Biomedical subjects

D Epstein

Publications and source records attributed to D Epstein.

97 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Epithelial alterations following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective observational study was conducted to test the hypothesis that there is clinically measurable epithelial hyperplasia after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and to determine its effect on the epithelial oxygen uptake rate. METHODS: One hundred myopic eyes who had been previously treated unilaterally with PRK were examined. Fifty eyes were treated with the Summit excimer laser (Summit Technology, Waltham, Mass) 27 +/- 7 months previously with ablation zone diameters of 4.1, 4.3, 4.5, or 5.0 mm. Fifty eyes were treated with the VISX excimer laser (VISX Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) 5 +/- 4 months previously with one ablation zone diameter of 6.0 mm. The untreated eyes served as controls. Epithelial thickness was measured at a standardized central area within the ablation zone with a modified optical pachometer. Oxygen uptake rate was measured in a subgroup of 30 eyes (20 Summit and 10 VISX). RESULTS: The epithelium after PRK was 24% thicker than in the control eye in the Summit group (mean difference 13 +/- 10 microns; p < .01) and 7% thinner in the VISX group (mean difference -4 +/- 10 microns; p < .01). A higher oxygen uptake rate correlated with a thicker epithelium (r = 0.42; p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The epithelium was significantly thicker after PRK between 13 and 37 months after treatment with the Summit excimer laser using ablation zone diameters of 4.1 to 5.0 mm. The epithelium was thinner between 1 and 15 months after treatment with the VISX laser using an ablation zone diameter of 6.0 mm. An increase in oxygen uptake rate reflected the metabolic rate of a greater number of cells in the hyperplastic layer.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Patient satisfaction following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.

This study was conducted to evaluate the subjective response of patients who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia with the Summit Technology UV 200 LA excimer laser (Summit Technology, Inc., Waltham, Mass.) (3.5 to 5.0 mm diameter ablation zone) 36 months previously. One-hundred thirteen patients with preoperative myopia between -1.50 diopters (D) and -6.50 D with an ablation diameter of 3.5 mm to 5.0 mm answered a questionnaire at the 36-month examination. Sixty-two percent of patients had both eyes treated. Halo problems were experienced always by 34% of patients in the group, 26% sometimes, and 40% never. Permanent night vision problems were experienced by 40%; 30% reported them sometimes and 30% reported no problems at all. Sixty percent never needed to use glasses after treatment, 30% sometimes did, and 10% always wore glasses. Seventy percent of patients thought the results were very good; the remaining 30% experienced different degrees of halo and night vision problems.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Failure of mechanical epithelial removal to reverse persistent hyperopia after photorefractive keratectomy.

BACKGROUND: Residual hyperopic overcorrection after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using early algorithms is a rare but serious complication. Anecdotal evidence suggests that epithelial removal can stimulate epithelial hyperplasia, thereby reducing overcorrection. The aim of this study was to determine if epithelial removal effectively reduced hyperopia after PRK for myopia and, concurrently, to correlate the healing response with the refractive outcome. METHODS: Enrolled were seven eyes of seven patients (mean age, 44 +/- 13 years) who had undergone PRK with a mean manifest refractive error of +2.21 +/- 0.74 diopters (D). All had undergone PRK an average of 24 +/- 9 months previously. Epithelial removal was performed over the excimer-treated zone with a surgical blade. Subjective refraction, epithelial thickness, corneal topography, and subepithelial haze were measured up to 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Reduction in hyperopia between the baseline and 1-year visit was not statistically significant (mean difference, 0.55 D reduction; p = .102). That epithelial removal did not stimulate a wound-healing response is further supported by the absence of change in epithelial thickness over the first month and the small amounts of subepithelial haze. Central corneal power was reduced by a mean of 0.64 D after 1 month (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Epithelial removal alone did not reduce the hyperopic overcorrection present after PRK, nor did it stimulate epithelial hyperplasia in the majority of these eyes. However, a trend toward improvement was noted with time was noted.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for presbyopia: 24-month follow-up in three eyes.

