Biomedical subjects

D McTavish

Publications and source records attributed to D McTavish.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

PubMed1991

Pravastatin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in hypercholesterolaemia.

Pravastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor which reduces plasma cholesterol levels by inhibiting de novo cholesterol synthesis and increasing the receptor-mediated catabolism of low density lipoprotein (LDL). Several large multicentre placebo-controlled trials have shown that pravastatin reduces total and LDL-cholesterol levels in a dose-proportional manner in patients with familial or nonfamilial hypercholesterolaemia. Reductions in LDL-cholesterol levels reported in the largest study were 18% (10 mg/day), 23% (20 mg/day) and 31% (40 mg/day) after 12 weeks. Once-daily administration appears to be as effective as two daily doses. Pravastatin consistently increases HDL-cholesterol levels and decreases levels of total triglycerides but these changes are not dose dependent. At the study dosages used, the antihypercholesterolaemic effects of pravastatin were superior to those of bezafibrate and clinofibrate, and were similar to those of simvastatin, lovastatin, gemfibrozil and cholestyramine although in some studies a trend towards a superior effect with pravastatin was seen. Pravastatin did not reduce HDL-cholesterol like probucol, or increase triglyceride levels like cholestyramine. Combined treatment with pravastatin and cholestyramine or colestipol enhances the cholesterol-lowering effects of either drug administered alone and offsets the increase in total triglyceride levels seen with cholestyramine or colestipol therapy. Pravastatin is well tolerated during treatment of up to 24 months but longer term tolerability has not yet been established. The effect of provastatin on cardiovascular events related to elevated plasma cholesterol levels is under investation in several large scale regression and primary and secondary prevention trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Omeprazole. An updated review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders.

Omeprazole is the first of a new class of drugs, the acid pump inhibitors, which control gastric acid secretion at the final stage of the acid secretory pathway and thus reduce basal and stimulated acid secretion irrespective of the stimulus. In patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers, omeprazole as a single 20 mg daily dose provides more rapid and complete healing compared with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or 300 mg at nighttime, or cimetidine 800 or 1000 mg/day. Patients poorly responsive to treatment with histamine H2-receptor antagonists respond well to omeprazole--most ulcers healed within 4 to 8 weeks of omeprazole 40 mg/day therapy. Omeprazole 20 or 40 mg/day has been administered as maintenance therapy for peptic ulcer disease for up to 5.5 years with very few ulcer recurrences. In patients with erosive or ulcerative oesophagitis, omeprazole 20 or 40 mg/day produces healing in about 80% of patients after 4 weeks, and is superior to ranitidine with respect to both healing and symptom relief. Healing rates of greater than 80% are achieved after 8 weeks in patients with severe reflux oesophagitis unresponsive to H2-receptor antagonists. Maintenance therapy with a daily 20 mg dose prevents relapse in about 80% of patients over a 12-month period. Omeprazole is considered to be the best pharmacological option for controlling gastric acid secretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Daily dosages of 20 to 360 (median 60 to 70 mg successfully reduce basal acid output to target levels (less than 10 mmol/h or less than 5 mmol/h in patients with severe oesophagitis or partial gastrectomy) during treatment for up to 4 years. Omeprazole is well tolerated in short term studies (up to 12 weeks); the reported incidence of serious side effects (about 1%) being similar to that seen in patients treated with an histamine H2-receptor antagonist. The longer term tolerability of omeprazole has been investigated in patients treated for up to 5.5 years. Slight hyperplasia, but no evidence of enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell dysplasia or neoplasia or ECL cell carcinoids has been reported. ECL cell carcinoids have been observed in rats after life-long treatment with high doses of omeprazole or ranitidine, or in rats with partial corpectomy; the weight of experimental evidence indicates that this is a result of prolonged hypergastrinaemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Roxatidine acetate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and its therapeutic potential in peptic ulcer disease and related disorders.

