Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Michelson

Publications and source records attributed to D Michelson.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Changes in sexual function during acute and six-month fluoxetine therapy: a prospective assessment.

Sexual dysfunction has been reported as an unwanted effect associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors therapy, but the nature and frequency of such effects have not been characterized systematically. Sexual function was assessed in depressed patients participating in a multicenter trial of acute and continuation fluoxetine therapy using a 4-item self-rated scale. Patients were evaluated at study entry, after 13 weeks of fluoxetine 20 mg daily, and during 25 weeks of continuation therapy with fluoxetine 20 mg daily, fluoxetine 90 mg weekly, or placebo. In a 13-week open-label trial, among 501 patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for depression, 51.6% of women and 40.6% of men reported improvement, 35.0% of women and 41.9% of men reported no change, and 13.4% of women and 17.4% of men reported worsening in overall sexual function. During double-blind continuation therapy, there were no statistically significant differences in change in sexual function between treatments. Worsened sexual function that occurred during continuation treatment was strongly associated with worsened depressive symptoms. Depression is associated with sexual dysfunction, and improvement in sexual functioning related to the antidepressant effects of fluoxetine may be more common than drug-associated deterioration in sexual function. Among patients who report worsening, effects may be most pronounced on orgasm. Deterioration in sexual function does not appear to be a late-onset drug-specific event, but is strongly related to worsening depressive symptoms.

Adult↗

Type I glucocorticoid receptor blockade does not affect baseline or ovine corticotropin-releasing-hormone-stimulated adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol secretion.

The type I glucocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone was administered to healthy volunteers to determine the effect of type I receptor blockade on adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol secretion in humans. On separate days and in a double-blind, randomized fashion, placebo and each of four increasing doses of spironolactone were administered orally to subjects. Doses were selected to be within the clinically used range and, following drug administration, baseline and ovine-corticotropin releasing hormone (oCRH)-stimulated ACTH and cortisol plasma levels were measured. In contrast to the clear effects of type II glucocorticoid receptor blockade on human pituitary adrenal function, no relationship between spironolactone dose or plasma levels and either basal or oCRH-stimulated pituitary-adrenal function was noted at doses comparable to those which induce type I receptor blockade and cardiovascular therapeutic effects in the kidney. These data suggest that, at physiologically relevant doses, type I glucocorticoid receptor blockade does not affect HPA axis function.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗

Developing and testing a multimedia presentation of a health-state description.

Quality-adjustment weights for health states are an essential component of cost-utility analysis (CUA). Quality-adjustment weights are obtained by presenting large numbers of subjects with multiattribute descriptions of health states for rating. Comprehending multiattribute health states is a difficult task for most respondents. The authors hypothesized that multimedia (MM) presentation using computers might facilitate this task better than would a paper-based text (Text). To test this hypothesis, they developed closely matched MM and Text descriptions of health states in the first-person narrative style, and developed a method of testing the presentation of a health state. Subjects were randomized to exposure to either MM or Text and subject recall of the health state and recognition of features of the health state were tested. How well defined the preferences of the subjects were after each presentation method was assessed by having the subjects mark on a double-anchored visual-analog scale the "best" and "worst" they believed the quality of life in the health state might be. MM subjects had better recall (11.85 vs 9.44 of a total of 24 meaning units, p = 0.098) and better recognition (4.71 vs 4.22, p = 0.08). The average interval between the "best" and "worst" ratings was shorter for the MM subjects (2.19 cm vs 3.26 cm, p = 0.12).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