Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Rischin

Publications and source records attributed to D Rischin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel for patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who have previously received paclitaxel--ANZGOG 02-01.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response rate of weekly docetaxel in women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with paclitaxel and at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this multi-center phase II trial, 37 patients with relapsed disease were enrolled and treated with weekly docetaxel at 35 mg/m for 5 out of 6 consecutive weeks. Two patient cohorts were considered, those who progressed or relapsed within 4 months (N=7) or at greater than 4 months (N=30) from the time of completing their last course of paclitaxel. RESULTS: Patients in both cohorts received a median of 2 cycles of treatment (range; 1-4). In evaluable patients, the combined overall response rate, using both CA125 and RECIST response criteria was 18.9% (7/37; 95% CI; 10-34%). The combined overall progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI; 2.5-3.8), and the combined overall survival was 12.3 months (95% CI; 8.2-16.4). Treatment was generally well tolerated with the only grade 4 toxicity being skin toxicity (3%). The most common grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (14%) and watery eyes (8%) with grade 3 neutropenia observed in only 5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Weekly docetaxel is well tolerated and has activity in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum and paclitaxel.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

A phase I trial of high-dose palliative radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly Vinorelbine and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

The role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) unsuitable for radical therapy but who require locoregional treatment has not been defined. The aims of this phase I trial were thus to develop a novel regimen of weekly chemotherapy concurrent with high-dose palliative RT (40 Gy/20 fractions) and assess its tolerability, objective and symptomatic response rates. Eligible patients had stage I-IIIB NSCLC unsuitable for radical RT or limited stage IV disease, ECOG PS<or=1 and required locoregional therapy. Treatment was RT (40 Gy/20 fractions/5 per week) and weekly Vinorelbine plus Cisplatin escalated in six planned dose levels (DLs). At 4 weeks post-RT, patients received two cycles of Cisplatin 80 mg m-2 day 1+Vinorelbine 25 mg m-2 days 1, 8, 15. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined in the CRT phase. Disease-related symptoms were assessed by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. In all, 24 patients accrued, stage IIIB (n=12) and IV disease (n=10). The highest administered dose was at DL 4, Vinorelbine 30 mg m-2+Cisplatin 20 mg m-2 with DLTs of grade 4 neutropenia in two of three patients. No grade 3 or 4 nonhaematological toxicities were observed. The overall radiological response rate was 65% (n=23: complete response 4% and partial response 61%) and infield FDG-PET responses were seen in 89% (n=18). There was an improvement or stabilisation of symptoms and quality of life. Dose level 3, Vinorelbine 25 mg m-2+Cisplatin 20 mg m-2, is recommended for further assessment. This regimen was tolerable and produced meaningful responses for patients for whom locoregional control is required, but who are unsuitable for radical CRT.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Clinical evaluation of ZD6474, an orally active inhibitor of VEGF and EGF receptor signaling, in patients with solid, malignant tumors.

BACKGROUND: ZD6474 selectively inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor. The safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ZD6474 were assessed in a phase I dose-escalation study of patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with tumors refractory to standard treatments received once-daily oral ZD6474 (50-600 mg) in 28-day cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were treated at doses of 50 mg (n=9), 100 mg (n=19), 200 mg (n=8), 300 mg (n=25), 500 mg (n=8), and 600 mg (n=8). Adverse events were generally mild, and the most common dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were diarrhea (n=4), hypertension (n=4), and rash (n=3). The incidence of most adverse events appeared to be dose-dependant. In the 500 mg/day cohort, 3/8 patients experienced DLT and this dose was therefore considered to exceed the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetic analysis confirmed that ZD6474 was suitable for once-daily oral dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily oral dosing of ZD6474 at 300 mg/day is generally well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors, and this dose is being investigated in phase II trials.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Oxaliplatin combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil and concomitant radiotherapy in inoperable and metastatic rectal cancer: a phase I trial.

