The significance of panic in general medicine.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D F Klein.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The current study assesses the relationship between presenting symptomatology of the self-labeled Hispanic popular diagnosis of ataques de nervios and the specific co-morbid psychiatric diagnoses. Hispanic subjects seeking treatment at an anxiety disorders clinic (n = 156) were assessed with a specially designed self-report instrument for both traditional ataque de nervios and panic symptoms, and with structured or semistructured psychiatric interviews for Axis-I disorders. This report focuses on 102 subjects with ataque de nervios who also met criteria for panic disorder, other anxiety disorders, or an affective disorder. Distinct ataque symptom patterns correlated with co-existing panic disorder, affective disorders, or other anxiety disorders. Individuals with both ataque and panic disorder reported the most asphyxia, fear of dying, and increased fear during their ataques. People with ataques who also met criteria for affective disorder reported the most anger, screaming, becoming aggressive, and breaking things during ataques. Ataque positive subjects with other anxiety disorders were less salient for both panic-like and emotional-anger symptoms. The findings suggest that (a) ataque de nervios is a popular label referring to several distinct patterns of loss of emotional control, (b) the type of loss of emotional control is influenced by the associated psychiatric disorder, and (c) ataque symptom patterns may be a useful clinical marker for detecting psychiatric disorders. Further study is needed to examine the relationship between ataque de nervios and psychiatric disorders, as well as the relationship to cultural, demographic, environmental, and personality factors.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We report the results of an 8-week open trial of imipramine in 15 patients with social phobia. Nine patients completed the trial; six dropped out early because of adverse effects. The mean reduction in the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale was 15% and 18% for the intent-to-treat and completer groups, respectively; the overall response rate (based on the Clinical Global Impression Scale of 1 or 2, very much or much improved) was 20% (3/15) and 22% (2/9), respectively. The results from this open trial do not support the efficacy of imipramine as a treatment for social phobia.
Because depression with atypical features is poorly responsive to imipramine, treatment trials including a tricyclic antidepressant arm should assess depressive subtype. Sotsky and Simmens had previously reanalyzed data from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program (TDCRP) providing independent confirmation that imipramine is ineffective for patients with atypical features. The TDCRP was a 16-week study in which 239 outpatients with major depression were randomly assigned to cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), imipraminecase management (IMI-CM), or pill placebo-case management (Pbo-CM). We used Sotsky and Simmens' algorithm to investigate the effect of diagnostic subtype on all four treatments. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses demonstrated IMI-CM benefit relative to Pbo-CM in patients without but not in those with atypical features. These analyses did not demonstrate differential psychotherapy efficacy between depressive subtypes. In conclusion, subsequent analyses of the TDCRP study demonstrated the need to identify the subgroup of depressed patients who have atypical features. Failure to identify this subtype underestimates imipramine's benefit in the appropriately treated subgroup. Comparisons of other treatments with imipramine may be misleading if they do not account for diagnostic subtype.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: In spite of the virtually ubiquitous nature of the initial 10-day placebo run-in period (IPR) in drug trials, there is little empirical data establishing its relevance. METHOD: Data from 593 subjects were examined retrospectively to determine whether or not the prognosis of subjects minimally improved during the IPR was different to those who were unimproved. The IPR period was single-blind and was followed by a six-week double-blind phase in all studies. RESULTS: Twenty-six per cent of the subjects were minimally improved and 74% were unimproved. Approximately 10% of the subjects who were much improved were not followed systematically. Across a range of diagnosis, severity and chronicity subjects minimally improved (versus unimproved) after IPR had a more favourable prognosis whether assigned to drug or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Change during IPR appears to be a meaningful predictor. Stratification should be considered in future antidepressant studies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Disordered breathing among patients with panic disorder, including hyperventilation during attacks and increased anxiogenic response to carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation, is well established. We wished to assess