Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Osoba

Publications and source records attributed to D Osoba.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Quality-of-life assessment: patient compliance with questionnaire completion.

BACKGROUND: Previous investigators have found that compliance with quality-of-life data collection on cancer clinical trials is poor. There is general belief that collecting complete quality-of-life data is at present an unachievable goal. PURPOSE: We assessed the completeness of quality-of-life data collection on trials instituted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG), since incorporation of quality-of-life outcomes into trials became mandatory for the group. METHODS: Data from three NCIC CTG trials in which quality of life was a study end point were examined to determine the extent to which protocol specifications were met with respect to questionnaire completion. Two of the studies examined adjuvant therapies, and one examined anti-emetics. In two trials, the quality-of-life questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer was used; in the other, the Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Questionnaire. RESULTS: Patient compliance with questionnaire completion was unexpectedly high: More than 95% of the scheduled questionnaires were returned, and more than 99% of the questions were answered. CONCLUSIONS: We attribute this success to a comprehensive set of measures taken to enhance compliance on these studies. Which of these measures was most contributory requires further investigation, as does the issue of whether similar results can be obtained in other circumstances. IMPLICATIONS: It seems that the commonly held belief that quality-of-life data cannot be successfully collected in multicenter cancer trials is incorrect.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1992

The Quality of Life Committee of the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada: organization and functions.

The Quality of Life Committee of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group has successfully advocated the adoption of quality of life outcomes in Canadian clinical trials in patients with cancer. It has developed a policy promoting quality of life assessment in phase III trials and developed writing guidelines to assist clinical investigators when developing protocols for proposed studies. As a result, all phase III clinical trials instituted since the policy was developed have quality of life assessment as a part of their objectives. It has assisted the Clinical Trials Group office personnel in the development of procedures for the conduct of quality of life assessments in clinical trials with the result that the completion rate of self-report questionnaires is very high. The Committee maintains contact with other clinical trials groups and organizations having an interest in measuring quality of life in cancer.

Canada↗
PubMed1992

A randomised, double-blind comparison of granisetron with high-dose metoclopramide, dexamethasone and diphenhydramine for cisplatin-induced emesis. An NCI Canada Clinical Trials Group Phase III Trial.

151 patients (149 evaluable) receiving their first course of chemotherapy containing cisplatin in a dose of at least 50 mg/m2 were randomised to receive either a single dose of intravenous granisetron 80 micrograms/kg or intravenous metoclopramide 2 mg/kg every 2 h for five doses plus a single dose of dexamethasone 10 mg and diphenhydramine. After 24 h, there was no significant difference between groups with respect to nausea or vomiting: in the granisetron group 46% of patients had no emesis, versus 44% of the standard group. Granisetron is an antiemetic agent with efficacy similar to that of high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1992

Efficacy of weekly cisplatin-based chemotherapy in recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer.

After disease recurrence or dissemination, patients who had been treated previously with radiation with or without surgery for cancer of the head and neck were given either cisplatin (16 patients), cisplatin/etoposide (15 patients), or cisplatin/etoposide/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (19 patients) in an ambulatory care clinic. Intravenous (i.v.) cisplatin 25 mg/m2 was given weekly, while etoposide was given i.v. (80 mg/m2) on day 1 and orally (160 mg/m2) on day 2 of every odd-numbered week. In the three-drug regimen, 5-FU 500 mg/m2 i.v. was given every even-numbered week. Patients in all three groups received daily oral prednisone to decrease myelosuppression and oral co-trimoxazole and ketoconazole to prevent infection. The supportive drugs were given to all groups to keep these variables constant. As expected, myelosuppression did not occur in the cisplatin group, while the rates of severe neutropenia (less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L) in the two- and three-drug groups were 26% and 74%, respectively. The incidence of infection requiring hospitalization was low (2.5%). The response rate (complete plus partial) was lowest in the cisplatin group (6%) and higher in the cisplatin/etoposide (47%) and cisplatin/etoposide/5-FU (53%) groups. Because of the low response rate and the short time to progression (5 weeks) in the cisplatin group, 9 of these 16 patients were treated subsequently with cisplatin/etoposide. Time to progression and response duration were similar in the cisplatin/etoposide and cisplatin/etoposide/5-FU groups--12 and 14 weeks, and 12 and 9 weeks, respectively. Median survival times of the cisplatin and cisplatin/etoposide/5-FU groups were 36 and 34 weeks, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Treatment of recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer with cisplatin/etoposide/bleomycin.

