Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D J Adelstein

Publications and source records attributed to D J Adelstein.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Resectable esophageal carcinoma: local control with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy before esophagectomy for invasive cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 154 patients who underwent esophagectomy for invasive cancer between September 1, 1991, and December 31, 1995. The end points evaluated were overall, disease-free, local-regional relapse-free, and systemic relapse-free survival. RESULTS: Seventy of the 154 patients received neoadjuvant combined-modality therapy (CMT) consisting of concurrent cisplatin and fluorouracil administration and accelerated, hyperfractionated radiation therapy. The remaining 84 patients underwent immediate esophagectomy. With a median follow-up of 34.7 months, the 3-year overall, disease-free, and distant metastatic relapse-free survival rates were 38.0%, 41.9%, and 56.0%, respectively. Although neoadjuvant therapy did not appear to prevent distant metastases, there was a dramatic effect on local control. After CMT, the 5-year local control rate was 90% compared to 64% after surgery (P < .001). Tumors in the GEJ recurred more frequently (P = .01); however, multivariate analysis showed CMT was the only independent predictor of local control. Postoperative mortality was 15.7% after CMT versus 5.9% without CMT (P = .05). CONCLUSION: Local control of esophageal cancer is excellent following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. However, the effects of CMT on overall and disease-free survival are less clear due to significant differences between the treatment groups.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

Overexpression of p53 protein associates decreased response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Induction chemoradiotherapy before esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma seems to improve patient survival. Given the toxicity of this regimen, it would be useful to predict those patients likely to benefit. p53 is known to mediate apoptosis in response to DNA damage, but there are few data evaluating the relationship between p53 expression and chemoradiosensitivity in human tissues. We immunohistochemically evaluated p53 protein expression in 95 biopsy specimens from patients with esophageal carcinoma before chemoradiotherapy. p53 expression was correlated to the pathologic response identified in subsequent esophagectomy specimens. p53 immunoreactivity was recorded semiquantitatively using the following scale: neg, < 5%; 1+, 5-25%; 2+, 26-50%; 3+, 51-75%; 4+, > or = 76%. Pathologic response in esophagectomy specimens was categorized as overt residual tumor (ORT), minimal residual tumor, and no residual tumor. Of the 95 patients, 64 had adenocarcinoma, and 31 had squamous cell carcinoma. Of those with adenocarcinoma, 46 (72%) of 64 were positive for p53. Thirty-seven (80%) of 46 p53+ patients had ORT, compared with 4 (22%) of 18 p53- patients (P < .001). There was no correlation between the degree of p53 staining and pathologic response. Of those with squamous cell carcinoma, 13 (42%) of 18 were positive for p53. Three (23%) of 13 p53+ patients had ORT, compared with 4 (22%) of 18 p53- patients (P = .96). Our data indicate that overexpression of p53 protein is associated with decreased responsiveness to induction chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma but that no such association exists in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with clinically localized, intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma usually receive initial treatment with a doxorubicin-containing regimen such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP). Pilot studies suggest that eight cycles of CHOP alone or three cycles of CHOP followed by involved-field radiotherapy are effective in such patients. METHODS: We compared these two approaches in a prospective, randomized, multi-institutional study. The end points were progression-free survival, overall survival, and life-threatening or fatal toxic effects. Two hundred eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive CHOP plus radiotherapy, and 201 received CHOP alone. RESULTS: Patients treated with three cycles of CHOP plus radiotherapy had significantly better progression-free survival (P=0.03) and overall survival (P=0.02) than patients treated with CHOP alone. The five-year estimates of progression-free survival for patients receiving CHOP plus radiotherapy and for patients receiving CHOP alone were 77 percent and 64 percent, respectively. The five-year estimates of overall survival for patients receiving CHOP plus radiotherapy and for patients receiving CHOP alone were 82 percent and 72 percent, respectively. The adverse effects included one death in each treatment group. Life-threatening toxic effects of any type were seen in 61 of 200 patients treated with CHOP plus radiotherapy and in 80 of 201 patients treated with CHOP alone (P=0.06). The left ventricular function was decreased in seven patients who received CHOP alone, whereas no cardiac events were recorded in the group receiving CHOP plus radiotherapy (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Three cycles of CHOP followed by involved-field radiotherapy are superior to eight cycles of CHOP alone for the treatment of localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of surgical complications after organ-preservation therapy in patients with stage III or IV squamous cell head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of minor and major complications in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract who require surgical salvage or planned neck dissection after an initial treatment regimen with radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation. DESIGN: The medical records of 100 patients treated in a phase 3 trial comparing radiotherapy alone with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage III and IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were reviewed. Fifty-four patients underwent 59 surgical procedures. Twenty-nine planned neck dissections were performed for persistent neck disease or initial stage N2 or greater. For persistent or recurrent disease at the primary site, 30 salvage operations were performed. SETTING: Academic tertiary care referral center. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 15 (46%) of the 33 procedures in the radiation-only group and 12 (46%) of the 26 procedures in the chemoradiotherapy group. Major complications occurred in 4 (12%) of the procedures in the radiation-only group and 3 (12%) of the procedures in the chemoradiotherapy group. The incidence of minor complications was 33% and 35% in the radiation-only and chemoradiotherapy groups, respectively. The major complication rate for salvage operations did not differ between the radiation-only and chemoradiotherapy groups (16% and 27%, respectively; P=.79 by chi2 test). The incidence of major complications in planned neck dissections was 7% of the radiation-only group and 0% of the chemoradiotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: After radiation or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, surgery can be performed with an acceptable rate of major complications. Adding chemotherapy did not increase the incidence of surgical complications. These results differ from other reports in the literature.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Esophageal carcinoma: depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status.