The aim of this study was to define the recommended dose of oxaliplatin when combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and concurrent pelvic radiotherapy. Eligible patients had inoperable rectal cancer, or symptomatic primary rectal cancer with metastasis. Oxaliplatin was given on day 1 of weeks 1, 3 and 5 of radiotherapy. Dose level 1 was oxaliplatin 70 mg m(-2) with 5-FU 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) continuous infusion 96 h week(-1). On dose level 2, the oxaliplatin dose was increased to 85 mg m(-2). On dose level 3, the duration of the 5-FU was increased to 168 h per week. Pelvic radiotherapy was 45 Gray (Gy) in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with a boost of 5.4 Gy. Fluorine-18 fluoro deoxyglucose and Fluorine-18 fluoro misonidazole positron emission tomography (FDG-PET and FMISO-PET) were used to assess metabolic tumour response and hypoxia. In all, 16 patients were accrued. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in one patient at level 2 (grade 3 chest infection), and two patients at level 3 (grade 3 diarrhoea). Dose level 2 was declared the recommended dose level. FDG-PET imaging showed metabolic responses in 11 of the 12 primary tumours assessed. Four of six tumours had detectable hypoxia on FMISO-PET scans. The addition of oxaliplatin to infusional 5-FU chemoradiotherapy was feasible and generally well tolerated. For future trials, oxaliplatin 85 mg m(-2) and 5-FU 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) continuous infusion 96 h week(-1) is the recommended dose when combined with 50.4 Gy of pelvic radiotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Parotid-sparing radiotherapy: does it really reduce xerostomia?

AIMS: Parotid-sparing radiotherapy (PSRT) was introduced for patients with selected head and neck cancer requiring bilateral upper-neck irradiation at our centre in 2000. The aim of this study was to compare the subjective degree of xerostomia in patients treated with PSRT between January 2000 and June 2003 with patients treated using conventional techniques (radiotherapy) over the same period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were required to have completed treatment 6 months previously and be recurrence-free at the time of interview. PSRT was defined as conformal radiotherapy, in which the mean dose to at least one parotid gland was 33 Gy or less, as determined by the dose-volume histogram. Patients receiving radiotherapy were treated with standard parallel-opposed fields, such that both parotids received a minimum of 40 Gy. Xerostomia was assessed using a validated questionnaire containing six questions with a rating between 0 and 10. Lower scores indicated less difficulty with xerostomia. RESULTS: Thirty-eight eligible patients treated with PSRT were identified: 25 with oropharyngeal cancer and 13 with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). The mean overall questionnaire score (Q1-5) for this group was 4.20 (standard error = 0.33). Forty-four patients (24 oropharyngeal, 21 NPC) treated with radiotherapy over the same period were eligible. The mean overall questionnaire score (Q1-5) for this group was 5.86 (standard error = 0.35). The difference in mean overall scores between the two groups of patients was statistically significant (P < 0.001), as were the scores for four of the six individual questions. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that PSRT offers improved long-term xerostomia-related quality of life compared with conventional radiotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Rounding of low serum creatinine levels and consequent impact on accuracy of bedside estimates of renal function in cancer patients.

To compare glomerular filtration rate measured by technetium-99m ([Tc(99m)]) DTPA clearance with estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) (Cockcroft and Gault (C&G) method) in patients with serum creatinine (Scr) levels <0.06 mmol l(-1), and determine the effect of rounding serum creatinine to 0.06 mmol l(-1). Patients with serum creatinine values <0.06 mmol l(-1) at the time of [Tc(99m)] clearance determination were identified. Creatinine clearance was calculated by the C&G method using both actual and rounded Scr values. A total of 419 adults had GFR measured by technetium-99m diethyl triamine penta-acetic acid ([Tc(99m)] DTPA) clearance. Out of this group, 26 patients had a serum creatinine value <0.06 mmol l(-1). The C&G estimates of renal function using actual serum creatinine resulted in an overall overestimation of 12.9% when compared to [Tc(99m)] DTPA clearance. When the value of serum creatinine was rounded to 0.06 mmol l(-1), the formula underestimated renal function by -7.0%. Analysis of estimated creatinine clearance for different levels of renal function showed significant differences to [Tc(99m)] DTPA clearance. Rounding up of serum creatinine to 0.06 mmol l(-1) improved the predictive ability of the C&G method for the patients with [Tc(99m)] DTPA clearance </=100 ml min(-1), but worsened the effect in those >100 ml min(-1). This work indicates that when bedside estimates of renal function are calculated using the C&G formula actual Scr should be used first to estimate CrCl. If the resultant CrCl is </=100 ml min(-1), then the Scr should be rounded up to 0.06 mmol l(-1) and CrCl recalculated. Further assessment of this approach is warranted in a larger cohort of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Clinical verification of the superiority of the current International Union Against Cancer staging criteria in an Australian population of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic abilities of the fourth and fifth edition International Union Against Cancer (UICC) staging systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in Australian patients. All patients planned for curative treatment at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre from April 1985 to December 1999 were included in this study. There were 181 patients eligible for this study. The median follow up was 7.6 years. Histological subgroups were World Health Organization (WHO) 1 (23), WHO 2 (12), and WHO 3 (146). Presentation with stage IV disease was 83% by UICC fourth edition staging and 34% by UICC fifth edition staging. The 5 years failure-free survival (FFS) rates for stage 1, 2, 3 and 4 disease by the fourth edition was 77, 100, 93, and 49% respectively,and by the fifth edition was 85, 76, 57 and 36%, respectively. The 5 years overall survival (OS) for stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 disease by the fourth edition was 77, 100, 100 and 61%; respectively, and by the fifth edition was 85, 82, 67 and 53%, respectively. Stage 4 patients by the fourth edition were reclassified as stages 2, 3 and 4 by the fifth edition with hazard ratios of 0.77, 1.01 and 1.79, respectively. In multifactor analysis, the fifth edition staging system was significantly related to FFS and OS after allowing for the fourth edition (FFS: P = 0.002; OS: P = 0.005), but the fourth edition was not significantly related to FFS or OS after allowing for the fifth edition (FFS: P = 0.96; OS: P = 0.96). This study confirms the prognostic superiority of the fifth edition UICC staging system over the fourth edition staging system in an Australian NPC population.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Comparison of neutropenia in a randomized, crossover trial of 3-, 6-, and 24-h infusions of paclitaxel.

