Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D E Steflik

Publications and source records attributed to D E Steflik.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Scanning electron microscopic studies of the oral tissue responses to dental implants.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and its associated technologies have proven invaluable in elucidating the interfacial oral tissue responses to dental implants. Since the dental implant must extend from the mandibular or maxillary jaw, through the oral mucosa, and into the oral cavity, these tissue responses include epithelium, connective tissue and bone. The continual occlusal forces acting upon these tissues reinforce the dynamic character of these tissue responses. Immediately upon implantation, a healing phase begins as a response to the implanted biomaterial. Following this immediate response a longer healing phase occurs, beginning approximately 1 week after implantation, resulting in the modeling of bone to the implant as well as the formation of epithelial attachment to the implant. This later, delayed healing continues throughout the lifetime of the implant since these tissues must die and be replaced by similar tissues. Current dental research employing scanning electron microscopy is now documenting these tissue responses. This paper reviews, in detail, SEM observations of these tissue responses.

Animals↗

Ultrastructural investigations of the bone and fibrous connective tissue interface with endosteal dental implants.

The interface between the tissues of the oral cavity and ceramic and titanium cylindrical endosteal dental implants was investigated with correlated light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. This study suggested that mandibular bone can directly interface and form an intimate association with one-stage endosteal dental implants. This potential attachment matrix is composed of a composite of calcified bone, and an osteoid unmineralized matrix in association with an apparent osteogenic connective tissue. Further, results from this study suggested that at a level inferior to the junctional epithelium, and superior to the level of crestal bone, fibrous connective tissue can attach to the dental implant. This non-loadbearing attachment of gingival connective tissue could, by contact inhibition, prevent apical epithelial migration. In association with previously documented epithelial attachment, such apical support and connective tissue attachment appears to suggest that endosteal dental implants can be adequately maintained in the oral cavity.

Animals↗

Ultrastructural comparisons of ceramic and titanium dental implants in vivo: a scanning electron microscopic study.

Identically prepared, screw-type ceramic and titanium endosteal dental implants were inserted in the jaws of adult mongrel dogs for periods of up to 6 months. Sixteen of the 32 total implants supported fixed bridgework. The interface of bone and soft connective tissues with the dental implants was examined by routine and innovative scanning electron microscopic (SEM) techniques using both secondary and backscattered electron imaging. Results demonstrated excellent bone adaptation to both titanium and ceramic implants. Direct adaptation of bone to the upper third of both type implants was observed with only minimal amounts of any intervening fibrous connective tissue. A composite of trabecular bone and fibrous connective tissue was observed in the lower two-thirds of the implants examined. Areas of bone alteration suggestive of osteoid were observed at the thread apicis of some loaded implants. From this investigation we concluded that similar longitudinal tissue responses were generated to one-piece, cylindrical screw-type titanium and alpha alumina oxide ceramic dental implants. Possible bone remodeling was observed at the thread apicis of the loaded implants, an area where occlusal forces may be distributed. We further suggest that one-stage endosteal implants are capable of maintaining a proportional bone-to-implant interface at the apical support region, similar to that suggested to two-stage implant systems.

Animals↗

An instructional module concerning oral implantology: II. Development and implementation.

This paper represents the second of a series of papers documenting the design/development process of an individualized instructional module concerning oral implantology. This module was specifically designed for predoctoral dental students. The first paper discussed the rationale for the module and the initial field testing of the preliminary module. This paper examines the design and development of the oral implantology instructional module given to second and third year predoctoral dental students at the Medical College of Georgia School of Dentistry.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Dental Implantation↗

Evidence for a junctional epithelial attachment to ceramic dental implants. A transmission electron microscopic study.

The interface of the crevicular gingiva with the surface of a dental implant is a critical zone representing the potential biological seal which protects the underlying bone and soft tissue-supporting mechanisms from destructive extraneous substances. Ultrastructural examination of regenerated junctional epithelial cells interfacing surgically placed endosteal dental implants, comprised of alpha-alumina oxide ceramic in single crystalline form, exhibited an external basal lamina and linear body located between the external surface epithelial cell and the implant. In addition, hemidesmosomes were located at intervals along the outer junctional epithelial plasma membrane. The component substructures of the basal lamina and the hemidesmosomes were similar to those seen interfacing natural teeth. The linear body was an electron-dense structure between the lamina densa and the inert biomaterial. This study provides ultrastructural evidence for the presence of an attachment complex between gingiva and aluminum oxide implants which is analogous to that seen around natural teeth. These data support concept that a viable biological seal can develop around endosteal dental implants and provide support for satisfactory clinical service.

Animals↗