Biomedical subjects

D J Watson

Publications and source records attributed to D J Watson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Gastrointestinal medications and procedures in osteoarthritis patients treated with rofecoxib compared with nonselective NSAIDs.

CONTEXT: Patients treated with nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitors (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]) often experience dyspepsia and upper gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects, and frequently require GI comedications and diagnostic procedures. OBJECTIVE: This study combined existing data to test the hypothesis that GI comedications and GI diagnostic procedures occur less frequently in osteoarthritis (OA) patients treated with rofecoxib compared with nonselective NSAIDs. DESIGN: Combined analysis of 8 randomized controlled clinical trials. SETTING: Rheumatology and general practice clinics. PATIENTS: Men and women aged 40 years and older with OA. INTERVENTIONS: Random assignment to placebo (n = 514), rofecoxib (n = 3357; 12.5, 25, or 50 mg daily combined; average 24.7 mg), or NSAIDs (n = 1564; ibuprofen 800 mg thrice daily, diclofenac 50 mg thrice daily, or nabumetone 1500 mg daily, combined). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cumulative incidence of patients using GI comedications (antacids, antispasmodics, antiflatulents, antiregurgitants, H2 antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, sucralfate, prostaglandins, other antiulcer therapy) and needing GI procedures (upper GI barium studies, upper or lower GI endoscopies) over 12 months. RESULTS: Compared with those treated with NSAIDs, patients treated with rofecoxib had a significantly lower incidence of GI comedication use (17.5% vs 27.0%, P <.001) and GI procedures (3.3% vs 5.3%, P =.02) over 12 months. Similar results were seen in analyses of protocols with placebo; in these studies, rates of GI comedications and procedures were highest with NSAIDs, while those with rofecoxib and placebo were similar to each other. CONCLUSIONS: OA patients treated with rofecoxib for up to 12 months required significantly less GI comedication and significantly fewer GI procedures than those treated with NSAIDs.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Economic evaluation of rofecoxib versus nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Results of phase III clinical trials of rofecoxib, a selective inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2, have shown that osteoarthritis patients treated with rofecoxib had significantly fewer clinically significant gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events than those who received nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). OBJECTIVE: This paper explores the potential economic implications of the use of rofecoxib versus nonselective NSAIDs for the treatment of osteoarthritis via a decision analytic model based on rofecoxib clinical data and the published literature. METHODS: Base-case 1-year analyses were done with data on GI adverse events, specifically perforations, ulcers, and bleeds (PUBs), obtained from a prespecified pooled analysis of the rofecoxib clinical trials. Analyses were also performed using pooled results of two 12-week endoscopic surveillance trials, with adjustments for silent ulcers of 40% and 85%. RESULTS: Under base-case conditions, the expected cost savings in GI problems and comedications averted with rofecoxib versus NSAIDs was 0.81 dollars per day, representing an 85% offset of the difference in drug price. For rofecoxib versus NSAIDs, the expected cost per PUB avoided with rofecoxib was 4738 dollars, and expected cost per year of life saved was 18,614 dollars. In analyses based on endoscopic data, therapy with rofecoxib was less expensive than therapy with NSAIDs, regardless of silent ulcer adjustment. Results were most sensitive to prophylactic GI comedication rates, and were robust over a range of model assumptions and costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis based on differences in clinically significant GI events for osteoarthritis patients, cost differences between rofecoxib and NSAIDs were markedly offset by expected cost savings in GI problems and comedications averted with rofecoxib. Costs per year of life saved with rofecoxib versus NSAIDs were well within accepted benchmarks for cost-effectiveness. When endoscopic data alone were considered, rofecoxib was cost saving across all assumptions about silent ulcer rates.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastroprotective agents before the advent of cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors: analysis of a large United States claims database.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that 20% to 40% of patients requiring nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are concomitantly prescribed gastroprotective agents (GPAs) such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2-receptor antagonists. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine NSAID prescription patterns and the concurrent use of GPAs in a large national sample of patients who were prescribed NSAIDs for the first time. METHODS: Patterns of NSAID use, particularly chronic NSAID use, and of concomitant use of GPAs were examined using a large US-based prescription database. Patients with at least 1 NSAID prescription dispensed between May 1 and August 31, 1998, were identified. Persons with any NSAID prescription within 4 months prior to the first (index) prescription were excluded. The remaining patients were defined as new NSAID users and then classified as chronic users (> or = 30 days of supply of NSAIDs during the 120 days of follow-up after the first NSAID prescription) or acute users (<30 days of NSAID supply during the 120 days of follow-up). Concomitant GPA use was defined as receipt of any GPA prescription between the fill date of NSAID prescription and 125% of days of supply. NSAIDs included diclofenac/misoprostol (in a fixed combination), diclofenac, naproxen, nabumetone, ibuprofen, and "other" (comprising several less frequently prescribed agents). Patients were classified as users of a particular NSAID based on the first NSAID prescription they received. GPAs included PPIs, H2-receptor antagonists, and misoprostol. RESULTS: A total of 3,028,808 new NSAID users were identified. Chronic NSAID users (47.8% of the sample) were older than acute users. The percentage of new chronic users aged > or = 65 years for each of the NSAIDs was 41.2% for diclofenac/ misoprostol, 33.0% for nabumetone, 30.8% for diclofenac, 20.4% for naproxen, and 20.3% for ibuprofen. The percentage of women was higher among patients treated with diclofenac/misoprostol than among patients treated with all other NSAIDs (P < 0.001). During the 120 days of follow-up, the percentages of NSAID users with concomitant GPA use were 22.7% for diclofenac/misoprostol, 16.3% for diclofenac, 11.5% for naproxen, 18.0% for nabumetone, 12.3% for ibuprofen, and 14.8% for other NSAIDs. Based on days of supply, the rates of concomitant GPA use were 31.1%, 23.6%, 17.6%, 27.3%, 18.8%, and 22.5% for diclofenac/misoprostol, diclofenac, naproxen, nabumetone, ibuprofen, and other NSAID users, respectively. Among those who were taking GPAs before the NSAID index prescription date, -89% continued GPA therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 22% of the days of NSAID supply were covered by GPAs. Prior GPA use was the strongest predictor of subsequent concomitant GPA/ NSAID use. Differences in GPA use were observed among patients using different NSAIDs.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Cost of prescribed NSAID-related gastrointestinal adverse events in elderly patients.