OBJECTIVE: Paclitaxel is most commonly infused over 3 hs rather than the original schedule of 24 h as the briefer infusion duration results in greater convenience, similar efficacy, significantly less myelosuppression, and less cost. While differences in toxicity between 3- and 24-h infusions are well described, there is little information about the effect of modest prolongation of infusion duration, which is often employed in patients who develop hypersensitivity reactions. To assess whether prolonging a 3-h infusion significantly increases the degree of neutropenia, we reviewed our data from a randomized, crossover trial of 3-h versus 6-h versus 24-h regimens of paclitaxel. METHODS: Results from 12 patients who were randomized to receive one 3-h, one 6-h and one 24-h infusion of paclitaxel in varied sequences during their first three cycles of treatment were analysed. The blood counts were monitored closely throughout each cycle of treatment. RESULTS: Crossover trial methodology was used to assess the differences in the degree of neutropenia caused by the three different infusion regimens. The 24-h infusion regimen resulted in significantly worse neutropenia than the 3- or 6-h infusion regimens. There was no statistically significant difference between the 3- and 6-h infusion regimens with respect to all endpoints. The estimated mean difference in the duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia between the 3- and 6-h infusion regimens (6 h - 3-h) was 1.1 day (95% CI: -0.9, 3.2), and for grade 4 neutropenia, the estimated mean difference in the duration was 0.8 day (95% CI: -0.4, 2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the duration of paclitaxel infusions from 3 to 6 h does not result in a statistically significant increase in the degree of neutropenia. Any additional neutropenia is likely to be of brief duration.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Phase I/II study of concurrent twice-weekly paclitaxel and weekly cisplatin with radiation therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

