Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D K Richardson

Publications and source records attributed to D K Richardson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

[Assessing the impact of delivery unit size on neonatal survival: estimation of potentially avoidable deaths in Hessen, Germany, 1990-2000].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are only few analyses from Germany on the impact of delivery unit size on neonatal outcome. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of delivery unit size on neonatal survival in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from the perinatal birth register for Hessen for 1990-2000 comprising 640554 births, and the Neonatal Survey for 1989-1997 in Hessen were used. Potentially avoidable deaths were assessed according to delivery unit size and birth weight category. Additionally trend analyses and an extrapolation to potentially avoidable deaths in all of Germany were performed. RESULTS: Compared to large delivery units, smaller ones showed higher risk adjusted mortality rates. Calculation of potentially avoidable deaths gave an estimate of 257 early neonatal deaths in 11 years. Although trend analyses revealed a decline of potentially avoidable deaths, an extrapolation of such deaths for all of Germany still yielded an estimate of more than 300 potentially avoidable deaths per year using data from 1997-2000 only. CONCLUSION: A valid inference as to the magnitude of the observed effect remains even in the face of a very cautious interpretation of our results. During the study period of 11 years, more than 200 neonatal deaths could be attributed to the fact that births in Hessen are dispersed among many small hospitals. If this pattern of births in small units is common throughout Germany, it suggests that several hundred neonatal deaths per year may be attributed to this risk factor when extrapolating these results nationally. Further research is necessary to describe the nation-wide magnitude of this problem and to identify the role of underlying causal risk factors more precisely. Additionally policy discussions regarding structural changes in obstetrical care should be undertaken in the meantime, aimed at reducing the observed mortality rates.

Birth Weight↗
PubMed2001

A critical review of cost reduction in neonatal intensive care. II. Strategies for reduction.

Neonatal intensive care is extremely expensive; there is both a financial and an ethical obligation to practice efficiently. In the current era of intense cost containment in hospital care, neonatologists and hospital administrators are under pressure to find strategies for cost reduction for neonatal services. In this review, we address reducing discretionary admissions, the high costs of low-cost testing, minimizing use of selected high-cost technologies (ventilators and parenteral nutrition), shortening length of stay, and optimizing nursing allocation.

Cost Control↗
PubMed2001

A critical review of cost reduction in neonatal intensive care. I. The structure of costs.

Neonatal intensive care is expensive. In the current era of intense cost containment in hospital care, neonatologists and hospital administrators are under intense pressure to find strategies for cost reduction for neonatal services. Few neonatal clinicians are trained in economics, management, or accounting, and few hospital administrators are familiar with neonatal intensive care. In this review, we describe the structure and sources of hospital costs and the accounting systems needed to isolate and measure such costs. We discuss where efficiencies might be found and consider specific issues in capitated settings such as health maintenance organizations in the United States, the Canadian health care system and the National Health System in the United Kingdom.

Accounting↗
PubMed2001

Relationship of race and severity of neonatal illness.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine whether there are racial differences in the severity of illness on admission for premature newborn infants independent of gestational age. STUDY DESIGN: The study population consisted of all African American and Caucasian singleton infants with gestational ages <34 weeks who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at Brigham and Women's Hospital between December 1994 and November 1995. Illness severity was measured with a neonatal severity of illness score, the SNAP score (Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology). The SNAP score is a physiologic scoring system that ranks the worst physiologic derangements in each organ system in the first 12 hours of life. It is an objective measure of neonatal illness severity with scores ranging from 0 (healthy) to 42 (most severely ill). Student t tests, chi(2) analysis, and Fisher exact tests were used to assess statistical significance. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations while confounding factors were controlled for. RESULTS: There were 129 (79%) Caucasian and 36 (22%) African American newborns included in the analysis. Caucasian newborns had significantly higher mean SNAP scores than African American newborns (8.8 vs. 6.3; P <.05). Compared with African American newborns, Caucasian newborns were more than twice as likely to have a SNAP score >10 (33% vs. 14%; P <.05). In a linear regression analysis in which we controlled for gestational age, birth weight, preterm premature rupture of membranes, preterm labor, preeclampsia, intrapartum fever > or =100.4 degrees F, route of delivery, and other maternal and fetal factors, African American newborns were predicted to have a SNAP score that was on average 3.0 points lower than that of Caucasian newborns (P =.005). In a logistic regression in which we controlled for the above-mentioned confounders, African American newborns were only 14% as likely to have a SNAP score >10 when compared with Caucasian newborns (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Over a broad range of prematurity, Caucasian newborns were more ill than African American newborns on admission to the neonatal intensive care unit.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: Simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores.

