Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Mascagni

Publications and source records attributed to D Mascagni.

50 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Mininvasive treatment of strangulated paraesophageal hiatal hernia in emergency. Case report].

The Authors report a case of strangulated paraesophageal hiatal hernia occurred in a elderly woman and treated with laparoscopic approach. After review of the literature regard on this uncommon pathology that present about 5% of the hiatal hernias, they emphasize that the laparoscopic approach is appropriated even in emergency and comprises complete reduction of the stomach in abdomen, control of suitable position of the distal esophagus and cardias and making of effective hiatus-plasty.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Sialomucins in the follow-up of patients surgically treated for colorectal cancer: preliminary results of a prospective study].

Preliminary results of a prospective study on sialomucin content found either at resection margins of colo-rectal cancer after curative surgery or in endoscopic biopsy specimens of colonic mucosa in thirteen patients selected for the follow up are reported. Though not statistically significant because of the small number of cases enrolled, preliminary data indicate that clinical application of differential mucin staining in colo-rectal neoplasms is potentially useful to predict subgroups of patients at risk for local recurrence as well as metachronous colo-rectal cancers.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Cholecystectomy and colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of a sample of 285 operated patients].

A review of 285 patients operated for colo-rectal cancer in order to evaluate cholecystectomy rate in their pathologic history is reported. A surprisingly high rate (9.47%) was registered also when compared with Literature data. Although not definitely conclusive for a positive correlation between cholecystectomy and colo-rectal cancer, the Authors believe that this study identifies a subgroup of patients potentially at risk for colo-rectal cancer. In these subjects a prophylactic, periodic colonoscopy could be useful.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Lymphadenectomy and nerve sparing technique in radical surgery of rectal cancer].

The extension that should be given to lateral lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of extraperitoneal rectal cancer has not yet been assessed because of the difficulty of realizing randomized prospective clinical trials. The theoretical advantage of an extended lateral lymphadenectomy is represented by an accurate staging of the tumour in patients undergoing surgery for possible curative resection; even if the high percentage (20 per cent) of pelvic node metastasis was already demonstrated, the prognostic impact of lateral lymphadenectomy was not proven until now. The results of the Literature demonstrated that an advanced rectal cancer can not be treated only by conventional surgery: radical surgery (with total mesorectal excision and pelvic lymphadenectomy) or, in alternative, a combined approach-chemo-radiotherapy+surgery-should-be applied in order to improve the 5-year survival and to reduce the percentage of local recurrence. With regard to surgery the main disadvantage for an extended lateral dissection is represented by the high incidence of urinary and sexual dysfunctions. The nerve-sparing technique, when combined to pelvic lymphadenectomy, allows preservation of autonomic innervation to the pelvis. The results of our experience demonstrated that nerve-sparing technique is an effective procedure that reduces the incidence of urinary and sexual dysfunctions when accurately performed.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The endoscopic treatment of postoperative stenoses of the upper digestive tract].

The authors compare their experience in dilatation of postoperative benign esophageal strictures. A total of 60 patients (37 males, 23 females: mean age 52), all with severe dysphagia, from January 1985 to September 1995, underwent endoscopic dilatation: 32 of these with Savary dilators and 28 with balloon dilators. Dilatation was effective in 93% in both groups. Two severe complications were recorded (1 heart attack and 1 perforation) in the group that underwent endoscopic dilatation with Savary dilators. During endoscopic management, pain recurred in 43% and 87% of cases after balloon or Savary dilatations, respectively. The authors believe balloon dilators are more effective, better tolerated and with less complications than Savary dilators. They reserve the management with Savary dilators to the extremely severe esophageal strictures.

Catheterization↗