Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Kane

Publications and source records attributed to D Kane.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of musculoskeletal ultrasound practices of a rheumatologist and a radiologist.

OBJECTIVE: There is considerable debate regarding the role of the rheumatologist ultrasonographer and how this development will impact on musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) performed by radiologists. We compared the MSUS practices of a rheumatologist and a radiologist working within the same National Health Service Trust. METHODS: A retrospective review of MSUS reports of consecutive scans performed by a consultant rheumatologist with a special interest in MSUS and a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist. Reports were analysed for referring specialties, indications for MSUS, joint regions scanned, MSUS findings, frequency with which patients were referred for injection and how often injection was performed. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were referred to the rheumatologist for MSUS of 282 joint regions (91% referred by rheumatologists). Of those, 84 (49%) patients had MSUS examination of more than one joint region, with up to five regions scanned per sitting. One hundred patients were referred to the radiologist for MSUS of 111 joint regions (49% referred by orthopaedic surgeons). The most frequently requested primary indication for MSUS performed by the rheumatologist was detection of synovitis [74 (44%) patients] while MSUS performed by the radiologist was most frequently for assessment for major structural changes [44 (44%) patients]. The rheumatologist performed MSUS-guided injection in 59 of 170 (35%) patients scanned and the radiologist in 13 of 100 (13%). CONCLUSION: MSUS performed by the rheumatologist was predominantly requested by rheumatologists to aid diagnosis of synovial and tendon inflammation and to guide injections, while MSUS performed by the radiologist was predominantly requested by orthopaedic surgeons to aid diagnosis of structural pathology. Curriculums in MSUS designed for rheumatologists may need to place appropriate emphasis on the identification of synovial and tendon inflammation, and injection guidance.

England↗

Pre-mobilization therapy blood CD34+ cell count predicts the likelihood of successful hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.

We examined pre-mobilization blood CD34+ cell count to predict ability to mobilize adequate peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in 106 cancer patients and 36 allogeneic donors. Mean pre-mobilization therapy blood CD34+ cell count was 3.1 cells x 10(6)/l (s.d. = 3.9, r = 0.3-37) and mean CD34+ cells collected were 5.3 x 10(6) cells/kg/leukapheresis procedure (s.d. = 7.0, r = 0.03-53). Yields correlated with pre-mobilization CD34+ cells x 10(6)/l (r = 0.37, P-value < 0.0001); correlation was stronger in allogeneic donors (r = 0.56, P-value = 0.0004) and males (r = 0.46, P-value < 0.0001). Based on classification and regression tree multivariate analysis, the predictive value of pre-mobilization blood CD34+ cell count was confounded by other variables, including age, gender, mobilization regimen and malignancy type. We generated an algorithm to predict a minimum PBPC yield of 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg/leukapheresis procedure after mobilization. A threshold pre-mobilization blood CD34+ cell count of 2.65 cells x 10(6)/l was the most important decision point in predicting successful mobilization. Only 2% of subjects with pre-mobilization blood CD34+ cell counts > 2.65 cells x 10(6)/l did not achieve the minimum per apheresis, whereas 24% with pre-mobilization values below threshold had inadequate mobilization. Prospectively identifying individuals at risk for mobilization failure would allow for improved treatment planning, resource utilization and time saving.

Adolescent↗

Interobserver reliability in musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a "Teach the Teachers" rheumatologist course.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the interobserver reliability of the main periarticular and intra-articular ultrasonographic pathologies and to establish the principal disagreements on scanning technique and diagnostic criteria between a group of experts in musculoskeletal ultrasonography. METHODS: The shoulder, wrist/hand, ankle/foot, or knee of 24 patients with rheumatic diseases were evaluated by 23 musculoskeletal ultrasound experts from different European countries randomly assigned to six groups. The participants did not reach consensus on scanning method or diagnostic criteria before the investigation. They were unaware of the patients' clinical and imaging data. The experts from each group undertook a blinded ultrasound examination of the four anatomical regions. The ultrasound investigation included the presence/absence of joint effusion/synovitis, bony cortex abnormalities, tenosynovitis, tendon lesions, bursitis, and power Doppler signal. Afterwards they compared the ultrasound findings and re-examined the patients together while discussing their results. RESULTS: Overall agreements were 91% for joint effusion/synovitis and tendon lesions, 87% for cortical abnormalities, 84% for tenosynovitis, 83.5% for bursitis, and 83% for power Doppler signal; kappa values were good for the wrist/hand and knee (0.61 and 0.60) and fair for the shoulder and ankle/foot (0.50 and 0.54). The principal differences in scanning method and diagnostic criteria between experts were related to dynamic examination, definition of tendon lesions, and pathological v physiological fluid within joints, tendon sheaths, and bursae. CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal ultrasound has a moderate to good interobserver reliability. Further consensus on standardisation of scanning technique and diagnostic criteria is necessary to improve musculoskeletal ultrasonography reproducibility.

Adult↗

Musculoskeletal ultrasound--a state of the art review in rheumatology. Part 2: Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology.