The optimal chemoradiation regimen for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been determined. In this phase I/II study, the use of twice-weekly paclitaxel concomitant with weekly cisplatin and thoracic radiotherapy (RT) was evaluated. Patients with stage III NSCLC (without pleural effusion or cervical lymphadenopathy) were treated with thoracic RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) with concurrent weekly cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) and escalating doses of twice-weekly paclitaxel (starting dose of paclitaxel of 20 mg/m(2) increased in increments of 5 mg/m(2)) in successive cohorts of three to six patients until two or more patients experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) at a particular dose level. All patients were planned to be given a further two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 5 after completion of RT. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this study from two institutions. At a dose of paclitaxel 35 mg/m(2), two of four treated patients had DLTs (1 grade 3 oesophagitis and pulmonary toxicity; 1 grade 3 oesophagitis and infection). The recommended dose was therefore determined to be 30 mg/m(2) and a total of 15 patients were enrolled in an expanded cohort at this level. The overall response rate for all patients was 64% (95% CI: 43-82%). The estimated median survival was 23.6 months with an estimated 1-year and 2-year survival of 72 and 49%, respectively. Paclitaxel can be safely given twice-weekly at a dose of 30 mg/m(2) in combination with weekly cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)) and thoracic RT (60 Gy), and this regimen has significant activity in stage III NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Docetaxel and carboplatin is an active regimen in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in Caucasian and Asian patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report response rates, survival and toxicity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following docetaxel and carboplatin, and to explore potential differences in these end points between Caucasian and Asian patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients of good performance status with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were entered on a phase II study at three sites in Australia and Singapore. Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 were given every 3 weeks. Response to treatment and toxicity were graded by standard criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates, and subgroups compared by the log-rank test. Cox's proportional hazards regression was used to determine which potentially explanatory variables independently affected the outcome. RESULTS: The response rate was 39% (95% confidence interval 27% to 52%), and 42% in evaluable patients. Response occurred in 65% of Asian and 31% of Caucasian patients (P = 0.01). Ethnicity was the only significant predictor of response in multivariate analysis. The 1-year survival rate was 53%. Performance status (P = 0.021), ethnicity (P = 0.035) and presence of bone or liver metastases (P = 0.011) were independent predictors of overall survival. Neutropenia (grade IV in 73% of patients), febrile neutropenia (26% patients) and diarrhea (grade III/IV in 11% of patients) were the major treatment related toxicities. A high rate (three of six) of febrile neutropenia in Singapore, including one treatment-related death in the initial patients treated, resulted in a reduction in the carboplatin dose to AUC 4.5 at that site. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen is active in advanced NSCLC. The potential impact of ethnicity on efficacy and toxicity of treatment requires further investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic trial of ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with five selected solid tumor types.

PURPOSE: To establish the safety and tolerability of ZD1839 (Iressa), a selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and to explore its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in patients with selected solid tumor types. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a phase I dose-escalating trial of oral ZD1839 150 mg/d to a maximum of 1,000 mg/d given once daily for at least 28 days. Patients with either advanced non-small-cell lung, ovarian, head and neck, prostate, or colorectal cancer were recruited. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients received ZD1839 (150 to 1,000 mg/d). At 1,000 mg/d, five of 12 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea [four patients] and grade 3 somnolence [one patient]). The most frequent drug-related adverse events (AEs) were acne-like rash (64%) and diarrhea (47%), which were generally mild (grade 1/2) and reversible on cessation of treatment. No change in ZD1839 safety profile was observed with prolonged administration. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed steady-state exposure to ZD1839 in 98% of patients by day 7. Nineteen patients had stable disease and received ZD1839 for >or= 3 months; seven of these patients remained on study drug for >or= 6 months. Serial skin biopsies taken before treatment and at approximately day 28 revealed changes indicative of inhibition of the EGFR signaling pathway. CONCLUSION: ZD1839 was generally well tolerated, with manageable and reversible AEs at doses up to 600 mg/d and dose-limiting toxicity observed at 1,000 mg/d. ZD1839 treatment resulted in clinically meaningful disease stabilization across a range of tumor types and doses. Pharmacodynamic changes in skin confirmed inhibition of EGFR signaling, which was predicted from the mode of action of ZD1839.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Carboplatin dosing: gender bias and inaccurate estimates of glomerular filtration rate.

The aim was to compare doses of carboplatin calculated using the Calvert formula and Chatelut formula and also to compare doses calculated using Calvert formula, modified with non-isotopic estimation of GFR, using the Cockcroft and Gault formula or the Jelliffe formula. For formulae comparison, doses were calculated to target an AUC of 7 mg/ml x min. When compared with the dose derived from the Calvert formula, the doses calculated in 122 adult cancer patients using the Chatelut formula were significantly higher for males and significantly lower for females. There was a statistically significant difference between the dose per kg calculated for males and females (P<0.0001). The mean percentage difference in dose calculated with substituted measures of renal function with the Cockcroft and Gault formula and Jelliffe formula was -8% (standard deviation (S.D.) 17%) and -14% (S.D. 16%), respectively. Further prospective evaluation of the Chatelut formula is required before it can be recommended for routine clinical application.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A phase II trial of ZD0473 in platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer.