AIMS: It is well established that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have gastrointestinal (GI) side-effects. However, the cost of health care resources spent on preventing and managing these side-effects is not clear. The objective of this study was to estimate the direct cost of NSAID-related GI events in an elderly population. METHODS: From the Régie de l'assurance-maladie du Québec (RAMQ) database, we obtained medical, pharmaceutical and demographic records of a 10% random sample (n = 49 033) of seniors who, between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1997, had a dispensed prescription of a NSAID. Patients who did not have any GI events during the year prior to their first dispensed prescription were included in the cohort. All patients were followed-up for 2 years. The daily direct Canadian dollar costs of GI events that were incurred by these patients while they were on NSAID therapy were compared with those of GI events that were incurred by these same patients while they were not on NSAID therapy. The difference in these daily costs was attributed to NSAIDs. RESULTS: A total of 12 082 new NSAID users were included in the study. Two hundred and seventeen (1.8%) were hospitalized for GI-related problems; of these, 130 (60%) had their GI hospitalization as their first GI event; 3257 (27.0%) used gastroprotective agents (GPAs), and 857 (26.3%) took GPAs without any apparent prior GI symptoms; 801 (6.6%) had GI diagnostic tests; and 661 (5.5%) died. The average direct costs of GI side-effects per patient-day on NSAIDs were 3.5 times higher than those of a patient-day not on NSAIDs. The direct cost of GI side-effects per patient-day on NSAIDs was $1.34, of which more than 70% ($0.94) was attributed to GI events resulting from NSAID treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one Canadian dollar was added to patient costs for every day he/she was on NSAID therapy. Safer therapies and appropriate patient risk management may potentially reduce NSAID-related health care resource use.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Materials for restoration of primary teeth: I. Conventional materials and early glass ionomers.

