Guidelines for human gene nomenclature (1997). HUGO Nomenclature Committee.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D Lancet.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This review represents an update of the nomenclature system for the UDP glucuronosyltransferase gene superfamily, which is based on divergent evolution. Since the previous review in 1991, sequences of many related UDP glycosyltransferases from lower organisms have appeared in the database, which expand our database considerably. At latest count, in animals, yeast, plants and bacteria there are 110 distinct cDNAs/genes whose protein products all contain a characteristic 'signature sequence' and, thus, are regarded as members of the same superfamily. Comparison of a relatedness tree of proteins leads to the definition of 33 families. It should be emphasized that at least six cloned UDP-GlcNAc N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases are not sufficiently homologous to be included as members of this superfamily and may represent an example of convergent evolution. For naming each gene, it is recommended that the root symbol UGT for human (Ugt for mouse and Drosophila), denoting 'UDP glycosyltransferase,' be followed by an Arabic number representing the family, a letter designating the subfamily, and an Arabic numeral denoting the individual gene within the family or subfamily, e.g. 'human UGT2B4' and 'mouse Ugt2b5'. We recommend the name 'UDP glycosyltransferase' because many of the proteins do not preferentially use UDP glucuronic acid, or their nucleotide sugar preference is unknown. Whereas the gene is italicized, the corresponding cDNA, transcript, protein and enzyme activity should be written with upper-case letters and without italics, e.g. 'human or mouse UGT1A1.' The UGT1 gene (spanning > 500 kb) contains at least 12 promoters/first exons, which can be spliced and joined with common exons 2 through 5, leading to different N-terminal halves but identical C-terminal halves of the gene products; in this scheme each first exon is regarded as a distinct gene (e.g. UGT1A1, UGT1A2, ... UGT1A12). When an orthologous gene between species cannot be identified with certainty, as occurs in the UGT2B subfamily, sequential naming of the genes is being carried out chronologically as they become characterized. We suggest that the Human Gene Nomenclature Guidelines (http://www.gene.acl.ac.uk/nomenclature/guidelines.html++ +) be used for all species other than the mouse and Drosophila. Thirty published human UGT1A1 mutant alleles responsible for clinical hyperbilirubinemias are listed herein, and given numbers following an asterisk (e.g. UGT1A1*30) consistent with the Human Gene Nomenclature Guidelines. It is anticipated that this UGT gene nomenclature system will require updating on a regular basis.
A cosmid clone covering a region of high olfactory receptor (OR) gene density inside the OR gene cluster on human chromosome 17 (17p13.3) was subjected to shotgun automated DNA sequencing. The resulting 40-kb sequence revealed three known OR coding regions, as well as a new OR pseudogene (OR17-25), fused to one of the previously identified OR genes (OR17-24). The suggested mechanism for the generation of this doublet structure involves an initial duplication mediated by flanking repeats and a subsequent deletion via nonhomologous recombination. Sequence analysis further suggests that the two other OR genes present in the cosmid (OR17-40 and OR17-228) may have evolved by ancient tandem duplication of an 11-kb fragment, mediated by recombination between mammalian-wide interspersed repeats. The duplicated genes appear to be complete and potentially functional. Their conserved structure reveals a long upstream intron and a previously uncharacterized 5' noncoding exon. No additional genes could be discerned in the cosmid, suggesting that the cluster may be part of a dedicated OR subgenome.
The superfamily of olfactory receptor genes, whose products are thought to be activated by odorant ligands, is critical for odor recognition. Two olfactory receptors, olp4 from rat and OR17-4 from human, were overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells. The presence of the proteins in cell membranes was monitored by immunoblotting with peptide-specific polyclonal antibodies directed against the C-terminal sequences of these receptors and with a mAb against an N-terminal octapeptide epitope tag. A DNA sequence that codes for a His6 tag, which binds tightly to a Ni2+-chelate-affinity column, was incorporated into the N-termini of both genes. The expressed olfactory receptors were found mainly in the cell-membrane fraction. The proteins were difficult to solubilize by many detergents and only lysophosphatidylcholine was found to be both suitable for efficient solubilization of the overexpressed olfactory receptors and compatible with the purification system used. After solubilization, the olfactory receptors were purified to near homogeneity by affinity chromatography on nickel nitrilotriacetic acid resin and by cation-exchange chromatography. Electrophoresis of the purified proteins and visualization with Coomassie Blue staining or by immunoblotting with specific antibodies, revealed bands of 32, 69 and 94 kDa, which were identified as the monomeric, dimeric and trimeric forms of the receptor proteins. The oligomeric forms were resistant to reduction and alkylation, and are therefore thought to be held together by non-covalent hydrophobic interactions that are resistant to SDS. This finding is similar to previous observations for other guanine-nucleotide-binding-regulatory-protein-coupled receptors. Reconstitution in phospholipid vesicles showed that the purified olfactory receptors insert specifically into the lipid bilayer. This provides a means to study functional reconstitution with putative transduction components such as olfactory guanine-nucleotide-binding-regulatory protein.