Roxatidine acetate is a histamine H2-receptor antagonist which, after almost complete oral absorption (greater than 95%), is rapidly converted to its active metabolite, roxatidine, by esterases in the small intestine, plasma and liver. Roxatidine is a potent inhibitor of basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion in animals and humans and, like most other H2-receptor antagonists, has no anti-androgenic effects and does not interfere with the hepatic metabolism of other drugs. Large-scale trials have shown that roxatidine acetate 150mg per day is as effective as standard doses of cimetidine and ranitidine in the treatment of patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer, and that roxatidine acetate 75mg in the evening is likely to become a 'standard' regimen for the prevention of peptic ulcer recurrence. Preliminary data also suggest that roxatidine acetate may be useful in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and stomal ulcer, and in the prevention of pulmonary acid aspiration. Roxatidine acetate is an H2-receptor antagonist which has been well tolerated in clinical trials. However, broader experience is required before definitive statements about tolerability relative to other H2-receptor antagonists can be made, and before the role of roxatidine acetate in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and stomal ulcer, and the prophylaxis of acid aspiration pneumonitis, can be clearly defined.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Ivermectin. A review of its antifilarial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy in onchocerciasis.

Ivermectin, a derivative of avermectin B, is an orally effective microfilaricidal agent. It is the current drug of choice for treating patients infected with the nematode Onchocerca volvulus, which is a major cause of blindness in inhabitants of some tropical areas. Ivermectin is administered orally as a single dose of 150 micrograms/kg given annually. Skin and ocular microfilarial counts are dramatically reduced after the first dose, with some evidence for a resulting decrease in transmission of infection by the blackfly vector. With the exception of rare serious reactions such as severe systemic postural hypotension, ivermectin is generally well tolerated. The drug has the clear advantages of ease of administration and better tolerability compared with diethylcarbamazine and suramin, agents previously used to treat onchocerciasis. Thus, ivermectin is suitable for inclusion in mass treatment programmes and is the best therapeutic option presently available to combat onchocerciasis. As such it provides hope for many thousands of people at risk of becoming blind, and represents a major contribution to tropical medicine.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

Clomipramine. An overview of its pharmacological properties and a review of its therapeutic use in obsessive compulsive disorder and panic disorder.

During the 20 years that have elapsed since clomipramine (chlorimipramine) was first marketed, it has become well established in the treatment of depressive illness, particularly treatment-resistant depression. However, in addition to its role as an antidepressant, attention is being focused on the use of clomipramine in 2 other areas of psychiatry: obsessive compulsive disorder and panic disorder. Short term clinical trials have shown that clomipramine is generally more effective than amitriptyline, imipramine, desipramine, nortriptyline or clorgiline in reducing obsessive compulsive symptoms. Clomipramine appears to produce some short term benefit with exposure therapy in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. However, the efficacy of the drug after long term follow-up has not been fully investigated. The antiobsessional efficacy of clomipramine appears to be independent of its antidepressant activity. In patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (DSM-IIIR), clomipramine reduces the frequency and severity of panic attacks within 7 to 21 days of beginning treatment and efficacy is maintained for at least 12 months. Clomipramine is more effective than imipramine, the generally accepted standard treatment for patients with panic disorder after 2 weeks' treatment, but after 6 or 10 weeks both drugs are similarly effective. Other double-blind studies have shown that clomipramine is more effective than placebo and at least as effective as fluvoxamine and oxitriptan (5-hydroxytryptophan) in reducing panic attacks and associated anxiety. Adverse effects associated with clomipramine treatment are mild to moderate in nature and are predominantly a result of the drug's anticholinergic activity. The incidence of seizures is dose related, occurring in 0.48% of all patients receiving clomipramine less than or equal to 250 mg/day and 2.1% of patients receiving greater than or equal to 300 mg/day. In conclusion, the available data indicate that clomipramine is a worthwhile addition to the limited treatments available for obsessive compulsive disorder and panic disorder, two psychiatric disorders which have previously been difficult to manage pharmacologically.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

