Organization and management of the nursing department.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Morgan.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A single stool specimen from each of 904 villagers participating in a placebo-controlled trial of ivermectin for onchocerciasis was examined for intestinal helminths by the formol-ether technique. Ivermectin had a significant effect on Ascaris infection, reducing prevalence and intensity for at least 3 months, but rapid reinfection occurred. There was no significant effect on Trichuris, Necator or Schistosoma mansoni infections. Incidental Strongyloides infections were not seen commonly in this population, but were significantly reduced in the ivermectin-treated group. Regular administration of ivermectin on a mass basis would reduce the prevalence of Ascaris infection and any attendant morbidity. This is a useful additional effect of the drug.
A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of ivermectin was started in 1987 in 6 villages in southern Sierra Leone. 1625 villagers, 93% of the total population, were surveyed before treatment and allocated at random to the trial. Onchocerciasis was hyperendemic and of moderate intensity in the area. Typical onchocerciasis skin lesions were seen in most cases; the blindness rate was 1.5% and a further 4.3% had visual impairment. Six months after treatment 988 subjects (80%) were reassessed and microfilarial loads in the ivermectin group were found to be 10% of control levels. Additionally, blood eosinophil concentrations were reduced by one-quarter. The severity, but not the prevalence, of skin lesions was significantly reduced in the ivermectin group, with a particularly marked effect on papular eruptions. There had been no reduction in the prevalence of itching, nor had markers of general health shown improvement after ivermectin. Ivermectin is an effective microfilaricidal agent and may improve Onchocerca-related skin lesions after a single dose. However, the lack of obvious benefit to a target population after the first dose of ivermectin may reduce compliance with subsequent doses. This has implications for planned mass treatment initiatives in onchocerciasis endemic regions.
We have studied the adverse reactions reported after ivermectin in 1745 villagers in southern Sierra Leone, allocated at random to receive ivermectin or placebo and treated 'double-blind' with 4 doses at six-monthly intervals. Six months after the fourth dose all eligible villagers received ivermectin regardless of their previous treatment. At the first treatment round more adverse reactions were reported by villagers treated with ivermectin than by those who received placebo. Reactions occurred most often on the second day after treatment. There were significant correlations between an individual's skin microfilarial load and the risk of developing adverse reactions. On re-treatment there was no significant excess of reported adverse reactions in the ivermectin group compared to the placebo group. Unlike other adverse reactions, the risk of cutaneous reactions after the first dose of ivermectin was not correlated with skin microfilarial load. In addition, after re-treatment with ivermectin, cutaneous reactions were reported significantly more often than with placebo. We confirm that ivermectin is safe for mass distribution, but adverse reactions should be monitored and treated after the first dose. Throughout this study ivermectin was well tolerated, with significantly more villagers returning for re-treatment after ivermectin than placebo, and all adverse reactions were self-limiting or successfully managed with symptomatic treatment. We question whether strict clinical monitoring should be routine at re-treatment, when only cutaneous reactions were consistently reported. If clinical monitoring could be used more selectively, distribution campaigns might be easier to manage and more cost-effective.
Clinical and parasitological responses were studied in villagers receiving all 4 doses of treatment, at 6-monthly intervals, in a placebo-controlled community trial of ivermectin for onchocerciasis in Sierra Leone. Skin microfilarial loads were markedly lowered by ivermectin throughout and there were reductions in the severity, but not the prevalence, of skin lesions. Markers of general health and the prevalences of itching, Onchocerca nodules and visual loss were not significantly reduced during the study period. Despite our inability to demonstrate obvious clinical benefit, treatment with ivermectin was well accepted throughout the study. Simple clinical measures for evaluating the short to medium term impact of the mass distribution of ivermectin on populations with onchocerciasis need further development.
Degrees of itching were estimated before and for 6 months after a fourth dose of ivermectin or placebo was given to 97 subjects in Sierra Leone. There was no reduction in itching attributable to ivermectin at any stage, but there were non-significant increases in the prevalence, severity and localization of itching within the first 2 months after ivermectin compared to placebo. We also found that cell-mediated immune responses to Onchocerca volvulus were significantly increased 4 weeks after a single dose of ivermectin compared to before treatment. A temporary reversal of the state of immunosuppression in people with onchocerciasis may counterbalance the reduction in skin microfilarial loads following ivermectin, with no consequent reduction in itching. The lack of effect of ivermectin on itching, a major symptom of onchocerciasis, while disappointing, need not detract from the success of mass distribution programmes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.