Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Hammel

Publications and source records attributed to D Hammel.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation leads: effect of transvenous electrode polarity on defibrillation threshold.

INTRODUCTION: The defibrillation threshold (DFT) of a transvenous-subcutaneous electrode configuration is sometimes unacceptably high. To obtain a DFT with a sufficient safety margin, the defibrillation field can be modified by repositioning the electrodes or more easily by a change of electrode polarity. In a prospective randomized cross-over study, the effect of transvenous electrode polarity on DFT was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 21 patients receiving transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation leads, the DFT was determined intraoperatively for two electrode configurations. Two monophasic defibrillation pulses were delivered in sequential mode between either the right ventricular (RV) electrode as common cathode and the superior vena cava (SVC) and subcutaneous electrodes as anodes (configuration I) or the SVC electrode as common cathode and the RV and subcutaneous electrodes as anodes (configuration II). In each patient, both electrode configurations were used alternately with declining energies (25, 15, 10, 5, 2 J) until failure of defibrillation occurred. The DFT did not differ between both configurations (18.3 +/- 8.2 J vs 18.9 +/- 8.9 J; P = 0.72). Eleven patients had the same DFT with both electrode configurations, 5 patients a lower DFT with the RV electrode as cathode, and 5 patients a lower DFT with the SVC as cathode. Four patients had a sufficiently low DFT (< or = 25 J) with only 1 of the 2 configurations. CONCLUSION: A change of electrode polarity of transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation electrodes may result in effective defibrillation if the first electrode polarity tested fails to defibrillate. In general, neither the RV electrode nor the SVC electrode is superior if used as a common cathode in combination with a subcutaneous anodal chest patch.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A prospective randomized cross-over comparison of mono- and biphasic defibrillation using nonthoracotomy lead configurations in humans.

INTRODUCTION: For current implantable defibrillators, the nonthoracotomy approach to implantation fails in a substantial number of patients. In a prospective randomized cross-over study the defibrillation efficacy of a standard monophasic and a new biphasic waveform was compared for different lead configurations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Intraoperatively, in 79 patients receiving nonthoracotomy defibrillation leads, the defibrillation threshold was determined in the initial lead configuration for the mono- and biphasic waveform. In each patient, both waveforms were used alternately with declining energies (20, 15, 10, 5 J) until failure of defibrillation occurred. Three different initial lead configurations were tested in different, consecutive, nonrandomized patients using a bipolar endocardial defibrillation lead alone (A; n = 36) or in combination with a subcutaneous defibrillation patch (B; n = 24) or array (C; n = 19) lead. The lowest successful defibrillation energy with the biphasic waveform was less than, equal to, or higher than with the monophasic waveform in 64%, 28%, and 8% of patients, respectively, and on average significantly lower with the biphasic waveform for all three lead configurations (A: 11.3 +/- 4.4 J vs 14.5 +/- 4.5 J; B: 9.7 +/- 4.7 J vs 15.1 +/- 4.5 J; C: 7.9 +/- 4.5 J vs 12.4 +/- 4.9 J). Defibrillation efficacy at 20 J was significantly improved by the biphasic waveform (91% vs 76%). CONCLUSION: In combination with nonthoracotomy defibrillation leads, the biphasic waveform of a new implantable cardioverter defibrillator showed superior defibrillation efficacy in comparison to the standard monophasic waveform. Defibrillation thresholds were improved for lead systems with and without a subcutaneous patch or array lead.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

[Pectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation combined with transvenous bipolar defibrillation electrodes].

