Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Landsberg

Publications and source records attributed to D Landsberg.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

A pilot study of steroid-free immunosuppression in the prevention of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids have been a mainstay of rejection prophylaxis for several decades, despite the multiple adverse effects of long-term use, including weight gain, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and bone disease. The detrimental effect of steroids on the metabolic profile begins in the early posttransplantation period, and the complete avoidance of steroids in transplantation would therefore be optimal. We hypothesized that the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a humanized monoclonal anti-CD25 antibody (daclizumab) to a cyclosporine (CsA microemulsion)-based immunosuppression protocol would permit transplantation without steroids. METHODS: Steroid-free renal transplantation was attempted in 57 patients treated with daclizumab, MMF, and CsA. Twenty-eight patients received kidneys from living donors; the remaining 29 received cadaveric grafts. RESULTS: At 1 year, patient and graft survival were 95% and 89%, respectively. Fourteen patients (25%) experienced rejections, of which 13 were readily reversed with steroids; 1 patient required OKT3. Mean serum creatinine at 12 months for patients not experiencing rejection was 149+/-58 micromol/L, compared with 158+/-102 micromol/L for those experiencing rejection. Five patients required hospitalization for infection; no patients developed lymphoproliferative disease. At baseline, 17 patients required 3 or more antihypertensive medications, compared with 2 patients at 1 year. Three of 43 nondiabetic patients developed diabetes during the study. There was no significant reduction in lumbar or femoral bone density. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these positive results, we believe steroid avoidance with this immunosuppressive regimen merits further study.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Lack of long-term benefits of steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients.

Glucocorticoids used in renal transplantation have been associated with numerous adverse effects. Most studies that showed short-term benefits of steroid withdrawal made comparisons for patients administered prednisone, 10 to 17.5 mg/d, versus no prednisone. Few have studied long-term benefits of steroid withdrawal. We performed a retrospective review and identified 58 patients administered cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone who underwent complete steroid withdrawal. Post-steroid withdrawal follow-up was 7.6 +/- 1.9 years. Nine patients restarted prednisone therapy, 3 patients lost their grafts (2 of those restarted on prednisone therapy), and 2 patients died with functioning grafts. When prednisone dosage was tapered from 10 mg/d to 10 mg every other day, clinically significant improvements were seen in weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, blood pressure medications, glycosylated hemoglobin level, and diabetic medications. No further benefits were seen in these parameters and total cholesterol level on complete steroid withdrawal from prednisone, 10 mg every other day. Most of the earlier benefits were not sustained on long-term follow-up, and the increase in these parameters was similar to that of a similar matched control group (that underwent transplantation during the same period) maintained on prednisone, 5 mg/d. Major differences were decreases in creatinine clearances and hemoglobin levels, which were greater in the steroid-withdrawal group (7.4 +/- 1.9 mL/min and 1.2 +/- 0.2 g/dL, respectively) compared with the control group (2.6 +/- 1.5 mL/min and 0.5 +/- 0.2 g/dL, respectively). In conclusion, most of the metabolic benefits were seen with steroid dosage taper from prednisone, 10 mg/d to 10 mg every other day, with no further benefits with steroid withdrawal. Most of these benefits were not sustained on long-term follow-up, questioning the utility of steroid withdrawal.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Screening for basiliximab exposure-response relationships in renal allotransplantation.

The immunosuppressant basiliximab--a chimeric monoclonal antibody specific to the interleukin-2 receptor on activated T-lymphocytes--significantly reduces the incidence of acute cellular rejection following renal transplantation. Screening for exposure-response relationships was performed within a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled efficacy trial in which patients received 40 mg basiliximab (20 mg on days 0 and 4) by intravenous infusion in addition to cyclosporine and corticosteroids. In a subset of patients, serum samples were collected pre-transplant and once in weeks 2, 3 and 4 for determination of basiliximab concentrations. A population pharmacostatistical model was used to derive individual empirical Bayes estimates of each patient's pharmacokinetic parameters. Biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes were recorded to month 6 post-transplant. Forty basiliximab-treated patients were evaluated, 30 men and 10 women, aged 48 +/- 12 yr (range, 24-73) and weighing 72.4 +/- 12.9 kg (range, 52.5-107.5). The basiliximab distribution volume was 7.5 +/- 1.7 L, the half-life 7.5 +/- 2.5 d and the clearance 33 +/- 12 mL/h. There was no clinically relevant influence of weight, age, or gender on basiliximab disposition. Receptor-saturating serum basiliximab concentrations (> 0.2 microgram/mL) were maintained for 41 +/- 23 d. Twenty-five patients remained rejection-free over the 6-month observation period, while a total of 26 biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes occurred in the remaining 14 patients. Of these episodes, 12 occurred during receptor blockade. No apparent relationship to basiliximab concentration on the day of onset was observed range, 0.1-9.0 microgram/mL) nor did the time of suppression offset represent a period of increased risk for rejection episodes. Fourteen rejection episodes occurred after basiliximab had cleared from the serum. The durations of receptor suppression preceding these events did not differ compared with those in patients who remained rejection-free: 32 +/- 11 versus 45 +/- 26 d, respectively (p = 0.1269). Given the durations of receptor saturation achieved with the chosen basiliximab regimen, this screen for exposure-response relationships did not identify the duration of receptor saturation in peripheral blood as a predictive factor for acute rejection episodes. Further exploration for exposure-effect relationships in a larger population is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Safety and tolerability of cyclosporine and cyclosporine microemulsion during 18 months of follow-up in stable renal transplant recipients: a report of the Canadian Neoral Renal Study Group.