OBJECTIVES: Illness severity scores for newborns are complex and restricted by birth weight and have dated validations and calibrations. We developed and validated simplified neonatal illness severity and mortality risk scores. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty neonatal intensive care units in Canada, California, and New England collected data on all admissions during the mid 1990s; patients moribund at birth or discharged to normal newborn care in <24 hours were excluded. Starting with the 34 data elements of the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP), we derived the most parsimonious logistic model for in-hospital mortality using 10,819 randomly selected Canadian cases. SNAP-II includes 6 physiologic items; to this are added points for birth weight, low Apgar score, and small for gestational age to create a 9-item SNAP-Perinatal Extension-II (SNAPPE-II). We validated SNAPPE-II on the remaining 14,610 cases and optimized the calibration. RESULTS: In all birth weights, SNAPPE-II had excellent discrimination and goodness of fit. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was .91 +/- 0.01. Goodness of fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow) was 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II are empirically validated illness severity and mortality risk scores for newborn intensive care. They are simple, accurate, and robust across populations.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Inter-neonatal intensive care unit variation in discharge timing: influence of apnea and feeding management.

BACKGROUND: Premature infants need to attain both medical stability and maturational milestones (specifically, independent thermoregulation, resolution of apnea of prematurity, and the ability to feed by mouth) before safe discharge to home. Current practice also requires premature infants to be observed in hospital before discharge for several days (margin of safety) after physiologic maturity is recognized. OBJECTIVE: To compare postmenstrual age (PMA) at discharge in a homogeneous population of premature infants cared for in different neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to assess the impact on hospital stay of the recognition and recording of physiologic maturity and the required margin of safety. METHODS: We studied premature infants delivered at 30 to 34 6/7 weeks gestational age (GA), free of significant medical or surgical complications. Medical records of 30 eligible infants consecutively discharged from the hospital before July 1997 from each of 15 NICUs in Massachusetts (9 level 2 and 6 level 3) were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 435 infants were included in the study sample. Mean (+/- standard deviation) GA and birth weight of the study population were 33.2 +/- 1.2 weeks and 2024 +/- 389 g, respectively. Infants were discharged at a similar PMA regardless of GA at birth. Considerable variation in the PMA at discharge between hospital sites was observed (range, 35.2 +/- 0.5 weeks to 36.5 +/- 1.2 weeks). Despite the homogeneous study population, hospitals in which infants had the latest PMA at discharge also recorded mature cardiorespiratory and feeding behavior at an older age. Longer duration of pulse oximetry use was associated with later resolution of apnea. Differences in the duration of the margin of safety between sites did not contribute to variation in hospital stay. CONCLUSION: NICUs vary widely in length of hospital stay for healthy premature infants. We speculate that this variation results in part from differences in monitoring for and documentation of apnea of prematurity and feeding behavior.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Cost-effectiveness and implications of newborn screening for prolongation of QT interval for the prevention of sudden infant death syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of universal and high-risk neonatal electrocardiographic (ECG) screening for QT prolongation as a predictor of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) risk in a theoretical group of neonates. STUDY DESIGN: Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis with decision analytic modeling. A hypothetical cohort of healthy, term infants was modeled, comparing options of no screening, high-risk neonate screening, and universal screening. The high-risk strategy is speculative, because no currently accepted methodology is known for identifying infants at high risk for SIDS. Given the uncertain mechanisms of association between prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc) and SIDS, analyses were repeated under different assumptions. Sensitivity analyses were also performed on all input variables for both costs and effectiveness. RESULTS: Under the assumption that neonatal electrocardiographic screening detects long QT syndrome responsive to conventional therapy, the cost-effectiveness of high-risk screening was $3403 per life year gained, whereas universal screening cost $18,465 per additional life year gained. However, if the effectiveness of SIDS therapy falls below 10%, the cost-effectiveness deteriorates to $28,376 per life year saved for the high-risk strategy and $118,900 for universal screening. The analyses were robust to a broad array of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The acceptability of the cost-effectiveness of neonatal electrocardiographic screening is heavily dependent on the pathophysiologic mechanism of SIDS and on the efficacy of monitoring and antiarrhythmic treatment. The nature of this association must be elucidated before routine neonatal electrocardiographic screening is warranted.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Economics of prematurity in the era of managed care.