Correlated mutation analysis and molecular models of olfactory receptors have provided evidence that residues in the transmembrane domains form a binding pocket for odor ligands. As an independent test of these results, we have calculated positive selection moments for the alpha-helical sixth transmembrane domain (TM6) of human olfactory receptors. The moments can be used to identify residues that have been preferentially affected by positive selection and are thus likely to interact with odor ligands. The results suggest that residue 622, which is commonly a serine or threonine, could form critical H-bonds. In some receptors a dual-serine subsite, formed by residues 622 and 625, could bind hydroxyl determinants on odor ligands. The potential importance of these residues is further supported by site-directed mutagenesis in the beta-adrenergic receptor. The findings should be of practical value for future physiological studies, binding assays, and site-directed mutagenesis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A rat olfactory epithelium cDNA library was screened for olfactory receptor clones. One of the positively hybridizing cDNA clones was sequenced and found to encode a new member of the olfactory receptor superfamily. This cDNA, termed olp4, was used as a model of olfactory receptor for expression, both in vitro and in vivo. Expression of olp4, as well as of another previously cloned olfactory receptor (F5), was monitored by immunoprecipitation was a monoclonal antibody directed against a Flag peptide epitope tag, inserted at the N-terminus of the open reading frame, and a specific polyclonal antibody against a C-terminal peptide of olp4. Translation in vitro, followed by immunoprecipitation, showed a major olp4-specific band of 27-29 kDa. The olp4 and F5 polypeptides were found to be inserted into microsomal membranes as expected for integral membrane proteins. Expression in vivo of Flag-olp4 in Sf9 insect cells, using the baculovirus expression system, showed a specific polypeptide of the same size as the in vitro species, with an additional band of 34 kDa, which is most likely a glycosylated form. Fluorescence cytometry and immunohistochemical assays demonstrated the localization of the Flag-olp4 product on the cell surface of the infected host Sf9 cells, with the N-terminus and C-terminus in the proper orientation. Affinity chromatography was used for the partial purification of the olp4 polypeptide from infected Sf9 cells. The identification and purification of this expressed olfactory receptor polypeptide could open the way for further characterization and functional studies of the olfactory receptor superfamily members.
A gene superfamily of olfactory receptors (ORs) has recently been identified in a number of species. These receptors share a seven transmembrane domain structure with many neurotransmitter and hormone receptors, and are likely to underlie the recognition and G-protein-mediated transduction of odorant signals. Previously, OR genes cloned in different species were from random locations in the respective genomes. We report here the cloning of 16 human OR genes, all from chromosome 17 (17p13.3). The intronless coding regions are physically mapped (on 35 cosmids) in one 0.35Mb long contiguous cluster, with an average intergenic separation of 15kb. The human OR genes in the cluster belong to four different gene subfamilies, displaying as much sequence variability as any randomly selected group of ORs. This suggests that the cluster identified may be one of several copies of an ancestral OR gene repertoire whose existence may predate the divergence of mammals. The latter may have duplicated in some species to form the present mammalian OR gene repertoire, with several hundred genes. The human chromosome 17 OR gene cluster may thus be a good model for understanding human olfaction, as well as the ontogeny and phylogeny of the OR gene superfamily.
The olfactory epithelium is exposed to a variety of xenobiotic chemicals, including odorants and airborne toxic compounds. Recently, two novel, highly abundant, olfactory-specific biotransformation enzymes have been identified: cytochrome P-450olf1 and olfactory UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT(olf)). The latter is a phase II biotransformation enzyme which catalyses the glucuronidation of alcohols, thiols, amines and carboxylic acids. Such covalent modification, which markedly affects lipid solubility and agonist potency, may be particularly important in the rapid termination of odorant signals. We report here the identification and characterization of a second olfactory phase II biotransformation enzyme, a glutathione S-transferase (GST). The olfactory epithelial cytosol shows the highest GST activity among the extrahepatic tissues examined. Significantly, olfactory epithelium had an activity 4-7 times higher than in other airway tissues, suggesting a role for this enzyme in chemoreception. The olfactory GST has been affinity-purified to homogeneity, and shown by h.p.l.c. and N-terminal amino acid sequencing to constitute mainly the Yb1 and Yb2 subunits, different from most other tissues that have mixtures of more enzyme classes. The identity of the olfactory enzymes was confirmed by PCR cloning and restriction enzyme analysis. Most importantly, the olfactory GSTs were found to catalyse glutathione conjugation of several odorant classes, including many unsaturated aldehydes and ketones, as well as epoxides. Together with UGT(olf), olfactory GST provides the necessary broad coverage of covalent modification capacity, which may be crucial for the acuity of the olfactory process.