BACKGROUND: The depth of tumor invasion (T) and regional lymph node status (N) are two factors that define the stage of an esophageal carcinoma. However, the arrangement of staging groups assumes that these factors are independent variables. A retrospective review of 359 consecutive patients undergoing esophageal resection was conducted to define the relationship between T and N and to determine whether T is a significant predictor of regional lymph node metastasis (N1). METHODS: Primary treatment was operation without preoperative therapy. There were 295 (82%) adenocarcinomas, 55 (15%) squamous cell carcinomas, and 9 (3%) adenosquamous carcinomas. T status was Tis in 29 (8%) patients, T1 in 65 (18%), T2 in 37 (10%), T3 in 219 (61%), and T4 in 9 (3%). N status was N0 in 161 (45%) patients and N1 in 198 (55%). M status was M0 in 327 (91%) patients and M1 in 32 (9%). Stage was 0 in 29 (8%) patients, I in 58 (16%), IIA in 70 (20%), IIB in 22 (6%), III in 148 (41%), and IV in 32 (9%). RESULTS: The likelihood of N1 disease occurring with increasing T was tested using the trend test. The percentage of patients with N1 disease is 0% for Tis, 11% for T1, 43% for T2, 77% for T3, and 67% for T4 (p < 0.001). This relationship existed for both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Multivariable analysis identified increasing T, adenocarcinoma, and lack of well-differentiated histologic features as significant predictors of N1 disease. Compared with a T1 patient, a T2 patient is 6 times more likely to have N1 disease, a T3 patient 23 times, and a T4 patient 35 times. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that for patients with esophageal carcinoma, T is an important predictor of N and this association should be included with other established factors used in clinical staging and treatment decisions.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

Short-course induction chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed toxicity, tumor response, disease control, and survival after short-course induction chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-five patients with stage III non-small-cell lung carcinoma received 12-day induction therapy of a 96-hour continuous infusion of cisplatin (20 mg/m2 per day), 24-hour infusion of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), and concurrent accelerated fractionation radiation therapy (1.5 Gy twice daily) to a dose of 30 Gy. Surgical resection was scheduled for 4 weeks later. Postoperatively, a second identical course of chemotherapy and concurrent radiation therapy (30 to 33 Gy) was given. RESULTS: Induction toxicity resulted in hospitalization of 18 (40%) patients for neutropenic fever. No induction deaths occurred. Of 40 (89%) patients who underwent thoracotomy, resection for cure was possible in 32 (71%) patients. Pathologic response was noted in 21 (47%) patients, and 14 (31%) were downstaged to mediastinal node negative (stage 0, I, or II). At a median follow-up of 19 months, 24 patients were alive, 10 with recurrent disease. Of 21 deaths, 16 were from recurrent disease, three were from treatment, and two were unrelated. Recurrent disease was distant in 21 patients, distant and locoregional in 2, and locoregional in 3. The Kaplan-Meier projected 24-month survival is 49%. Projected 24-month survival is 61% for stage IIIA, 17% for stage IIIB (p = 0.035); 84% for pathologic responders, 22% for nonresponders (p<0.001); 83% for downstaged patients (stage 0, I, or II), 33% for those not downstaged (p = 0.005); and 63% for resectable patients, 14% for unresectable patients (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that short-course neoadjuvant therapy with paclitaxel (1) has manageable toxicity and a low treatment mortality, (2) results in good tumor response and downstaging, (3) provides excellent locoregional control with most recurrences being distant, and (4) has improved the median survival compared with historical controls. Survival was better in stage IIIA patients, resectable patients, pathologic responders, and patients downstaged to mediastinal node negative disease (stage 0, I, or II).