Both the acute intensive care of premature infants and the management of their long-term medical and educational sequelae are costly. Because neonatal intensive care is very effective in reducing mortality, however, its cost effectiveness as described previously is actually quite favorable when compared with other well-accepted medical interventions, such as coronary artery bypass grafting and renal dialysis. This article has highlighted the relatively scant literature on which those estimates of costs and cost effectiveness of both neonatal intensive care and its component interventions rest. This is particularly true with respect to long-term resource use by graduates of NICUs. Without such information, we cannot hope to allocate resources in a way that ensures optimal care of this vulnerable population.

Child Health Services↗
PubMed2000

Occurrence of nosocomial bloodstream infections in six neonatal intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial bloodstream infections (NBSIs) occur frequently in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Little has been published regarding variation in NBSI among institutions. OBJECTIVE: To determine NBSI incidence among six NICUs and to explore how much variation is explained by patient characteristics and NICU practice patterns. METHODS: From October, 1994, to June, 1996, six regional NICUs prospectively abstracted clinical records of all neonates weighing <1,500 g. Occurrence of NBSI, defined as first positive culture occurring >48 h after admission, was analyzed in relation to baseline patient characteristics and several common therapeutic interventions. Variables significant in univariate analyses were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: There were 258 NBSIs (incidence, 19.1%) among 1,354 inborn first admissions. Incidence varied significantly by site, from 8.5 to 42%. Birth weight, Broviac catheter use and parenteral nutrition were significantly associated with NBSI (P < 0.05). When controlling for these variables interinstitutional variation in NBSI occurrence decreased but remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal NBSI incidence varies substantially among institutions despite adjustment for length of stay and some known risk factors. The uses of Broviac catheters and especially intravenous nutrition supplements were significant determinants of NBSI risk.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2000

Intrapartum maternal fever and neonatal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Much of fever during term labor may not be infectious but rather a consequence of the use of epidural analgesia. Therefore, we investigated the association of elevated maternal intrapartum temperature with neonatal outcome when the infant does not develop an infection. METHODS: We studied 1218 nulliparous women with singleton, term pregnancies in a vertex presentation and spontaneous labor. Women were excluded if their temperature was >99.5 degrees F at admission for delivery, if they were diabetic or had an active genital herpes infection or if their infant developed a neonatal infection, had a congenital infection, or had a major malformation. Maximum intrapartum temperature was categorized as: </=100.4 degrees F (afebrile), 100.5 degrees F to 101 degrees F, and >101 degrees F. RESULTS: During labor, 123 women (10.1%) developed a fever >100.4 degrees F; 62 (5.1%) women had a maximum temperature of 100.5 degrees F to 101 degrees F and 61 (5.0%) women had a maximum temperature >101 degrees F. Of febrile women, 97.6% had received epidural analgesia for pain relief. Infants of women developing a fever >100.4 degrees F were more likely to have a 1-minute Apgar score <7 (22.8% for >100.4 degrees F vs 8.0% for afebrile) and to be hypotonic after delivery (4.8% for >100.4 degrees F vs.5% for afebrile). Compared with infants of afebrile women, infants whose mothers' maximum temperature was >101 degrees F were more likely to require bag and mask resuscitation (11.5% vs 3.0%) and to be given oxygen therapy in the nursery (8.2% vs 1.3%). We also found a higher rate of neonatal seizure with fever (3.3% vs.2%), but the number of infants with seizure was small (n = 4). All associations remained essentially the same after controlling for confounding in logistic regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Intrapartum maternal fever, particularly if >101 degrees F, was associated with a number of apparently transient adverse effects in the newborn. Larger studies are needed to investigate the association of intrapartum fever with neonatal seizures and to determine whether any lasting injury to the fetus may occur.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Variation in the use of alternative levels of hospital care for newborns in a managed care organization.

