Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D L Page

Publications and source records attributed to D L Page.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria.

Although the categorization of proliferative breast lesions provides valuable information regarding subsequent risk of breast cancer, the ability of pathologists to classify such lesions in a reproducible fashion has not been adequately evaluated. To assess further interobserver reproducibility in the categorization of proliferative breast lesions, six pathologists each reviewed 24 proliferative ductal lesions and classified them as either usual hyperplasia (H), atypical hyperplasia (AH), or carcinoma in situ (CIS). Before evaluation of the study slides, all the participants were instructed to use the diagnostic criteria of Page and co-workers and were provided with both a written summary of these criteria and a set of teaching slides with representative examples of each type of lesion. Complete agreement among all six pathologists was seen in 14 cases (58%); five or more agreed in 17 cases (71%); and four or more arrived at the same diagnosis in 22 cases (92%). No pathologist consistently rendered more "benign" or "malignant" diagnoses than any other. After assigning numerical values for each diagnostic category (H = 1, AH = 2, CIS = 3), the scores for the group of 24 cases did not differ significantly by pathologist (p = 0.68; average score range, 1.7-2.0). Our results indicate that with the use of standardized criteria, interobserver concordance in the diagnosis of proliferative ductal breast lesions can be obtained in the majority of cases.

Breast↗

Pathology of preinvasive and excellent-prognosis cancers.

Recent advances in breast cancer treatment have made recognition of different prognostic groups mandatory. In addition, further experience with screening-detected lesions has resulted in the definition of new associations. Therapeutic approaches to these frequently microscopic lesions are currently the source of much debate. This article reviews recent studies of excellent-prognosis carcinomas as well as premalignant and other histologically defined lesions that indicate an increased risk for the development or recurrence of carcinoma. Advances in fine-needle aspiration and in hormone receptor assays are also reviewed.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Distant cutaneous metastasis of pleural malignant mesothelioma.

We report a facial tumor that was proven to be a metastatic mesothelioma. The diagnosis was not established pre-mortem. The patient died shortly after the facial biopsy, and an autopsy revealed a large pleural-based mass which had the gross appearance typical of a mesothelioma. Electron microscopic examination of tissue from the pleural tumor was diagnostic for mesothelioma. The patient had extensive visceral metastatic disease. Inclusion of this entity in the differential diagnosis of certain cutaneous tumors is important, in part because this lesion may be confused with angiosarcoma, particularly when it occurs in the skin of the face or head in older patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Altered expression of a structural protein (fodrin) within epithelial proliferative disease of the breast.

Although certain histopathologic patterns of epithelial proliferative breast disease are well established as indicating an increased relative risk for the subsequent development of mammary carcinoma, the biologic characterization of these changes is not known. One evident histologic characteristic of epithelial hyperplasia is the partial or complete loss of normal cellular polarity. Nonerythroid spectrin (fodrin) is a structural protein whose function is related to maintenance of cellular polarity. By immunohistochemical analysis, normal breast luminal epithelia contain fodrin confined to a characteristic basolateral distribution. Proliferative breast disease of the common type partially loses this polarized distribution of fodrin; fodrin immunoreactivity is not limited to a basolateral location but is present around the cell membrane and is inconsistently present at luminal interfaces. Whether this change in distribution of fodrin is a permissive event in the development of proliferative disease or merely an associated finding is not known.

Adult↗

Benign breast disease: indicators of increased breast cancer risk.

Assessment of cancer risk, particularly with a view toward targeting strategies for prevention, is a recent development. The future will see the garnering of more specific information about determinants of risk and their interaction with screening prevention and therapeutic modalities. We are not a full professional generation removed from a time when the question of malignancy in the breast was absolute, yes or no. Now special types of breast cancer are recognized that pose little threat to life, while some benign conditions indicate greatly increased risk of death from cancer. Comparisons of premalignant determinants in other organ systems indicate that cytologic, histologic, and metaplastic features may be more or less important in different organs. Their separate and combined analysis as predictors give a complex measure of tissue organization, which is often predictive of concurrent cancer and/or future cancer development. In proliferative breast disease, the markers of cancer risk may be classified into histologic categories of slightly, moderately, and markedly increased risk. In cases of slightly increased risk, the probability for cancer development is 1.5 to 2 times that of the general population; a moderately increased risk denotes that the likelihood of cancer development may be 4 to 5 times greater; a markedly increased risk has a predictive value of 9 to 10 times that of the general population.