BACKGROUND: There has been concern that the increased drug exposure associated with treatment with cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) would lead to an increase in adverse events. METHODS: The long-term safety and tolerability of conventional cyclosporine (CsA) and CsA-ME were compared in a randomized, multicenter, pharmacoepidemiologic study involving 1097 stable renal transplant patients after 18 months of follow-up. RESULTS: No significant difference was seen in change in serum creatinine or calculated creatinine clearance between the two groups. Episodes of deterioration in renal function (change in serum creatinine > or = 20%) were categorized with the following results for CsA-ME versus CsA, respectively: acute rejection, 4.5% vs. 4.5%; chronic rejection, 8% vs. 11%; CsA nephrotoxicity, 12% vs. 7% (P=0.008); transient changes, 17% vs. 12%; other causes, 4% vs. 6%. During the first 6 months of the study, a transient increase in the incidence of gastrointestinal and neurological adverse events was seen in the CsA-ME group compared with the CsA group. Up to 18 months, patients in the CsA group reported significantly fewer hearing and vestibular disorders, but more cardiovascular problems than those in the CsA-ME group (P=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Tolerance to CsA and CsA-ME was similar. Renal function over 18 months was not adversely affected by the increased drug exposure with CsA-ME, although there was a transient increase in nephrotoxicity. The frequency of acute and chronic rejection did not change.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Investigation of a possible interaction between ciprofloxacin and cyclosporine in renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infection is a common complication during the first few months after renal transplantation. Ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone broad-spectrum antibiotic, is used frequently in treating infections in the early posttransplant period. Evidence from in vitro studies has suggested that ciprofloxacin can antagonize the cyclosporine (CsA)-dependent inhibition of interleukin-2 production. Such an effect in renal transplant patients could antagonize the immunosuppressive activity of CsA and lead to rejection of the graft. METHODS: To investigate the possibility of a pharmacodynamic interaction between ciprofloxacin and CsA, we conducted a case-control study in 42 patients who had received a kidney transplant and who were prescribed ciprofloxacin in the first 1-6 months after transplantation and in their matched controls (two per case) who did not receive ciprofloxacin during the study period. RESULTS: There was a twofold greater incidence (P=0.008) of ciprofloxacin use at 1-3 months (65%) than was observed at 4-7 months (35%) after transplantation. The proportion of cases experiencing at least one episode of biopsy-proven rejection 1-3 months posttransplant (45%) was significantly greater (P=0.004) than that of controls (19%). Furthermore, there was a marked increase (P<0.001) in the incidence of rejection temporally associated with ciprofloxacin use among cases (29%) compared with that experienced by the controls (2%). CONCLUSIONS: The possibility that ciprofloxacin increases rejection rates in renal transplant patients may be of clinical importance and therefore warrants further investigation.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed1996

A randomized, prospective multicenter pharmacoepidemiologic study of cyclosporine microemulsion in stable renal graft recipients. Report of the Canadian Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of conventional cyclosporine (ConCsA) and cyclosporine microemulsion (MeCsA) were compared under conditions of normal clinical practice in a prospective, randomized, concentration-controlled, pharmacoepidemiologic study. METHODS: Between September 1994 and March 1995, 1097 stable renal transplant recipients in 14 Canadian centers were randomized 2:1 to treatment with MeCsA or ConCsA. Patients were commenced on each study drug at a dose equal to their previous therapy with ConCsA, and the dose was adjusted to maintain predose whole blood cyclosporine concentrations within the therapeutic range established for each center. Prednisone and azathioprine were continued unless dose adjustment was required for clinical reasons. RESULTS: The mean cyclosporine concentration was comparable in both treatment groups at all time points throughout the 6 months of follow-up. The mean dose of cyclosporine was 3.6 mg/kg/day in both treatment groups at entry to the study, and declined by 0.3% and by 2.8% in patients receiving ConCsA and MeCsA, respectively. The nature and severity of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups, but there was a transient increase in neurological and gastrointestinal complications in the group receiving MeCsA within the first month after conversion (P<0.05). Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance did not change in either treatment group throughout the study. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in three patients (0.8%) receiving ConCsA and in seven patients (0.9%) receiving MeCsA, with non-histologically proven acute rejection in an additional three patients (0.8%) receiving ConCsA and five patients (0.6%) receiving MeCsA (P=NS). Serum creatinine rose transiently in 35 patients (9.8%) receiving ConCsA and 138 patients (18.7%) receiving MeCsA (P<0.05) and resolved either spontaneously or after a reduction in the cyclosporine dose. One graft was lost in the MeCsA group due to irreversible rejection, and seven patients died, three in the group receiving ConCsA and four of those receiving MeCsA (P=NS). Absorption of cyclosporine was more rapid and complete from MeCsA than from ConCsA during the first 4 hr of the dosing interval, resulting in almost 40% greater exposure to the drug (P<0.001). There was close correlation between area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the first 4 hr of the 12-hr dosage interval and AUC over the entire 12-hr dosage interval for both formulations, making AUC over the first 4 hr a good predictor of total cyclosporine exposure. Using this parameter, patients with low absorption randomized to receive MeCsA showed a marked increase in drug exposure by months 3 and 6, whereas there was no change in those who continued on ConCsA. A limited sampling strategy utilizing samples at the predose and postdose trough levels provided an excellent correlation with drug exposure, particularly for patients receiving MeCsA (r2=0.94 MeCsA vs. r2=0.89 ConCsA). CONCLUSIONS: MeCsA appears to be a safe and effective therapy in stable renal transplant patients and provides superior and more consistent absorption of cyclosporine when compared with ConCsA. Transient toxicity after conversion to MeCsA occurs in some patients, and may reflect the increased exposure to cyclosporine. Use of a limited sampling approach combining trough and 2-hr postdose concentrations may provide an effective way to monitor this exposure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Renal function changes over time in adult recipients of small pediatric kidneys. Evidence against hyperperfusion injury.