Cisplatin/etoposide/bleomycin (DEB) was given as an outpatient regimen in a novel weekly schedule to 27 patients with recurrent and/or widely metastatic cancer of the head and neck region. Six of these patients also received mitomycin (DEB/M) when their disease failed to respond after at least three weekly DEB doses. All but three patients had been treated previously with radiotherapy directed to the primary site and regional nodal disease; four had also received chemotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin. Before treatment with DEB, 19 patients had distant metastases. Of an intended 12 doses per patient, a mean of 8.2 was achieved. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, with neutropenia in 45% of patients and significant anemia in 26%. The overall response rate to DEB in 27 patients was 59%, increasing to 70% after the addition of mitomycin. There were two complete and 17 partial responses. The median duration of response was 12 weeks and median survival was 6 months, with 20% of patients surviving 1 year. We conclude that the relatively short survival time together with the significant toxicity of the DEB/M regimen does not warrant its routine use in clinical practice. However, this regimen, or one patterned on it, should be evaluated in combination with radiotherapy as the initial treatment for selected patients with previously untreated head and neck cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Superiority of granisetron to dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Trials of selective 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonists have shown excellent antiemetic activity for chemotherapy containing cisplatin when compared with high-dose metoclopramide. There is little information about the efficacy of these new agents for chemotherapy other than for high-dose cisplatin. We performed a double-blind, randomized trial comparing a single dose of the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist granisetron (BRL 43694A) as a single intravenous dose with dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in 152 patients receiving their first course of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (mainly doxorubicin- and cyclophosphamide-containing combinations). During the first 24 hours, there was a statistically significant advantage for the granisetron group in terms of the prevention of both nausea and emesis. There was no difference in the frequency of reported adverse events. We conclude that granisetron is more effective than dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in patients who are receiving moderately emetogenic cytotoxic agents.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1991

Brief intensive chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the weekly CODE regimen.

Fifty-three patients, 17 with stage IIIB and 36 with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer, were given CODE (cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, and etoposide) plus antibiotic prophylaxis and an antiemetic regimen in an intensive chemotherapy program emphasizing weekly treatment and a planned brief duration (9-12 weeks); for 45 of these patients, the CODE program also included antifungal prophylaxis and supportive corticosteroids. Of the total study population, 33 patients (62%) responded to treatment, including five (9%) with complete response. The median survival for the entire group was 42 weeks (55 weeks for those with stage IIIB and 39 weeks for those with stage IV). More than 40% were alive at 1 year. Comparison of granulocyte counts of patients receiving prednisone with those of the subgroup to whom no corticosteroids were given showed less granulocytopenia for those receiving prednisone. Use of prednisone thus allowed improved delivery of myelosuppressive drugs. CODE was halted in nine patients because of disease progression. Although more constitutional side effects are associated with weekly chemotherapy than with standard chemotherapy, only 12 of the remaining 44 patients (27%) failed to receive at least 9 weeks of treatment. Serious toxicity was uncommon: There were no treatment-related deaths and only three episodes of neutropenia with fever. CODE is a novel treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer that this pilot study provided entirely in an outpatient setting over a 9-12 week period with an acceptable incidence of toxicity and a promising level of efficacy. Additional testing and comparison with other regimens or supportive care alone are warranted.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

A randomized, double-blinded study comparing six doses of batanopride (BMY-25801) with methylprednisolone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Several agents in a new class of antiemetic compounds, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonists, have shown promise as effective antiemetics with fewer side effects than metoclopramide. One of these agents, batanopride, produced no severe toxicity at doses that prevented emesis due to chemotherapy in early Phase I trials. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, 7 arm clinical trial to: (1) identify the presence of a dose-response for complete protection from emesis, and (2) compare batanopride with a standard antiemetic, methylprednisolone if a dose-response was found not to exist. Prior to chemotherapy, six patient groups each received a single intravenous dose of batanopride ranging from 0.2 to 6.0 mg/kg whereas a seventh group received methylprednisolone 250 mg intravenously. Chemotherapy-naïve cancer patients scheduled to receive moderately emetogenic chemotherapy were eligible. Primary treatment outcomes that were recorded and analyzed included the number of episodes of emesis, the time to the first episode of emesis as well as the frequency and severity of nausea. Two hundred and eight patients accrued between April 1989 and February 1990 were evaluable for response. A significant dose-response effect for complete protection from emesis was not seen over the first 24 hours after chemotherapy (p = 0.102). However, a linear dose-response effect for time to first emesis was evident in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.029). While the highest batanopride dose group was associated with a higher complete protection rate (CPR) than the control group, this group also exhibited a higher incidence of diarrhea (p = 0.013), hypotension, and electrocardiographic abnormalities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Intensive weekly chemotherapy for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

The regimen of cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CODE) was designed to double the dose intensity of these drugs in comparison with a standard regimen (alternating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine [CAV] and etoposide-cisplatin [EP]) for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The dose intensity was increased by more frequent treatments rather than by increasing the dose size. The structure of this outpatient protocol includes weekly administration of chemotherapy, alternation of myelosuppressive and nonmyelosuppressive treatments, supportive corticosteroids, gastroprotective agents, and prophylactic antibiotics. Although the duration of chemotherapy was brief (9 to 12 weeks), the total cumulative doses of drugs delivered were similar to the standard regimen. Patients with no residual disease outside the chest after chemotherapy received thoracic irradiation, and patients with complete responses (CRs) received prophylactic cranial irradiation. Eligible extensive-stage SCLC patients were ambulatory, younger than 66 years of age, and free of brain metastasis. Forty-eight extensive-stage SCLC patients were treated. Forty-five (94%) responded to chemotherapy, with 19 (40%) attaining CR. After consolidative thoracic irradiation, the CR rate was 56%. The median time to progression was 43 weeks, and the median survival was 61 weeks. The 2-year survival rate was 30%. The most common site of first relapse was brain (38%). Although two patients (4%) died of toxicity, overall toxicity was acceptable for an outpatient regimen. We conclude that the CODE regimen reliably produces palliative remissions for selected extensive-stage SCLC patients, and it may be associated with durable remissions for some patients. The results of this pilot study are sufficiently promising to justify a phase III trial of CODE versus standard (alternating CAV and EP) chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

