to stratify patients in the monophasic group for their risk of implantation failure. In the biphasic group, no clinical factor could be correlated with a low DFT with a fully endovascular system.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia: narrowing the anatomic location for successful ablation.

Pace mapping used to locate the site for ablation of idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) ventricular tachycardia remains difficult and time-consuming. A method to facilitate pace mapping and the most common site of ablation of this tachycardia are reported. In 18 consecutive patients with RVOT ventricular tachycardia, electrocardiographic criteria based on the QRS orientation in lead 1 and the R wave progression in the precordial leads were used to find pace maps matching the arrhythmia. Identical pace maps were obtained on the septum of the RVOT in 16 patients and resulted in successful ablations. These sites were concentrated in the anterior superior aspect of the RVOT determined by fluoroscopic imaging. In the remaining two cases identical pace maps could not be found in this area. The results of this study narrow the anatomic location for radiofrequency ablation of idiopathic RVOT ventricular tachycardia. This is the first description of an electrocardiography-guided approach to finding an identical pace map in the RVOT.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia with unusual left atrial sites of origin: report of two cases.

Two cases of successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of adult-onset atrial tachycardia originating from the left atrium adjacent to the mitral annulus are presented. Endocardial catheter activation mapping performed by retrograde or atrial transseptal approach revealed presystolic activation at the successful ablation site in both patients, and fractionation during sinus rhythm and tachycardia in one. The 12-lead electrocardiographic P wave appearance was suggestive of a left atrial tachycardia origin in both cases.

Catheter Ablation↗
PubMed1996

Nonuniform heating patterns of commercial electrodes for radiofrequency catheter ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Previous investigations of the biophysics of myocardial ablation using radiofrequency energy have focused mainly on the electrode-myocardial interface. Relatively little has been written about the overall function of commercial electrodes used for ablation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the heating patterns of several commercial electrodes used for myocardial ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The specific absorption rate, a unit of measure proportional to the initial rate of rise of the temperature at the electrode-tissue interface and reflecting the energy deposition from the electrode, was measured during radiofrequency energy application at multiple points around each electrode. These measurements were combined to form a specific absorption rate pattern, which reflected the spatial pattern of energy deposition from the electrode. There was significant nonuniformity of the specific absorption rate pattern of each electrode evaluated. The proximal edge of the electrode and the curvature of the distal portion of the electrode were two sites of accentuated heating relative to the remaining portions of the electrode. The magnitude of this nonuniformity was similar between the 4-mm length electrodes of different manufacturers, but increased progressively in larger (5- and 8-mm length) electrodes. CONCLUSIONS: The heating patterns of commercial electrodes used for myocardial ablation are nonuniform. These data have implications for electrode design and utilization.

Catheter Ablation↗
PubMed1996

Bundle branch reentry ventricular tachycardia: an investigation of the circuit with resetting.

We describe a patient with bundle branch reentry ventricular tachycardia with 1:1 VA conduction in whom resetting was performed while obtaining simultaneous recordings from the right ventricular apex (V) and His-bundle electrogram. Both the tachycardia return cycle and the V-His interval demonstrated an increasing reset response, while the His-V interval demonstrated a flat reset response. These reset responses are consistent with a partially excitable gap localizing to the V-His portion of the bundle branch reentry circuit.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Early postoperative rise in defibrillation threshold in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems: attenuation with biphasic shock waveforms.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with non-thoracotomy defibrillation lead (NTL) systems coupled with monophasic shock waveforms, the defibrillation threshold (DFT) rises early after implantation. There is little information regarding features predictive of the DFT rise, or DFT changes early after implantation of NTL systems coupled with biphasic shock waveforms. METHODS AND RESULTS: DFT measurements were performed serially at implantation, prior to hospital discharge (mean 4 +/- 3 days), and at follow-up (mean 49 +/- 22 days) in 146 patients with an NTL system. Factors were assessed for association with a "clinically important" early postimplantation DFT rise, defined as a rise of > or = 2 energy steps (2 to 4 J per step; > or = 5 J total). A clinically important early postimplantation DFT rise occurred in 48 patients (33%). Univariate predictors of the rise included the monophasic shock waveform, the Medtronic Transvene lead system, the presence of a subcutaneous defibrillation patch, and the number of shocks delivered during the implantation procedure. However, the only independent predictor of a clinically important DFT rise was the monophasic shock waveform (F = 18, P < 0.001). For the monophasic patient group (n = 79), the incidence of a DFT rise was 53% (n = 42). For the biphasic patient group (n = 67), the incidence of a DFT rise was 9% (n = 6). The clinical characteristics of the monophasic and biphasic groups were not significantly different, nor were their DFTs at implantation. Among a subgroup of 18 consecutive patients who underwent serial DFT testing utilizing both monophasic and biphasic waveforms, the incidence of a clinically important DFT rise with monophasic (n = 9,50%) was higher than with biphasic shocks (n = 3,17%; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: NTL systems coupled with biphasic shock waveforms have an attenuated incidence of a clinically important DFT rise early after implantation, relative to patients with NTL systems coupled to monophasic waveforms.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1996

Serial defibrillation lead impedance in patients with epicardial and nonthoracotomy lead systems.

