Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D G Armstrong

Publications and source records attributed to D G Armstrong.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Risk factors for above-knee amputations in diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Above-knee amputation (AKA) is a common complication in diabetics, mostly after one or more lower level amputations (LEAs) have been done. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for AKAs among diabetics. METHODS: We abstracted 1,800 medical records of hospitalizations for LEA. Kaplan's comorbidity classification was used to rank disease severity. We used both univariate and multivariate models to identify risk factors for AKA. RESULTS: Of the 1,043 diabetic amputees in this study, 22% had AKA. Variables associated with AKA were locomotor impairment, severe anemia, history of lower extremity bypass surgery, body mass index (BMI) < 20 kg/m2, female sex, cerebrovascular disease, cardiovascular disease, and SGOT > 40 U/L. CONCLUSIONS: Most of these risk factors represent end-stage processes and do not have good treatment alternatives. Perhaps one of the practical applications of these data is not to describe risk of proximal amputations but instead to look more closely at candidates who should be considered for distal procedures.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Pathophysiology and treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy of the lower extremity.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic peripheral neuropathy is the most common complication of diabetes mellitus, affecting up to 62% of Americans with diabetes. METHODS: We reviewed the literature using the National Library of Medicine's MEDLINE search service. In total, we reviewed 54 articles. RESULTS: Hyperglycemia leads to increased activity in the polyol pathway in nerve cells; this ultimately results in abnormal nerve function. Numerous pharmacologic agents have been used to treat symptomatic peripheral neuropathy, but all of these drugs can be associated with adverse side effects. Recent work has indicated that subsensory electrical stimulation may be preferred to pharmacotherapy, since it is equally effective and has a more favorable safety profile. CONCLUSION: Although the pathophysiology of diabetic neuropathy is well understood, treatment of the symptoms associated with this condition can be challenging. Additional research is needed to reveal a safe and effective treatment for this debilitating sequela of diabetes mellitus.

Diabetic Neuropathies↗

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein -2 and -4 messenger ribonucleic acid expression in bovine ovarian follicles: effect of gonadotropins and developmental status.

This work is concerned with the role of insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-2 and -4 in the regulation of IGF bioactivity in bovine follicles during the development of dominance. We measured the expression of IGFBP-2 and -4 messenger RNA (mRNA) in small (1-4 mm) gonadotropin-sensitive follicles and medium (4-8 mm) and large (>8 mm) gonadotropin-dependent follicles using in situ hybridization. In healthy nonatretic bovine follicles, IGFBP-2 and -4 mRNA expression was confined to granulosa and theca tissue, respectively. Moreover, during the development of follicular atresia, there were distinct changes in the temporal and spatial expression of these genes. IGFBP-2 immunoactivity was localized in granulosa tissue and the basement membrane of healthy preantral follicles, whereas IGFBP-4 immunoactivity was localized in both theca and granulosa tissue. Of particular interest was the lack of IGFBP-2 mRNA expression in large (>8 mm) gonadotropin-dependent follicles, an observation that was confirmed by the lack of immunoreactive IGFBP-2 in these follicles. The regulation of IGFBP-2 and -4 mRNA expression in granulosa and theca cells was analyzed using a serum-free cell culture system. FSH inhibited the expression of IGFBP-2 mRNA in granulosa cells, whereas LH stimulated IGFBP-4 mRNA expression in theca cells. Our results provide evidence for the existence of different roles for IGFBP-2 and -4 in the developing follicle.

Animals↗

Elevated peak plantar pressures in patients who have Charcot arthropathy.