The effect of dose of thoracic irradiation on recurrence in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer. Initial results of a Canadian Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer were initially randomized to receive either three courses of Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and Vincristine (CAV) followed by three courses of VP-16 and Cis-platin (VP-PT) or six courses of alternating CAV and VP-PT. Responding patients received prophylactic cranial radiation (PCI) after three courses of chemotherapy (CT) and loco-regional thoracic radiation (LRTR) after six courses. No maintenance chemotherapy was given. Patients receiving LRTR were randomized to receive either 25 Gy in ten fractions over 2 weeks (SD) or 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks (HD). In both arms the pre-chemotherapy disease was treated with a 2 cm margin around the primary tumor volume. The mediastinum was included in the treatment volume and the supraclavicular nodes were also included if involved originally. The spinal cord was shielded after 32 Gy. Of the 333 patients enrolled by the time the trial closed in October 1984, 168 were eventually randomized to LRTR and are eligible for response assessment. The overall response rate after combined RT and CT was 94% (CR 67%, PR 27%). The CR rate for SD was 65% and for HD 69%. The combined treatment was well tolerated by most patients. Forty-nine percent of HD patients developed dysphagia compared to 26% of those SD (p less than 0.01). At the time of this analysis the median duration of follow-up since randomization to radiotherapy is 30 months. The median local progression-free survival on HD is 49 weeks. On SD it is 38 weeks (p = 0.05, one sided). The actuarial incidence of local progression by 2 years is 69% on HD and 80% on LD. There is as yet no significant difference in overall survival between the two arms. It appears that HD radiotherapy as administered in this study may have an impact on local control, but it is too early to determine if this will translate into a survival benefit.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Failure of methylprednisolone acetate to prolong the antinauseant effect of intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate in patients receiving chemotherapy.

The efficacy of intramuscular methylprednisolone acetate in maintaining the antinauseant effect of intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate was assessed in a prospectively-randomized, double-blind, crossover-design trial. Of 150 patients entered, 127 were evaluable. There was no statistically significant difference between methylprednisolone acetate and saline placebo, although patient preferences slightly favoured the methylprednisolone acetate for nausea, vomiting, and overall effectiveness.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Predictive value of staging investigations in patients with clinical stage I malignant melanoma.

We reviewed the charts of 393 consecutive patients referred to the Toronto-Bayview Regional Cancer Centre and the Ontario Cancer Institute between January 1, 1978, and December 31, 1982, with clinical stage I malignant melanoma to determine the predictive value of routine staging investigations. The investigations reviewed included physical examination, liver function tests, radionuclide liver-spleen and bone scans, chest x-ray, whole-lung tomograms, CT chest scans, CT brain scans, and bipedal lymphangiograms. The clinical stage of nine patients was changed, eight as a result of physical examination and one as a result of lymphangiogram. No other investigations detected metastatic melanoma at referral. We recommend that staging investigations for patients referred with clinical stage I malignant melanoma be restricted to a complete physical examination and a baseline chest x-ray for all patients.

Humans↗
PubMed1987

Imaging studies and the prognostic value of serum calcitonin in staging small-cell lung cancer.

The controversial prognostic significance of serum calcitonin in small-cell lung cancer (SCC) prompted this retrospective study relating serum levels to (1) stage of disease [limited disease (LD) vs. extensive disease (ED)], (2) imaging studies of metastases to bone, liver, and brain, and (3) survival. Of the 127 previously untreated patients with SCC presenting from 1979 to 1984, calcitonin levels could be compared to the stage of the disease in 69 patients (25 LD and 44 ED) and to various staging procedures including 99mTc methylene diphosphonate bone scans (63 patients), 99mTc sulfur colloid liver-spleen scans (64 patients), computed tomography of the head (63 patients) and serum calcium (61 patients). 71% (49/69) of patients had elevated calcitonin of whom 65% (32/49) had ED. 29% (20/69) had normal levels of whom 60% (12/20) had ED. 40% (18/45) of patients with raised calcitonin had liver metastases. 100% (19/19) with normal calcitonin had no liver involvement. Two patients with hypercalcemia and increased calcitonin had extensive bony metastases. The survival experiences of patients with normal and elevated serum calcitonin levels were analyzed. No significant differences were found within each stage or in the group overall. The positive correlation of serum calcitonin to liver metastases was statistically significant. No such relationship could be demonstrated with stage of disease, bone metastases, brain metastases, or survival.

Calcitonin↗