There has been considerable debate regarding the use of pediatric donor kidneys in adults with end-stage renal disease. These small kidneys may not be able to deal with the metabolic demands of the large adult size, and thus pediatric kidneys may be at higher risk of loss due to hyperperfusion injury. To study the impact of small kidney size on renal outcome, we studied two groups of patients. This retrospective review of patients at a single institution compared recipients of pediatric renal transplants (age < 7 years, n = 37) to a matched group of adult-kidney recipients (1:2 ratio, n = 74). The groups were matched for age, sex, diabetic status, HLA type, and duration of follow-up. Primary outcomes of interest were: calculated creatinine clearance at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after transplantation and evidence of hyperperfusion damage as determined by proteinuria, graft biopsy, and late graft loss due to chronic rejection. This study demonstrates no significant difference in calculated creatinine clearance between pediatric and adult transplants at 6 months (43.8 vs. 50.7 ml/min, respectively) or at 3 years after transplantation (56.3 vs. 56.2 ml/min), nor was there any evidence of increased proteinuria or late graft loss in the pediatric-kidney recipients compared with adult-kidney recipients. Our data do not demonstrate the detrimental effects of small kidney size relative to recipient on subsequent renal outcomes, and thus support the practice of pediatric donor kidneys being used in adult recipients when pediatric recipients are not available.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Lymphoproliferative disorders after renal transplantation in patients receiving triple or quadruple immunosuppression.

A retrospective review of 478 renal transplant recipients receiving cyclosporin A (CsA) was conducted to determine the incidence, relative risk, and outcome of lymphoproliferative disease after transplantation. Cases of neoplasm were identified by linking the computerized databases of the British Columbia (B.C.) Transplant Society and the B.C. Cancer Agency. B.C. Cancer Statistics for 1988 were used to determine relative risk. Patients were monitored for a total of 1,054 patient years with a mean follow-up time of 26 months (range, 0.1 to 63 months). A total of 334 patients were treated with triple immunosuppression (CsA), azathioprine, and prednisone), and 144 received adjunctive antilymphocyte globulin as induction immunosuppression. Sixty-nine patients received OKT3 for the treatment of transplant rejection. Twenty-two patients developed 23 malignancies (4.8%) at a mean interval of 16 months (range, 3 to 45 months) after transplantation. Non-Hodgkins lymphoma occurred in five patients, of whom two received triple (0.6%) and three received quadruple (2.1%) therapy. All five patients, in addition, received OKT3 for the treatment of graft rejection. The relative risk of developing a neoplasm among the defined sample adjusted for age and sex was 3.08 overall, increasing to 26.9 (P less than 0.005) for lymphoma. Six of the 22 patients (27%), including all 5 patients with lymphoma, died as a result of their tumor. Renal transplant recipients receiving CsA have a significantly elevated risk of developing a de novo lymphoreticular malignancy, which is comparable to that reported for those receiving azathioprine treatment, and which appears to be increased by the use of quadruple immunosuppression and the administration of OKT3 for the treatment of acute graft rejection.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1991

Cyclosporine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy resulting in renal allograft loss and its successful reuse: a report of two cases.

Cyclosporine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy is a rare complication of renal transplantation. It commonly leads to graft loss. The mechanism of this entity is unknown. Factors intrinsic to the donor kidney appear to play an important role. We describe two cases of renal transplant patients who lost their first grafts secondary to cyclosporine-induced thrombotic microangiopathy. These patients were successfully retransplanted with an immunosuppressive protocol that included long-term cyclosporine. We conclude that graft loss from this entity is not a contraindication to subsequent successful transplantation with cyclosporine.

Adult↗