BACKGROUND: For some patients, standard optical correction for presbyopia is not satisfactory. Using a specially designed mask, we developed a procedure for correcting presbyopia with excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: A mask consisting of a mobile diaphragm formed by two blunt blades was used to ablate a 10 to 17 microm deep semilunar-shaped zone immediately below the pupillary center, steepening the corneal curvature in that area. Three eyes of three presbyopic patients were treated, aiming at a near addition of +3.00 D. Follow-up time was 24 months. RESULTS: After an initial regression of 1.00 D during the first 6 months, the presbyopic correction remained stable for the duration of the follow-up period, enabling uncorrected near vision of J3 in all three eyes. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was not altered. Contrast sensitivity (Regan) was slightly decreased only at the 11% level. Videokeratography confirmed corneal steepening in the ablated area. CONCLUSION: The visual and refractive outcome of excimer laser PRK for presbyopia with the Aesculap-Meditec MEL 60 is promising, especially in view of the 2-year follow-up.

Cornea↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopic or hyperopic astigmatism with a cross-cylinder ablation.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a combined ablation of the steep and flat meridian to correct astigmatism with the excimer laser. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes with myopic, mixed, or hyperopic astigmatism (mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction -4.30 +/- 4.70 D [range, -12.50 to +1.50 D] and mean preoperative cylinder magnitude -3.40 +/- 1.40 D [range, -1.50 to -6.00 D]) underwent PRK with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. The surgical strategy involved ablating half the amount of the cylinder (in diopters) along steepest meridian, the other half in a subsequent step along the flattest meridian; thereafter, the spherical equivalent was corrected. RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.07 +/- 0.87 D and mean cylinder was -0.44 +/- 0.36 D. Mean spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.86 +/- 0.13 compared to 0.75 +/- 0.22 preoperatively. Mean corneal haze was 0.67 +/- 0.31. No patient lost 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity and there were no complaints about night halos or glare. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike other ablation strategies, the cross-cylinder method creates a smooth transition (low dioptric gradient) between the treated and untreated cornea. This is achieved by first treating the cylinder and making the corneal surface spherical and then ablating the spherical component of the refractive error.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Algorithm to correct hyperopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of a new ablation algorithm for the correction of hyperopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-five eyes with mean preoperative hyperopia of +3.76 +/- 1.70 D and a mean hyperopic cylinder of 2.20 +/- 0.80 D underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using a new algorithm with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser (software version 3.0). The new algorithm differed from previous algorithms in that less tissue was removed for the same amount of diopters, and there was less of a dioptric gradient between the optical zone and the transition zone. Mean preoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.8 +/- 0.09. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: Mean postoperative spectacle corrected visual acuity (geometric mean) increased significantly to 0.89 +/- 0.1. The mean sphere decreased by 3.08 D and the mean cylinder by 1.60 D. CONCLUSION: Hyperopic PRK using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser with this new algorithm for hyperopic astigmatism appears to be safe and effective.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of corticosteroids in postoperative care following photorefractive keratectomies.

Since the start of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) Seiler has recommended the use of topical corticosteroids during the first 3 months after surgery. The rationale for this treatment was to diminish the inflammatory reaction as well as to control the keratocytes from producing collagen and creating scars. Our knowledge of corneal wound healing in general, and after PRK in particular, is very limited and the action of corticosteroids is still unclear. Corticosteroids, when given in comparatively large topical doses, create problems. Between 15 and 30% of patients are corticosteroid responders with increased intraocular pressure. This is a threat to the eye, and also a burden for the doctor as intraocular pressure has to be checked during the treatment. The risk for cataract formation after longer periods of topically administered corticosteroids also has been discussed. In order to decrease the rise in intraocular pressure, FML has been used in place of dexamethasone. During the 4 years follow up after PRK it has been reported that a number of patients do not regress or get a scar formation if they have not used corticosteroids in the postoperative period. The reasons to avoid topical corticosteroids in some patients are a misunderstanding of their instructions, or those who have had a history of herpes infection or glaucoma. A double-masked study of the effects of corticosteroids after PRK was performed by Gartry, et al in a small group of patients. After 6 months, the results revealed that there were no differences between the corticosteroid and the non-corticosteroid group. However, the standard deviation was high.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cornea↗