OBJECTIVE(S): To assess the extent to which variation in the use of neonatal intensive care resources in a managed care organization is a consequence of variation in neonatal health risks and/or variation in the organization and delivery of medical care to newborns. STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected on a cohort of all births from four sites in Kaiser Permanente by retrospective medical chart abstraction of the birth admission. Likelihood of admission into a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is estimated by logistic regression. Durations of NICU stays and of hospital stay following birth are estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The likelihood of admission into NICU and the duration of both NICU care and hospital stay are proportional to the degree of illness and complexity of diagnosis. Adjusting for variation in health risks across sites, however, does not fully account for observed variation in NICU admission rates or for length of hospital stay. One site has a distinct pattern of high rates of NICU admissions; another site has a distinct pattern of low rates of NICU admission but long durations of hospital stay for full-term newborns following NICU admission as well as for all newborns managed in normal care nurseries. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variations exist among sites in the risk-adjusted likelihood of NICU admission and in durations of NICU stay and hospital stay. Hospital and NICU affiliation (Kaiser Permanente versus contract) or affiliation of the neonatologists (Kaiser Permanente versus contract) could not explain the variation in use of alternative levels of hospital care. The best explanation for these variations in neonatal resource use appears to be the extent to which neonatology and pediatric practices differ in their policies with respect to the management of newborns of minimal to moderate illness.

Health Maintenance Organizations↗
PubMed1999

Perinatal risk and severity of illness in newborns at 6 neonatal intensive care units.

OBJECTIVES: This multisite study sought to identify (1) any differences in admission risk (defined by gestational age and illness severity) among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and (2) obstetric antecedents of newborn illness severity. METHODS: Data on 1476 babies born at a gestational age of less than 32 weeks in 6 perinatal centers were abstracted prospectively. Newborn illness severity was measured with the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology. Regression models were constructed to predict scores as a function of perinatal risk factors. RESULTS: The sites differed by several obstetric case-mix characteristics. Of these, only gestational age, small for gestational age. White race, and severe congenital anomalies were associated with higher scores. Antenatal corticosteroids, low Apgar scores, and neonatal hypothermia also affected illness severity. At 2 sites, higher mean severity could not be explained by case mix. CONCLUSIONS: Obstetric events and perinatal practices affect newborn illness severity. These risk factors differ among perinatal centers and are associated with elevated illness severity at some sites. Outcomes of NICU care may be affected by antecedent events and perinatal practices.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗
PubMed1998

Variation among neonatal intensive care units in narcotic administration.

OBJECTIVES: To compare rates of narcotic administration for medically treated neonates in different neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to compare treated and untreated neonates to assess whether narcotics provided advantages or disadvantages for short-term outcomes, such as cardiovascular stability (ie, blood pressure and heart rate), hyperbilirubinemia, duration of respiratory support, growth, and the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage. STUDY DESIGN: The medical charts of neonates weighing less than 1500 g, admitted to 6 NICUs (A-F), were abstracted. Neonates who had a chest tube or who had undergone surgery were excluded from the study, leaving the records of 1171 neonates. We modeled outcomes by linear or logistic regression, controlling for birth weight (<750, 750-999, and 1000-1499 g) and illness severity (low, 0-9; medium, 10-19; high, > or =20) using the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP), and adjusted for NICU. RESULTS: Narcotic use varied by birth weight (<750 g, 21%; 750-999 g, 13%; and 1000-1499 g, 8%), illness severity (low, 9%; medium, 19%; and high, 37%), day (1, 11%; 3, 6%; and 14, 2%), and NICU. We restricted analyses to the 1018 neonates who received mechanical ventilation on day 1. Logistic regression, adjusting for birth weight and SNAP, confirmed a 28.6-fold variation in narcotic administration (odds ratios, 4.1-28.6 vs NICU A). Several short-term outcomes also were associated with narcotic use, including more than 33 g of fluid retention on day 3 and a higher direct bilirubin level (6.8 micromol/L higher [0.4 mg/dL higher], P = .03). There were no differences in weight gain at 14 and 28 days or mechanical ventilatory support on days 14 and 28. Narcotic use was not associated with differences in worst blood pressure or heart rate or with increased length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found a 28.6-fold variation among NICUs in narcotic administration in very low-birth-weight neonates. We were unable to detect any major advantages or disadvantages of narcotic use. We did not assess iatrogenic abstinence syndrome or long-term outcomes. These results indicate the need for randomized trials to rationalize these widely differing practices.