INTRODUCTION: The stability of implantable cardiac defibrillation lead impedance subsequent to implantation has not been reported and may have important clinical implications. The objective was to characterize the incidence and degree of impedance changes occurring after implantation of defibrillation lead systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of patients who received epicardial or nonthoracotomy lead systems. Defibrillation impedance was recorded at implantation, prior to hospital discharge (predischarge), and during follow-up. For each individual the magnitude of the impedance change relative to implantation was characterized. Among patients with an epicardial system, a significant decrease in impedance was observed at predischarge (mean 9.3 omega). The magnitude of the decrease was large in 39% and moderate in 31% of individuals. Subsequently, a gradual rise in mean impedance was apparent. At 18-21 months postimplantation, impedance was significantly increased relative to implantation (mean 6.8 omega). At this time, the magnitude of the increase was large in 46% and moderate in 23% of patients. Among patients with a nonthoracotomy lead system including a subcutaneous patch, a significant decrease in mean impedance was observed at predischarge (mean 3.5 omega). The magnitude of the decrease was large in 8% and moderate in 50% of individuals. Subsequently, a gradual rise in impedance was apparent. At 5-6 months, it was significantly increased relative to implantation (mean 2.3 omega). The magnitude of the increase was large in 10% and moderate in 33% of patients. Among the group of patients whose nonthoracotomy lead system did not include a subcutaneous patch, there was no significant change in mean impedance at predischarge relative to implantation. In subsequent intervals, a gradual rise was apparent. At 5-6 months, impedance was significantly increased relative to implantation (mean 4.3 omega). The magnitude of the increase was large in 16% and moderate in 47% of individuals. CONCLUSION: Significant changes in defibrillation lead impedance occur after implantation of epicardial and nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems. These data may serve as a standard for identifying the anticipated maximum change in lead impedance and thus may be useful as a tool for recognizing problems with defibrillation lead integrity.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗
PubMed1996

Insights into the electrophysiology of accessory pathway-mediated arrhythmias provided by the catheter ablation experience: "learning while burning, part III".

The success of catheter ablation has greatly improved the care of patients with paroxysmal tachycardias and has caused a revolution in the practice of electrophysiology. Some investigators have expressed that concern over procedural success in an increasingly interventional specialty threatens to eclipse attempts to understand the physiology of arrhythmia syndromes. Alternatively, due to the precise and directed nature of the lesions created with radiofrequency energy, catheter ablation procedures have allowed investigation to continue at a more focused level. In this article, the insights provided by the catheter ablation experience into the physiology of arrhythmias mediated by accessory AV pathways will be reviewed. Although the learning process was sometimes delayed by the nearly immediate success of radiofrequency catheter ablation, difficult situations have continued to renew efforts for understanding at a deeper level. Conscious attempts at "learning while burning" will provide the opportunity to investigate aspects of bypass tract physiology that remain incompletely characterized, such as partial response to therapy and late recurrence.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Circadian variation of ventricular arrhythmia recurrences after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with healed myocardial infarcts.

Past studies using Holter monitoring and retrospective reviews of death certificates have documented peak occurrence of sudden death and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the morning hours. We used the Ventritex Cadence device (Ventritex, Sunnyvale, California) which documents the date and time of all stored arrhythmias leading to device therapy to evaluate the circadian pattern of sustained ventricular arrhythmia recurrence. Mean follow-up after defibrillator implantation was 628 +/- 285 days. All 390 patients had at least 1 episode (range 1 to 43) of sustained VT documented from analysis of the stored electrograms associated with an arrhythmia event. Stored electrograms were available for review and analysis in 3,041 device detections; 349 stored events were excluded because they did not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for VT or failed to document the onset of the ventricular arrhythmia at the beginning of the recorded event of the arrhythmia episode. Criteria for the diagnosis of VT or ventricular fibrillation were met in 2,692 arrhythmia episodes occurring in 390 patients. There was circadian variation for ventricular arrhythmia recurrence for the whole patient group with the data fit to the sinusoidal density function: f(t) = 126 - 51 x cos (-57 + 2 pi t/24) - 25 x sin (63 + 2 pi t/12) (p < 0.0001). Ventricular arrhythmia occurrence rate was lowest between 2:00 and 3:00 A.M., and highest between 10:00 and 11:00 A.M. In addition, the same circadian pattern was demonstrated regardless of patient age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction (< 35% or > or = 35%), and VT cycle length (< 300 or > or = 300 ms).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Age Factors↗
PubMed1995