Although diabetes and peripheral neuropathy are perhaps the most important risk factors for neuropathic osteoarthropathy, we hypothesized that peak plantar pressures may also be higher in patients who have this condition. We are unaware of any reports in the medical literature that have specifically addressed this hypothesis. We obtained data from the medical records of 164 diabetic patients who had been managed in a multidisciplinary tertiary-care diabetic foot-specialty clinic. We then divided the patients into four groups: those who had acute Charcot arthropathy, those who had neuropathic ulceration, those who had neuropathy without ulceration, and those who had neither neuropathy nor ulceration. The peak plantar pressures were significantly higher in the patients who had acute Charcot arthropathy and those who had a neuropathic ulcer (p < 0.001 for both) compared with the pressures in those who had no history of arthropathy and those who had neuropathy without ulceration. With the numbers available, we could not detect a significant difference in the peak pressure between the affected and the unaffected foot in the patients who had Charcot arthropathy (mean [and standard deviation], 100+/-8.5 compared with 101+/-9.6 newtons per square centimeter; p > 0.05). However, the mean peak pressure was significantly higher on the ulcerated side than on the contralateral side in the patients who had a neuropathic ulcer (90+/-18.8 compared with 86+/-20.7 newtons per square centimeter; p < 0.02). Although the midfoot was the site of maximum involvement in all patients who had Charcot arthropathy, the peak plantar pressure was on the forefoot, suggesting that the forefoot may function as a lever, forcing collapse in the midfoot.

Acute Disease↗

Validation of a diabetic wound classification system. The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation.

OBJECTIVE: To validate a wound classification instrument that includes assessment of depth, infection, and ischemia based on the eventual outcome of the wound. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We evaluated the medical records of 360 diabetic patients presenting for care of foot wounds at a multidisciplinary tertiary care foot clinic. As per protocol, all patients had a standardized evaluation to assess wound depth, sensory neuropathy, vascular insufficiency, and infection. Patients were assessed at 6 months after their initial evaluation to see whether an amputation had been performed. RESULTS: There was a significant overall trend toward increased prevalence of amputations as wounds increased in both depth (chi 2trend = 143.1, P < 0.001) and stage (chi 2trend = 91.0, P < 0.001). This was true for every subcategory as well with the exception of noninfected, nonischemic ulcers. There were no amputations performed within this stage during the follow-up period. Patients were more than 11 times more likely to receive a midfoot or higher level amputation if their wound probed to bone (18.3 vs. 2.0%, P < 0.001, chi 2 = 31.5, odds ratio (OR) = 11.1, CI = 4.0-30.3). Patients with infection and ischemia were nearly 90 times more likely to receive a midfoot or higher amputation compared with patients in less advanced wound stages (76.5 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001, chi 2 = 133.5, OR = 89.6, CI = 25-316). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes deteriorated with increasing grade and stage of wounds when measured using the University of Texas Wound Classification System.

Adult↗

1998 William J. Stickel Silver Award. Mechanically assisted, delayed primary closure of diabetic foot wounds.

The authors evaluated the time to healing and prevalence of complications in patients undergoing mechanically assisted, delayed primary closure of diabetic foot wounds compared with a similar population who received standard wound care. A total of 55 patients were enrolled for study, with 25 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. Patients in the experimental (stretch) group underwent mechanically assisted primary closure of their wounds using a skin-stretching device. There was no difference between the stretch and control groups with regard to any descriptive characteristics, including wound chronicity. Although the wounds were over three times as large on average in the stretch group (P < .001), the stretch group reached full epithelialization approximately 40% sooner than the control group (26.4 +/- 16.0 versus 42.5 +/- 19.9 days; P < .002). Eighty-eight percent of patients in the stretch group experienced wound dehiscence, at a mean time of 1.8 +/- 0.6 weeks following mechanically assisted closure. However, patients who experienced dehiscence in the stretch group healed significantly faster than patients in the control group (27.4 +/- 16.7 versus 42.5 +/- 19.9 days; P < .007). The results of this study suggest that mechanically assisted closure of diabetic foot wounds may result in reduced healing time compared with healing by secondary intention.

Adult↗

Emergence of non-group A streptococcal necrotizing diabetic foot infections.