whether there is a change in the physiological response to CO2 after patients have undergone antipanic therapy with either tricyclic antidepressants or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with panic disorder underwent baseline CO2 sensitivity testing using the traditional Read rebreathing method and then received either antidepressant treatment (n = 21) or CBT (n = 8). After completing treatment, CO2 testing was repeated. A comparison sample of 14 normal volunteers also had two CO2 sensitivity tests, separated by an average of 21.6 (SD = 8.8) weeks. RESULTS: Using a liberal standard, in which all CO2 sensitivity tests whose correlations between minute ventilation and end-tidal CO2 were at least .75 were used, patients, but not controls, demonstrated a significant reduction in CO2 sensitivity between the first and second test. Using a more conservative .90 correlation standard reduced the sample size available and resulted in trend reduction in patients but no significant change in controls. There was a suggestion that the change was most pronounced in treatment responders, although the number of patient nonresponders is extremely small in this sample. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that treatment reduces CO2 sensitivity in patients with panic disorder. We speculate that manipulation of the serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission systems, both known to play a role in the control of respiration, may have a specific effect in reducing respiratory hyperactivity in panic disorder.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Central noradrenergic (NA) dysregulation has provided a major theoretical framework for understanding the pathogenesis of panic disorder (PD). Using clonidine, an alpha 2-adrenergic receptor agonist, as a probe of NA function, we investigated the hypothesis that the antipanic efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be associated with normalization of a putatively dysregulated NA system. METHODS: We report further analyses on data from 17 subjects with PD and 16 healthy volunteers who underwent measurement of the plasma NA metabolite 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) immediately before and after oral clonidine administration. Thirteen patients with PD were rechallenged after 12 weeks during open fluoxetine hydrochloride treatment using the same clonidine paradigm; 13 healthy volunteers were rechallenged at 12 weeks, not having received treatment between challenges. RESULTS: Patients with PD, compared with healthy volunteers, have markedly elevated plasma MHPG volatility during the first clonidine challenge. Volatility describes the magnitude of within-subject plasma MHPG oscillatory activity as assessed by the root of the mean square successive difference. A greater degree of clinical global improvement was predicted by a greater magnitude of basal MHPG reduction with fluoxetine treatment. Antipanic response to fluoxetine was accompanied by a significant decrease of MHPG volatility to volunteer levels. Volunteer MHPG volatility remained unchanged from the first to second clonidine challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Further evidence is provided for the hypothesis of NA dysregulation in PD as reflected by elevations of within-subjects plasma MHPG volatility during clonidine challenge. Effective selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-antipanic treatment in this clinical sample was paralleled by normalization of dysregulated NA function.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Respiratory abnormalities may play a central role in the pathophysiology of panic disorder. The current study was undertaken to examine the respiratory response in the largest series of subjects to date during three respiratory challenges that used improved methodology. METHOD: Fifty-nine patients with DSM-III-R panic disorder and 39 normal volunteers were challenged with 5% and 7% CO2 inhalation and room air hyperventilation separated by room air breathing with continuous spirometry. RESULTS: Patients with panic disorder were more sensitive to the anxiogenic effects of CO2 than were normal subjects, and CO2 was a more potent stimulus to panic than hyperventilation. Patients increased their respiratory rate more quickly during CO2 inhalation than did comparison subjects, and this increase preceded the panic attacks. Patients who panicked in response to 5% CO2 demonstrated continued rise in end-tidal CO2, while the end-tidal CO2 of the comparison groups stabilized. Low end-tidal CO2 and high variance in minute ventilation at baseline predicted panic attacks during CO2 inhalation. Following CO2 or hyperventilation challenges, respiratory rate dropped sharply, while tidal volume remained elevated longer in patients than in comparison subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm the greater behavioral and physiological sensitivity of patients with panic disorder to CO2 inhalation and identify a series of respiratory abnormalities. Panic attacks in panic disorder may be explained by inefficient compensatory mechanisms, primarily of respiratory rate.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.