Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D J Birnbach

Publications and source records attributed to D J Birnbach.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Use of atraumatic spinal needles among neurologists in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate atraumatic spinal needle use among US neurologists. BACKGROUND: Postdural puncture headache following lumbar puncture may be dramatically reduced through the use of atraumatic pencil-point spinal needles. It was hypothesized that atraumatic spinal needles are rarely used by members of specialties outside of anesthesiology. To determine the extent to which atraumatic spinal needles are currently being used for lumbar puncture in the United States, American neurologists (one group of physicians who regularly perform lumbar punctures) were surveyed. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all 7798 members of the American Academy of Neurology listed in the membership directory. The questionnaire included items pertaining to age, practice setting, knowledge of pencil-point (atraumatic) spinal needles, and lumbar puncture practices. RESULTS: Only a fraction (2%) of the neurologists surveyed routinely use atraumatic spinal needles. Almost half of the responding neurologists reported having no knowledge of pencil-point spinal needles. Among those who did have knowledge of these new spinal needles, the most common reasons given for not using them were nonavailability and expense. CONCLUSIONS: Atraumatic spinal needles for lumbar puncture have been shown to dramatically decrease the risk of postdural puncture headache. Although the use of these needles is standard practice among anesthesiologists, they have not been adopted by other medical specialties. This may lead to unnecessary morbidity among patients undergoing lumbar puncture.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A pregnant woman with previous anaphylactic reaction to local anesthetics: a case report.

A 43-year-old woman with a history of lidocaine allergy required dermatologic surgery during pregnancy. To accomplish this without the use of general anesthesia, intradermal allergy testing was performed. This information enabled appropriate anesthetic care for a tissue biopsy at 29 weeks' gestation and subsequent labor analgesia and obstetric management at term.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Identification of polysubstance abuse in the parturient.

Illicit drugs are widely used by inner city patients and their use by pregnant women has increased in recent years. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of polysubstance abuse among parturients at our institution who received no prenatal care ('unbooked') and to determine the accuracy of the Ontrak TesTcup an in vitro immunodiagnostic assay. We prospectively analysed urine from 50 'unbooked' parturients and found that 26 (52%) tested positive for cocaine. Of these, six patients (23%) were also positive for morphine. All TesTcup results were confirmed by the hospital laboratory using alternate chemical methods. When comparing TesTcup to the hospital laboratory, there were no false positive or negative results. Given the high frequency of concomitant opioid abuse in cocaine-abusing parturients, anyone suspected of cocaine abuse should be tested for other illicit substances. TesTcup is a clinically accurate test that allows the rapid assessment of several drugs of abuse, which may impact on anaesthetic care.

Cocaine-Related Disorders↗
PubMed2001

Unmasked mischief.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed2001

The effect of intrathecal analgesia on the success of external cephalic version.

UNLABELLED: External cephalic version (ECV), the procedure whereby a fetus in the breech position is converted to vertex, is often performed to avoid an operative delivery. Potential benefits of epidural and spinal anesthesia for this procedure are controversial. Several previous studies have evaluated the use of epidural anesthesia with varying results. We sought to determine whether analgesia produced by subarachnoid sufentanil would safely improve the success of ECV. Patients who received subarachnoid analgesia (n = 20) were compared with those who did not (n = 15) in regard to success of ECV, level of pain during ECV, and satisfaction. ECV was successful in 21 patients (60%), with more frequent success in women who received spinal analgesia as compared with those who did not (80% vs 33%, respectively; P = 0.005). Patients who received spinals also reported smaller pain scores and were more satisfied with ECV. None of the women who received spinal analgesia developed a postdural puncture headache, and the only case of fetal bradycardia occurred in a patient who did not receive spinal analgesia. More profound patient comfort after spinal analgesia may have permitted greater manipulation of the abdomen during ECV, thus improving success rates of ECV without increasing risk. IMPLICATIONS: The success of external cephalic version (ECV) was compared in women who received spinal analgesia and those who did not. Successful ECV occurred more frequently in those women who received spinal analgesia. Because term singleton pregnancies associated with breech position usually require cesarean delivery, an increase in success of ECV may decrease the number of cesarean deliveries performed.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The substance-abusing parturient: implications for analgesia and anaesthesia management.

Substance abuse remains a major problem in society, while substance abuse in pregnancy has emerged as a major health problem in the 1990s. Due to this trend, obstetricians, neonatologists and anaesthesiologists are encountering an increasing number of pregnant patients who use licit and illicit substances. The use of these substances presents a multitude of problems for the patient, her unborn child, and the physicians involved in their care. The following article reviews the various substances of abuse use by pregnant women and the implications of their use for analgesia and anaesthesia during labour and delivery. In conclusion, it is essential for physicians to identify the substance abusing parturient to optimize care of these patients and be prepared for the crises that may arise.

Alcoholism↗
PubMed1998

Spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric 0.75% versus hyperbaric 1% bupivacaine for cesarean section.

UNLABELLED: Although 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine is commonly administered to provide spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in the United States, in some countries, only the 1% hyperbaric solution of spinal bupivacaine is available. The aim of this study was to compare 0.75% with 1% hyperbaric spinal bupivacaine for cesarean section. In this prospective study, 50 patients undergoing elective cesarean section were randomized to receive a spinal anesthetic with either 1.5 mL of 0.75% bupivacaine (n = 25) or 1.125 mL of 1% bupivacaine (n = 25). There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, time to onset of block, or intraoperative pain. All patients had a successful block for surgery. The time from injection of the spinal anesthetic to first request for pain medication in the postanesthesia care unit was longer in the women who received 0.75% bupivacaine (4.3 vs 3 h; P < 0.05). Six women (24%) who received 1% bupivacaine versus one woman (4%) who received 0.75% bupivacaine complained of postoperative backache (P < 0.05). In addition, postdural puncture headache occurred in four women, all of whom received 1% bupivacaine (P = 0.04). In conclusion, our data suggest that 0.75% bupivacaine results in fewer postoperative problems and offers several significant benefits compared with the 1% concentration. IMPLICATIONS: Although 0.75% bupivacaine is usually used to provide spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in the United States, a more concentrated solution is popular in Europe. In this study, we compared 0.75% bupivacaine with 1% bupivacaine when administered for cesarean section and found that the 0.75% solution offers several significant benefits.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Povidone iodine and skin disinfection before initiation of epidural anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Povidone iodine (PI) solution is used commonly for skin disinfection before epidural and spinal anesthesia. Although there have been reports indicating the presence of microbial contaminants in PI solution, none have evaluated the prevalence of PI contamination. The aims of this study were to assess the frequency of bacterial contamination of previously opened bottles of PI solution and to compare the effectiveness of new and previously opened bottles of PI solution for skin disinfection. METHODS: Twenty previously opened and ten previously unopened multiple-use bottles of PI solution were evaluated for microbial contamination. In addition, final swabs and PI solution used for skin disinfection in 80 patients undergoing elective epidural analgesia were evaluated. RESULTS: The inside of the bottle cap or the PI solution from 40% of the multiple-use PI bottles in use were contaminated. There was no growth from any previously unused PI bottles. Povidone iodine from newly opened bottles provided more effective skin decontamination than did solution from previously opened bottles. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple-use PI bottles in normal use may become contaminated by bacteria. In addition, PI solution from previously opened bottles was less effective than PI from previously unopened bottles. Based on these findings, if PI solution is chosen for skin antisepsis before initiation of epidural and spinal anesthesia, only single-use containers should be used.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