This paper demonstrates how the treatment of primary dentition may present the clinician with increased difficulties compared with the preparation and placement of restorations in adult dentition. Established dental materials (dental amalgam and conventional glass ionomer cements) and less well established alternative materials (copper cements) are reviewed. The use of amalgam to restore primary dentition is the subject of concern amongst the dental profession in terms of lack of adhesion and potential toxicity concerns, while the low tensile strength of traditional glass ionomer cements make them less suitable for the restoration of primary dentition.

Child, Preschool↗

PubMed2001

Gastrointestinal-related healthcare resource usage associated with a fixed combination of diclofenac and misoprostol versus other NSAIDs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare gastrointestinal (GI) healthcare resource use (HCRU) and associated costs in patients taking a fixed combination of diclofenac and misoprostol versus other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: We analysed a sample (49,033 patients) of the Government of Quebec Health Insurance Agency database. Patients were included in the study if they did not have GI events during the year preceding the date of their first NSAID prescription dispensing (the index date). Patients were followed up for 2 years. A 3-stage model was used to determine the factors that influenced the direct medical costs of GI HCRU: (i) a logistic regression model (model 1) to estimate the risk of GI HCRU; (ii) a linear regression model (model 2) to estimate the direct costs of GI HCRU for those who had such events; (iii) multiplying the estimated risks from model 1 by the estimated costs from model 2 gave the estimated direct costs of GI HCRU for all patients. STUDY PERSPECTIVE: Provincial government of Quebec, Canada. RESULTS: 1,533 patients were prescribed diclofenac/misoprostol at the index date and 10,540 another NSAID. Comorbidity markers were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Of the diclofenac/misoprostol patients, 23 (1.5%) were hospitalised for GI problems compared with 194 (1.8%) of the NSAID group; 403 (26.3%) of diclofenac/misoprostol patients used gastroprotective agents compared with 2,849 (27.0%) of the NSAID patients; 118 (7.7%) of diclofenac/misoprostol patients had GI diagnostic tests compared with 682 (6.5%) of the NSAID patients. The average direct medical cost of GI HCRU was 310.52 Canadian dollars ($Can)/patient (1997 values) in the diclofenac/misoprostol group compared with $Can231.19/patient (1997 values) in the NSAID group. When adjusted for baseline factors, the ratio of the total direct medical cost of GI HCRU in the diclofenac/misoprostol group to that of the NSAID group was 1.15 (95% confidence interval: 0.89, 1.48). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed no significant differences in GI HCRU among patients taking diclofenac/misoprostol compared with those taking NSAIDs.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Effect of rofecoxib therapy on measures of health-related quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Bodily pain and physical disability can negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of treatment with a new agent, rofecoxib, on HRQL in patients with OA. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, 6-week clinical trial comparing treatment with rofecoxib, 5 to 50 mg, with placebo in 672 patients with OA of the hip or knee. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient HRQL was assessed at baseline and at the end of treatment using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: At 6 weeks, mean change from baseline in all SF-36 mental and physical health domain scores demonstrated significant improvement with rofecoxib use (P < .05 for all doses for all SF-36 domains), with evidence of a dose-response relation. Improvements in mental and physical HRQL domains with rofecoxib treatment were significantly greater than those with placebo treatment (P < .05 for each dose of rofecoxib vs placebo for all domains except general health) and highly correlated with improvements observed using disease-specific OA outcome measures such as the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index-visual Analog 3.0 OA index pain and physical function subscales. The effect of rofecoxib vs placebo treatment on mental health largely disappeared after adjustment for improvement in OA disease-specific measures. CONCLUSIONS: Rofecoxib treatment increased physical and mental HRQL domain scores on the SF-36. Improvements in mental health with rofecoxib use primarily resulted from effective treatment of OA (i.e., reduction in pain and improvement in physical function).