Birth Weight↗
PubMed1998

Variations in blood transfusions among newborn intensive care units. SNAP II Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: Very low birth weight (< 1500 g) infants frequently require packed red blood cell transfusions, and transfusion rates vary among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We analyzed transfusions and compared outcomes among NICUs. STUDY DESIGN: In a 6-site prospective study, we abstracted all newborns weighing < 1500 g (total = 825) born between October 1994 and September 1995. Transfusion frequency and volume and phlebotomy number were analyzed by site and adjusted for birth weight and illness severity. We compared rates of intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, growth, and length of stay between the high and low transfuser NICUs. RESULTS: Sites differed significantly in mean birth weight, illness severity, number of transfusions, pretransfusion hematocrit, blood draws, and donor number. Multivariate adjustment for these risks showed that the highest transfusing NICU transfused an additional 24 cc/kg per baby during the first 14 days and 47 cc/kg per baby after 15 days, relative to the lowest transfusing NICU. The presence of arterial catheters increased the frequency of blood transfusions. The rates of intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were not higher in the 2 lowest transfusing NICUs, nor were there differences in 28-day weight gain or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Major differences in transfusion practices for very low birth weight infants exist among NICUs. Because clinical outcomes were no different in lower transfuser NICUs, it is likely that transfusion and phlebotomy guidelines could result in fewer transfusions, fewer complications, and reduced cost.

Anemia, Neonatal↗
PubMed1998

Intravenous lipid emulsions are the major determinant of coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia in very low birth weight newborns.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous lipid emulsions and the i.v. catheters through which they were administered were the major risk factors for nosocomial coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CONS) bacteremia among newborns in our neonatal intensive care units a decade ago. However, medical practice is changing, and these and other interventions may have different effects in the current setting. OBJECTIVES: We determined the independent risk factors for CONS bacteremia in current very low birth weight newborns after adjusting for severity of underlying illness. METHODS: We surveyed 590 consecutively admitted newborns with birth weights < 1500 g hospitalized in 2 neonatal intensive care units and conducted a case-control study in a sample of 74 cases of CONS bacteremia and 74 pairs of matched controls. Adjusted relative odds of bacteremia were estimated for a number of attributes and therapeutic interventions in 2 time intervals before CONS bacteremia: any time before bacteremia and the week before bacteremia. RESULTS: Using conditional logistic regression to adjust for indicators of severity of illness, two procedures were independently associated with subsequent risk of CONS bacteremia at any time during hospitalization: i.v. lipids, odds ratio (OR) = 9.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 74.2]; and any surgical or percutaneously placed central venous catheter, OR = 2.0 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.9). Considering only the week immediately preceding bacteremia, the independent risk factors were: mechanical ventilation, OR = 3.2 (95% CI 1.3 to 7.6); and short peripheral venous catheters, OR = 2.6 (95% CI 1.0 to 6.5). CONCLUSIONS: During the last decade exposure to i.v. lipids any time during hospitalization has become an even more important risk factor for CONS bacteremia (OR = 9.4). Of these bacteremias 85% are now attributable to lipid therapy. In contrast the relative importance of intravenous catheters as independent risk factors has declined. Mechanical ventilation in the week before bacteremia has emerged as a risk factor for bacteremia.

Bacteremia↗