The objective of the presented, randomized study was to compare the efficacy of antimicrobial monotherapy with imipenem (3 x 0.5g/d) to a combination therapy with cefotaxime (3 x 2g/d) plus piperacillin (3 x 4g/d) for empirical treatment of infections in neutropenic patients. In 165 patients, 237 infectious episodes were evaluable. The overall response rate of patients treated with cefotaxime plus piperacillin was 67/115 (58%), of those treated with imipenem 66/122 (54%). In patients not responding to the initial therapy regimen within 2 or 3 days, the antimicrobial therapy was modified. After therapy modification 85/100 patients were cured. Fever of unknown origin (FUO) showed the most favourable course compared to other infection types, with a response in 46/59 (78%) and in 35/50 (70%) cases, respectively. In comparison, pneumonias were successfully treated in only 3/21 (14%) and 7/37 (19%) cases. Even including patients with modified therapy, only 66% (21/32) of pneumonia episodes responded. The unfavourable results in pneumonias is mainly due to the high rate of 13 systemic mycoses in this group (22%). Overall, a similar response was observed in patients treated with cefotaxime plus piperacillin in comparison with imipenem. In primary bacteremias however, an advantage was observed in patients treated with imipenem (20/27; 74%) compared with cefotaxime plus piperacillin (11/23; 48%).

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of toxicity and outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with high-dose cytosine arabinoside consolidation after induction with a regimen containing idarubicin or daunorubicin.

The toxicity and outcome after high-dose ara-C/daunorubicin (HDara-C/DNR) consolidation therapy in de novo AML was compared in 11 patients who received an idarubicin-containing induction therapy (IDA; from June 1995 to March 1997) and 16 patients pretreated with daunorubicin (DNR; from July 1990 to May 1995) for induction. The DNR group consisted of two cohorts, one (n = 6) of patients who had received, as had the IDA group, two induction and one intermediate-dose ara-C consolidation courses, and another (n = 10) of patients who had been pretreated with one induction and one consolidation course prior to HDara-C/DNR. There was no difference in the relative dose between the three cohorts. Following HDara-C/DNR, the IDA-pretreated patients experienced a more prolonged myelosuppression during consolidation therapy compared with the DNR group. Duration of neutropenia (< 500 neutrophils/microl) following HDara-C/DNR was 31.2 +/- 16 days (mean +/- SEM) in the IDA group compared with 18.7 +/- 5 days in the DNR group (p < .001 Mann-Whitney U-test). The duration 'of thrombocytopenia (platelets < 25000/microl) was 34.8 +/- 20 days in the IDA group vs. 18.5 +/- 6 days in the DNR group (p < .005). The more prolonged myelosupression was associated with a longer duration of fever (18.9 +/- 24 vs. 6.9 +/- 5.2 days). A greater incidence, length (11 +/- 8 vs. 1.2 +/- 2 days), and severity of diarrhea were observed in the IDA-pretreated group. Three of 11 IDA patients experienced WHO grade III-IV diarrhea. In the IDA group two patients developed severe enterocolitis with Candida septicemia, and one of these patients died. One patient in the IDA group died during prolonged aplasia. In the DNR group 6/16 patients experienced grade I-II diarrhea. Two patients in each group died during consolidation therapy. The CR rate was 87% in the IDA group and 79% in the DNR group. Relapse-free survival after HDara-C is 50% at a median follow-up of 60 months in the DNR group and 45% after a median follow-up of 17 months in the IDA group. Whether the advantage of the superior response rate in the IDA-treated patients may be lost during HDara-C consolidation treatment due to increased toxicity remains to be proven in larger trials.

Acute Disease↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Detection of dsDNA antibodies in diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus--comparative studies of diagnostic effectiveness of 3 ELISA methods with different antigens and a Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test].

Antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA, dsDNA-Ab) are frequently found in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), especially during active disease and differ with respect to immunoglobulin class and avidity. The detection of anti-dsDNA is one of the diagnostic criteria for SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Most of the commercial ELISA test systems have great advantages in routine laboratory testing but often detect dsDNA-Ab which are not specific for SLE and therefore give false positive results for non-SLE patients. The newly developed ELISA presented here, using human recombinant dsDNA (h-Rek) is compared to two commercial ELISA tests with genomic dsDNA from salmon testes (L-dsDNA) or plasmid dsDNA (P-dsDNA) and to the Chrithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIF) as well. In this study 143 sera were tested, 48 derived from patients with SLE, 40 from rheumatoid arthritis patients, 26 from non-rheumatoid patients whose sera were ANA-negative but L-dsDNA-Ab-positive and 30 from healthy volunteers. All patients were followed and clinically defined by the rheumatology outpatient clinic of our hospital. The prevalence for SLE of all sera was 32%. The sensitivity was 0.73 (h-Rek), 0.83 (L-dsDNA), 0.81 (P-dsDNA) and 0.57 (CLIF); specificity was determined 0.84 (h-Rek), 0.62 (L-dsDNA), 0.63 (P-dsDNA) and 0.98 (CLIF). The diagnostic efficiency of the L-dsDNA- and P-dsDNA-assay was identical, 0.69, and amounted to 0.81 for the h-Rek and 0.84 for the CLIF. Comparing all the ELISA tests and CLIF, the human recombinant dsDNA ELISA is much more sensitive than the CLIF, but considerably more specific than the ELISA assays using genomic or plasmid DNA, whereas the diagnostic efficiency is very close to that of the CLIF. This new generation of anti-dsDNA ELISA using human recombinant dsDNA seems to be a much better diagnostic tool for the detection of highly specific anti-dsDNA antibodies in the diagnosis of SLE than other commercial ELISAs. These results can only be explained by the use of a human recombinant antigen instead of undefined genomic or recombinant plasmid DNA for immobilization.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Changes in the haematopoietic progenitor cell compartment in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

In order to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the disturbances of haematopoiesis in HIV-infected individuals, bone marrow from 25 patients with either ARC or AIDS was studied. There is a stage-related decrease in CFU-GEMM, CFU-MK, BFU-E and CFU-GM, with the latter being least affected. This decrease is inversely correlated with the number of circulating CD4 cells and the CD4/CD8 ratio. Immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization studies of haematopoietic colonies failed to demonstrate HIV infection of haematopoietic cells. Neither the depletion of adherent mononuclear cells from haematopoietic cell cultures nor the addition of plasma containing antibodies against HIV gp120 could demonstrate an inhibitory effect of HIV-infected macrophages or immune-mediated progenitor cell lysis, respectively. Hence, imbalances of T-cell subpopulations appear to be mainly responsible for the progressive impairment of proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow progenitor cells observed in HIV-infected individuals.

AIDS-Related Complex↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Infection of granulocyte/monocyte progenitor cells with HIV1.

In order to study whether cytopathic HIV1 infection of haemopoietic progenitor cells is involved in the derangement of haemopoiesis in patients with HIV1 infection, we infected enriched progenitor cells with HIV1, by addition of viral inoculate supernatants from HIV1-infected peripheral blood mononuclear cells or by coculture with HIV1-infected monocytes/macrophages. Progenitor cells were seeded into colony assays and single colonies were chosen for HIV1 mRNA determination by in situ hybridization. Growth of progenitors was not affected by infection. However, up to 42% of colonies of pluripotent progenitor cells (colony-forming unit/granulocyte-erythrocyte-monocyte; CFU-GEM) and committed progenitor cells CFU/granulocyte-monocyte (CFM-GM) contained HIV1 mRNA-expressing cells. In addition, we studied HIV1 infection of progenitor cells from the bone marrow of 6 patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex. Two patients were negative, two had a few colonies expressing HIV1 mRNA in a minority of cells, and in the remaining two, up to 11% of CFU-GM contained HIV1-expressing cells. Thus, infection of progenitor cells with HIV1 was achieved experimentally in vitro and occurs in vivo. However, growth of progenitors after in vitro infection continues and therefore HIV1 infection does not seem to contribute directly to the reduced incidence of haemopoietic progenitor cells in vivo.

Granulocytes↗