Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D M Burger

Publications and source records attributed to D M Burger.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Indinavir crystallization around the loop of Henle: experimental evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the probable site of the nephron and the plasma indinavir (IDV) concentration at which intrarenal IDV crystallization occurs. DESIGN: We performed in vitro crystallization experiments in IDV solutions simulating conditions found in the nephron. METHODS: To determine intrarenal IDV concentrations at which conditions in the nephron allow crystallization, several concentrations of IDV basic solutions (0-800 mM) were titrated from pH 4.0 to higher pH values until crystals formed within 1 minute. Based on the combination of pH and ionic strength at which crystals formed, we determined the site of the nephron at which this combination was first attained. Based on the capacity for concentration at that site, we were able to measure the corresponding plasma IDV concentration. RESULTS: Under conditions normally found at the proximal tubule (i.e., pH 6.7 and ionic strength of 200 mM), IDV crystallized at 200 mg/L. Under conditions applying to the loop of Henle, pH 7.4 and ionic strength of 200 mM, IDV crystallized at 125 mg/L, which would correspond to a plasma IDV concentration of 8 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: IDV crystallization is most likely in the loop of Henle and may already start at plasma IDV concentrations as low as 8 mg/L. Increasing hydration does not reduce the risk of IDV crystallization in the loop of Henle but instead prevents IDV crystallization and aggregation in the lower urinary tract. It remains to be confirmed whether prevention of high IDV plasma concentrations will reduce the risk of IDV crystallization in the loop of Henle.

Crystallization↗
PubMed2001

Analysis of variation in plasma concentrations of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 in HIV-positive patients.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize sources of variation in plasma concentrations of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 and to evaluate the use of therapeutic drug monitoring for nelfinavir treatment. METHODS: Plasma samples and patient's characteristics were obtained from outpatient clinic. Differences between groups of patients were studied by comparing the observed plasma concentrations with the corresponding concentration on a pharmacokinetic population curve based on median plasma levels. RESULTS: Plasma samples (618) were available from 355 patients taking 1250 mg nelfinavir twice daily. The median ratio between M8 and nelfinavir concentrations was 0.29. This ratio appeared to be independent of the time after ingestion. Statistically significantly lower M8 concentrations were found in Black and Asian patients, or when comedication with CYP3A4 inducers was used. Coadministration of CYP2C19 inhibitors, such as omeprazole, decreased the median M8/nelfinavir ratio. Nevertheless, nelfinavir concentrations and summed concentrations of nelfinavir and M8 were only marginally affected in these patients. Diarrhoea was identified as a cause for lower nelfinavir concentrations, without changing the M8/nelfinavir ratio. In a number of patients with suspected therapy failure or intoxication, abnormal nelfinavir plasma concentrations were found. Dose adjustments based on nelfinavir plasma levels were helpful in a number of patients. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the total concentration of nelfinavir and M8 together is not significantly influenced when variation in M8 levels occurs. Consequently, measuring M8 concentrations in addition to nelfinavir concentrations is not required for the purpose of therapeutic drug monitoring for this drug.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

A retrospective, cohort-based survey of patients using twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir combinations: pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir regimens DESIGN: A cohort-based survey of HIV-infected patients who either used indinavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg twice daily or indinavir 400 mg + ritonavir 400 mg twice daily. METHODS: Data were extracted from a database of samples sent to our laboratory for measurement of indinavir + ritonavir plasma concentrations. Patient characteristics, safety, and efficacy measurements were collected by retrospective chart review. RESULTS: 100 Patients using 800-mg indinavir + 100-mg ritonavir twice daily and 32 patients using 400-mg indinavir + 400-mg ritonavir twice daily were eligible. Median peak and trough concentrations of indinavir were 6.8 and 0.77 mg/L in the 800/100 group and 2.6 and 0.45 mg/L in the 400/400 group. The most frequently found side effects were nausea and vomiting, which occurred in 22.1% and 34.9% of the patients in the 800/100 and the 400/400 groups, respectively. Viral load data were analyzed for patients who switched from 800-mg indinavir three times daily to one of the indinavir + ritonavir twice daily regimens. At the time of switch 63% (800/100 group) and 60% (400/400 group) had an undetectable viral load and this increased to 77% and 70%, respectively, during follow-up. Patients who switched to the 400/400 group discontinued treatment more frequently than patients who switched to the 800/100 group (70% vs. 26%, p =.008). CONCLUSIONS: Indinavir + ritonavir regimens show improved pharmacokinetic properties, allowing twice-daily dosing with food. Clinical data suggest that safety and efficacy is at least as good as with indinavir three-times-daily regimens without ritonavir. Prospective, comparative trials are needed to properly assess the role in HIV therapy of these twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir regimens.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed2001

The effect of fluconazole on ritonavir and saquinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-1-infected individuals.