The primary aim of this phase II trial was to assess the antitumour activity of ZD0473 in ovarian cancer patients who had failed initial platinum-based therapy. Patients (n=94) were classified as either platinum-sensitive (n=35) or platinum-resistant (n=59) depending on whether they had relapsed or progressed within 26 weeks of completing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients initially received 120 mg/m(2) ZD0473 as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. If well tolerated, the dose could be escalated to 150 mg/m(2). Few patients (9%) withdrew because of treatment-related adverse events and no clinically significant oto-, nephro- or neurotoxicity was observed. Objective response rates for platinum-resistant and sensitive patients were 8.3 and 32.4%, respectively, and clinical benefit was observed in 76.5% of the sensitive patients. Median time to progression was 57 and 180 days, and median time to death was 242 and 402 days, for resistant and sensitive patients, respectively. In conclusion, ZD0473 has a manageable toxicity profile and encouraging activity in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Results of ZD0473 in platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer: analysis according to platinum free interval.

Resistance to platinum-containing regimens can develop in many women with ovarian cancer and may lead to relapse in > 80% of patients. ZD0473 is a new-generation platinum agent that, in preclinical studies, shows evidence of antitumour activity and overcomes platinum-resistance mechanisms. This Phase II trial has evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of ZD0473 in second-line ovarian cancer patients. Patients received ZD0473 120 mg/m2 (1-h iv infusion, day 1 q 3-weeks); the starting dose was increased to 150 mg/m2 after a safety review. We report here on results when patients are divided into four cohorts depending upon whether they were considered platinum-resistant or -sensitive. Patients were placed into one of 3 cohorts if they were platinum resistant (relapsed/progressed < or = 26 weeks after completion of prior platinum-based chemotherapy) or cohort 4 if this period was > 26 weeks (sensitive). Ninety-four patients were recruited to the trial (59 resistant, 35 sensitive; median age 58 [range 27-75] years; 86 with performance status [PS] < or = 1). Forty-nine patients received a starting dose of 120 mg/m2, of which 15 escalated to 150 mg/m2, and 45 received a starting dose of 150 mg/m2. Overall, the median number of treatment cycles received was 3 (range 1-8). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was the most common haematological adverse event occurring in 62% of patients overall. Grade 3/4 lethargy, vomiting and nausea were the most common non-haematological toxicities. No clinically significant oto-, nephro- or neurotoxicity was observed. Overall response rates for all platinum-resistant and -sensitive patients were 8.3% and 32.4%, respectively. Stable disease occurred in 17 resistant and 15 sensitive patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Isolex 300i CD34-selected cells to support multiple cycles of high-dose therapy.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that repeated cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT), can be supported by unmanipulated autologous PBPC. Here we investigate whether purified CD34+ cells, obtained by immunomagnetic separation using the Isolex 300i device, can support such therapy. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer had PBPC mobilized and harvested following chemotherapy and G-CSF (10 microg/kg per day). Patients with > 4.0 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells in the apheresis product underwent CD34-selection using the Isolex 300i (v2.0) device. All cells collected were equally divided into three aliquots and cryopreserved. Patients who did not achieve this threshold had unmanipulated cells collected and stored. Patients subsequently received three cycles of HDT with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and either ifosfamide (10 g/m2) or cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2). It was intended for patients to receive CD34-selected cells to support each of the three cycles of HDT (i.e 1/3 for each cycle) and to compare hemopoietic recovery between patients receiving CD34-selected cells or unmanipulated cells. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 29 patients (45%) did not mobilize sufficient CD34+ cells to undergo CD34-selection. The remaining 16 patients underwent CD34-selection with a median purity of 84.3% (range: 16.3-96.1%) and yield of 34% (range: 1-60%). Fifteen of these patients proceeded to HDT and 42 of the planned 45 cycles were administered. Nine patients had all three HDT cycles supported by CD34-selected cells. The median number of CD34-selected cells (x 10(6)/kg) infused per cycle was 1.5 (range: 0.04-3.01). Three of the 15 patients required infusion of 'back-up' unmanipulated cells because of delayed neutrophil recovery. Of the 13 patients whose PBPCs did not undergo CD34+ cell selection, 11 proceeded to HDT with a median of 3.2 x 10(6)/kg (range: 2.0-4.4) unselected cells infused per cycle and 31 of 33 planned cycles were delivered. When hemopoietic recovery was compared between cycles of HDT supported by CD34-selected (n = 34) and unmanipulated cells (n = 31), there was a modest slowing in the patients receiving CD34-selected cells; time to ANC > 1.0 x 10(9)/L = 11 days versus 10 days (P = 0.0122) and platelets > 20 x 10(9)/L = 14 days versus 13 days (P = 0.0009). No difference in recovery to 50 x 10(9)/L was observed (P = 0.54). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that Isolex 300i CD34-selected cells are capable of supporting multiple cycles of HDT. However, we were unable to acquire sufficient CD34+ cells to perform this processing in 45% (13/29) of patients and further improvements in yield are required to overcome the modest delay in neutrophil and platelet recovery.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

