Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Reintgen

Publications and source records attributed to D Reintgen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Learning curves and breast cancer lymphatic mapping: institutional volume index.

INTRODUCTION: To date, studies of breast cancer lymphatic mapping (LM) have analyzed success with respect to individual surgeons. However, LM and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) are procedures that require institutional multidisciplinary cooperation between the departments of radiology, pathology, and surgery. Thus, it is important to evaluate these procedures with respect to the institution. This study examines 30 institutions to clarify the value of the institutional volume index (IVI) (cases/month) to the outcome of LM and SLNBx in breast cancer. METHODS: From July 1997 to July 1999, 30 institutions participated in the Department of Defense national breast LM trial. All participants underwent a 2-day training course for surgeons, nuclear medicine physicians, and pathologists. The records for each institution were prospectively accrued and submitted to a database. The false negatives, failure rates, and IVI were calculated for each institution. A logistic regression model plots the relationship between IVI and institutional failure rate. Using a multivariate analysis, mapping failure was analyzed as a function of case number with respect to the individual surgeon and the institution as a whole. RESULTS: False negative results were demonstrated in only 5 (4%) cases among all institutions and were excluded from further analysis due to small numbers. Mapping failures were found in all but 7 of the 30 institutions whose data were complete. There were 71 mapping failures among 74 surgeons over 555 cases, which yielded an overall failure rate of 12.79% (71 555). The logistic regression model revealed an inverse relationship between IVI and institutional failure rate. However, the multivariate analysis revealed that the individual surgeon performance was the most significant factor in determining institutional mapping success. CONCLUSION: Failure to map can be a function of multiple factors including surgical skill, surgical volume index, and injection method of the SLN patient, all under the quality control of an institution. The surgical failure rate on the other hand is a function of surgical skill, surgical volume, and injection methods. While differences in mapping success exist across institutions, this disparity is not due to factors associated with the institution as a whole, but lie with the individual surgeon.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

Improved staging of node-negative patients with intermediate to thick melanomas (>1 mm) with the use of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Elective lymph node dissection (ELND) may contribute to a survival benefit in certain stratified subsets of melanoma patients. We hypothesized that lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (with complete node dissection if metastases are present) may improve both staging and survival of patients with clinically negative nodes, without subjecting all patients to the morbidity associated with complete ELND. METHODS: We reviewed the data for all 14,914 N0 patients of the AJCC Melanoma Staging Database to determine the effect of SLN biopsy and ELND on staging and survival. RESULTS: Retrospective analysis revealed that there was an apparent statistically significant survival advantage to SLN biopsy in patients with melanomas > 1 mm (n = 9024; 68.5% and 26.2% reduction in mortality compared with patients staged to be N0 by clinical exam and ELND, respectively; P < .0001). Five-year survivals were 90.5%, 77.7%, and 69.8%, respectfully, for patients staged by SLN biopsy (n = 2552), ELND (n = 2014), and clinical examination alone (n = 5192). The survival advantage of SLN biopsy was statistically significant for each T-stage category (T2, T3, and T4) and ulceration status. There was no advantage to SLN biopsy in patients with melanomas <1 mm (n = 5890). CONCLUSIONS: SLN biopsy provides more accurate staging and may contribute to a survival benefit in populations of patients with melanoma.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): why map DCIS?

The appropriateness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of patients with biopsy diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) has not been established. Three hundred forty-one patients presented with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS or DCISM. Two hundred forty (70%) underwent sentinel node biopsy at their definitive procedure. All clinical and pathologic data were collected prospectively. Of 224 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS 23 (10%) were upstaged to infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) at their definitive therapy and of 16 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCISM seven (44%) were upstaged to IDC. Excisional biopsies were no more sensitive for detecting IDC than was core biopsy. Lymph node metastases were detected in 26 of 195 (13%) patients with a definitive diagnosis of DCIS, in three of 15 (20%) with a definitive diagnosis of DCISM, and in eight of 30 (27%) with a definitive diagnosis of IDC. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a valuable tool in the treatment of patients with DCIS and DCISM and is particularly needed in those undergoing mastectomy. No "high-risk" group of patients can be identified for selective sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

Molecular analysis in evaluating the sentinel node in malignant melanoma.

The most powerful predictor of cancer mortality in solid tumors is the status of regional lymph nodes. If the presence or absence of regional nodal metastases will determine which patient receives formal dissection or which patient enters adjuvant therapy, then a technique is needed to accurately screen lymph node samples for occult disease. Routine histopathologic examination commonly underestimates the number of patient with metastases. The use of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method increased the detection of nodal metastases exponentially. Studies have shown that RT-PCR is a sensitive, reproducible, and efficient technique with prognostic significance. If identification of micrometastases through RT-PCR can lead to improved clinical outcome, then this more accurate method of staging would become the new standard in cancer care.