Ultimately, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) will one day be implantable like present pacemakers. However, due to the size of the pulse generator and the low defibrillation efficacy of monophasic shocks, only a few selected patients have been implanted transvenously-pectorally. Therefore, we have prospectively investigated whether a transvenous-pectoral approach is in general feasible with a new downsized ICD capable of delivering biphasic shocks. Out of 33 patients, 76% received a bipolar transvenous defibrillation lead system. In the first 13 consecutive patients, a randomized crossover study showed that this high efficacy was above all achieved by a superior defibrillation efficacy of the biphasic waveform in comparison to the monophasic waveform (69% vs. 23%; p = 0.03). Not a single patient could be defibrillated exclusively with the monophasic waveform. In a further 15 consecutive patients, a crossover study showed that a position of the transvenous anode within the Vena anonyma instead of the Vena cava superior is, in general, not superior (87% vs. 80%; p = 0.67). Only one patient could be exclusively defibrillated with the V. anonyma position. Intraoperatively, no complications occurred and all but one patient received a pectoral implantation of the pulse generator. Postoperatively, in five patients local complications related to the ICD system were seen; two needed a surgical revision. In two patients movements of the left shoulder joint were temporarily restricted. Thus, in the majority of patients a new downsized ICD capable of biphasic shocks can be implanted transvenously-pectorally like a pacemaker.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

[Cost/benefit relations in heart transplantation].

The expanding role of cardiac transplantation as well as mechanical and antiarrhythmic bridging requires a critical reflection of the economic impact of these therapeutic modalities. Based on assumptions from the pertinent literature, cardiac transplantation requires costs of about 55,000 DM per year of life gained by the procedure. Even if a maximum social and professional reintegration percentage of about 60% is assumed, it does not seem possible to perform the procedure without additional costs to the health care system. The consequences of this are the following: 1) Cardiac transplantation should only be performed by centers experienced in all aspects of terminal heart failure care including a heart failure program, high-risk conventional surgery program, mechanical and antiarrhythmia bridging program, and qualified post transplant care program. 2) In order to evaluate potentially cost-saving therapeutic strategies in cardiac transplantation, multicenter trials have to be conducted which require a continuous scientific working group and research data organization based on the consensus of all participating transplant centers. 3) An improved professional reintegration program is necessary. 4) The ethical foundation for offering cardiac replacement to patients, namely, the responsibility for the individual person's well-being, has to be emphasized by physicians active in the field. 5) The society as a whole, not the group of physicians active in the field, has to debate and decide on how many resources should be spent in this field of health care. 6) Since potential cardiac transplant recipients are, to a large extent, recruited from patients suffering from coronary artery disease, it is essential to incorporate a primary preventive perspective into this high-technology field of medicine.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

[Transvenous subcutaneous implantation technique of the cardioverter/defibrillator].

For years the high efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) to prevent sudden cardiac death was impaired by the substantial perioperative mortality of the therapy. With the introduction of transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation leads, thoracotomy could be abandoned and perioperative mortality was reduced to less than 1%. Despite frequent lead complications as dislocations, conductor fractures and isolation failures, long-term efficacy in termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmias remained approximately 98% and prevention of sudden cardiac death was not impaired. All nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems involve an endocardial right ventricular lead usually introduced from the left cephalic vein or directly via the subclavian vein. This lead has a pace/sense tip and at least one defibrillation electrode located in the right ventricle. Additionally, a second transvenous electrode and/or a subcutaneous patch or array electrode or the pulse generator shell has to be used for defibrillation. In combination with the biphasic defibrillation waveform, virtually all patients can be defibrillated using a combination of these electrodes. In most patients defibrillation is possible with transvenous electrodes alone and there is no need for an additional subcutaneous electrode. Smaller pulse generators have already been implanted in a subpectoral position--in many patients allowing a single incision approach as used for pacemaker implantation. Ultimately, with even smaller pulse generators ICDs should be implantable like present pacemakers in local anesthesia. This overview covers the history, models, practical aspects of implantation and testing, efficacy and complications of transvenous/subcutaneous defibrillation leads. Figures show the impact of the surgical approach on the frequency of de novo ICD implantations, X-rays of nearly all current bipolar and tripolar transvenous subcutaneous ICD lead systems, transvenous-epicardial hybrid systems and various complications. Additional figures cover lead complications not visible on X-rays. Defibrillation thresholds are compared for various lead configurations. Sensing amplitudes and pacing thresholds are compared for bipolar and pseudobipolar sense/pace leads as well as for different cardiac diseases. Tables summarize the main characteristics of current transvenous and subcutaneous ICD leads and external devices for intraoperative testing of ICD leads as well as the complications of transvenous/subcutaneous leads in three multicenter studies.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of frequency of aggravation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after implantation of automatic defibrillators using epicardial versus nonthoracotomy lead systems.