CliniMACS CD34-selected cells to support multiple cycles of high-dose therapy.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, following high-dose therapy (HDT), unmanipulated autologous PBPC are infused. Alternatively, purified CD34+ cells can now be obtained by immunomagnetic separation using the CliniMACS device. Limited data currently exist examining hemopoietic recovery with such cells. METHODS: Ten patients with advanced breast cancer had PBPC mobilized with docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and G-CSF (10 microg/kg per day), harvested and processed using the CliniMACS CD34-selection device and equally divided into three aliquots for cryopreservation. Unmanipulated 'back-up' cells were also collected on a separate day of the same mobilization, divided into three and cryopreserved. Patients subsequently received three cycles of HDT with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2). The intent was for patients to receive CD34-selected cells to support each of the three cycles of HDT (i.e., 1/3 for each cycle). If, however, hemopoietic recovery was delayed after Cycle 1, 1/3 of the unmanipulated cells were infused following Cycle 2 and the remaining CD34-selected cells (2/3) were used to support Cycle 3. RESULTS: PBPC from 10 patients underwent CD34-selection with a resulting median purity of 93% (range: 76-98%) and yield of 62% (range: 16-93%). Of the 10 patients, only two were able to be supported with CD34-selected cells for all three cycles of HDT. The remaining eight patients required unmanipulated 'back-up' cells to support Cycle 2. Three patients also required infusion of 'back-up' unmanipulated cells because of persistent neutropenia (n = 1) or thrombocytopenia (n = 2) following cycles initially supported by CD34-selected cells. The median number of CD34-selected cells (x 10(6)/kg) infused per cycle was 1.5 (0.7-2.6) (n = 20) and unselected cells was 1.7 (1.4-2.8) (n = 10). Comparing hemopoietic recovery between cycles of HDT supported by CD34-selected (n = 20) and unmanipulated cells (n = 10) there was a significant slowing with the CD34-selected cells; time to ANC > 1.0 = 13 days versus 10 days, platelets > 20 = 17 days versus 13 days, > 50 = 25 versus 17 days (all P values < 0.001). There was no correlation between the dose of CD34-selected cells infused and neutrophil/platelet recovery. DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated that, although unmanipulated PBPC achieve rapid hemopoietic recovery (at modest CD34 doses of < or = 2.8 x 10(6)/kg), CliniMACS-selected CD34+ cells (in the doses utilized in this study of < or = 2.6 x 10(6)/kg) result in significantly prolonged recovery.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Treatment with the novel anti-angiogenic agent PI-88 is associated with immune-mediated thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: The novel molecule PI-88 is a highly sulfonated oligosaccharide which inhibits heparanase activity and competes with heparan sulfate binding of growth factors such as FGF and VEGF. Preclinical data demonstrates that PI-88 inhibits angiogenesis and has anti-metastatic effects. The aim of this phase I study was to determine the recommended dose and toxicity profile of PI-88. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PI-88 was given intravenously in increasing duration of administration (0.57 mg/kg for 2 h, 0.57 mg/kg/day for 1 day, 4, 7 and 14 consecutive days) and then increasing dose for 14 consecutive days (1.14 mg/kg/day and 2.28 mg/kg/day) in patients with advanced malignancies until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. Fourteen assessable patients with advanced malignancies received PI-88 intravenously. RESULTS: DLT was thrombocytopenia. The thrombocytopenia appeared to be immunologically mediated with the development of anti-heparin platelet factor 4 complex antibodies. There were no other significant toxicities. At the final dose and schedule (2.28 mg/kg/day for 14 days), there was limited evidence of biological activity as measured by the surrogate marker activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), although two patients had stabilisation of disease. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, PI-88 at a dose of 2.28 mg/kg/day for 14 days resulted in dose-limiting thrombocytopenia which appeared to be immune related. Limited evidence of biological activity was noted. Alternate scheduling and routes of administration are now being explored.

Adult↗