Breast↗

Elevated content of the tyrosine kinase substrate phospholipase C-gamma 1 in primary human breast carcinomas.

Phospholipase C-gamma 1 (PLC-gamma 1) is a substrate for several receptor tyrosine kinases and its catalytic activity is increased by tyrosine phosphorylation. However, the biological significance of this molecule in normal or malignant human epithelial cell proliferation is unknown. We determined the relative content of PLC-gamma 1 in primary human mammary carcinomas and in nonmalignant mammary tissues. By Western blot and immunohistochemistry, considerably higher levels of PLC-gamma 1 protein were detectable in the majority of carcinomas and in one of two benign fibroadenomas compared to normal breast tissues. In 18 of 21 carcinomas that contained high levels of PLC-gamma 1, the presence of phosphotyrosine on PLC-gamma 1 could also be detected. All carcinomas in which tyrosine phosphorylated PLC-gamma 1 was present also expressed detectable levels of the epidermal growth factor receptor or erbB-2, two tyrosine kinases known to phosphorylate this enzyme. Thus, a high percentage of mammary carcinomas concomitantly display increased levels of receptor tyrosine kinases and a direct tyrosine phosphorylation substrate, thereby potentially amplifying two successive steps in a signal transduction pathway.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Lobular neoplasia of the breast: higher risk for subsequent invasive cancer predicted by more extensive disease.

We have stratified the cancer risk implications of lobular pattern in situ neoplasias of the breast by separating marked examples of this histologic spectrum (lobular carcinoma in situ [LCIS]) from lesser examples (atypical lobular hyperplasia). The lesser-developed examples have been shown previously to have a lower relative risk (RR) of later invasive carcinoma of the breast (IBC). Forty-eight examples of LCIS were found in 10,542 otherwise benign breast biopsies, representing an incidence of 0.5%. Nine patients were excluded from follow-up because of bilateral mastectomy within 6 months of entry biopsy, IBC within 6 months of entry biopsy, or prior IBC. Follow-up of the remaining 39 patients was complete, averaged 18 years, and revealed an RR of subsequent IBC of 6.9 (P less than .00001). Average overall follow-up for LCIS patients was 19 years; it was 25 years for those alive and free of IBC at the time of their follow-up interview. Neither family history of IBC nor postmenopausal estrogen therapy further affected risk. The absolute risk of IBC after LCIS was 17% at 15 years (adjusted for withdrawals), and the RR was 8.0 in the first 15 years of follow-up compared with the general population. An analysis based on a time-dependent hazards model found that during the first 15 years following biopsy women with LCIS had 10.8 times the risk of breast cancer compared with biopsied women of comparable age who lacked proliferative disease. Some previously published articles reporting lobular neoplasia (LN) suggest that those series with the greatest incidences of LN (whether termed LN or LCIS) have the lowest RR of subsequent breast cancer. Those series with higher incidences of LN include less well-developed histologic patterns of LN (atypical lobular hyperplasia). We conclude that our study of LN and studies performed by others support the higher risk of IBC after histologically flagrant examples (LCIS, about nine times higher) and a relatively lower but definable risk after more histologically subtle examples (atypical lobular hyperplasia, four to five times lower). This relative cancer risk is probably not constant over more than 15 years; thus, cancer risk 15 to 25 years after initial diagnosis of LCIS is uncertain.

Adult↗

Prognosis and breast cancer. Recognition of lethal and favorable prognostic types.

Assignment of breast cancer patients to specific prognostic groups has been a relatively empty exercise until the recent acceptance of the effectiveness of systemic chemotherapy. The previous question of who should be so treated has changed in North America to a question of who should not be so treated. The availability of intensive chemotherapy for the worst prognostic groups as well as efficacious, low-toxicity adjuvant chemotherapy has made prognostication mandatory. The current major question is which women with breast cancer will not benefit from chemotherapy. We are actually much better at prognostication than many studies and the current broad search for new prognostic markers would indicate. The assignment of excellent prognosis categories by defined special histologic types or grade of breast cancer as well as other measures recognize women with survival approaching or equaling the general population. Likewise, extremely poor prognosis may be recognized in 20% to 40% of women with breast cancer by the presence of extensive mitoses or high proliferation index (by any modality) and poor differentiation (highest grade). Combined tumor size and nodal status data with high-grade indicates that women with these indicators will die within 2 to 3 years with as high as 80% certainty. The surgical pathologist still determines if cancer is present and must also determine if the tumor is in situ or invasive, its type or grade if invasive, and the extent of in situ component. Considering the diminution in overall size of cancers detected by modern techniques, it is clear that validation of newer prognostic variables will be more useful and will allow more separate determinations if adapted to tissue sections rather than tissue homogenates. The many measures of these carcinomas, such as size and nodal status, make multiparametric assessment of putative prognostic markers mandatory.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

Pathology of preinvasive and excellent-prognosis breast cancer.