AIMS: To study the effect of fluconazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of the protease inhibitors ritonavir and saquinavir in HIV-1-infected patients. METHODS: Five subjects treated with saquinavir and three with ritonavir received the protease inhibitor alone (saquinavir 1200 mg three times daily, ritonavir 600 mg twice daily) on day 1, and the same protease inhibitor in combination with fluconazole (400 mg on day 2 and 200 mg on days 3 to 8). Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined on days 1 and 8. RESULTS: In the saquinavir group, the median increase in the area under the plasma concentration vs time curve was 50% from 1800 microg l(-1) h to 2700 microg l(-1) h (P = 0.04, median increase: 900 microg l(-1) h; 2.5 and 97.5 percentile: 500-1300), and 56% for the peak concentration in plasma (from 550 to 870 microg l(-1), P = 0.04; median increase: 320 microg l(-1) h, 2.5 and 97.5 percentile: 60-450 microg l(-1)). In the ritonavir group, there were no detectable changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters on addition of fluconazole. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the favourable safety profile of saquinavir, dose adjustments are probably not necessary with concomitant use of fluconazole, as is the case for ritonavir.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Pharmacokinetics of the protease inhibitor indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children as part of a prospective, open, uncontrolled, multicenter study in The Netherlands. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children were monitored over 6 months of treatment with zidovudine (120 mg/m(2) every 8 h [q8h]), lamivudine (4 mg/kg of body weight q12h), and indinavir (33mg/kg of metabolic weight [MW] q8h). Four weeks after the start of treatment, the steady-state pharmacokinetics of indinavir were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. If patients had an indinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of below 10 or above 30 mg/liter. h, a dose increase or a dose reduction was made and pharmacokinetic measurements were repeated 4 weeks later. Nineteen patients started with the dose of 33 mg/kg of MW q8h. The median AUC (range) was 10.5 (2.8 to 51.0) mg/liter. h. The median AUC (range) in 17 children treated with 50 mg/kg of MW q8h was 20.6 (4.1 to 38.7) mg/liter. h. Finally, five patients had a dose increase to 67 mg/kg of MW q8h, resulting in a median AUC (range) of 36.6 (27.2 to 80.0) mg/liter. h. After 6 months of treatment, there were 11 children with an AUC of below 20 mg/liter. h, of whom 5 (45%) had a detectable viral load, while this was the case in none of the 11 children with an AUC of higher than 20 mg/liter. h. We conclude that the optimal dose of indinavir in children to obtain drug exposure similar to that observed in adult patients is 50 mg/kg of MW q8h, which approximates 600 mg/m(2) q8h. It would even be better to adjust the indinavir dose based on an AUC of greater than 20 mg/liter. h.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Durable HIV-1 suppression with indinavir after failing lamivudine-containing double nucleoside therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the durability of the antiretroviral effect in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of antiviral therapy intensification, produced by the addition of indinavir from week 12 onwards to the original regimen of zidovudine/lamivudine or stavudine/lamivudine, after 72 weeks of follow-up using an ultrasensitive HIV-1 RNA assay. To assess CSF concentrations of indinavir at week 48. DESIGN: In a prospectively, randomized, open, single-centre study, antiretroviral-naive patients (CD4 cell count > or =200 cells/microl and a plasma HIV-1 RNA level 10,000 copies/ml) were assigned to a combination of zidovudine/lamivudine or stavudine/lamivudine. Indinavir could be added to the double nucleoside analogue regimen from week 12 or thereafter in case the plasma HIV RNA level was insufficiently suppressed (>500 copies/ml). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were enrolled (23 stavudine/lamivudine and 24 zidovudine/lamivudine), of whom 33 completed a follow-up of 72 weeks. Indinavir was added in 89% (42/47) of the patients. Only one discontinuation occurred due to virological failure. At week 72, the median plasma HIV-1 RNA levels in the zidovudine/lamivudine group had decreased from 4.80 log10 copies/ml to <500 copies/ml in 100% of patients and <50 copies/ml in 86.6% of the patients. In the stavudine/lamivudine group the plasma HIV-1 RNA decreased from 4.98 log10 copies/ml at baseline to <500 copies/ml in 100% of patients and <50 copies/ml in 66.7% of the patients. On an intent-to-treat basis these figures were 54.2 and 52.2% for zidovudine/lamivudine and stavudine/lamivudine, respectively, for the 50 copies/ml assay. The median CD4 cell count increased from 315 cells/microl, with 150 cells/microl in the zidovudine/lamivudine arm, and from 290 cells/microl, with 310 cells/microl in the stavudine/lamivudine arm (P=0.0001). However, the percentage of CD4 cells did not differ in each group. In the zidovudine/lamivudine group 9/10 and 5/5, and in the stavudine/lamivudine group 11/11 and 6/6 had a CSF HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/ml at week 12 and 48, respectively. The CSF indinavir concentration ranged from 50 to 170 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: The long-term HIV-1 suppression observed in this study is remarkable, as adding a single antiretroviral agent to a failing regimen goes against current notions of adequate therapy.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2000

