Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Myburgh

Publications and source records attributed to D Myburgh.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Smad expression during kidney development.

Signaling by the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta superfamily is important during kidney development. Here, we describe the spatial and temporal expression patterns of the Smads, the transcription factors that translate TGF- signals into gene expression. RT-PCR data and in situ hybridization analysis showed that the receptor-regulated (R) Smads (Smad1, -2, -3, -5, and -8), the common partner Smad (Smad4), and the inhibitory (I) Smads (Smad6 and -7) were all expressed during mouse kidney development from embryonic day 12 until the end of nephrogenesis at postnatal day 15. Each Smad had a distinct spatial distribution. All were expressed by mesenchymal cells in the nephrogenic zone and were downregulated once these cells began to epithelialize. The common partner Smad, Smad4, was present in uninduced mesenchymal cells and at ureteric bud tips. The bone morphogenetic-responsive R-Smads, Smad1, -5, and -8, were mainly expressed in the nephrogenic zone, whereas the TGF-- responsive R-Smads were predominantly noted in the medullary interstitium. Expression of the I-Smad Smad7 was also seen in mesenchymal cells in the interstitium. Based on the observed patterns of expression, we speculate that individual or combinations of Smads may play specific roles in cell-fate determination during kidney development.

Animals↗

Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Bolus fibrinolytic therapy facilitates early efficient institution of reperfusion therapy. Tenecteplase is a genetically engineered variant of alteplase with slower plasma clearance, better fibrin specificity, and high resistance to plasminogen-activator inhibitor-1. We did a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase compared with alteplase. METHODS: In 1021 hospitals, we randomly assigned 16,949 patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than 6 h duration rapid infusion of alteplase (< or = 100 mg) or single-bolus injection of tenecteplase (30-50 mg according to bodyweight). All patients received aspirin and heparin (target activated partial thromboplastin time 50-75 s). The primary outcome was equivalence in all-cause mortality at 30 days. FINDINGS: Covariate-adjusted 30-day mortality rates were almost identical for the two groups--6.18% for tenecteplase and 6.15% for alteplase. The 95% one-sided upper boundaries of the absolute and relative differences in 30-day mortality were 0.61% and 10.00%, respectively, which met the prespecified criteria of equivalence (1% absolute or 14% relative difference in 30-day mortality, whichever difference proved smaller). Rates of intracranial haemorrhage were similar (0.93% for tenecteplase and 0.94% for alteplase), but fewer non-cerebral bleeding complications (26.43 vs 28.95%, p=0.0003) and less need for blood transfusion (4.25 vs 5.49%, p=0.0002) were seen with tenecteplase. The rate of death or non-fatal stroke at 30 days was 7.11% with tenecteplase and 7.04% with alteplase (relative risk 1.01 [95% CI 0.91-1.13]). INTERPRETATION: Tenecteplase and alteplase were equivalent for 30-day mortality. The ease of administration of tenecteplase may facilitate more rapid treatment in and out of hospital.

Aged↗