Terfenadine. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Terfenadine is a selective histamine H1-receptor antagonist which, in pharmacodynamic studies, is devoid of central nervous system depressant activity. In clinical studies terfenadine is well tolerated and at a dose of 60mg administered twice daily the drug provides effective relief of symptoms in patients with allergic rhinitis (seasonal and perennial), allergic dermatological conditions (particularly chronic urticaria), and other histamine-mediated disorders. Terfenadine is superior to placebo, has a more rapid onset of action than astemizole and is as effective as most other histamine H1-receptor antagonists, in relieving rhinitis symptoms. In allergic rhinitis, terfenadine relieves ocular symptoms to a greater extent (but nasal symptoms to a lesser extent) than inhaled corticosteroids. Administration of oral terfenadine with inhaled sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) or an inhaled corticosteroid appears more effective than terfenadine alone. Despite the absence of CNS depressant activity in pharmacodynamic studies, sedation is the adverse effect most frequently associated with terfenadine treatment. However, it is important to realise that the incidence of this adverse effect is similar in terfenadine and placebo recipients, and is less frequent than with traditional histamine H1-receptor antagonists. In conclusion, terfenadine is a clinically effective antihistamine which has an improved adverse effect profile compared with classic histamine H1-receptor antagonists. Like other nonsedating antihistamines, it can be considered as a first-line agent in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria. With additional clinical experience, the drug could find a similar role in other disorders in which a histamine H1-receptor antagonist is indicated.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Diltiazem. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Diltiazem is a calcium antagonist effective in the treatment of stable, variant and unstable angina pectoris and mild to moderate systemic hypertension, with a generally favourable adverse effect profile. It is also effective in terminating supraventricular tachycardia and in controlling the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation/flutter. Atrioventricular block, the risk of which may be exacerbated by concomitant beta-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy, occurs rarely as an adverse effect of diltiazem treatment. Diltiazem appears to exert complex cardioprotective effects which have been of benefit after intracoronary administration to patients undergoing coronary angiography and bypass procedures. In addition, long term diltiazem treatment has produced a significant reduction in subsequent cardiac events in patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Thus, diltiazem is an effective and well-tolerated first-line or alternative treatment of patients with ischaemic heart disease, systemic hypertension, and supraventricular arrhythmias, with possible potential in limiting ischaemia-induced myocardial damage.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

PubMed1990

Ticlopidine. An updated review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in platelet-dependent disorders.

Ticlopidine inhibits platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and most other platelet agonists in ex vivo studies of human platelets. The drug also improves other abnormalities of platelet function seen in patients with cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, ischaemic heart disease or other conditions involving platelet hyperaggregation. Abnormal platelet activity has been implicated in a variety of clinical conditions in which patients are at high risk of thromboembolic events, and thus the effectiveness of ticlopidine has been investigated in such patients. Since the initial review of the drug appeared in the Journal, data from several large multicentre studies have shown that ticlopidine has a substantial benefit to offer patients who have experienced transient ischaemic attacks or stroke, and in those with peripheral arterial disease or ischaemic heart disease. Ticlopidine reduces the incidence of further stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death, and is superior to placebo and aspirin in this regard in studies of patients with recent stroke or transient ischaemic attacks, or intermittent claudication. Ticlopidine is equally effective in both men and women and also improves symptoms of claudication in patients with peripheral arterial disease, and appears to reduce anginal pain. Patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage and sickle cell disease have shown some improvement with ticlopidine administration. The drug reduces thromboembolic events and re-stenosis in patients undergoing haemodialysis and cardiac surgery, and appears to prevent the progression of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ticlopidine in large clinical trials is associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects than placebo and an overall incidence similar to aspirin. Most adverse effects do not require withdrawal of treatment. Gastrointestinal symptoms (particularly diarrhoea) are most common, occurring almost twice as frequently with ticlopidine as with aspirin. Other adverse effects associated with ticlopidine include skin rash, haemorrhagic disorders, and haematological effects; these latter effects require careful monitoring of patients during the initial weeks of therapy. In conclusion, ticlopidine is a valuable addition to the prophylactic treatments available for the management of patients with cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease or ischaemic heart disease, who present a high risk of thromboembolic events. Although tolerability may be a problem for some patients, the overall benefit conferred by the drug would appear to outweigh this potential disadvantage. Because of its antiplatelet activity, ticlopidine has a promising role in other disorders mediated by platelet dysfunction. However, the precise role of the drug in these additional therapeutic indications awaits clarification with wider clinical experience.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Fenofibrate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in dyslipidaemia.

Fenofibrate is a lipid-regulating drug which is structurally related to other fibric acid derivatives, such as clofibrate. At the recommended dosage of 200 to 400 mg daily, it produces substantial reductions in plasma triglyceride levels in hypertriglyceridaemic patients and in plasma total cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolaemic patients. High density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels are generally increased in patients with low pretreatment values. Fenofibrate appears to be equally effective in diabetic patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia without adversely affecting glycaemic control. The influence of fenofibrate on the plasma lipid profile is sustained during long term (2 to 7 years) treatment. Comparative studies conducted to date have involved only small groups of patients--in overall terms fenofibrate was at least as effective as other fibrates, but larger comparative studies are needed before valid conclusions on its relative efficacy compared with nonfibrate lipid-lowering drugs can be drawn. The influence of fenofibrate on morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease has not been studied. Clinical adverse reactions to fenofibrate have mainly consisted of gastrointestinal disturbances, headache and muscle cramps. Transient elevations in transaminase and creatine phosphokinase levels commonly occur. Isolated cases of hepatitis with substantially elevated transaminase levels have been reported. Fenofibrate induces hepatomegaly, peroxisome proliferation and hepatic carcinomas in rodents, but this type of hepatotoxicity has not been observed in humans. The biliary lithogenic index is increased by fenofibrate, but this has not been shown to have increased the incidence of gallstones in treated patients. Thus, fenofibrate offers an effective and well tolerated alternative to clofibrate or other fibric acid derivatives, but its relative efficacy and tolerability compared with other types of lipid-lowering drugs, and its effect on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, remain to be clarified.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1990