Antigens, Differentiation↗
PubMed2001

Desmoplastic melanoma.

Desmoplastic melanoma is an uncommonly encountered variant of malignant melanoma. Three histological subtypes exist: desmoplastic, neurotropic, and neural transforming. Desmoplastic melanoma commonly presents in conjunction with existing melanocytic lesions or as an amelanotic firm nodule. Local recurrences are common. Thirty patients over a 6-year period were treated at our institution for desmoplastic melanoma. All lesions were treated with local excision. Local recurrence occurred in seven patients (23%) and was treated by aggressive re-excision in each instance. Clinical regional metastasis (lymph nodal basins) were detected in two patients (6%). Distant metastasis (lung) developed in two patients (6%). Twenty-three patients (76%) were found to have desmoplastic subtype, whereas five (17%) had neurotropic subtype. Six patients (20%) had associated pigmented melanotic lesions. Average length of follow-up has been 18 months. Overall survival is 96 per cent. Presentations and histologic diagnosis can sometimes be difficult and misleading. Treatment is aggressive local excision with follow-up necessary to detect resectable recurrent lesions.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

The Melanoma Staging Committee of the AJCC has proposed major revisions of the melanoma TNM and stage grouping criteria. The committee members represent most of the major cooperative groups and cancer centers worldwide with a special interest in melanoma; the committee also collectively has had clinical experience with over 40,000 patients. The new staging system better reflects independent prognostic factors that are used in clinical trials and in reporting the outcomes of various melanoma treatment modalities. Major revisions include 1) melanoma thickness and ulceration, but not level of invasion, to be used in the T classification; 2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes, rather than their gross dimensions, the delineation of microscopic versus macroscopic lymph node metastases, and presence of ulceration of the primary melanoma to be used in the N classification; 3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum LDH, to be used in the M classification; 4) an upstaging of all patients with Stage I,II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; 5) a merging of satellite metastases around a primary melanoma and in-transit metastases into a single staging entity that is grouped into Stage III disease; and 6) a new convention for defining clinical and pathologic staging so as to take into account the new staging information gained from intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy. The AJC Melanoma Staging Committee invites comments and suggestions regarding this proposed staging system before a final recommendation is made.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2000

Invited critique

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Surgical management of primary melanoma.

A significant proportion of the general population is diagnosed with malignant melanoma each year, and more people die of melanoma now than at any time in the past. Consequently, treatment of melanoma at all stages of development is an important clinical issue. A variety of management options are discussed here, including biopsy techniques and treatment of the primary melanoma. The latter include lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy, hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion, and surgery for stage IV melanoma patients. Procedure-associated benefits and possible complications associated with each modality are also summarized.

Biopsy↗
PubMed1999

Cutaneous lymphatic drainage in patients with grossly involved nodal basins.

BACKGROUND: The development of lymphatic mapping techniques has facilitated the identification of the sentinel lymph node (SLN), the first node in the regional basin into which cutaneous lymphatics flow from a particular skin area. Previous studies have shown that SLN histology reflects the histology of the entire basin, because melanoma metastases progress in an orderly fashion, involving the SLN before higher nodes in the basin become involved with metastatic disease. It is uncertain whether these orderly cutaneous lymphatic flow patterns are maintained in grossly involved basins. Lymphatic mapping was performed in a population of melanoma patients with clinically palpable lymphadenopathy to address this question. We aimed to determine whether the presence of gross nodal disease in the basin alters lymphatic flow into that basin so that lymphatic mapping techniques are not applicable, and, in patients referred with a grossly involved basin, whether preoperative lymphoscintigraphy should be performed to identify other regional basins at risk for metastases. METHODS: Eight patients presented with grossly palpable disease in the regional basin and underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. All patients with palpable disease and all basins indicated by lymphoscintigraphy to be at risk were dissected. Three patients presented with clinically palpable nodes at the time of diagnosis, and five developed nodal disease on clinical follow-up after undergoing initial wide local excision only. A total of 10 basins in the eight patients were dissected. Of these, eight of the basins had grossly palpable regional nodal disease, and the other two basins were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy as being at risk for metastases. The SLN was identified with intraoperative mapping, harvested, and submitted to pathology. Complete therapeutic lymph node dissections were performed following the SLN harvest in the basins with grossly palpable disease. SLN biopsy alone was performed in the two basins that did not have clinically palpable adenopathy but showed cutaneous lymphatic flow from the scintigram. RESULTS: Sixteen SLNs were harvested from these eight basins with grossly palpable disease, and 14 (87.5%) contained tumor. In each case, one of the SLNs was the grossly palpable node, and in six of the basins (75%) it was the only site of melanoma metastases. An additional 190 higher level, non-SLNs were removed, 32 (16.8%) of which contained microscopic foci of metastatic melanoma (P = .015). The null hypothesis that melanoma nodal metastasis is a random event is rejected. Two patients with trunk melanoma primary sites were identified to have other basins at risk for metastatic disease on lymphoscintigraphy. SLN biopsies were performed in these two patients, and one had microscopic nodal disease in the SLN. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the fact that cutaneous lymphatic drainage patterns are maintained in patients with grossly involved basins, thus buttressing the idea that the SLN is the node most likely to develop metastatic disease. Gross disease in the basin does not significantly alter cutaneous lymphatic flow into the regional basin, as the sentinel lymph node identified under these circumstances is the same as with the grossly involved node. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in patients who present with grossly involved nodes in one basin may identify other regional basins with micrometastatic disease and deserves further study in this setting.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Parotid selective lymphadenectomy in malignant melanoma.