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Gastrointestinal tolerability of the selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor rofecoxib compared with nonselective COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors in osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Most nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are nonselective cyclooxygenase (COX-1 and COX-2) inhibitors and are associated with a variety of upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract symptoms. The roles of COX-1 and COX-2 in the pathogenesis of these symptoms are unclear. To test whether COX-2 inhibition with rofecoxib would have greater GI tolerability than nonselective COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition, we compared the incidences of (1) treatment discontinuations for GI adverse events (AEs) and (2) prespecified dyspeptic-type GI AEs among patients with osteoarthritis treated with rofecoxib vs NSAIDs. METHODS: A prespecified, combined analysis of investigator-reported GI AEs in all 8 double-blind, randomized, phase 2b/3 osteoarthritis trials of rofecoxib was conducted. Patients included men and women with osteoarthritis (N = 5435); there was no upper age limit for entry. Treatments tested included rofecoxib, 12.5, 25, or 50 mg (combined), vs ibuprofen, diclofenac, or nabumetone (combined). Primary outcomes were the time (by survival analysis) to (1) treatment discontinuation due to GI AEs and (2) first reported dyspeptic-type GI AE. Between-treatment comparisons were made by log-rank test. RESULTS: The number of treatment discontinuations caused by GI AEs during 12 months was significantly lower (P=.02) with rofecoxib vs NSAIDs (8.2 vs 12.0 per 100 patient-years; relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.94). The incidence of prespecified dyspeptic-type GI AEs during the first 6 months was significantly lower (P=.02) with rofecoxib vs NSAIDs (69.3 vs 85.2 per 100 patient-years; relative risk, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.97). However, the difference between treatments in dyspeptic-type GI AEs was attenuated after 6 months. CONCLUSION: Rofecoxib was associated with a lower incidence of treatment discontinuations due to GI AEs over 12 months and a lower incidence of dyspeptic-type GI AEs over 6 months than treatment with nonselective COX inhibitors, or NSAIDs. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2998-3003

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2000

Relation between baseline and on-treatment lipid parameters and first acute major coronary events in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS).

BACKGROUND: The Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) is the first primary-prevention study in a cohort with average total cholesterol (TC) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and below-average HDL cholesterol (HDL-C). Treatment with lovastatin (20 to 40 mg/d) resulted in a 25% reduction in LDL-C and a 6% increase in HDL-C, as well as a 37% reduction in risk for first acute major coronary event (AMCE), defined as fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or sudden cardiac death. This article describes the relation between baseline and on-treatment lipid and apolipoprotein (apo) parameters and subsequent risk for AMCEs. METHODS AND RESULTS: With all available data from the entire 6605-patient cohort, a prespecified Cox backward stepwise regression model identified outcome predictors, and logistic regression models examined the relation between lipid variables and AMCE risk. Baseline LDL-C, HDL-C, and apoB were significant predictors of AMCE; only on-treatment apoB and the ratio of apoB to apoAI were predictive of subsequent risk; on-treatment LDL-C was not. When event rates were examined across tertiles of baseline lipids, a consistent benefit of treatment with lovastatin was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with average TC and LDL-C levels and below-average HDL-C may obtain significant clinical benefit from primary-prevention lipid modification. On-treatment apoB, especially when combined with apoAI to form the apoB/AI ratio, may be a more accurate predictor than LDL-C of risk for first AMCE.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Gastrointestinal health care resource use and costs associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs versus acetaminophen: retrospective cohort study of an elderly population.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate gastrointestinal (GI) health care resource use and direct costs associated with prescription nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in an elderly population. METHODS: Using the Government of Quebec's health insurance database, we obtained the medical, pharmaceutical, and demographic records of 73,850 senior citizens who, between 1993 and 1997, had either an NSAID or an acetaminophen prescription dispensed. The date of their first dispensed prescription for an NSAID or acetaminophen was termed their index date. Patients who were not taking oral corticosteroids or anticoagulants at their index date, were not diagnosed with cancer at their index date, and were not hospitalized and did not have any GI events during the year prior to their index date were included in the study. Patients who had a dispensed NSAID prescription at their index date formed the NSAID cohort; the others formed the acetaminophen cohort. All patients were followed up for 2 years. The daily direct costs of GI events incurred during NSAID therapy by the NSAID cohort were compared with those incurred during a similar followup period by the acetaminophen cohort. The difference in these average daily costs was attributed to NSAID use. RESULTS: The NSAID cohort included 5,268 senior citizens and the acetaminophen cohort 2,245. More GI adverse events were observed in the NSAID cohort (odds ratio 2.48, 95% confidence interval 2.06, 3.00). The average daily direct cost of GI events for a day of NSAID therapy attributed to the NSAIDs was $0.84 (Canadian). On average, for each Canadian dollar spent on NSAIDs, an additional $0.66 was spent on their side effects. CONCLUSION: Safer alternatives to NSAIDs would significantly reduce medical care costs for patients in need of NSAID therapy.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed2000

Application of the National Cholesterol Education Program and joint European treatment criteria and clinical benefit in the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS).