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1998

Recent randomized trials of chemoradiation in the management of locally advanced head and neck cancer.

The use of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation, or chemoradiation, has become the focus of increasing interest in the management of patients with squamous-cell head and neck cancer. Randomized trials comparing radiation therapy alone with radiation and single chemotherapeutic agents given concurrently have suggested benefit for several different drugs. Randomized multiagent chemoradiotherapeutic trials have been approached somewhat more tentatively in view of the anticipated additional toxicity. Nonetheless, several studies have been reported, and a more consistent survival benefit with chemoradiotherapy has been observed. Treatment regimens using rapidly alternating chemotherapy and radiation schedules have also resulted in an improvement in survival. Although these kinds of aggressive treatment approaches produce significant incidences of morbidity and may not be appropriate for all patients, a role for chemoradiotherapy in the definitive management of this disease is being defined.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1997

Use of concurrent chemotherapy, accelerated fractionation radiation, and surgery for patients with esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The results of a Phase II study of concurrent chemotherapy and accelerated fractionation radiation therapy followed by surgical resection for patients with both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus are presented. Pretreatment and postinduction staging were correlated with pathologic findings at surgery to assess the role of surgical resection and the predictive value of noninvasive staging techniques. METHODS: Patients received 2 induction courses with 4-day continuous intravenous infusions of cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day) and 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2/day) beginning on Day 1 and Day 21, concurrent with a split course of accelerated fractionation radiation (1.5 grays [Gy] twice daily, to a total dose of 45 Gy). All patients were subsequently referred for surgical resection. A single, identical postoperative course of chemotherapy and 24 Gy accelerated fractionation radiation was planned for patients with residual tumor at surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were entered on this study; 72 patients were considered eligible and evaluable. Induction toxicity included nausea (85%), increased dysphagia (90%), neutropenia (<1000/mm3) (43%), thrombocytopenia (<20,000/mm3) (10%), and reversible nephrotoxicity (8%). Sixty-seven patients (93%) underwent surgery, and 65 (90%) were found to have resectable tumors. Twelve of these patients (18%) died perioperatively, and 18 (27%) had no residual pathologic evidence of disease. Resolution of symptoms and normalization of radiographic studies, endoscopy, or esophageal ultrasound did not identify pathologic complete responders accurately. No patient completing induction therapy and surgery experienced a locoregional recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier 4-year projected recurrence free and overall survival rates were 49% and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although this regimen is feasible, there was significant preoperative toxicity and perioperative mortality. Nonetheless, the recurrence free and overall survival rates were encouraging. However, no staging tool can predict a pathologic complete response after induction therapy accurately, suggesting a continued need for surgical resection.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Randomized trial of carboplatin plus amifostine versus carboplatin alone in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that the cytoprotectant amifostine attenuates the thrombocytopenia produced by carboplatin, the authors performed a randomized trial comparing treatment with carboplatin alone versus the combination of amifostine and carboplatin. METHODS: Patients with refractory or carboplatin-sensitive malignancies were randomized to receive either carboplatin, 500 mg/m2 alone or carboplatin, 500 mg/m2 in conjunction with 2 doses of amifostine of 910 mg/m2 each. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with a variety of malignancies were entered on this study. One patient withdrew from each arm prior to the administration of any therapy, leaving 30 evaluable patients treated with carboplatin alone and 23 treated with the combination of amifostine and carboplatin. For 82 cycles of therapy with amifostine plus carboplatin, the median platelet nadir was 127 x 10(9)/L while the median platelet nadir was 88 x 10(9)/L over the 80 courses of therapy with carboplatin alone (P = 0.023). The median platelet nadir after the first cycle of therapy was 144 x 10(9)/L for patients treated with amifostine plus carboplatin and 85 x 10(9)/L for patients treated with carboplatin alone (P = 0.24). The median survival for 9 patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma treated with carboplatin alone was 39 weeks whereas the median survival for 12 such patients treated with amifostine plus carboplatin was 52 weeks (P = 0.116). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that amifostine attenuates the myelosuppression of carboplatin. Additional studies of amifostine in combination with carboplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens are warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Management of the neck in a randomized trial comparing concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in resectable stage III and IV squamous cell head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treating the neck after organ-preservation treatment with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy can be problematic. METHODS: To develop management guidelines, we reviewed the results of a 100-patient phase-3 trial that had compared outcome after radiotherapy alone with outcome after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. After completing therapy, patients were reassessed, and surgery was recommended for persistent disease at the primary site or neck and for all patients with stage N2-3 neck nodes regardless of clinical response. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients with stage NO-1, 43 had a complete response (CR); of the 18 N1 patients, all but 4 had a CR. One of these 4, as well as 5 others among the NO-1 patients, underwent neck dissection (n = 6). No disease was found on pathologic examination, and no patient had neck recurrence. Of the remaining 41 N0-1 patients, 3 had disease progression and received no further therapy. Of the 38 others, 4 had neck recurrence, with 3 recurring at the primary site. Of the 53 with stage N2-3, 23 had less than a complete response (<CR), and 30 had a CR. In 35 N2-3 patients, neck dissection was performed as planned. Of these 35, 18 had a CR in the neck; 4 had positive nodes on pathologic examination. The other 17 had a <CR in the neck; 8 had positive nodes on pathologic examination. One patient in this group of 17 had regional recurrence after a pathologically negative neck dissection. Of the 18 N2-3 patients who did not undergo planned neck dissection, 6 had tumor progression and had no further therapy. The other 12, all with a CR in the neck, were followed, and 3 had neck recurrence; none successfully salvaged. Despite a CR in 30 N2-3 patients, 7 had persistent disease or eventual neck recurrence. Adding neck dissection minimized neck recurrence (p = .05). In N2-3 patients, disease-specific survival was significantly better in patients with a CR in the neck (p = .002). Disease-specific survival was not affected by neck dissection (p = .40) but was significantly affected by viable tumor in the specimen (p = .03). CONCLUSION: Based on these results and the realization that it is difficult to follow patients for recurrent neck cancer, that salvage is often unsuccessful, and that patients dying from uncontrollable neck disease have an extremely poor quality of life, we recommend neck dissection for all N2-3 patients regardless of the neck response and for N1 patients without a CR.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1997

A phase III randomized trial comparing concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in resectable stage III and IV squamous cell head and neck cancer: preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: A phase III randomized comparison of radiotherapy alone versus combination chemotherapy and concurrent continuous-course radiotherapy was performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. METHODS: Between March 1990 and June 1995, 100 patients with resectable stage III and IV squamous cell head and neck cancer were randomized to either Arm A: radiotherapy alone, 68-72 Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy per day; or to Arm B: the identical radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 1000 mg/m2/day, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2/ day, both given as continuous intravenous infusions over 4 days beginning on day 1 and day 22 of the radiotherapy. At 50-55 Gy, patients were clinically reassessed. If a response was evident, radiotherapy was completed. In non-responding patients, however, radiotherapy was terminated and surgery recommended. After completion of all treatment, salvage surgery was performed, if possible, for any residual primary or nodal disease or for any subsequent locoregional recurrence. RESULTS: Except for an overrepresentation of T1 patients on Arm A, the treatment arms were equivalent. Toxicity was greater in the patients on Arm B with a higher incidence of grade III and IV neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, cutaneous reaction, and mucositis. Feeding tubes were also required more often, and weight loss was greater on the chemotherapy arm. No toxic deaths occurred. With a median follow-up of 36 months, the Kaplan-Meier 3-year projections of relapse-free survival are 52% for Arm A and 67% for Arm B (p = .03), and the likelihood of developing hematogenous metastases is 21% for Arm A and 10% for Arm B (p = .04). Although overall survival is not significantly different, overall survival with successful primary site preservation was 35% for Arm A and 57% for Arm B (p = .02). This difference remains statistically significant in the subsets of patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal primaries but not in patients with oropharyngeal primaries. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous-course radiotherapy and concurrent combination chemotherapy is an intensive, toxic but tolerable treatment regimen, which, when compared with radio therapy alone, can produce an improvement in relapse-free survival, a decrease in distant metastases, and an improvement in overall survival with successful primary site preservation.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1997

Squamous cell head and neck cancer in nonsmokers.