Cadralazine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of hypertension.

Cadralazine is a peripheral arteriolar vasodilator which, unlike hydralazine or dihydralazine, has a protected hydrazino group. In hypertensive patients the optimal effect, based on the antihypertensive efficacy to tolerability ratio, is seen after a 15 mg dose when the drug is administered as monotherapy. When administered in combination with other antihypertensive agents, a 10 mg daily dosage seems appropriate. Noncomparative trials have shown that, in patients who had failed to respond adequately to a beta-blocker and/or diuretic, the addition of cadralazine 10 to 30 mg once daily reduced systolic/diastolic blood pressure by 11 to 19%/13 to 22%. This antihypertensive effect becomes evident over a 2- to 6-week period of therapy and persists during longer term administration. Comparative studies have shown that cadralazine is superior to placebo, and has a similar blood pressure lowering effect to hydralazine, dihydralazine and prazosin in patients not controlled by beta-blocker and/or diuretic but who continued to receive these treatments. Similarly, cadralazine and chlorthalidone were equally effective in reducing blood pressure in resting hypertensive patients but cadralazine shows an advantage in reducing the pressor response in exercising patients. Cadralazine is well tolerated when administered with a beta-blocker or diuretic. Most adverse effects become less frequent and severe with continued use, occur more frequently at dosages of 20 mg/day or more, and do not generally require withdrawal of therapy. Manifestations of the drug's vasodilating properties such as headache, asthenia, dizziness, palpitations and flushing are the most commonly reported symptoms during cadralazine monotherapy, but these may be reduced during combination therapy. The drug does not appear to induce a systemic lupus-like erythematosus syndrome, as may occur with hydralazine, but additional clinical experience is required to completely exclude this possibility. In conclusion, because of its efficacy as a second- or third-line antihypertensive agent, its simple once daily dosage regimen and favourable risk: benefit ratio, cadralazine may have a useful role, particularly in those hypertensive patients who do not respond adequately to established antihypertensive treatments. However, the therapeutic potential of cadralazine cannot be clearly established until the present limited clinical base is expanded to include comparisons with other classes of vasodilating drugs (ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists), and its utility in the management of other indications such as severe hypertension during pregnancy has been adequately explored.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

PubMed1990

Terodiline. A review of its pharmacological properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of urinary incontinence.

Terodiline has both anticholinergic and calcium antagonist properties and, as a result, effectively reduces abnormal bladder contractions caused by detrusor instability. When administered to adult patients with urge incontinence (generally as a 25mg twice-daily dose) terodiline reduces diurnal and nocturnal micturition frequency and incontinence episodes. In studies also assessing cystometric parameters, bladder volume at first urge and bladder capacity are increased. Children with diurnal enuresis respond similarly to a daily 25mg dose. Several studies have shown that terodiline 50 mg/day is preferred by patients when compared with emepronium 600 mg/day or flavoxate 600 mg/day, and tends to reduce voluntary micturition frequency and episodes of incontinence more effectively than these drugs. Terodiline is well tolerated in short and long term (up to 3.5 years) studies. Anticholinergic effects are most commonly reported; other adverse effects occur equally during terodiline and placebo treatment. Thus, terodiline is effective and well tolerated in patients with urge incontinence or neurogenic bladder dysfunction, and will claim an important place in the treatment of such patients in light of the limitations of alternative therapies.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Verapamil. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension.