Rheumatologists remain divided on whether they should introduce musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) into their clinical practice. A central issue in the application of MSUS in clinical rheumatology is the need for proof of clinical relevance and improved patient care. There is now accumulating evidence that MSUS improves clinical diagnosis and intervention skills. High-resolution ultrasound is superior to clinical examination in the diagnosis and localization of joint and bursal effusion and synovitis. MSUS is the imaging modality of choice for the diagnosis of tendon pathology. MSUS is seven times more sensitive than plain radiography in the detection of rheumatoid erosions, allowing earlier diagnosis of progressive rheumatoid arthritis. Ligament, muscle, peripheral nerve and cartilage pathology can also be readily demonstrated by MSUS. There is exciting evidence that MSUS may potentially be used by rheumatologists to non-invasively diagnose and monitor not just joint and muscle disease but also nerve compression syndromes, scleroderma, vasculitis and Sjögren's syndrome. Joint aspiration and injection accuracy can be improved by MSUS, with initial evidence confirming improved efficacy. As the number of rheumatologists performing MSUS increases and the technical capabilities of MSUS improve, there is likely to be a growing number of proven clinical indications for the application of MSUS in rheumatology practice. This paper reviews the evidence for the application of MSUS in rheumatology.

Bone and Bones↗

Protective effect of sensory denervation in inflammatory arthritis (evidence of regulatory neuroimmune pathways in the arthritic joint).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the direct effect of joint innervation on immune mediated joint inflammation in a patient with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). CASE REPORT: The patient developed arthritis mutilans in all digits of both hands with the exception of the left 4th finger, which had prior sensory denervation following traumatic nerve dissection. Plain radiography, ultrasonography and nerve conduction studies of the hands confirmed the absence of articular disease and sensory innervation in the left 4th digit. METHODS: This relationship between joint innervation and joint inflammation was investigated experimentally by prior surgical sensory denervation of the medial aspect of the knee in six Wistar rats in which carrageenan induced arthritis was subsequently induced. Prior sensory denervation--with preservation of muscle function--prevented the development of inflammatory arthritis in the denervated knee. DISCUSSION: Observations in human and animal inflammatory arthritis suggest that regulatory neuroimmune pathways in the joint are an important mechanism that modulates the clinical expression of inflammatory arthritis.

Animals↗

Musculoskeletal ultrasound--a state of the art review in rheumatology. Part 1: Current controversies and issues in the development of musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology.

As we begin the 21st century, musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is routinely used by an increasing number of rheumatologists throughout Europe and there is a growing interest in the application of MSUS in rheumatological practice in the UK. MSUS allows high-resolution, real-time imaging of articular and periarticular structures and has the advantages of being non-radioactive, inexpensive, portable, highly acceptable to patients and repeatable. There are a number of critical issues that need to be addressed in order to develop the role of MSUS within rheumatology. These include issues of equipment costs, training and certification and the relationship of rheumatologists and radiologists in advancing the field of MSUS. Rheumatologists must demonstrate the relevance of MSUS in their clinical practice through high-quality research. Emerging technologies such as power Doppler and 3D imaging will further improve imaging capabilities and the range of clinical applications of MSUS systems. This paper reviews how MSUS in rheumatology has evolved and the controversies and issues that rheumatologists must now address in developing MSUS as an indispensable, everyday clinical tool.

Clinical Competence↗

A prospective, clinical and radiological study of early psoriatic arthritis: an early synovitis clinic experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical presentation and clinical and radiological outcome of early psoriatic arthritis (PsA) at 1 and 2 yr. METHODS: Patients with PsA were assessed at the St. Vincent's University Hospital Early Synovitis Clinic. Standardized clinical and laboratory assessment was performed at presentation and 1- and 2-yr follow-up. Radiographs of the hands and feet were evaluated in chronological order by two trained observers using the Sharp method modified to include the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints. RESULTS: A total of 129 (12.7%) of 1018 patients were diagnosed with PsA [mean age at onset of arthritis was 40.4 yr (range 11-76); mean duration of disease was 9.9 months (range 0.3-48); 52 oligoarticular, 77 polyarticular]. Means and standard deviations of indices of disease activity at presentation were: 10-cm visual analogue scale = 4.8 +/- 2.7, HAQ score = 0.71 +/- 0.64, ACR functional class III/IV = 41 (35%), Ritchie Articular Index = 5.6 +/- 6, swollen joint count = 6.9 +/- 8, erythrocyte sedimentation rate = 24 +/- 26.4 mm/h, C-reactive protein = 27.6 +/- 58.5 mg/l. At presentation, 49 (38%) patients had peripheral enthesopathy, 13 patients (10%) had inflammatory spine pain and 50 (39%) patients had DIP involvement. A total of 119 had psoriasis at the time of presentation [plaque psoriasis in 112 (94%), mean age of psoriasis onset was 29.8 +/- 16.2 yr, nail dystrophy present in 78 patients (67%)]. At 1 yr of follow-up, 119 (92%) patients were reassessed and 70 (59%) were taking a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). At 2 yr, 97 (75%) patients were reassessed and 54 (56%) were taking a DMARD. Despite considerable improvement in inflammation and function scores, only 31 (26%) patients were in remission at 1 yr with 20 (21%) in remission at 2 yr. There was a low rate of DMARD-free remission [14 (12%) at 1 yr and 11 (11%) at 2 yr]. Radiographs of hands and feet were obtained for 117 (91%) patients at presentation and 86 (67%) patients at a median follow-up of 24 months (range 11-56); 47% of patients had joint erosions in hands or feet at follow-up with a mean Sharp erosion score of 3 (0) +/- 5.2 (range 0-25) and a mean Sharp narrowing score of 3.2 (0) +/- 7.5 (range 0-48). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that PsA is a chronic, progressive disease in the majority of patients. Despite clinical improvement with current DMARD treatment, PsA results in radiological damage in up to 47% of patients at a median interval of 2 yr.