AIMS: The Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study reported that diet with lovastatin, 20-40 mg daily, reduced the risk for a first coronary event by 37%. Because only 17% of this cohort would have qualified for drug therapy according to current U.S. guidelines, we assessed clinical benefit by risk categories. METHODS AND RESULTS: The main outcome measures were event rates of first acute major coronary events stratified by National Cholesterol Education Program and European criteria and target goal. Both those who would and would not be eligible for drug therapy, according to National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, benefited from intervention. As expected, drug-eligible participants (event rate: lovastatin 1%/year, placebo 1.87%/year [relative risk 0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.33, 0.84]) were at greater absolute risk for acute major coronary events than non-eligible participants (lovastatin 0.62%/year, placebo 0.93%/year [relative risk 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.51, 0.88]). Similar results were found using European guidelines for coronary risk management. Treatment to a target goal suggested a non-significant trend to greater benefit. CONCLUSIONS: The consistent relative benefit across risk categories suggests that it may be possible to improve identification of at-risk persons who would benefit from primary prevention, and to recommend appropriate goals of such treatment.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS): baseline characteristics and comparison with USA population.

BACKGROUND: Results of the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) demonstrated that treatment with lovastatin, in addition to modifications of diet and lifestyle, reduced the rate of first acute major coronary events compared with placebo in a cohort that included participants with average to mildly elevated total levels of cholesterol, and below average levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, women, and elderly subjects. OBJECTIVE: To describe the baseline characteristics of the study's cohort. DESIGN: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, primary-prevention trial in which Americans with average to mildly elevated total levels of cholesterol [4.65-6.83 mmol/l (180-264 mg/dl)] and no clinical evidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomly allocated either 20-40 mg/day lovastatin or placebo in addition to a low-saturated fat, low-cholesterol diet. Baseline characteristics of the study cohort are described, and the characteristics of a USA reference population based upon NHANES III data are provided for comparison. RESULTS: The study includes 5608 men (85%) and 997 women (15%) with mean total cholesterol level 5.71 +/- 0.54 mmol/l (221 +/- 21 mg/dl), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level 3.88 +/- 0.44 mmol/l (150 +/- 17 mg/dl), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 0.96 +/- 0.15 mmol/l (37 +/- 6 mg/dl), and median triglyceride level 1.78 +/- 0.86 mmol/l (158 +/- 76 mg/dl). The mean age is 58 years (ranges 45-73 years for men and 55- 73 years for women). The participants are 89% white, 7% Hispanic, and 3% black. CONCLUSION: Results from AFCAPS/TexCAPS will be applicable to large segments of populations; in the USA alone, eight million share the demographic and baseline-lipid-level characteristics of the study cohort.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Gastrointestinal symptoms and health related quality of life in patients with arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and health related quality of life (QOL) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A total of 1773 patients with arthritis participating in a longterm outcome study (OA of the hip or knee = 648, RA = 1125) completed mailed surveys that included assessments of GI symptoms and overall GI symptom severity, Short Form-36, the visual analog scale (VAS) for the EuroQol (Health QOL), a VAS global disease severity scale, and measures of disease and psychological status. The overall response rate exceeded 85%. RESULTS: Dyspepsia (heartburn, bloating, or belching) and upper abdominal/epigastric pain were identified as the most important GI contributors to reduction in QOL, and the simultaneous presence of both these symptoms was associated with lower QOL (54.5) compared to those without symptoms (70.9) on the 0-100 Health QOL scale. Similarly, those in the upper tertile of the global GI severity scale had Health QOL scores of 55.7 compared to 76.4 for those in the lower tertile. These differences in GI symptoms and GI severity, however, were reduced substantially when the effects of functional disability, pain, and depression were adjusted for: 62.3 to 68.6 (p = 0.003) and 63.7 to 70.3 (p<0.001) for the GI symptoms and GI severity scales, respectively. CONCLUSION: QOL is significantly impaired among unselected arthritis patients with GI symptoms compared to those without these symptoms. Dyspepsia and upper abdominal/epigastric pain are more strongly related to QOL measures than other GI symptoms, and are common among arthritis patients. It is possible to construct a simple scale of these 2 symptoms or to use the VAS GI severity scale and get a clinically useful idea of the current level of GI distress and alteration of QOL by GI problems. Two components of impairment can be identified, one that is smaller and unrelated to disease or psychological factors, and a second that is larger and includes these factors. Because GI symptoms can alter function, pain, and psychological status, it is likely that the true effect of GI symptoms on QOL is somewhere between the unadjusted and adjusted values cited above.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the minimal perceptible clinical improvement (MPCI) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire, and patient and investigator global assessment of disease status in randomized clinical trials for treatment of OA. METHODS: Subjects with OA of the knee or hip were randomized to receive either rofecoxib 12.5 or 25 mg once daily, ibuprofen 800 mg 3 times daily, or placebo for 6 weeks. The WOMAC and global assessments were completed at baseline and Weeks 2, 4, and 6. A patient global assessment of response to therapy (0 to 4 scale) was used to "anchor" the WOMAC scores. MPCI was defined as the difference in mean change from baseline in WOMAC (100 mm normalized visual analog scale, VAS) between patients with 0 = "None" global response to therapy and patients with 1 = "Poor" global response to therapy. RESULTS: MPCI was determined to be 9.7, 9.3, and 10.0 mm for the WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscales, respectively, and 11.1 mm for WOMAC question 1: Pain walking on a flat surface. The MPCI for the investigator was 0.4 with investigator assessment of disease status reported on a 0 to 4 Likert scale. Of note, the estimated MPCI for the WOMAC and investigator globals were similar irrespective of treatment, sex, age, or geographic region. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, mean changes of roughly 9 to 12 mm (100 mm normalized VAS) on WOMAC scales were perceptible changes to patients with hip and knee OA. A mean decrease of 0.4 in global disease status (0 to 4 Likert scale) as assessed by the investigator corresponded to the patients' MPCI. Understanding the minimal perceptible differences may permit a better assessment of the clinical relevance of therapeutic interventions in OA.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Adverse upper gastrointestinal effects of rofecoxib compared with NSAIDs.

