Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D K Prasher

Publications and source records attributed to D K Prasher.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Tinnitus after head injury: evidence from otoacoustic emissions.

OBJECTIVE: Tinnitus may be caused by a lesion or dysfunction at any level of the auditory system. This study explores cochlear mechanics using otoacoustic emissions in patients with tinnitus after head injury, in whom there seems to be evidence to support dysfunction within the CNS. METHODS: The study included 20 patients with tinnitus and other auditory symptoms, such as hyperacusis and difficulty in listening in background noise, after head injury, in the presence of an "intact" auditory periphery (normal or near normal audiometric thresholds). They were compared with 20 normal subjects and 12 subjects with head injury, but without tinnitus, who had similar audiometric thresholds. In all subjects otoacoustic emissions, including transient click-evoked (TEOAEs) and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), were recorded, and a test of efferent medial olivocochlear suppression, consisting of recording of TEOAEs under contralateral stimulation, was performed. RESULTS: A significantly higher prevalence of SOAEs (100%), higher TEOAE response amplitudes, and reduced medial olivocochlear suppression in patients with tinnitus in comparison with subjects without tinnitus have been found. CONCLUSION: These findings have been interpreted to be an extracochlear phenomenon, in which the reduction in central efferent suppression of cochlear mechanics, leading to an increase in cochlear amplifier gain, was subsequent to head injury. Auditory symptoms in these patients seemed to constitute the "disinhibition syndrome".

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1997

Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.

The suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions by contralateral sound stimulation is thought to occur as a result of the action of the efferent pathway from the superior olivary complex to the cochlea via the medial olivo-cochlear neurons. The purpose of this study was to determine the time taken for this pathway to activate the suppressive mechanism in response to contralateral sound in normal human subjects. The time for onset of suppression was found to be between 7 and 20 ms.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1995

Mechanisms of hearing loss in acoustic neuroma: an otoacoustic emission study.

Evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAE) are active mechanical responses from the cochlea which provide information about the integrity of the preneural cochlear receptor mechanisms. It may be hypothesised, therefore, that if a hearing impairment is neural in origin, normal EOAEs may be obtained from the cochlea, which, although dissociated, is functioning normally. This study examined the status of the cochlea with EOAE in patients with cochlear (Meniere's disease) and neural (surgically proven acoustic neuroma) disease. In patients with presumed cochlear lesions, no emissions were present with mean hearing worse than 40 dB across a frequency range of 0.5 to 4 kHz. Similarly, an EOAE was not present in any of the 26 acoustic neuroma patients studied when the average (0.5 to 4 kHz) hearing was greater than 40 dB. We conclude that dissociation of the cochlea in patients with acoustic neuroma appears to be rare and, in fact, cochlear involvement occurs in most cases. Possible mechanisms responsible for the effect on the cochlea in this group include degenerative changes due to chronic partial obstruction of the blood supply by the tumour, biochemical alterations in the inner ear fluids, loss of efferent control of active mechanical tuning, and hair cell degeneration secondary to neuronal loss in the eighth nerve.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1994

Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.

The effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE) were examined in three subject groups in order that the impact of efferent olivocochlear bundle section (as a consequence of vestibular neurectomy) could be compared with normal findings, and with a control surgical population. Results demonstrated that the inhibitory effect of contralateral noise on OAE amplitude was absent from the cochlea with severed efferent fibers. These findings appear to be independent of acoustic reflex activity, as suppression was absent despite normal reflexes. Inter-aural suppression of emissions recorded from the patients' intact cochleae act as a control and show a clear reduction in amplitude during contralateral stimulation in a frequency specific pattern consistent with normal findings. Patients who had undergone a similar surgical approach for vascular decompression of the VIIIth nerve without vestibular nerve section, were studied in order to assess the impact of retrolabyrinthine surgery on inter-aural suppression. Inhibition of OAE amplitude was maintained in all control cases in both the operated and intact sides, and was consistent with suppression observed in normal subjects, suggesting that the surgical procedures had not disturbed inter-aural suppression of otoacoustic emissions. It is concluded that the olivocochlear efferent system, when activated by low level contralateral acoustic stimulation, has an inhibitory role in controlling the cellular mechanisms responsible for the generation of otoacoustic emissions in humans. OAE techniques in conjunction with contralateral acoustic stimulation may thus prove to be of value in providing a rapid and non-invasive clinical test of efferent function and offer a means of investigating the functional significance of the efferent auditory system in humans.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1993

Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on otoacoustic emissions following vestibular neurectomy.