The molecular components of olfactory reception and regulation are expressed in a tissue-specific manner. The functional attributes mediated by some of these proteins have been previously shown to display a well-defined developmental emergence during the last week of rat gestation. To gain a better understanding of the relations between chemosensory function and neuronal development, we studied the ontogeny of 7 olfactory-specific genes by quantitative PCR. Relative levels of expression during rat development were determined for each gene, starting at embryonic day 15 (E15) and ending at postnatal day 35 (P35). In addition, the level of expression of the different genes was quantified in juvenile rats. The onset of expression for olfactory receptors and the olfactory cation channel at embryonic day 19 (E19) coincides with the functional maturation of the sensory neurons. Olfactory G-protein and adenylyl cyclase are expressed earlier (approximately E16) while olfactory biotransformation enzymes appear later (E20-E21), just before birth. The sequence of developmental expression of olfactory receptor genes has possible implications to the establishment of neuronal connectivity in this sensory pathway.
A generalized phenomenological model is presented for stereospecific recognition between biological receptors and their ligands. We ask what is the distribution of binding constants psi(K) between an arbitrary ligand and members of a large receptor repertoire, such as immunoglobulins or olfactory receptors. For binding surfaces with B potential subsite and S different types of subsite configurations, the number of successful elementary interactions obeys a binomial distribution. The discrete probability function psi(K) is then derived with assumptions on alpha, the free energy contribution per elementary interaction. The functional form of psi(K) may be universal, although the parameter values could vary for different ligand types. An estimate of the parameter values of psi(K) for iodovanillin, an analog of odorants and immunological haptens, is obtained by equilibrium dialysis experiments with nonimmune antibodies. Based on a simple relationship, predicted by the model, between the size of a receptor repertoire and its average maximal affinity toward an arbitrary ligand, the size of the olfactory receptor repertoire (Nolf) is calculated as 300-1000, in very good agreement with recent molecular biological studies. A very similar estimate, Nolf = 500, is independently derived by relating a theoretical distribution of maxima for psi(K) with published human olfactory threshold variations. The present model also has implications to the question of olfactory coding and to the analysis of specific anosmias, genetic deficits in perceiving particular odorants. More generally, the proposed model provides a better understanding of ligand specificity in biological receptors and could help in understanding their evolution.
The emerging understanding of the molecular basis of olfactory mechanisms allows one to answer some long-standing questions regarding the complex recognition machinery involved. The ability of the olfactory system to detect chemicals at sub-nanomolar concentrations is explained by a plethora of amplification devices, including the coupling of receptors to second messenger generation through GTP-binding proteins. Specificity and selectivity may be understood in terms of a diverse repertoire of olfactory receptors of the seven-transmembrane-domain receptor superfamily, which are probably disposed on olfactory sensory neurons according to a clonal exclusion rule. Signal termination may be related to sets of biotransformation enzymes that process odorant molecules, as well as to receptor desensitization. Many of the underlying molecular components show specific expression in olfactory epithelium, with a well-orchestrated developmental sequence of emergence, possibly related to sensory neuronal function and connectivity requirements. A general model for molecular recognition in biological receptor repertoires allows a prediction of the number of olfactory receptors necessary to achieve efficient detection and sheds light on the analogy between the immune and olfactory systems. The molecular cloning and mapping of a human genomic olfactory receptor cluster on chromosome 17 provides insight into olfactory receptor diversity, polymorphism and evolution. Combined with future genotype-phenotype correlation, with particular reference to specific anosmia, as well as with computer-based molecular modelling, these studies may provide insight into the odorant specificity of olfactory receptors.
Olfactory thresholds for four odorants were determined in groups of monozygotic and dizygotic human twins. Odorants were presented in an ascending dilution series in odorless solvent, using a three-way forced choice method. For two of the tested odorants, 5 alpha-androst-16-en-3-one and isoamyl acetate, the thresholds showed a strong genetic component. This was demonstrated by respective values of 0.78 and 0.73 for the intraclass correlation difference, and of z = 3.69 and z = 2.71 in a within-pair difference analysis. The results for isoamyl acetate are novel, and suggest that genetic polymorphism in the affinity of odorant receptor proteins contributes to the (nearly normal) threshold distribution for this odorant.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.