Dose-finding study of a once-daily indinavir/ritonavir regimen.

In antiretroviral therapy, to improve compliance the need is increasing to develop regimens that combine potency and safety with convenient dosing. The objective of our study was to find a once-daily dosing regimen of a HIV-protease inhibitor, indinavir (IDV), by combining it with ritonavir (RTV). In the study, 12 healthy volunteers took a single IDV dose of 800 mg on day 1. Plasma and urine sampling was done for 12 hours. From day 2 to day 21, participants took RTV liquid 200 mg (group A) or 400 mg (group B) once daily. Repeated pharmacokinetic sampling was performed over the course of 24 hours, after single doses of indinavir 400 mg (day 15), 800 mg (day 18), and 1200 mg (day 21). The best dosage regimen in this pharmacokinetic study was selected based on efficacy and tolerability criteria. The study comprised 10 male and 2 female healthy volunteers, mean age, 25 years (range, 18-50 years), mean weight, 70 kg (range, 52-83 kg). One male participant discontinued on day 8 due to influenza. All other participants completed the study without the occurrence of serious adverse events. RTV inhibited indinavir plasma clearance by 51% to 70%, leading to increased and prolonged IDV exposure. Renal clearance was influenced by the addition of RTV and dosage increments of IDV. The efficacy criterion was best fulfilled by 1200 mg IDV/400 mg RTV, whereas this combination performed most poorly on tolerability criteria. Based on the single dose data, a once-daily regimen of IDV with a low dose of RTV is possible. The best dosage regimen to start with among those studied here appears to be 1200 mg IDV/400 mg RTV, which could be decreased at steady state to 800 IDV/400 RTV or 1200 IDV/200 RTV if toxicity occurs. Steady-state pharmacokinetic data of once-daily IDV/RTV regimens in HIV-infected patients are warranted.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Development of an indinavir oral liquid for children.

An indinavir oral liquid was developed and studied. Several oral liquids containing indinavir were prepared and taste tested in eight healthy volunteers. Physical and chemical stability over two weeks were examined, and a randomized, two-way-crossover, single-dose bioequivalence trial was performed in 12 healthy male volunteers. Indinavir 800 mg was given as two 400-mg indinavir capsules (Crixivan) on day 1 and as 80 mL of the indinavir liquid on day 2, or vice versa. A standard breakfast and lunch were given at fixed times, and blood and urine samples were collected at various intervals up to eight hours. The log-transformed area under the concentration-versus-time curve from zero to eight hours (AUC0-8) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for the liquid versus the capsules were compared by using a 90% confidence interval (CI) test (limits, 80-125%), and the time to Cmax (tmax) was compared by using the nonparametric sign test. The liquid selected had an acceptable taste, contained indinavir 10 mg/mL, and was chemically stable for two weeks at 4 degrees C. The 90% CI for the AUC ratio (liquid versus capsules) was 92-99% (mean, 95%); for the Cmax ratio it was 95-106% (mean, 100%). There was no significant difference in tmax between the liquid and capsules. An oral liquid formulation of indinavir was developed that had an acceptable taste, was chemically stable, and was bioequivalent to the commercially available capsule.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Determination of nevirapine, an HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in human plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

A sensitive and rapid high-performance liquid chromatography method has been developed to measure the levels of the HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine in human plasma. The sample pre-treatment consists of a protein precipitation with perchloric acid. A Hypersil ODS column is used at ambient temperature and a wavelength of 280 nm is used for ultraviolet detection. The mobile phase contains acetonitrile and a 60 mM phosphate buffer pH 4.5 (30:70, v/v). The detection limit of the method is 0.05 mg/l using 150 microl of plasma. The lower and upper limit of quantitation are 0.1 mg/l and 10 mg/l, respectively. The average recovery of nevirapine is 101.8% with a variation of 4.6%. The average inter-assay precision is 2.4%, the average intra-assay precision 2.9% and the average accuracy 97%.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Enhanced penetration of indinavir in cerebrospinal fluid and semen after the addition of low-dose ritonavir.

