Biomedical subjects

D Morrone

Publications and source records attributed to D Morrone.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1991

[Diagnostic errors in mammography. I. False negative results].

The authors evaluate 1455 consecutive breast cancers detected 1985-1987, undergoing mammography 6 months before diagnosis at the most. One hundred and seventy-eight cases reported as negative/benign were assumed as false negatives. Overall sensitivity was 88%, and was influenced by tumor stage (TIS = 80%, T1 = 83%, T2 = 91%, T3-4 = 95%) and patients' age (less than 40 = 76%, 40-49 = 78%, 50-59 = 91%, greater than 59 = 94%). Sensitivity varied also with readers' experience full- or part-time involved in reading mammograms (total cases = 92% vs 88%, T1 cases = 86% vs 74%). No correlations were evidenced between mammographic sensitivity and histologic type of cancer. Palpation and cytology allowed the correct identification of 98% of mammographic false negatives. One hundred and seventy-eight false negatives and 142 more cases showing evidence of a mammographic error more than 6 months before diagnosis were reviewed to assess the most common types of radiologic fault. A benign-like lesion was the most frequent finding (49.4%), whereas suspicious signs were infrequent at review (16.6%). Failure to encompass the lesion in the mammographic field or poor technique accounted for 3.8 or 1.3% of cases, respectively. 29% of false-negative subjects (mostly young or with a dense breast) showed no lesion even at review. This study confirms the good sensitivity of mammography but suggests a less confident diagnostic approach in younger women, stresses the need for other tests whenever a minimal doubt is present, and encourages the radiologist's full-time involvement in mammography and breast diagnosis to achieve greater experience and improve his diagnostic sensitivity.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

[Differential diagnosis of intracystic breast lesions in hemorrhagic cysts].

The authors report on 117 consecutive hemorrhagic breast cysts cases. All patients underwent cytologic examination of cystic fluid content and US or pneumocystography. Ten cancers (9 infiltrating, and 1 lobular in situ) and 22 papillomas had histologic confirmation--out of 45 cases undergoing surgical biopsy. Seventy-two cases exhibiting no intracystic growth have been followed for 5.4 years on the average and no cancer has developed so far. Pneumocystography or US had 100% predictive value for intracystic lesions; we observed that surgical biopsy could be safely avoided when both examinations were negative, that is in about 3/4 cases. No differential diagnosis of cancer and papilloma was possible on pneumocystography or US. Even though positive cytology was highly predictive for cancer, cytology exhibited poor sensitivity and surgical biopsy was necessary in all cases presenting with intracystic growth.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of mammography carried out for secondary prevention. Results of a test with a sample caseload conducted by 75 Italian radiologists].

PURPOSE: To report the results of a test performed by 75 volunteer radiologists involved in screening program in Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The test includes 12 screening detected cancers and 6 cancers (4 screening detected and 2 interval lesions) with minimal signs at review of a previous negative mammogram. Data on previous experience in mammography (years of activity, years of screening activity, total number of mammograms read and number of mammograms read per year) were also collected. RESULTS: Standards for passing the test were at least 83.3% for sensitivity for screening detected cancers and at most 30% for recall rate among negative cases. Mean sensitivity was 83.9% (median 83.3%, range 50-100%) and mean recall rate was 16.3 (median 14.4%, range 3.8-42.4%). In all, 44 radiologists (58.7%) passed the test. On average 1.4 of 6 cancers with minimal signs were correctly identified. According to readers' experience (at least 5 years in mammographic activity, at least 3 years in screening mammography, at least 10,000 total mammograms read, at least 5,000 per year) radiologists were classified as expert (13) or not (62): no difference in test performance was observed between the two groups. The only significant association occurred for years of mammographic activity and sensitivity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Test results suggest the need for proper training of radiologists prior to involvement in a screening program. Seeding proficiency tests with cancers with minimal signs was of no benefit as far as evaluation is concerned.

Aged↗