CONTEXT: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal (GI) toxic effects, such as upper GI tract perforations, symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcers, and upper GI tract bleeding (PUBs), are thought to be attributable to cyclooxygenase 1 (COX-1) inhibition. Rofecoxib specifically inhibits COX-2 and has demonstrated a low potential for causing upper GI injury. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of PUBs in patients with osteoarthritis treated with rofecoxib vs NSAIDs. DESIGN: Prespecified analysis of all 8 double-blind, randomized phase 2b/3 rofecoxib osteoarthritis trials conducted from December 1996 through March 1998, including one 6-week dose-ranging study, two 6-week efficacy studies vs ibuprofen and placebo, two 1-year efficacy studies vs diclofenac, two 6-month endoscopy studies vs ibuprofen and placebo, and one 6-week efficacy study vs nabumetone and placebo. SETTING: Multinational sites. Participants Osteoarthritis patients (N = 5435; mean age, 63 years [range, 38-94 years]; 72.9% women). INTERVENTIONS: Rofecoxib, 12.5, 25, or 50 mg/d (n = 1209, 1603, and 545, respectively, combined) vs ibuprofen, 800 mg 3 times per day (n = 847), diclofenac, 50 mg 3 times per day (n = 590); or nabumetone, 1500 mg/d (n = 127) (combined). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cumulative incidence of PUBs for rofecoxib vs NSAIDs, based on survival analysis of time to first PUB diagnosis, using PUBs that met pre-specified criteria judged by a blinded, external adjudication committee. RESULTS: The incidence of PUBs over 12 months was significantly lower with rofecoxib vs NSAIDs (12-month cumulative incidence, 1.3% vs 1.8%; P = .046; rate per 100 patient-years, 1.33 vs 2.60; relative risk, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.00). The cumulative incidence of dyspeptic GI adverse experiences was also lower with rofecoxib vs NSAIDS over 6 months (23.5% vs 25.5%; P = .02), after which the incidence rates converged. CONCLUSION: In a combined analysis of 8 trials of patients with osteoarthritis, treatment with rofecoxib was associated with a significantly lower incidence of PUBs than treatment with NSAIDs.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Effects of the amyloid precursor protein Glu693-->Gln 'Dutch' mutation on the production and stability of amyloid beta-protein.