Recent advances in breast cancer treatment have made recognition of different prognostic groups mandatory. In addition, further experience with screening-detected lesions has resulted in definition of new associations. Therapeutic approaches to these frequently microscopic lesions are currently the source of much debate. This article reviews recent studies of excellent-prognosis carcinomas, as well as premalignant and other histologically defined lesions that indicate an increased risk for development or recurrence of carcinoma. Advances in fine-needle aspiration and in hormone receptor assays are also reviewed.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Menopausal estrogen replacement therapy and breast cancer.

We conducted a meta-analysis of the literature concerning breast cancer and estrogen replacement therapy. The overall relative risk of breast cancer associated with this therapy was 1.07. However, the variation of the estimated risks among the studies was far greater than could plausibly be explained by chance alone. To explain this variation, we looked at the effects of type, duration, and dosage of treatment. Overall, women who took 0.625 mg/d or less of conjugated estrogens had a risk of breast cancer that was 1.08 times that of women who did not receive this therapy (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.2). The relative risks from these individual studies of low-dosage therapy did not differ significantly from each other. Women who took 1.25 mg/d or more of conjugated estrogens had a breast cancer relative risk of 2.0 or less in all studies. However, the variation in observed risks at this higher dosage was significant. This implies that other risk factors varied among these studies, making it difficult to estimate the overall risk associated with this dosage. The relative risk of breast cancer associated with estrogen replacement therapy among women with a history of benign breast disease was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.5). The combined results from multiple studies provide strong evidence that menopausal therapy consisting of 0.625 mg/d or less of conjugated estrogens does not increase breast cancer risk.

Breast Diseases↗

Anatomic markers of human premalignancy and risk of breast cancer.

Epithelial hyperplasia of the breast carries an increased likelihood of carcinoma development, with most lesions best understood as markers of higher risk. The indication of increased cancer risk for more worrisome or complex histologic patterns has been supported in many studies. About 25% of women who underwent biopsies in the premammographic era had well-developed hyperplastic changes associated with an elevated risk of 1.5 to 2.0 times that of the general population when age and length of time of follow-up were considered. Somewhat fewer than 5% of women had specific patterns of atypical hyperplasia (AH) that approached the criteria of carcinoma in situ (CIS). These women with AH had a risk of cancer four to five times that of the general population, or about one half the risk associated with microscopic CIS. Only ductal CIS should be considered without question to be an intrinsic precancerous lesion because of its regular association with recurrence at the site of its initial diagnosis. Further studies indicated an appreciable interaction between AH and other nonanatomic risk factors, particularly a family history of breast cancer. Also, lower dosage estrogen replacement after menopause does not affect risk in any histologically defined group. The atypical hyperplastic lesions are more common in women undergoing biopsies on the indication of mammographic calcifications than because of palpable masses. The primary therapeutic implications of these premalignant lesions are intensified breast cancer surveillance and screening for these patients.

Breast↗

Premalignant conditions and markers of elevated risk in the breast and their management.

Most epithelial hyperplasias of the human breast indicate an increased likelihood of carcinoma development, and the majority are best understood as markers or indicators of higher risk. Prospective studies of women with hyperplasia biopsied in the premammographic era indicate that about 70 per cent of women had mild or no hyperplastic epithelial alterations and experienced no increase in the risk of subsequent carcinoma. About 25 per cent of women had well-developed hyperplastic changes associated with a risk 1.5 to 2.0 times that of the general population controlled for age and length of follow-up. Somewhat fewer than 5 per cent of women had specific patterns of atypical hyperplasia that approached the patterns of carcinoma in situ. The women with atypical hyperplasia had a risk of cancer four to five times that of the general population, or about half the risk associated with microscopic carcinoma in situ. Only ductal carcinoma in situ should be considered without question to be an intrinsically precancerous lesion because of its regular association with recurrence at the site of its initial diagnosis. No follow-up studies of comparable type involving women with mammographically detected lesions are as yet available. However, it is clear that the incidence of atypical hyperplasia is higher in mammographically directed biopsies. The principal therapeutic implication of these premalignant lesions is a need for intensified breast cancer surveillance and screening for these patients.

Breast↗