Recently the authors have noted a disturbing trend toward an increased incidence of necrotizing infections caused by non-group A streptococcal species. This article describes the typical clinical course of such an infection. Prompt surgical intervention, coupled with an antibiotic regimen aimed at mitigating exotoxin release, may be both limb- and life-preserving.

Adult↗

Who is at risk for diabetic foot ulceration?

Diabetic foot ulceration is the most common cause of nontraumatic, lower-extremity amputation throughout the developed world. This article reviews recent data that report on various risk factors for ulceration. Subsequently, it discusses appropriate risk stratification for both the neuropathic ulcer specifically and the diabetic foot in general, using The University of Texas Diabetic Foot and Diabetic Wound Classification Systems. We believe that knowledge and communication of the most common risk factors precipitating ulceration and subsequent amputation lead to more consistent treatment of the diabetic foot, and, ultimately, to a reduction of its prevalence.

Diabetic Foot↗

Evidence-based options for off-loading diabetic wounds.

Whereas the treatment of the diabetic wound has received a great deal of attention in the medical literature, the majority of the focus of recent research has been centered on dressings and advanced wound healing modalities. All these methods, however, are less than effective if the central tenet of treating the diabetic wound, namely reducing plantar pressure through off-loading, is not addressed primarily. This article examines the most commonly used off-loading methods in the medical literature and discusses the attributes and disadvantages of many of these devices.

Casts, Surgical↗

The edge effect: how and why wounds grow in size and depth.

The central tenet for healing any wound is pressure redistribution and appropriate débridement. It is generally not what you put on these wounds that heals them, but rather what you take off. If the wound is adequately débrided and plantar pressure is redistributed, in the absence of profound ischemia, most diabetic foot wounds will heal. Off-loading is best achieved by spreading force over a wide area of contact, such as with the total contact cast or certain removable cast walkers.

Diabetic Foot↗

Reaching closure with skin stretching. Applications in the diabetic foot.

At the present time, there are no evidence-based protocols outlining the use of the Sure-Closure Skin Stretching System on diabetic, neuropathic wounds. Ideally, surgical correction of the precipitating deformity and appropriate shoe gear accommodation should be performed con-comitantly with skin stretching (as indicated) to achieve an optimal long-term result. For several years, we have used the Sure-Closure device as an adjunctive treatment for diabetic-foot wound closure, and believe that, ultimately, this device more likely will be used in a clinical setting. In this manner, a patient with an open wound may, under aseptic conditions, be sequestered for a period of 1 to 2 hours during a clinical visit to allow for skin stretching. This procedure may be carried out two or three times weekly until closure is achieved. Mechanically assisted delayed primary closure is a relatively new category of wound closure; however, this device is by no means a panacea. Appropriate patient selection and intraoperative judgment are of critical preoperative and perioperative importance when employing this technique. Currently, we are completing a clinical trial comparing mechanically assisted delayed primary-wound closure to traditional treatment and off-loading in a population of high-risk diabetic patients. We believe that this project will better elucidate the relative indications and contraindications with what may be a very effective tool for the diabetic foot specialist.

Dermatologic Surgical Procedures↗

Wound healing. New modalities for a new millennium.

