Orientation-specific losses of contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Regan.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Psychophysical evidence supports the idea that the human visual pathway computes an object's rate of change of angular size rather independently of the object's trajectory and rather independently of other visual parameters, including contrast and intensity. This independence could provide a basis for accurately judging the component of an object's velocity along a line through the eye in the working visual environment where many visual parameters vary simultaneously. We describe a procedure for quantifying a subject's ability to track changing size, and illustrate the procedure with preliminary experimental data. The subject's R.M.S. tracking errors are displayed in three frequency bands. Our device also measures the perturbing effect of sideways motion upon the subject's ability to track changing size. Such data may go some way to predict a subject's performance in tasks of eye-limb coordination, especially where visual information is largely restricted to the changing-size channel.
Inspecting a radial flow pattern depressed visual sensitivity to changes in the size of a small test square, but only when the square was located near the focus of the flow pattern. The result suggests that precise visual judgments of one's direction of forward motion with respect to the outside world may be mediated by an already known neural organization sensitive to changes in the size of small objects.
We describe psychophysical evidence that the human visual system contains information-processing channels for motion in depth in addition to those for position in depth. These motion-in-depth channels include some that are selectively sensitive to the relative velocities of the left and right retinal images. We propose that the visual pathway contains stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion filters that respond to only a narrow range of the directions of motion in depth. Turning to the single-neuron level we report that, in addition to neurons turned to position to depth, cat visual cortex contains neurons that emphasize information about the direction of motion at the expense of positional information. We describe psychophysical evidence for the existence of channels that are sensitive to change size, and are separate from the channels both for motion and for flicker. These changing-size channels respond independently of whether the stimulus is a bright square on a dark ground or a dark square on a bright ground. At the physiological level we report single neurons in cat visual cortex that respond selectively to increasing or to decreasing size independently of the sign of stimulus contrast. Adaptation to a changing-size stimulus produces two separable after-effects: an illusion of changing size, and an illusion of motion in depth. These after-effects have different decay time constants. We propose a psychophysical model in which changing-size filters feed a motion-in-depth stage, and suppose that the motion-in-depth after-effect is due to activity at the motion-in-depth stage, while the changing-size after-effect is due to to activity at the changing-size and more peripheral stages. The motion-in-depth after-effect can be cancelled either by a changing-size test stimulus or by relative motion of the left and right retinal images. Opposition of these two cues can also cancel the impression of motion in depth produced by the adapting stimulus. These findings link the stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion filters and the changing-size filters: both feed the same motion-in-depth stage.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Exposure to an FM tone elevates FM threshold but not AM threshold. This holds for a wide range of frequency deviations (delta F = +/- 0.4 Hz- +/- 30 Hz at least) provided that modulation frequency is low (fm = 2 Hz), but if fm is somewhat higher (e.g., 8 Hz) the finding only holds for small frequency deviations. FM threshold can rise with time up to an adapting duration of at least 1200 s, through this buildup depends on frequency deviation. Exposure to an AM tone elevates AM threshold, but not FM threshold, over a wide range of modulation depths (at least m = 5%--50%). Quasi-FM (QFM) adapting tones resemble FM adapting tones in their effects upon FM and AM sensitivities, even though QFM and AM adapting tones have identical power spectra. Exposure to a pure tone produces no difference between FM and AM threshold elevations. These data can be explained if the human auditory pathway contains separate information-processing channels for AM and FM signals whose sensitivities do not overlap even with suprathreshold stimuli. We suppose that the FM channel (but not the AM channel) is sensitive to changing differences (or ratios) between signals from different sites along the basilar membrane.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
1. On psychophysical grounds, Beverley & Regan suggested that in man different neural mechanisms mediate the binocular perception of movement in depth and the binocular perception of positional (static) depth. They proposed that the human visual pathway contains several neural mechanisms, each sensitive to a different direction of motion in space. These mechanisms compute the direction of motion from the relative speeds and directions of movement of the left and right retinal images.2. We have recorded from 101 units in area 18 of cat visual cortex, searching for neurones tuned to the direction of motion in three dimensions, with properties that could account for the proposed directionally tuned binocular motion detectors in man. The cat's left eye viewed one bar, while its right eye simultaneously viewed a second bar. Single units were stimulated by independently oscillating the bars from side to side. The apparent direction of movement in three dimensions was altered by varying the relative speeds of the bars and their relative directions of motion. The mean (positional) disparity of the bars could also be varied.3. For one class of neurone (twenty cells), binocular stimulation inhibited firing for trajectories parallel to the frontoparallel plane over a large volume of space. Strong firing was produced by oppositely directed bar movements. Some of these neurones were especially narrowly tuned to the direction of movement in depth, responding only to a range of 2-3 degrees , i.e. to moving bodies that would hit or only narrowly miss the cat. These cells emphasized the direction of movement at the expense of positional information.3. These units occurred in clusters. On the perpendicular penetrations in which they were found, they comprised a substantial majority of all cells encountered.5. For a second class of neurone (nine cells), binocular facilitation produced selective responses to objects moving along trajectories that missed the head.6. The two classes of neurone provide a basis for four proposed directionally tuned binocular motion detectors.7. A third class of neurone (seventeen cells) was selectively sensitive to movements parallel to the frontoparallel plane. There was strong binocular facilitation when the bars moved at the same speeds in the same directions: oppositely directed movements might be more than 100 times less effective. These neurones may signal positional disparity.8. These three classes of neurone cut across established categories. Only when both eyes were stimulated simultaneously with targets moving in different speeds and directions was it possible to demonstrate the binocular interactions described here.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.