Adolescent↗

A classification study of clinical subsets in an inception cohort of early psoriatic peripheral arthritis--'DIP or not DIP revisited'.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple psoriatic arthritis (PsA) classification criteria exist, but these are based on established PsA when pre-existing joint damage and the effect of medication may confound their validity. This study examined the application of the Veale classification criteria in early PsA to determine the effect of disease progression and treatment on classification and to determine the effect of the number of involved joints and the presence of distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint involvement at initial presentation on clinical and radiological outcome. METHODS: A total of 129 patients presenting with PsA to an Irish early synovitis clinic were assessed at presentation and at 1- and 2-yr follow-up. The Veale criteria were used for PsA classification and the Sharp score of hands and feet was used to quantify radiological outcome. RESULTS: At presentation, 52 (40%) had oligoarticular PsA and 77 (60%) had polyarticular PsA. Patients with polyarticular PsA were administered disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) more frequently than patients with oligoarticular PsA and this resulted in a significant number of polyarticular PsA patients being reclassified as oligoarticular PsA at 1- [27/70 (39%)] and 2-yr [26/53 (49%)] follow-up. Fewer patients initially classified with oligoarticular PsA were reclassified as polyarticular PsA. More patients with oligoarticular PsA at baseline were in DMARD-free remission and there was less radiological damage at 2-yr follow-up. DIP disease was associated with other classic seronegative disease features-enthesopathy and nail dystrophy-but did not influence clinical or radiological outcome and the separation of DIP disease as a distinct subgroup in classification criteria was not supported. Synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis (SAPHO) syndrome was not observed as a separate subgroup. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the application of classification criteria of PsA based on the pattern and number of involved joints may be confounded in established PsA by the effects of DMARDs. The application of classification criteria based on disease pattern prior to treatment may be more useful in studies of pathogenesis and long-term outcome in PsA.

Adolescent↗

Expression of the pro-inflammatory protein S100A12 (EN-RAGE) in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Infiltration of synovial tissue by neutrophils is crucial in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and seronegative arthritis (SA). Altered vascular function and endothelial activation are important in PsA. S100A12 (EN-RAGE) is secreted by activated granulocytes and binds to the receptor for advanced glycation end products, which induces nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB-dependent activation of endothelium. METHODS: Immunohistochemical studies were performed to detect synovial S100A12 expression. We analysed serum and synovial fluid of 42 patients for S100A12 levels. RESULTS: S100A12 was strongly expressed in inflamed synovial tissue whereas it was nearly undetectable in synovia of controls or patients after successful treatment. Serum levels of S100A12 correlated with disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Local expression of S100A12 in inflamed tissue suggests a role in synovitis, especially in PsA. High serum concentrations of S100A12 in patients with active arthritis compared with healthy controls or patients in remission point to its usefulness as a serum marker.

Adult↗

Legal claims in Scottish National Health Service Dermatology Departments 1989-2001.

BACKGROUND: An area of current National Health Service (NHS) interest is risk management as it is one of the requirements of clinical governance. If there are aspects of dermatological practice prone to mishap or dispute then a review of legal claims in dermatology may highlight these areas. This would then allow input into these specific areas of practice to try and minimize future risk. OBJECTIVES: To review all legal claims relating to NHS Dermatology in Scotland and characterize the main areas of risk. METHODS: Staff at the Central Legal Office in Edinburgh reviewed all legal claims in NHS Dermatology between 1989 and 2001. Details provided were general, and claimants, staff, hospitals and regions of Scotland could not be identified. RESULTS: Thirty claims were identified relating to five main areas of dermatological practice: (i) phototherapy (eight claims); (ii) therapeutics (eight); (iii) cryosurgery/cryotherapy (six); (iv) surgery (four); and (v) misdiagnosis (three) and one alleged neurological problem after fainting. As well as consultants, nurses featured in phototherapy claims and junior medical staff in cryosurgery claims. Twelve of the 30 (40%) claims have reached settlement; three claims are presently outstanding. CONCLUSIONS: Given the numbers of patients seen annually at Scottish NHS Hospital Dermatology units the absolute number of claims is low. Five main areas within dermatology were highlighted as at risk of litigation and this has implications for all U.K. dermatology departments with regard to funding, staff training and patient information and consent.

Adolescent↗