Tobacco and alcohol abuse are the major known risk factors for the development of squamous cell head and neck cancer (SCHNC). Information about this disease in nonsmokers, however, is limited. We retrospectively studied a group of 59 tobacco nonusers with SCHNC, diagnosed since 1986 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF). Two objectives were defined: (a) to characterize this nonsmoking population of patients and identify any significant differences compared with a control population consisting of all patients diagnosed with SCHNC at the CCF between 1986 and 1993 and (b) to determine the prevalence of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in this nonsmoking group of patients with SCHNC and compare it with the environmental tobacco-smoke exposure in a second, control population of non-SCHNC, nonsmoking patients matched for age, race, sex, and alcohol use. The group of nonsmoking patients with SCHNC was notable for only rare alcohol abuse, a preponderance of whites, and relatively fewer laryngeal primary tumors. There were significantly more women and more tongue primaries. When compared with the control population without cancer, the nonsmoking patients had a significantly higher risk of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke both in the home and in the workplace. We conclude that the tobacco nonuser who develops SCHNC is likely to be female and white and to have a primary tongue cancer. A significant association with environmental tobacco smoke exposure is suggested by our data.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1997

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for salvage in relapsed squamous cell head and neck cancer.

The results in 9 patients with unresectable recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck who were treated with aggressive concurrent chemoradiotherapy are reported. Treatment consisted of one or two courses of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2/day and cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day, both given as 4-day continuous intravenous infusions, concurrent with radiation therapy. Salvage radiation doses between 30 and 70 Gy were administered. Seven patients had previously undergone an attempt at curative surgery, and 7 had been treated with radiation doses between 52 and 72 Gy. The recurrent disease was locally confined in 3, locoregional in 5, and locoregional with metastases in 1 of the 9 patients. Treatment toxicity was significant and included mucositis, nausea/vomiting, and granulocytopenia, but there were no toxic deaths. Complete tumor clearance was possible in 6 of these 9 patients, and 5 patients remain disease-free at 41+, 43+, 45+, 47+, and 50+ months. Of these 5 patients, 4 had previously been treated with both surgery and radiation, while 1 had only undergone surgery. We conclude that aggressive chemotherapy and concurrent (re)irradiation can be given to patients with unresectable, recurrent, squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Treatment is tolerable, and disease-free long-term survival is possible. Careful patient selection, however, is required.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Precise clinical staging allows treatment modification of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Treatment of esophageal carcinoma requires the realization that this neoplasm is not a single entity with a uniformly poor prognosis. As with any other malignancy, disease stage has prognostic and therapeutic importance. Patients with stage T1-2,N0,M0 or lower tumors have acceptable surgical cure rates and should undergo immediate resection. Patients with more advanced tumors (T3 or N1) are still potentially curable but do poorly with surgery alone. These patients should be considered for multimodality therapy. Patients with hematogenous metastatic disease should be treated with palliative intent. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), an accurate, reproducible staging tool, allows for clinical staging of these patients and modification of treatment at the time of diagnosis. Our experience at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation using this algorithm of surgery alone in patients with EUS-defined early-stage carcinomas and multimodality therapy in patients with EUS-staged locally advanced disease is described.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed1997

Advances in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

Recent changes in the epidemiology of esophageal carcinoma now recognize adenocarcinoma as the predominant histologic cell type. Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia in this epithelium identify patients who are at risk of developing invasive adenocarcinoma. This neoplasm is not a single entity with a consistently poor prognosis, and disease stage is important for determining therapy. These findings offer the potential for further development of therapeutic regimens. Endoscopic esophageal ultrasound is an accurate and reproducible staging tool. It allows the physician to determine clinical stage and modify treatment. T2 N0 M0 or lesser stage tumors have acceptable surgical cure rates, and patients should undergo immediate resection. Patients with more advanced T3 or N1 tumors have a potential for cure but do poorly with surgery alone. These patients should be considered for multimodality therapy. Palliative therapy should be given to patients with hematogenous metastatic disease. Treatment stratification by stage proves that esophageal carcinoma is not a uniformly fatal disease without hope for cure.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Stage II esophageal carcinoma: the significance of T and N.