OBJECTIVE: Penetration of antiretroviral drugs into anatomical HIV-1 reservoirs such as the male genital tract and the central nervous system is important. Data on indinavir (IDV) concentrations in seminal plasma are lacking and IDV concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid are at best borderline. DESIGN: Thirteen patients were treated with zidovudine (or stavudine), lamivudine, abacavir, nevirapine and IDV (1000 mg three times daily). When nevirapine led to low IDV concentrations, IDV was changed into the combination IDV/ritonavir (RTV) 800/100 mg twice daily to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of IDV. METHODS: A serum pharmacokinetic profile, a semen sample and a cerebrospinal fluid sample were collected at weeks 8, 24, 48 and 72. RESULTS: Addition of RTV increased the median IDV trough concentration in serum from 65 to 336 ng/ml (P = 0.005). Median IDV concentration in seminal plasma increased from 141 to 1634 ng/ml (P = 0.002) (n = 9) and in cerebrospinal fluid from 39 (n = 12) to 104 (n = 7) ng/ml (P < 0.001). In six patients with samples collected both before and after the addition of RTV, the IDV concentration in seminal plasma increased 8.2 times [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2-11.6], and in cerebrospinal fluid 2.4 times (95% CI 1.8-3.9). CONCLUSIONS: IDV penetrates well into the male genital tract. The addition of low-dose RTV not only increases IDV concentrations in serum but also in seminal plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, thereby probably improving the potency of the regimen in these anatomical HIV reservoirs. Higher serum trough levels alone can not sufficiently explain the observed increases in seminal plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations. Inhibition of P-glycoprotein-mediated transport by RTV might be an additional mechanism.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Clinical and virologic response to combination treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in children with human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection: a multicenter study in the Netherlands. On behalf of the Dutch Study Group for Children with HIV-1 infections.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical, immunologic, and virologic response to indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in children with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-eight HIV-1-infected children (3 months to 16 years of age) with or without prior treatment with reverse-transcriptase inhibitors and a HIV-1 RNA >5000 copies/mL and/or a CD4 cell count less than the lower limit of the age-specific reference value were treated with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. Pharmacokinetics of indinavir were determined in each child. RESULTS: The combination treatment was well tolerated in the majority of patients. Clinical improvement was seen in all patients. After 6 months of therapy, 70% of the patients had an HIV-1 RNA load below 500 copies/mL, whereas 48% of the children had a viral load below 40 copies/mL. Relative CD4 cell counts in relation to the lower limit of the age-specific reference value increased significantly from a median value of 79% at baseline to 106% after 6 months of therapy. The doses of indinavir necessary to achieve area under the curve values comparable to adult values varied from 1250 mg/m(2)/d to 2450 mg/m(2)/d. CONCLUSIONS: Highly active antiretroviral therapy consisting of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in children reduced HIV-1 RNA to less than 500 copies/mL in 70% of the children within 6 months. Improved CD4 cell counts were observed in most patients, as was a better clinical condition (no invasive or opportunistic infections, increased weight gain). Side effects of the triple therapy were mild. Highly active antiretroviral therapy can be used as successfully in children as in adults.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Saliva as a specimen for monitoring compliance but not for predicting plasma concentrations in patients with HIV treated with indinavir.