Although verapamil is a well-established treatment for angina, cardiac arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies, this review reflects current interest in calcium antagonists as anti-hypertensive agents by focusing on the role of verapamil in hypertension. Verapamil is a phenylalkylamine derivative which antagonises calcium influx through the slow channels of vascular smooth muscle and cardiac cell membranes. By reducing intracellular free calcium concentrations, verapamil causes coronary and peripheral vasodilation and depresses myocardial contractility and electrical activity in the atrioventricular and sinoatrial nodes. Verapamil is well suited for the management of essential hypertension since it produces generalised systemic vasodilation resulting in a marked reduction in systemic vascular resistance and, consequently, blood pressure. Evidence from clinical studies supports the role of oral verapamil as an effective and well-tolerated first-line treatment for the management of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Clinical studies have shown that verapamil is more effective the higher the pretreatment blood pressure and some authors have found a more pronounced antihypertensive effect in older patients or in patients with low plasma renin activity. Sustained release verapamil formulations are available for oral administration which, as a single daily dose, are as effective in lowering blood pressure over 24 hours as equivalent doses of conventional verapamil formulations given 3 times daily. As a first-line antihypertensive agent, oral verapamil is equivalent to several other calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and other vasodilators, and is not associated with many of the common adverse effects of these treatments. Verapamil may be preferred as an alternative first-line antihypertensive treatment to diuretics in elderly patients because it has similar efficacy in these patients without causing the adverse effects commonly linked with diuretic treatment. Furthermore, because verapamil does not cause bronchoconstriction, it may be used in preference to beta-blockers in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive airway disease. Reflex tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension or development of tolerance is not evident following verapamil administration. As a second- or third-line treatment for patients refractory to established antihypertensive regimens, verapamil produces marked blood pressure reductions when combined with diuretics and/or ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers and vasodilators such as prazosin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1989

Midodrine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in orthostatic hypotension and secondary hypotensive disorders.

Midodrine, a peripheral alpha-adrenergic agonist, finds use in the clinical management of patients with orthostatic hypotension or hypotension secondary to other clinical conditions or drug therapies. Midodrine is almost completely absorbed after oral administration and undergoes enzymatic hydrolysis to form its pharmacologically active metabolite, de-glymidodrine. In patients with refractory orthostatic hypotension oral midodrine increases standing blood pressure and improves symptoms of orthostatism, such as weakness, syncope, blurred vision and fatigue, without any associated cardiac stimulation. Comparative studies have shown midodrine to be clinically at least as effective as other sympathomimetic agents (norfenefrine, etilefrine, dimetofrine and ephedrine) and dihydroergotamine in this regard. Additionally, midodrine appears to cause less frequent and severe adverse effects associated with alpha-receptor agonism such as piloerection and urinary hesitancy. The most commonly experienced adverse effects--piloerector reactions, gastrointestinal disorders, and cardiovascular complaints--are generally mild and can be controlled by reducing the dosage of midodrine. Thus, midodrine is at least as useful as other currently available options in the management of orthostatic or secondary hypotension, and represents a stepping stone towards optimal therapy.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Azelastine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential.

Azelastine is an antiallergic agent which demonstrates histamine H1-receptor antagonist activity and also inhibits histamine release from mast cells following antigen and non-antigen stimuli. Azelastine antagonises histamine- and leukotriene-induced bronchospasm in animal studies and reduces airway responsiveness to inhaled antigen or distilled water, and exercise challenge. In comparative studies, orally administered azelastine in doses up to 4 mg/day consistently relieved symptoms in patients with seasonal or perennial rhinitis - comparable to inhaled sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) 80 mg/day, oral chlorpheniramine (chlorphenamine) and oral terfenadine 120 mg/day. In addition, azelastine administered as an intranasal spray was as effective as oral terfenadine 120 mg/day and intranasal budesonide 0.4 mg/day in alleviating symptoms of rhinitis. Azelastine is also a potent antiasthmatic agent which produces significant and long lasting bronchodilation in patients with bronchial asthma. The drug is superior to placebo and comparable to oral ketotifen 2 mg/day and sustained release theophylline 700 mg/day when administered as a twice daily oral 4 mg dose. Azelastine is generally well tolerated: the most common adverse effects are altered taste perception and drowsiness. Adverse effects are mild and transient and result in withdrawal of treatment in less than 2% of patients. In a comparative study oral azelastine 2 or 4 mg/day produced no more sedation than terfenadine 120 mg/day. Thus, barring unexpected findings with wider clinical use, azelastine offers an effective and well tolerated choice of treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis and/or bronchial asthma, which may be particularly beneficial in patients in whom inhaled drug treatment is contraindicated.