Malignant melanoma of the head and neck can metastasize to lymph nodes within the parotid gland. Selective lymphadenectomy is the modern method of staging regional lymph node basins in clinically localized melanoma. This procedure involves intraoperative lymphatic mapping and directed, selective removal of the first draining nodes or sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Historically, the assessment of parotid lymph nodes would involve a superficial parotidectomy with facial nerve dissection. Since 1993, 28 patients with localized melanoma of the head and neck have demonstrated lymphatic drainage to parotid lymph nodes on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. The overall success rate of parotid selective lymphadenectomy is 86% (24 of 28 patients). Of the 28 patients, there were 6 early patients in whom blue dye alone was utilized intraoperatively, and the success rate is 50% (3 of 6 patients). When blue dye and radiocolloid mapping techniques are combined, the parotid selective lymphadenectomy is successful in 95% of patients (21 of 22 patients). Four of the 24 patients (17%) had metastases to the SLNs and underwent therapeutic superficial parotidectomy and/or modified radical neck dissection. After completion of the therapeutic superficial parotidectomy, 1 of the 4 patients was found to have an additional parotid (nonsentinel) node with melanoma metastases. None of the patients incurred injury to the facial nerve by parotid selective lymphadenectomy. To date, 2 of 28 patients (7%) have had regional recurrence to the parotid gland. Failure of the SLN technique may occur when blue dye alone is used, when human serum albumin (not sulfur colloid) is the radiocolloid, when prior wide excision and skin graft is present before lymphatic mapping, and when all SLNs are not retrieved. We conclude that parotid selective lymphadenectomy is a safe and reliable alternative to superficial parotidectomy for staging clinically localized melanoma of the head and neck.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early-stage melanoma: a multicenter trial. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the multicenter application of intraoperative lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymphadenectomy, and selective complete lymph node dissection (LM/SL/SCLND) for the management of early-stage melanoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The multidisciplinary technique of LM/SL/SCLND has been widely adopted, but not validated in a multicenter trial. The authors began the international Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT) 5 years ago to evaluate the survival of patients with early-stage primary melanoma after wide excision alone versus wide excision plus LM/SL/SCLND. This study examined the accuracy of LM/SL/SCLND in the MSLT, using the experience of the organizing center (John Wayne Cancer Institute [JWCI]) as a standard for comparison. METHODS: Before entering patients into the randomization phase, each center in the MSLT was required to finish a 30-case learning phase with complete nuclear medicine, pathology, and surgical review. Selection of MSLT patients in the LM/SL/SCLND treatment arm was based on complete pathologic and surgical data. The comparison group of JWCI patients was selected using these criteria: primary cutaneous melanoma having a thickness > or =1 mm with a Clark level > or =III, or a thickness <1 mm with a Clark level > or =IV (MSLT criterion); LM/SL performed between June 1, 1985, and December 30, 1998; and patient not entered in the MSLT. The accuracy of LM/SL/SCLND was determined by comparing the rates of sentinel node (SN) identification and the incidence of SN metastases in the MSLT and JWCI groups. RESULTS: There were 551 patients in the MSLT group and 584 patients in the JWCI group. In both groups, LM performed with blue dye plus a radiocolloid was more successful (99.1 %) than LM performed with blue dye alone (95.2%) (p = 0.014). After a center had completed the 30-case learning phase, the success of SN identification in the MSLT group was independent of the center's case volume or experience in the MSLT. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy can be successfully learned and applied in a standardized fashion with high accuracy by centers worldwide. Successful SN identification rates of 97% can be achieved, and the incidence of nodal metastases approaches that of the organizing center. A multidisciplinary approach (surgery, nuclear medicine, and pathology) and a learning phase of > or =30 consecutive cases per center are sufficient for mastery of LM/SL in cutaneous melanoma. Lymphatic mapping performed using blue dye plus radiocolloid is superior to LM using blue dye alone.

Adolescent↗