Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D S Fisher

Publications and source records attributed to D S Fisher.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Image analysis and nonlinear modeling to determine dimensions of wet-sieved, masticated forage particles.

A procedure to estimate dimensions of digesta particles was developed and evaluated. After wet sieving, particles of masticated switchgrass and bermudagrass hays retained on sieves with apertures of 1.0 mm2 or larger were placed on moist white filter paper, separated manually, and photographed. Photographs were scanned with a flat-bed scanner, scaled to size, and digitized. Projected area, perimeter, length, and width of particles were determined by a microcomputer system. Variables derived for each particle included the form factor, which was defined as (4 x pi x area)/perimeter2, and each particle's length: width ratio. Ninety-three percent of data from two trials with steers had significant lack of fit (P less than .05 to P less than .0001) to normal, lognormal, Weibull, or gamma distributions. As an alternative, individual particle measurements were summed on a cumulative percentage basis for each variable and were fit to an inverted Gompertz function to estimate median, mode, and mean dimensions of scanned particles. Estimates from the equation fit the distribution well; asymptotic SE averaged 3.5 and 1.4% of parameter means for dimensions of masticated switchgrass and bermudagrass hay particles, respectively. No analytic solution exists for the mean, which must be estimated numerically, but analytic solutions are available for the median and mode. Use of this equation will prevent bias caused by lack of fit to a particular distribution and yield more accurate estimates of mean particle dimensions than arithmetic means.

Animal Feed↗

Estimation of mean and median particle size of ruminant digesta.

An alternative exponential equation with a parameter as an exponent was compared to a recently published exponential procedure for estimating mean and median particle size. Both equations were fit to literature values for particle size distributions of esophageal extrusa, rumen digesta, and feces. In addition, 112 observations of particle-size distributions of esophageal extrusa were fit to both equations for comparison. Both equations gave adequate fits of rumen digesta and feces, but the earlier model was biased by regular deviations from observed data for esophageal extrusa. Use of the previously published model overestimated mean particle size in esophageal extrusa from 4.5 to 10.3%. Median particle size was underestimated from 4.9 to 5.6%. Analytic solutions exist for mean and median particle sizes for the earlier model, but it is necessary to estimate numerically the mean and median particle sizes when using the proposed equation. Even though the solution for the proposed equation must be determined numerically, it will prevent bias between experimental treatments, give more accurate estimates of mean and median particle size, and result in a lower residual sums of squares. In addition, a single equation can be used to model particle size reduction throughout the digestive tract.

Animals↗