The presence of the HIV-protease inhibitor indinavir in saliva was analyzed to investigate whether salivary indinavir concentrations are applicable to monitor compliance and/or predict plasma indinavir levels. Fourteen HIV-infected outpatients treated with indinavir and 24 healthy volunteers who ingested a single dose of indinavir were included. Paired plasma and citric-acid-stimulated saliva samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Stimulated salivary indinavir concentrations showed a high correlation (r = 0.85, p < 0.01) with corresponding plasma levels. The median saliva/plasma ratio was 65% (P25 50%; P75 94%). The ratios were independent of the plasma concentration; however, a relation with time after ingestion was seen. The unbound fraction of indinavir in plasma was not significantly correlated with the saliva/plasma ratio after stimulated saliva collection, in contrast with a subset of nonstimulated saliva from healthy volunteers, where we did find a significant correlation. Although stimulated salivary indinavir concentrations are highly correlated with plasma concentrations, it is not possible to predict plasma indinavir levels by the salivary concentrations for purposes of therapeutic drug monitoring, due to large interindividual and intraindividual variation. Nevertheless, monitoring compliance by measuring the presence of indinavir in saliva is possible: ingestion of indinavir can be assessed with a sensitivity of 84.8% in the whole dosing interval or with 98.8% between 1 and 6 hours after the last dose, which is comparable with plasma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Carbamazepine--indinavir interaction causes antiretroviral therapy failure.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of antiretroviral therapy failure caused by an interaction between carbamazepine and indinavir. CASE SUMMARY: A 48-year-old HIV-positive white man was treated with antiretroviral triple therapy, consisting of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. His HIV-RNA (viral load) became undetectable (<400 copies/mL) less than two months after this therapy was started; this was confirmed one month later. Shortly after the start of antiretroviral therapy, the patient developed herpes zoster, which was treated with famciclovir. Tramadol was initially prescribed for postherpetic neuralgia; however, this was substituted with carbamazepine due to insufficient analgesic effect. Indinavir plasma concentrations decreased substantially during carbamazepine therapy. Carbamazepine was stopped after 2.5 months and, two weeks later, the HIV-RNA was detectable (6 x 103 copies/mL). Resistance for lamivudine was observed in that blood sample; resistance for zidovudine might have been present, and resistance to indinavir was not detected. A few months later, a further increase of the HIV-RNA occurred (300 x 103 copies/mL), after which the therapy was switched to a new antiretroviral regimen containing nevirapine, didanosine, and stavudine. DISCUSSION: Physicians may prescribe carbamazepine for HIV-infected patients to treat seizures or postherpetic neuralgia, which are complications of opportunistic infections such as herpes zoster or toxoplasmosis. Carbamazepine is a potent enzyme inducer, predominantly of the CYP3A enzyme system, while HIV-protease inhibitors such as indinavir are substrates for and inhibitors of CYP3A. Therefore, an interaction between these drugs could be expected. A low dose of carbamazepine (200 mg/d) and the usual dose of indinavir (800 mg q8h) in our patient resulted in carbamazepine concentrations within the therapeutic range for epilepsy treatment; indinavir concentrations dropped substantially. The virologic, resistance, and plasma drug concentration data, as well as the chronology of events, are highly indicative of antiretroviral treatment failure due to the interaction between carbamazepine and indinavir. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of carbamazepine and indinavir may cause failure of antiretroviral therapy due to insufficient indinavir plasma concentrations. Drugs other than carbamazepine should be considered to prevent this interaction. Amitriptyline or gabapentin are alternatives for postherpetic neuralgia; valproic acid or lamotrigine are alternatives for seizures. When alternate drug therapy is not possible, dosage adjustments, therapeutic drug monitoring, and careful clinical observation may help reduce adverse clinical consequences.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1999

Randomized trial comparing saquinavir soft gelatin capsules versus indinavir as part of triple therapy (CHEESE study).

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and tolerability of saquinavir soft gelatin capsule (SQV-SGC) formulation and indinavir, both given as part of a triple drug regimen containing zidovudine and lamivudine, in HIV-1-infected individuals. DESIGN: Randomized, open label, multicentre study. PATIENTS: A total of 70 patients who were antiretroviral-naive and who had a CD4 cell count < 500 x 10(6)/I and/or > 10000 HIV RNA copies/ml plasma and/or HIV-related symptoms. Subjects were assigned randomly to zidovudine 200 mg three times per day plus lamivudine 150 mg twice per day plus either SQV-SGC 1200 mg three times per day (SQV-SGC group) or indinavir 800 mg three times per day (indinavir group). Data are presented for all patients up to week 24. RESULTS: Mean baseline CD4 cell counts (+/- SE) were 301+/-29 x 10(6) cells/l and 310 +/-43 x 10(6) cells/l in the SQV-SGC and indinavir groups, respectively. The log10 median baseline HIV RNA load was 5.00 copies/ml in the SQV-SGC group and 4.98 copies/ml in the indinavir group. No difference in antiretroviral effect between the treatment arms could be demonstrated. Intention-to-treat analysis (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) at week 24 revealed that RNA levels decreased to < 50 copies/ml in 74.3% of patients in the SQV-SGC group and in 71.4% of the patients in the indinavir group (P = 0.78). In the on-treatment analysis the proportion of patients < 50 copies/ml at week 24 was 88.0% in the SQV-SGC group and 84.6% in the indinavir group (P = 0.725). Intriguingly, the mean increase of CD4 cells in the first 24 weeks was 162+/-20 x 10(6) cells/l in the SQV-SGC group and 89+/-21 x 10(6) cells/l in the indinavir group (P = 0.01), but preliminary data indicate that this difference in CD4 cell count gain may disappear after 24 weeks of treatment. Both regimens were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: During the first 24 weeks of the study, we found no difference in antiviral potency between the indinavir group and the SQV-SGC group. A significantly higher CD4 response in the SQV-SGC group was observed.

Adult↗