Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D L Wilkerson

Publications and source records attributed to D L Wilkerson.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Accreditation and the use of outcomes-oriented information systems.

Rehabilitation programs of all types and sizes must be able to use information technology to respond to both internal and external forces. One can anticipate that consumer-driven care will mean a desire for and access to more public information about health plans, specialty components of health care (eg, rehabilitation), and the quality of plans and providers. Providers need information with which to plan and manage their outcomes and resource allocation, to monitor and improve the quality of services, and to communicate with external stakeholders. The Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) has for more than two decades required accredited organizations to have active outcome-oriented program evaluation systems. Yet, accreditation requirements have historically been process-oriented. This process orientation is now evolving toward an outcome orientation, both in the accreditation environment at large, and at CARF. This article describes these outcome-oriented initiatives, including CARF SCoRsSM, a standards conformance rating system under development at CARF, and a project to identify a limited, uniform set of performance indicators for rehabilitation programs. In addition, the article reflects on the significance of a potential National Information System for brain injury to the accreditation and outcomes arena.

Accreditation↗

Use of functional status measures for payment of medical rehabilitation services.

In the search for an appropriate payment system for medical rehabilitation hospitals and units, the use of a functional status measure (FSM) has emerged as a recurring theme. Conceptually, functional status measurement is important because the primary goal of medical rehabilitation is to enhance patient function and independence. Studies indicate that functional status and functional gain are among the best predictors of resource utilization at rehabilitation facilities. This article examines conceptually the use of FSMs in payment for medical rehabilitation in two different types of payment systems--as a means of classifying patients for purposes of determining the applicable payment amount (ie, a "classification system"), and as a means of justifying that payment, or continued payment, for services is appropriate (ie, a "justification system"). Several payment models using an FSM are described and analyzed. An agenda for future research is proposed.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