This study demonstrates that, following unilateral vestibular neurectomy, the inhibitory effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions is absent. The patient acts as her own control in that the unoperated side shows normal suppression of otoacoustic emission amplitude with contralateral acoustic stimulation. The lack of interaural suppression of otoacoustic emissions on the sectioned side, in the presence of normal acoustic reflex threshold levels, provides evidence that observed phenomena are not merely a function of middle ear reflex activity. It is concluded that the lack of inhibition in the operated ear is due to the sectioning of the olivocochlear bundle within the inferior vestibular nerve, removing the efferent control of the receptor cells. Otoacoustic emissions recorded during contralateral acoustic stimulation may thus provide a rapid, non-invasive means of investigating the functional of the efferent auditory system.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1990

Effect of simulated bilateral cochlear distortion on speech discrimination in normal subjects.

Bilateral sensorineural hearing loss may introduce grossly dissimilar cochlear distortion at the two ears, causing abnormal demands to be made upon the cortical analytical centres which normally receive congruent information. As a result, the prescription of binaural hearing aids may be a handicap rather than a help. In order to explore this possibility, 10 normal subjects were presented with simulated, dissimilar cochlear distortion at the two ears. Discrimination scores with binaural presentation were poorer than the best monaural score and there were clear indications that in the former, subjects selectively attended to one ear and neglected the other. In contrast, binaural presentation of the same simulated distortion resulted in a significant improvement, compared with the monaural discrimination score. Inability of the cortex to contend with discongruent speech input from the two ears may be a factor contributing to the rejection of binaural hearing aids in some individuals.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

The effect of acoustic neuroma removal on hearing in the contralateral ear.

22 patients with unilateral acoustic neuromas were assessed audiometrically pre- and post-operatively. A high proportion (36%) were found to have a hearing loss of 10 dB or more (6 frequency average) in the contralateral ear in the post-operative period. The evidence points to a cochlear site of the loss, and serial audiograms suggest that the hearing deteriorates in the immediate post-operative period. Follow-up audiometry at three months or more showed that the hearing recovered to pre-operative levels. The possible mechanism of the hearing loss is discussed.

Audiometry, Pure-Tone↗
PubMed1986

Electrocochleography and brain-stem potentials in Ramsay Hunt syndrome.

Audiometric investigations and electrophysiologic recordings of cochlear and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) were performed in 13 patients to elucidate further the type of hearing disorders in Ramsay Hunt syndrome. Transtympanic electrocochleography showed no enhancement of summating potential and did not suggest secondary endolymphatic hydrops. The recording of BAEPs was clearly abnormal in several of the 13 patients. The striking feature of the abnormalities in these patients was the prolongation of the latencies of waves III and V with the preservation of wave I, which clearly suggests retrocochlear involvement. In all the patients tested, abnormalities of the BAEPs were present only on the affected side. It is possible, on the basis of BAEP findings, to suggest that in Ramsay Hunt syndrome both cochlear and retrocochlear involvement may occur.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Latency variability and temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potentials (N1, P2, N2, and P3) in normal subjects.

Peak latency variation and the temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potential were investigated in 12 normal adults (ages 28-42). Measures of variation were based on both conventional averages and single trials. Estimates of N1, P2, N2 and P3 latencies were made on a trial-by-trial basis to target stimuli recorded from Fz, Cz and Pz scalp locations. Results showed that single-trial latency variability of the auditory ERP differed both among the various components and between subjects. Larger standard deviations were measured for the later N2 and P3 components than the earlier N1 and P2 components. Regression analyses between various component latencies indicated a strong covarying relationship between N2 and P3, with N2 accounting for up to 61% of the variance of P3 latency at Pz. Earlier N1 and P2 components added little to the overall prediction of either P3 or N2. For the other components, P2 accounted for 9-16% of the variance of N2, while N1 accounted for approximately 1% of the variance of N2; N1 accounted for 8-10% of the latency variation of P2. The correlations between single-trial peak latencies and RTs were positive but of low magnitude. The highest correlations between peak latency and RT were found for N2 (r = 0.33) and P3 (r = 0.24). The low correlations between the single-trial latencies of N1 and P3 suggest that the processes reflected by these components are independent and support a distinction between the earlier and the later components of the ERP. The close temporal coupling between N2 and P3 suggests that N2 may reflect cognitive properties in common to P3 in stimulus evaluation processes.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Neuro-otological abnormalities in xeroderma pigmentosum with particular reference to deafness.