Common to all studies of wound healing modalities is the need to convert the chronic wound into an acute wound and to maintain the wound in an acute state while subsequently using adjunctive therapy. Hence, precise control and documentation of wound care is extremely important in order to avoid contamination of the effects of a specific modality with the effects of good wound care. Falanga has noted that neuropathy of diabetes has been given wide support as the primary pathogenic component of diabetic ulcers, whereas less recognition has been made of the wound-healing failure component. The therapies discussed in this article considered the wound-healing failure component. Oxygen is a drug. The use of oxygen under normobaric conditions at higher than normal inspired partial pressures is standard operating procedure when clinicians are faced with patients with respiratory embarrassment or heart failure. The use of oxygen under hyperbaric conditions, however, remains estranged from the mainstream thoughts of most clinicians. Abnormally hypoxic wounds may benefit from specific oxygen therapy in hyperbaric dosage ranges. However, correction of abnormal wound oxygen tension alone does not guarantee healing. Hyperbaric studies have been criticized for the lack of well-defined wound care protocols, the absence of precise wound healing measures, and poorly defined wound healing endpoints. Studies with growth factors and human skin equivalents exclude patients typically referred for hyperbaric therapy. Patients referred for hyperbaric therapy often have larger wounds with greater severity of peripheral vascular disease with ABIs < 0.7 and TcPO2 < 30 to 40 mm Hg, are often on medications known to inhibit wound healing (e.g., steroids), or have concomitant medical disorders (collagen vascular disease, renal failure) associated with poor healing. No hyperbaric study has controlled stringently for all of these factors. Nevertheless, HBO2 is more specific and successful for the intended purpose of correction of abnormal tissue oxygen tensions than are growth factors for the intended purpose of growth. Similarly, skin substitutes are limited in their application and have not been tried in patients with ABIs < 0.7 or TcPO2 values < 30 mm Hg. In our view, hyperbaric therapy probably can be combined successfully with allogenic grafts and human skin equivalents in this group of patients. Hyperbaric therapy can generate a sufficient granulation base in which these products should be able to close properly selected wounds successfully. No studies of this combined modality approach exist. Finally, regardless of the modality used to aid in wound closure, long-term outcomes probably depend more on neuropathy and large vessel disease than on microangiopathy and local wound-healing defects. The modalities presented in this article must prove to be both cost effective and practical before they are widely disseminated. Nevertheless, the ability to manipulate the local wound environment is no longer inviolate as was once presumed, and current investigations continue to advance therapeutic options in this most fascinating and challenging discipline.

Diabetic Foot↗

How effective is manual palpation in detecting subtle temperature differences?

In the management of diabetic, neuropathic sequelae, namely ulceration and Charcot's arthropathy, appropriate quantification of inflammation is critically important in predicting future events and charting current progress. This article evaluates the ability of the physician to quantify subtle differences in temperature through manual palpation. The "laying on of hands" in a clinical setting is a necessary, crucial component of the doctor-patient relationship; however, our data suggest that manual palpation, even in a controlled environment, may not be an objective means to assess temperature, a cardinal sign of inflammation.

Adult↗

Peak foot pressures influence the healing time of diabetic foot ulcers treated with total contact casts.

The purpose of this article is to describe the progression of ulcer healing using total contact casts (TCC) and to examine explanatory variables that may influence ulcer healing. We prospectively studied 25 diabetics with grade I (Meggitt-Wagner) plantar ulcers. All subjects received weekly contact cast changes with wound assessment. Following healing, all subjects were fitted with prescription shoe gear. Mean duration of casting until healing was 38.8 +/- 21.3 days. Individuals with pressures over 99 N/cm2 took longer to heal (33.1 +/- 13.0 vs. 53.4 +/- 31.4 days, P = 0.05) and had longer ulcer duration prior to treatment (52.7 +/- 37.2 vs. 180.7 +/- 145.0 days, P = 0.02). Subjects with wound size greater than 8 cm2 took longer to heal (50.2 +/- 26.2 vs. 29.9 +/- 10.6 days, P = 0.02). We conclude that subjects with high plantar pressures and wounds greater than 8 cm2 took significantly longer to heal when uniformly treated with TCC.

Adult↗

Is postural instability exacerbated by off-loading devices in high risk diabetics with foot ulcers?

Pressure reduction is of pivotal importance in any treatment plan designed to heal diabetic foot ulcers. However, to our knowledge, no work has evaluated the effect of ambulatory pressure reducing devices on postural stability (PS) in high risk diabetics. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare PS associated with 5 off-loading strategies: total contact casts with cast boot, total contact casts with heel, removable cast walker, half-shoes, and canvas shoes using a repeat measure design. Twenty-six diabetic patients with foot ulcers were enrolled in the study. Using a digital pressure platform, the degree of sway was measured as total deviation of center of force. Three 30 second trials were evaluated using Turkey's studentized range test for multiple comparisons (alpha = 0.05). Sway was significantly greater with total contact casts with heel compared to other devices. While total contact casting remains the gold standard with which to treat neuropathic ulcers, care should be taken when placing patients in any devices that may exacerbate postural instability. The results suggest that total contact casts with an incorporated rubber heel may indeed accentuate sway. It is therefore recommended that the rubber heel be eliminated in lieu of a protective cast boot when using this modality.