Hereditary cerebral haemorrhage with amyloidosis, Dutch type (HCHWA-D), is a cerebral amyloidosis characterized by prominent vascular deposits and fatal haemorrhages. The disorder is caused by a point mutation in codon 693 of the gene encoding the amyloid precursor protein (APP), resulting in a Glu-->Gln amino acid substitution at position 22 of the amyloid beta-protein (Abeta) region. The pathogenetic mechanisms of HCHWA-D are unknown but could involve alterations in the proteolytic processing of APP and in amyloid fibril formation. We examined Abeta production and stability by using cultured human embryonic kidney 293 cells stably expressing wild-type or 'Dutch' APP. Radiosequencing and quantitative immunoprecipitation experiments showed that cells expressing Dutch APP secreted increased quantities of Abeta peptides beginning at Asp1, and of truncated peptides beginning at Val18 and Phe19. The ratio of levels of 4 kDa (Abeta) to 3 kDa (p3) peptides remained constant due to co-ordinate decreases in other peptide species. Novel truncated or elongated peptides were not observed. Pulse-chase experiments showed that the Dutch mutation did not affect the stability of the Abeta or p3 populations. These results are consistent with a disease process in which the Dutch mutation results in the production of Abeta peptides with enhanced propensities for fibrillogenesis, leading to accelerated vascular deposition and disease.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1999

Comparison of the responsiveness and relative effect size of the western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the short-form Medical Outcomes Study Survey in a randomized, clinical trial of osteoarthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the responsiveness and relative effect sizes of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in a randomized clinical trial for treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Patients with OA of the knee or hip were randomized to receive either placebo or 2,400 mg/day of ibuprofen for 28 days. Patients completed the WOMAC and SF-36 at baseline and days 7, 14, and 28 of the trial. RESULTS: Patients receiving ibuprofen showed significant improvement in WOMAC pain, physical functioning, and the total score, while improvement was detected only for bodily pain on the SF-36. The WOMAC detected significant differences between ibuprofen and placebo for pain and physical functioning, whereas the SF-36 detected differences for the bodily pain subscale. CONCLUSION: These results suggest the WOMAC has greater power to detect treatment differences than the SF-36, with respect to pain and physical functioning, in OA clinical trials.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1998

Diabetes mellitus and its complications in an African-American community: project DIRECT.

Project DIRECT (Diabetes Intervention Reaching and Educating Communities Together) is a multilevel community-based intervention project designed to address diabetes and its complications in an African-American community. This article presents results of the Project DIRECT pilot study and describes risk factors for diabetes, diabetes prevalence, complications, and care practices. During 1993, a pilot study was conducted among persons 20 to 74 years of age in Wake County, North Carolina. The study involved household interviews and examinations, and more extensive health center interviews and examinations based on the race of the head of the household, previous diagnosis of diabetes, and results of capillary glucose tests done in the household. Of the black population aged 20 to 74 years, 52 +/- 3% reported being inactive and 51 +/- 3% were overweight; the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes was 5.2 +/- 0.9%; the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was 5.7 +/- 2.7%; and the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance was 11.4 +/- 7.5%. Blacks with diabetes were significantly more likely than nonblacks with diabetes to have uncontrolled hypertension and to smoke cigarettes. Blacks with diabetes were significantly less likely to report having health insurance or to have a private health-care provider. Diabetes mellitus is a major public health problem in the African-American community of Wake County. Modifiable risk factors for diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes are common. Project DIRECT is attempting to improve the health-related quality of life of this population by reducing the burden of diabetes and its complications through a multilevel, community-based intervention.

Adult↗