Biomedical subjects

D J Witherspoon

Publications and source records attributed to D J Witherspoon.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

Selective constraints on P-element evolution.

P elements, like mariners, inhabit eukaryotic genomes and transpose via a DNA intermediate. Mutant and wild-type elements in the same genome should be transposed with equal probability by trans-acting transposase, and so no selection should counteract the accumulation of inactivating mutations in transposase genes. Thus, copies of mariner elements diverge within a host species under no selection (Robertson and Lampe 1995). It is unknown whether or not this pattern holds for P elements, which are unrelated to mariner elements but share the same life history. Publicly available P-element sequences were analyzed for evidence of conservative selection for the function of P-element-encoded proteins. Results were compared to predictions derived from several hypotheses that could explain selection, or the lack of it. P-element protein-coding sequences do evolve under conservative selection but apparently because of more than one selective force. Of the four exons in the P-element transposase, the first three (exons 0, 1, and 2) can be translated alone into a repressor of transposition, while the last (exon 3) is only expressed as part of the full-length transposase and probably serves a transposition-specific role. As full-length P-element copies diverge from each other within a host population, selection maintains exons 0-2 but apparently not exon 3. The selection acting on exons 0-2 may act at the host level for repression of transposition (since host level selection does act on orthologous truncated elements that contain only exons 0-2). Evidence of selection on exon 3 is only found in comparisons of more diverged elements from different species, suggesting that selection for transposition acts primarily at horizontal transfer events. Thus, horizontal transfer events may be the sole source of the selection that is crucial to the maintenance of autonomous P elements in the face of mutation (as suggested by Robertson and Lampe 1995). The predictions derived here suggest a strategy for collecting sequence data that could definitively answer these questions.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Conserved features of TBE1 transposons in ciliated protozoa.

The complete sequences of four TBE1 transposons from Oxytricha fallax and O. trifallax are presented and analyzed. Although two TBE1s are 98% identical to each other at the nucleotide level, the remaining two TBE1s are only 90% identical both to each other and to the other two. This large evolutionary divergence allows us to identify conserved TBE1 features. TBE1 transposons are 4.1 kbp long and are flanked by 3 bp target-site repeats. The elements consist of 78 bp inverted terminal repeats, of which the 17 terminal base pairs are Oxytricha telomere repeats; a central conserved section of 550 bp that includes a set of nested direct and inverted sequence repeats; and 3 open reading frames conserved for encoded amino acid sequence. The three open reading frames encode a 22 kDa basic protein of unknown function, a 42 kDa 'D,D35E' transposase, and a 57 kDa chimeric C2H2 zinc finger/protein kinase. The protein kinase domain of the 57 kDa protein is unusual, lacking a conserved ATP-binding motif.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1997

Selection on the protein-coding genes of the TBE1 family of transposable elements in the ciliates Oxytricha fallax and O. trifallax.

TBE1s are "cut-and-paste" transposable elements found in high copy number in the germline genomes of the ciliates Oxytricha fallax and O. trifallax. TBE1 "family" sequence (sequence of mixed polymerase chain reaction products generated using primers that match roughly half the TBE1s in host whole-cell DNA) was obtained from both host species. Although family sequence autoradiograms represent thousands of different elements, they are as legible as those representing corresponding sequences of a single TBE1, implying that ideal polymorphisms are rare within the genes examined. Nucleotide polymorphisms among TBE1s (indicated by ambiguities in family sequence) are far more common at third than at first or second positions of codons of genes, implying that selection has conserved the amino acid sequences of these genes in the majority of TBE1s. Portions of the transposase gene and another TBE1 gene have been sequenced from 10 individual TBE1s. None of these portions is interrupted by stop codons or frameshifts, and, for both genes, pairwise comparisons of these sequences show that nonsynonymous differences are significantly less common than synonymous differences, again implicating conservative selection Phylogenetic analysis shows that multiple divergent lineages of TBE1s have evolved under this selection within O. fallax. All these results are unexpected for cut-and-paste transposons in eukaryotic hosts: since transposase encoded by intact elements presumably acts in trans, it can duplicate mutant copies (those that do not encode functional transposase) found in the same genome, and thus no selection is expected to maintain the transposase gene. The selection demonstrated here could act at transposition (if functional TBE1s are preferentially transposed) or at the level of the host (if the host's fitness depends on functional TBE1 genes). TBE1-encoded proteins might be responsible for the precise excision of TBE1s that occurs during development of the host somatic nucleus; selection on hosts for uninterrupted somatic genes would then translate into selection for TBE1 protein-coding competence. We suggest a method for distinguishing between these two classes of explanations by finding and analyzing divergent alleles of ancestral transposable element insertions.

Animals↗