The neuro-otological findings are described in 3 unrelated patients who had xeroderma pigmentosum. All had impaired hearing. Routine audiometric assessment suggested that the hearing loss was of cochlear origin; brainstem evoked potentials in 2 patients and electrocochleography in 1 support this conclusion. Two adult patients had a supranuclear ophthalmoplegia. Vestibular function was mildly deranged and visual suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex impaired.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

The selective effects of central masking on brain stem potentials.

The effect of contralateral white noise stimulation on ipsilaterally presented click evoked brain stem potentials was examined. Continuous contralateral white noise does not influence the brain stem response components but pulsed white noise simultaneously presented with the clicks produced a central masking effect which was observed as an amplitude reduction confined to Wave V. Our findings confirm those of Zwislocki (1971) that pulsed noise is a more effective central masker than continuous noise. A computer addition of the responses to pulsed white noise and clicks recorded independently revealed no reduction in Wave V amplitude but the response to the two stimuli presented simultaneously showed a specific reduction in Wave V amplitude. No change in the latency of Wave V was observed to suggest any 'cross-over' masking of the click stimulus. Patients with total unilateral deafness did not exhibit this phenomenon. The effect of a time delay of the masker to one ear in relation to the click presented to the other ear reduced the amplitude of Wave V less than when the two stimuli were presented simultaneously. The reduction in the amplitude, being specific to Wave V, suggests that the effect is central and that the particular locus for this aspect of central masking is at the level of the inferior colliculus.

Audiometry↗
PubMed1983

Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials and electrocochleography: comparison of different criteria for the detection of acoustic neuroma and other cerebello-pontine angle tumours.

Different means of identifying the presence of cerebello-pontine angle (CPA) tumours using brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEP) were evaluated. The results from 33 ears affected by tumours were compared with BAEP from 50 normal ears and 23 ears affected by Menière's disease. Measurement of inter-aural latency differences correctly identified 97% of tumours from the normal group, but only 81% of tumours from the Menière group. Comparison of different interwave interval measures showed that the NI to NV interval was the best criterion and correctly identified 90% of the tumours from both the normal and the Menière groups. The use of transtympanic electrocochleography (ECochG) is discussed. Used alone, ECochG was of limited value in detecting CPA tumours except in five out of nine deaf ears where no BAEP were recorded but 'disconnection' action potentials were encountered. By combining BAEP and ECochG, the NI to NV interval could be identified with certainty. Combined BAEP and ECochG recordings were only undertaken when NI was unclear on BAEP recordings or when the ECochG was indicated clinically for the identification of endolymphatic hydrops. In this series, the combined use of BAEP and ECochG resulted in a tumour detection rate of 100% with a false positive rate of zero. The BAEP from the unaffected ear recorded from the ipsilateral and contralateral sides were compared. Significant NI to NV delay was noted, especially on recording from the contralateral side, when there was distortion of the brainstem due to a large tumour. The article concludes with an appendix of six illustrative case reports.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Binaural voltage summation of brainstem auditory evoked potentials: an adjunct to the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis.

Brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) amplitude is modified according to whether or not the stimulus is applied monaurally or binaurally. In normal subjects, wave V amplitude increases by an average of 68.7% upon changing stimulation from monaural to binaural. From earlier studies there is evidence that brainstem potential amplitude is reduced in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) but none to suggest that binaural stimulation results in increased amplitude. This study evaluated the extent of binaural summation of BAEPs in patients with MS. In a large majority of patients with MS who have no hearing deficit, BAEPs showed no increase in wave V amplitude on binaural stimulation. This finding is in contrast to the normal group and thus has diagnostic importance. Measurements of binaural summation therefore might usefully be applied to the clinical assessment of disease progression, or lack of it, in individual patients.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1981

Phase reversal in brain stem responses: its use in the detection of asymmetry in the auditory pathways.

Electrode placement is an important consideration in the recording of a large-amplitude stable response. In this study, brain stem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEP) were obtained from subjects and patients under two electrode configurations, namely 'vertex-mastoid' and 'mastoid-mastoid'. The BAEP waveforms to ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural stimulation were examined for their phase relation with respect to stimulation. In the mastoid-mastoid recording mode, a complete polarity reversal was shown upon changing stimulation from the ipsilateral (with respect to the active input) to the contralateral ear. On simultaneous binaural stimulation, the response was shown to summate to zero. This observation has led to the objective assessment of asymmetry of hearing. Several patients exhibiting recruitment were tested under the mastoid-mastoid recording configuration with binaural stimulation. The results show that a summated 'null' response only occurs at an intensity level where loudness equality is attained at the two ears and recruitment is complete. Applied in this way the technique has promising application in the determination of the presence or absence of recruitment and hence in the differential diagnosis of cochlear and retrocochlear lesions.

Auditory Pathways↗