Adult↗

Plantar pressures are higher in diabetic patients following partial foot amputation.

The purpose of this study was to compare peak plantar pressure in diabetic patients with and without foot-level amputation. This project was conducted as a case-control study. We enrolled 27 cases and 150 controls diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. Cases were defined as patients with a history of forefoot-level amputation (digit or ray amputations distal to the tarsometatarsal joint) secondary to an infected forefoot wound. Controls were defined as subjects that had never had a foot ulceration. We used a pressure platform system to evaluate dynamic barefoot pressure on the sole of the foot. There was no significant difference in vascular perfusion or body mass index between the case and control groups. Patients with a foot-level amputation were nearly ten times more likely to present with limited joint mobility or a rigid foot deformity than those without amputation (92.6% vs. 44.0%, p < 0.0001, X2 = 13.0, Odds Ratio = 9.8 CI = 2.2 to 43.0). Peak plantar pressure was significantly higher for patients with amputations compared to controls (80.0 +/- 31.1 N/cm2, vs, 62.5 +/- 21.0 N/cm2, p < 0.001). Peak pressure and limited joint mobility have long been associated with ulceration. We conclude that increased pressure and contractures associated with biomechanical compensation following a partial foot amputation further increase plantar pressure, placing an already high-risk limb at further risk for tissue breakdown and reamputation.

Adult↗

Vibration perception threshold: are multiple sites of testing superior to single site testing on diabetic foot examination?

Vibration perception threshold (VPT) values, measured at different anatomic locations on the foot and ankle, and the time to assess VPT and sensory perception using two difference modalities in 102 diabetic patients were compared. VPT was evaluated at the great toe, fifth metatarsal and ankle. Differences in VPT at these three sites, in addition to differences in duration of testing comparing single site (great toe) to multiple sites, and to standard SWMF testing were assessed. No significant difference in VPT between the great toe and fifth metatarsal was found for patients both with and without loss of protective sensation (LOPS). Mean VPT was significantly higher at the ankle compared with both the great toes and fifth metatarsals. However, the difference between ankle and great toe was not significant between patients with and without LOPS [3.9 +/- 11.2 (12%) vs. 3.0 +/- 10.8 (16%) volts, respectively, p > 0.6]. Testing of one site took approximately half the time of Semmes-Weinstein 10-gram monofilament wire SWMF testing (40.5 +/- 16.9 vs. 22.3 +/- 9.1 seconds, p < 0.01) and less than one third the time of three-site VPT testing (10.5 +/- 26.1 vs. 22.3 +/- 9.1 seconds, p < 0.01). There may not be a significant practical benefit in multiple site VPT testing when compared with single site testing on the great toe alone. The value of multiple site testing is further called into question when one notes that the great toe VPT remains the only site tested for sensitivity and specificity for ulceration.

Diabetic Foot↗

Is intermittent pulsatile pressure a valuable adjunct in healing the complicated diabetic wound?

Diabetic neuropathic ulceration and subsequent lower extremity amputation are a significant cause of chronic disability. High-risk diabetic patients with infected foot wounds, poor lower extremity blood flow, and inadequately controlled blood glucose require prompt action by clinicians in order to successfully avoid more severe sequelae. Dysvascular patients who are poor candidates for arterial bypass surgery may benefit from adjunctive treatment with a pneumatic pedal compression device. The authors discuss the rationale behind this unique treatment modality and present a case report illustrating a successful outcome in a high-risk diabetic patient.

Adult↗