The time of onset of 4,471 episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) in 40 of 65 patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) with endocardial defibrillation electrodes (group 1) and in 53 of 123 with epicardial defibrillation electrodes (group 2) was analyzed to examine whether the incidence of VT/VF immediately after surgery is greater than during further follow up and whether the site of lead placement exerts an influence on the occurrence of these arrhythmias. Actuarial survival rates free of VT/VF were 77, 65, and 54% at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively, for group 1, and 84, 66 and 52%, respectively, for group 2. The probability of VT/VF was increased only during the first week after surgery; in that week, 12.8% of all patients had VT/VF, without significant differences between groups 1 and 2. Until the end of the first month, this percentage increased to 23%, whereas only 12 to 15% of patients had VT/VF during subsequent months. In 19 patients with third-generation devices capable of terminating tachycardias by overdrive pacing, 326 of 412 VT/VF episodes occurring in the first week after surgery were terminated by antitachycardia pacing, and only 86 had to be terminated by cardioversion or defibrillation. No postoperative exacerbation of inappropriate ICD therapies was observed in any group; 2 to 5% of patients per month received ICD therapies for atrial fibrillation or sinus tachycardia. Patients who received appropriate ICD therapies in the first week after surgery were at high risk of recurrence of VT/VF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Defibrillators, Implantable↗
PubMed1993

Surgical experience with defibrillator implantation using nonthoracotomy leads.

Between October 10, 1989, and June 17, 1991, 109 patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator at our institution. In 50 patients, nonthoracotomy lead systems consisting of a subcutaneous chest wall patch electrode near the cardiac apex and one (Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc: Endotak C) or two (Medtronic: Transvene) transvenous electrodes were tested. The mean ejection fraction was 0.44 +/- 0.15 with a range from 0.19 to 0.81. Twenty-four patients had a history of open heart operation. In 43 patients the nonthoracotomy lead system was implanted, whereas in 7 patients epicardial patch lead systems were required due to elevated defibrillation thresholds during nonthoracotomy lead testing. There was one perioperative death unrelated to the operative procedure (hydrocephalus internus). Hemorrhage from the subcutaneous patch pocket or the device pocket that required reintervention occurred in 4 patients. During a mean follow-up of 13 +/- 5 months (range, 4 to 26 months) no dislocation of an endocardial lead, insulation defect, or lead fracture has been observed. In 1 patient, the lead system had to be removed due to infection of the subcutaneous patch pocket. The cardiovascular survival rate was 98% at 12 and 18 months, and freedom from sudden cardiac death was 100% at 6 and 12 months. In conclusion, defibrillator implantation using nonthoracotomy lead systems is feasible with a success rate of 86%, and during short-term follow-up no problems related to the lead system such as dislocation, fracture, or insulation defect have occurred.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Do patients with an implantable defibrillator live longer?