OBJECTIVE: Stage II esophageal carcinomas are a heterogeneous group of uncommon malignant tumors that include both node-negative (IIA; T2 N0 M0 and T3 N0 M0) and node-positive (IIB; T1 N1 M0 and T2 N1 M0) carcinomas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this heterogeneity and to identify predictors of improved survival. RESULTS: Ninety-four of 345 patients undergoing esophageal resection at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 1985 and 1994 had stage 11 carcinomas; 70 stage IIA (24 T2 N0 M0 and 46 T3 N0 M0) and 24 stage IIB (9 T1 N1 M0 and 15 T2 N1 M0). Pathologic stage and T and N status were the only identifiable predictors of survival. Stage IIA survival was significantly better than stage IIB (p = 0.01). T2 N0 M0 survival was not different from T1 N0 M0 survival (p = 0.83). T3 N0 M0 survival was significantly worse than T1 N0 M0 (p = 0.03) and intermediate between T2 N0 M0 survival (p = 0.06) and T1 N1 M0 and T2 N1 M0 survivals (p = 0.07). T1 N1 M0 and T2 N1 M0 survival was not significantly different from T3 N1 M0 survival (p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: (1) N1 disease is the principal predictor of reduced survival and N1 is independent of T. Therefore the distinction between T1 N1 M0, T2 N1 M0, and T3 N1 M0 carcinomas is not warranted. (2) N0 disease is the principal predictor of improved survival but N0 is not independent of T. T1 N0 M0 and T2 N0 M0 survivals are similar and therefore distinction between these subgroups is not warranted. T3 N0 M0 survival is intermediate between T1 N0 M0 and T2 N0 M0 carcinomas and between T1 N1 M0, T2 N1 M0, and T3 N1 M0 carcinomas. Therefore stratification by T for N0 carcinomas is warranted.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1995

Accelerated induction therapy and resection for poor prognosis stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy and resection may improve the survival of patients with poor prognosis stage III non-small cell lung cancer, at the cost of significant treatment prolongation. The purpose of this study was to assess toxicity, response, and survival of an accelerated induction regimen and resection in poor prognosis stage III non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Forty-two surgically staged patients with poor prognosis stage III non-small cell lung cancer received 11 days of induction treatment consisting of 96 hours of continuous chemotherapy infusions of cisplatin (20 mg.m-2.day-2), 5 fluorouracil (1,000 mg.m-2.day-2), and etoposide (75 mg.m-2.day-2) concurrent with accelerated fractionation radiation therapy (1.5 Gy twice a day, to a dose of 27 Gy). Induction was followed in 4 weeks by resection. Postoperatively, a second course of continuous chemotherapy and concurrent accelerated fractionation radiation therapy (postoperative dose 13 to 36 Gy) was given. RESULTS: Despite some degree of induction toxicity in all patients there was only one induction death (2.4%). A clinical partial response was seen in 24 patients (57%). Thirty-six patients (86%) underwent thoracotomy, and resection was possible in 33 (79%). Pathologic downstaging was seen in 17 patients (40%), and 2 patients (5%) had no residual carcinoma at operation. There were 11 postoperative complications (31%) and 4 postoperative deaths (11%). Thirteen patients (31%) are alive and disease-free, 24 (57%) have persistent disease or have recurred (15 distant, 5 locoregional, 4 both), and 9 patients are alive with disease. The median survival is 21 months and the 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival is 43%, with no differences identified between stages IIIA and IIIB patients (p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that accelerated induction therapy and resection in poor prognosis stage III non-small cell lung cancer (1) is toxic, with a 12% treatment mortality; (2) is effective with a 79% resection rate and 40% pathologic downstaging rate; (3) provides excellent local control; (4) may prolong survival; and (5) is of value in stage IIIB as well as stage IIIA patients.

Adult↗