Animals↗

PubMed1981

Na+ and K+ concentration of rat parotid saliva. Comparison of carbachol and auriculo-temporal stimulation.

The effects of carbachol and auriculo-temporal stimulation on the Na+ and K+ concentrations of rat parotid saliva have been compared. The main duct perfused in situ, does not transport Na+ or K+ and is water impermeable. The Na+ concentration of secretion evoked by either stimulus is flow dependent, increasing with increasing flow rate and plateauing at near plasma Na+ levels. At low flow rate the carbachol evoked secretion has a higher Na+ concentration. This is not due to the release of catecholamines since neither sympathectomy nor adrenoceptors block altered the nature of the secretion. The K+ concentration, whilst flow dependent, decreasing with increasing flow rate, was the same for both stimuli.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Levamisole/fluorouracil. A review of their pharmacology and adjuvant therapeutic use in colorectal cancer.

The combination of the antimetabolite fluorouracil plus the immunomodulator levamisole is used as adjuvant therapy following surgical tumour removal in patients with Dukes' stage C colon cancer. Fluorouracil given alone in this setting results in only a modest improvement in survival rate, and levamisole monotherapy is clinically ineffective. Well controlled studies, however, demonstrate that combined levamisole/fluorouracil reduces the recurrence rate by between 31 and 41% and the total mortality rate by between 13 and 33% compared with surgery alone in patients with Dukes' stage C colon cancer after median follow-up of 3 or 7.75 years. The median time to recurrence and median survival time are also extended significantly by levamisole/fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone or no adjuvant treatment. Thus, levamisole/fluorouracil has been recommended as the standard adjuvant therapy for patients with Dukes' C colon cancer, against which new investigative regimens should be compared. Methods for optimising the impressive results already achieved with this combination, and using this as a basis for further progress should be the thrust of future trials.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Nimodipine. A review of its pharmacological properties, and therapeutic efficacy in cerebral disorders.

Nimodipine is a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist which dilates cerebral blood vessels and increases cerebral blood flow in animals and humans. Preliminary findings reveal its potential benefit for the treatment of a wide range of cerebrovascular disorders, particularly for prophylaxis and treatment of delayed ischaemic neurological deficits resulting from cerebral vasospasm in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Studies involving patients aged up to 79 years have confirmed these preliminary findings by showing that nimodipine reduces the incidence of severe ischaemic deficit after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Initial results from studies of patients with acute ischaemic stroke indicate that nimodipine, started within 72 hours of onset, improved recovery, particularly in patients over 65 years. However, other investigators have found no marked difference in 6-month mortality or morbidity rates of stroke patients aged up to 97 years. Findings from other studies suggest that nimodipine may improve symptoms of cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients. Nimodipine is well tolerated by both younger and older patients. The most frequently reported adverse event has been hypotension. Thus, nimodipine therapy offers important benefits as part of the approach to management of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage and has potential in other cerebral disorders, including stroke and impaired cognitive function, although confirmation of initial results in patients with cerebral impairment are required.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Transdermal estradiol. A review of its pharmacological profile, and therapeutic potential in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The estradiol transdermal therapeutic system is a percutaneous delivery device which, when affixed to the skin, delivers estradiol (the major estrogen in premenopausal women) into the systemic circulation at a constant rate for up to 4 days. Because this method of delivery avoids first-pass hepatic metabolism, premenopausal levels of estradiol can be maintained in postmenopausal women using very low dosages. Bone density decreases at an accelerated rate after the menopause, which can lead to development of osteoporosis and increased fracture risk. In common with other estrogen therapies, transdermal estradiol provides protection against osteoporosis following spontaneous or surgical menopause, as evidenced by both biochemical markers of bone resorption and, in a small number of studies, measurement of bone mineral density. Protection against further vertebral fractures was also demonstrated in women with established osteoporosis in one study. Transdermal estradiol also has beneficial effects on vaginal cytology and menopausal symptoms similar to those of oral estrogens. The tolerability of transdermal estradiol appears to be very good, the most common adverse effect being local irritation at the application site. As with other estrogens, transdermal estradiol can be given continuously or in 4-week (3 weeks on/1 week off) cycles, and concomitant progestogen therapy is recommended in women with intact uteri, in order to minimise the risk of endometrial hyperplasia. Available evidence thus suggests that transdermal estradiol may represent an attractive alternative to other forms of estrogen therapy for the prevention, and possibly treatment, of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Administration, Cutaneous↗