OBJECTIVES: This study was done to provide information on the potential benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy regarding sudden and arrhythmia-related deaths and to examine whether such therapy improves survival. BACKGROUND: Implantation of automatic cardioverter-defibrillators is reported to abort sudden cardiac death due to malignant tachyarrhythmias. METHODS: Between 1989 and 1992, 107 patients were screened for implantation of a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator combined with endocardial leads. Mean age was 57 +/- 13 years and mean ejection fraction was 40 +/- 15%. Sudden death, total arrhythmia-related death and total cardiac death were compared with the occurrence of fast ventricular tachyarrhythmias (> 240 beats/min), assuming that most of these arrhythmias would have been fatal without treatment by the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. RESULTS: The surgical mortality rate was 2.7% in all 107 patients and 1% in the 99 patients who qualified for endocardial leads. During a follow-up period of 12 +/- 8 months, actuarial survival rate free of events at 6 months as well as at 12 and 18 months was 100% for sudden death, 97% for total arrhythmia-related death and 95% for total cardiac death. In contrast, after 6, 12 and 18 months, the rate of survival free of fast ventricular tachycardia was only 83%, 74% and 69%, respectively, and the rate of survival free of any ventricular tachyarrhythmia was only 59%, 49% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of patients treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and endocardial defibrillation leads is excellent. For many patients, this treatment is probably lifesaving.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

[Therapy of ventricular tachyarrhythmia with implantable cardioverters/defibrillators--mortality and complications using epicardial electrodes].

Technical improvements of third generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) like antitachycardia pacing modalities lead to an extended use of ICDs, not only in patients with aborted sudden cardiac death, but also in patients with hemodynamically tolerable ventricular tachycardia. In addition, anticipated results of current prospective studies might indicate the prophylactic use of ICDs in patients with high risk for sudden cardiac death, but without documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias. This report reviews mortality and complications associated with the ICDs with epicardial defibrillation leads. Mortality is separated in cardiac death, sudden cardiac, arrhythmogenic "not so sudden" cardiac death, and overall mortality. Pulmonary complications and infections are related to the underlying disease and the surgical procedure. Device- and lead-related complications, high defibrillation thresholds, pacemaker interactions, inappropriate shocks, arrhythmic effects, syncope, and psychosocial problems are reported, respectively.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

201Tl reinjection predicts improvement of left ventricular function following revascularization.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between improved Tl uptake in reinjection imaging with improvements in regional wall motion and global ejection fraction following PTCA or aorto-coronary bypass surgery. 19 patients with CHD were investigated and divided into two groups according to their thallium uptake in the reinjection studies. Group I showed additional uptake on reinjection imaging compared to the redistribution image, whereas group II showed no additional uptake. Both groups had a similar number and distribution of affected vessels and location of the leading stenosis. Stress, redistribution and reinjection images were obtained prior to revascularization and evaluated semiquantitatively from a bulls eye scheme. There was a postoperative increase in regional wall motion in group 1 from 5.3 to 8.8% whereas group II did not show a relevant change (6.3 vs 6.0%). The ejection fraction increased II from 55.0 to 66.7% in group I and dit not increase in group II (59.8 vs 58.7%). The overall predictive value of the reinjection image for improvement in wall motion (> 10%) was 91% and for the redistribution image 58%. Increased uptake in reinjection imaging predicts improved ventricular function following revascularization and indeed indicates viable myocardium with reversible functional impairment.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Implantation of a cardioverter/defibrillator in the subpectoral region combined with a nonthoracotomy lead system.

An implantable cardioverter defibrillator was placed into a subpectoral pocket via the incision for cephalic venotomy during implantation of a nonthoracotomy lead system. The approach obviated another incision and subcutaneous tunneling of the leads. There were no perioperative complications and after 6 months of follow-up, the patient continues to tolerate the device satisfactorily.

Electric Countershock↗
PubMed1992

Role of ventricular tachycardia surgery and catheter ablation as complements or alternatives to the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the 1990s.

Although the implantable cardioverter defibrillator is used increasingly, other nonpharmacological approaches have their indications and merits. Furthermore, as the natural history of ventricular tachyarrhythmias or their underlying structural cardiac abnormality, i.e., coronary artery disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular disease, etc. change, the mode of therapy may be modified accordingly. Because of the disappointing results of the CAST study in previously asymptomatic patients after myocardial infarction and the evidence that failure of one or two antiarrhythmic drugs tested by programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with documented sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation predicts further drug failure, there will be a significant increase in the use of implantable cardioverters defibrillators in the 1990s. However, care should be taken to avoid inappropriate use of these devices.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICD): a new lead-system using transvenous-subcutaneous approach in patients with prior cardiac surgery.

