Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Morrell

Publications and source records attributed to D Morrell.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Perceptions and opinions on the performance of Pap smears: a survey of clinicians using a commercial laboratory.

Office-based clinicians play a major role in cervical cancer screening in the United States, but little is known about their specific knowledge and understanding of the technical aspects of obtaining an adequate Pap smear. We surveyed 186 office-based clinicians using a major commercial laboratory for cytology services to obtain their opinions regarding the technical adequacy of Pap smears, collection procedures, and methods of communicating test results to patients. There was an 80.1% response rate. Two thirds of the respondents were men. Cytobrush use was reported significantly more by female clinicians. Respondents varied in reported rotation of the cytobrush, from 90 degrees to greater than 360 degrees. More female than male clinicians appropriately indicated that inflammation and heavy vaginal discharge caused sampling difficulties. Approximately half of the respondents believed that errors in cervical screening most often resulted from sampling the cervix or preparation of the Pap smear. Nineteen percent reported that ectocervical cells were not necessary for an adequate smear to be reported. Just over 25% of respondents indicated they did not report normal Pap smear results to the patient. The results indicate differences between clinicians by gender and specialty in reported knowledge, understanding, and technique in cervical cancer screening. The differences suggest that targeted education in this population may be important to improve the quality of cervical cancer screening. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): screening; neoplasms, cervical; Papanicolaou smear; diagnosis, laboratory.

Adult↗

Recall and treatment decisions of primary care providers in response to Pap smear reports.

INTRODUCTION: Although the frequency of cervical cancer screening has been extensively studied, little is known about how clinicians decide to screen or recall patients for Pap smears. This study reports the management decisions made by office-based clinicians for 10 different Pap smear reports describing adequacy limitations and cytological diagnoses. METHODS: We surveyed 186 clinicians using a commercial laboratory in the southeastern United States and analyzed results by frequency and comparison statistics. RESULTS: Our respondents were 148 clinicians (79.6% response rate) from different specialties. There was variation in reported management of inflammation, atypia, and low-grade abnormalities (LGSIL), in regard to recall for repeat or routine testing as well as arranging colposcopy. In only 3 of 10 Pap smear results did more than 50% of respondents agree on a specific test recall interval. CONCLUSIONS: The variation in responses from office-based clinicians suggests either uncertainty or different opinions in making recall and treatment decisions for smears of limited quality even when associated with cytologic abnormalities. These differences may have relevance to outcomes, clinician workload, and costs of care in cervical cancer screening.

Adult↗