Postoperative lead-related complications in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to document postoperative complications attributable to nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems in a large cohort. BACKGROUND: The incidence of postoperative complications specifically associated with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems is unknown. METHODS: Postoperative lead-related complications were evaluated in 170 patients with a nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead system who were followed up for a mean (+/- SD) of 17 +/- 12 months. Each system incorporated one or more intravascular leads. In 117 patients (69%), the system incorporated a subcutaneous defibrillation patch. All implantations were performed in an operating room by cardiothoracic surgeons. Defibrillation thresholds were measured at implantation, before hospital discharge (mean 3 +/- 2 days) and at 4 to 18 weeks after implantation. Patients were evaluated every 2 to 3 months after implantation or as indicated by clinical exigency. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (15.9%) were diagnosed with a lead-related complication that either extended the initial hospital period or led to a second hospital admission. Complications included endocardial lead or subcutaneous defibrillation patch dislodgment in eight patients (4.7%), which was diagnosed between 2 and 345 days after implantation; endocardial or subcutaneous patch lead fracture in six (3.5%), which was diagnosed between 53 and 600 days after implantation; subcutaneous patch mesh fracture in one, which was diagnosed at 150 days after implantation; subclavian vein thrombosis in three (1.8%), which was diagnosed at 2 to 50 days after implantation; and unacceptably elevated defibrillation threshold (within 5 J of maximal device output) in nine (5.3%), which was documented at one of the two postimplantation evaluations in eight patients or at the time of failure to terminate a spontaneous ventricular tachycardia in one. Seventeen of the 27 patients required reoperation for correction of their complication. In addition, system infection requiring complete explantation occurred in seven other patients (4.1%) at an interval from implantation ranging from 14 to 120 days. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative complications related to a nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead system were common and frequently required reoperation for correction. The rate of system explantation due to infection was also significant. Postoperative defibrillation testing and vigilant outpatient follow-up evaluation are necessary to ensure normal lead function.

Binomial Distribution↗
PubMed1995

Benefits and lessons learned from stored electrogram information in implantable defibrillators.

Implantable defibrillators have evolved from simple event counters to sophisticated diagnostic monitoring units capable of storing electrocardiographic information surrounding arrhythmia events and device therapy. In this review, the nature and characteristics of these stored electrocardiographic recordings are discussed and examples displayed. Potential benefits and limitation of stored electrogram analysis are described with respect to both clinical utility and the ability to enhance our understanding of ventricular arrhythmogenesis. Finally, future developments to improve data storage, retrieval, and analysis are identified.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗
PubMed1995

Postshock sensing performance in transvenous defibrillation lead systems: analysis of detection and redetection of ventricular fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: The sensing performance of transvenous lead systems may be adversely affected by the delivery of high-energy shocks. This may be due to the proximity of the sensing and energy-delivery electrodes on transvenous leads. METHODS AND RESULTS: The time required for detection of ventricular fibrillation and redetection after a failed first shock was compared in 93 patients with five different lead system-pulse generator combinations: Cadence--Endotak 60 series, Ventak P--Endotak 60 series, Jewel--Transvene, Cadence--TVL, and Cadence--Transvene. A total of 418 successful and 204 failed first shocks were delivered during induced ventricular fibrillation. Redetection times (RED) were consistently shorter than detection times (DET) in the Jewel-Transvene (RED minus DET: -1.9 +/- 0.8 sec, P < 0.0001), the Cadence-TVL (-1.6 +/- 1.0 sec, P < 0.0001), and the Cadence-Transvene combinations (-2.0 +/- 0.9 sec, P < 0.0004). Redetection times were not significantly different than detection times in the Cadence-Endotak combination (0.9 +/- 3.1 sec; P = 0.09). Redetection times were significantly longer than detection times in the Ventak-Endotak combination (1.2 +/- 2.3 sec; P = 0.034). Prolonged individual redetection episodes (> 8.2 sec) were observed in the Cadence-Endotak (7 [10%] of 73 episodes) and the Ventak-Endotak (4 [10%] of 39 episodes), but not in the Jewel-Transvene, the Cadence-TVL, and the Cadence-Transvene combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Redetection of ventricular fibrillation may be delayed in some transvenous lead-pulse generator combinations. Successful redetection of ventricular fibrillation following a failed first shock should be demonstrated prior to hospital discharge of patients with implantable defibrillators.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Insights into the electrophysiology of atrial arrhythmias gained by the catheter ablation experience: "learning while burning, Part II".

Although the development and wide-scale application of catheter ablative techniques has drastically changed the practice of electrophysiology, catheter ablation does not preclude physiologic investigation. On the contrary, given the precise and directed nature of this technique and the increased attention to detailed cardiac mapping that it requires, catheter ablation may be viewed as a tool to provide unique information about arrhythmia substrates. In this article, the insights provided by the catheter ablation experience into the pathophysiology of the focal atrial arrhythmias, atrial tachycardia, sinus node reentrant tachycardia, and inappropriate sinus tachycardia will be reviewed. Atrial arrhythmias were initially difficult to treat with ablative therapy, particularly because they can occur anywhere within the atria and the experience with mapping for surgical ablation was quite limited. A number of novel approaches to atrial mapping have been developed in response to this challenge, and presently, catheter ablation provides effective therapy for the majority of patients with focal atrial arrhythmias. In addition, deliberate attempts at "learning while burning" have already begun to enhance our understanding of the interaction of the structural and electrophysiologic aspects of the substrate for atrial arrhythmias.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