The current approach in cardioverter-defibrillator implantation requires placement of epicardial leads which may lead to pericardial and/or pleural effusion and pneumonia during the perioperative period. Although ICD implantation is less invasive than other surgical techniques for the treatment of rhythm disturbances, the perioperative mortality must be considered. Minimizing the operative procedure could lead to a reduction in perioperative mortality. Therefore, we investigated an approach without the need for thoracotomy using a transvenous/subcutaneous lead system. In nine patients with prior cardiac surgery, defibrillator implantation was performed by a transvenous/subcutaneous approach. There was no perioperative mortality. In all patients, a sufficient defibrillation threshold was achieved. The defibrillation pulses were delivered as two sequential pulses between a right ventricular electrode (cathode) and a coronary sinus or superior caval vein electrode (anode 1) and a subcutaneous patch electrode (anode 2). Intubation of the coronary sinus was necessary in 4 patients in order to obtain satisfactory defibrillation thresholds. These data demonstrate that a transvenous/subcutaneous approach is feasible in patients with prior cardiac surgery obviating the need for thoracotomy. Sensing function of the RV-electrode, intubation of the coronary sinus and the intraoperative use of an epicutaneous patch electrode are current problems of this new technique.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Cardiopulmonary effects of internal cardioverter/defibrillator implantation.

Cardiopulmonary effects of electrophysiological testing of internal cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) devices were studied in ten patients undergoing general anaesthesia. In the control-phase, haemodynamic performance and oxygenation were slightly impaired. After completion of the electrophysiological procedures (ICD-phase), cardiopulmonary function had deteriorated significantly. Cardiac index declined by 16%, whereas left ventricular filling pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance increased (P less than or equal to 0.01). Oxygenation, but not CO2-elimination deteriorated (P less than or equal to 0.01) and venous admixture increased by 72% (P less than or equal to 0.01). Alveolo-arterial PO2-difference (PA-aO2) increased by 43% (P less than or equal to 0.01), indicating ventilation-perfusion (VA/Q) mismatching. Repeated inductions of ventricular tachycardia and/or fibrillation subject the myocardium to transient global ischaemia, leading to acute congestive heart failure, and positive inotropic intervention was necessary in 40% of the patients. Partial pulmonary insufficiency resulted possibly from interstitial oedema and VA/Q-inhomogeneities. ICD implantation has detrimental effects on haemodynamics and gas exchange in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

[Initial clinical experiences with a transvenous-subcutaneous defibrillation system].

In 19 patients with an indication for an implantable defibrillator, it was tried to avoid thoracotomy by using two electrodes positioned via the subclavian vein in the right ventricle (for pacing, sensing, and defibrillation) and the superior vena cava or coronary sinus (for defibrillation), and one electrode positioned subcutaneously near the ventricular apex (for defibrillation). In 17 patients (89%) the transvenous-subcutaneous leads were implanted, whereas in the remaining two patients an epi-/pericardial lead system was subsequently used due to an insufficient defibrillation threshold. Perioperatively, no major complications were observed and patients were rapidly mobilized. Within a follow-up period of 7 +/- 4 months, no malfunction of the lead system became evident. Sixty-eight episodes of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred, all of which were successfully terminated. In one patient an infection of the lead system developed after 2 months that proved refractory to antibiotics and required surgical removal. Thus, transvenous-subcutaneous placement of leads for implantable defibrillators yielded a sufficient defibrillation threshold in the majority of patients. Long-term efficacy was excellent and no malfunctions were observed. This approach seems to be feasible and advisable in patients with an increased risk for thoracotomy.

Adolescent↗