Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D E Nichols

Publications and source records attributed to D E Nichols.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Serotonergic basis of antipsychotic drug effects in schizophrenia.

Recent attention has been focused on the involvement of serotonin (5-HT) in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and its role in mediating antipsychotic drug effects. There are two reasons for the new emphasis: the tremendous success of the so-called "atypical" antipsychotic drugs (a common feature of which is their high affinity for specific 5-HT receptor subtypes); and the elucidation of a complex family of 5-HT receptors whose function and pharmacology is only beginning to be understood. This paper will review the evidence that pertains to the role of 5-HT in mediating antipsychotic drug effects. The interaction of dopamine and 5-HT systems will be reviewed, and the mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotic drugs will be evaluated in this context. The impact of serotonin on neurodevelopment, and the involvement of serotonin in the psychotomimetic and psychotogenic properties of hallucinogens, will be discussed. Together, these facts will be placed into the context of changes in serotonergic function in schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

Substituted naphthofurans as hallucinogenic phenethylamine-ergoline hybrid molecules with unexpected muscarinic antagonist activity.

A series of substituted racemic naphthofurans were synthesized as "hybrid" molecules of the two major prototypical hallucinogenic drug classes, the phenethylamines and the tryptamines/ergolines. Although it was hypothesized that these new agents might possess high affinity for the serotonin 5-HT2A/2C receptor subtypes, unexpected affinity for muscarinic receptors was observed. The compounds initially synthesized for this study were (+/-)-anti- and syn-4-amino-6-methoxy-2a,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2H-naphtho[1,8-bc]furan (4a,b), respectively, and their 8-bromo derivatives 4c,d, respectively. The brominated primary amines 4c,d were assayed initially for activity in the two-lever drug discrimination (DD) paradigm in rats trained to discriminate saline from LSD tartrate (0. 08 mg/kg). Also, 4c,d were evaluated for their ability to compete against agonist and antagonist radioligands at cloned human 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C receptors. After the syn diastereomers were found to have the highest activity in these preliminary assays, the N-alkylated analogues syn-N,N-dimethyl-4-amino-6-methoxy-2a,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-2H-naphtho[1,8-bc]furan (4e) and syn-N, N-dipropyl-4-amino-6-methoxy-2a,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2H-naphtho[1, 8-bc]furan (4f) were prepared and assayed for their affinities at [3H]ketanserin-labeled 5-HT2A and [3H]-8-OH-DPAT-labeled 5-HT1A sites. All of the molecules tested had relatively low affinity for serotonin receptors, yet a preliminary screen indicated that compound 4d had affinity for muscarinic receptors. Thus, 4b,d,e were evaluated for their affinity at muscarinic M1-M5 receptors and also assessed for their functional characteristics at the M1 and M2 isoforms. Compound 4d had affinities of 12-33 nM at all of the muscarinic sites, with 4b,e having much lower affinity. All three compounds fully antagonized the effects of carbachol at the M1 receptor, while only 4d completely antagonized carbachol at the M2 receptor. The fact that the naphthofurans lack LSD-like activity suggests that they do not bind to the serotonin receptor in a way such that the tricyclic naphthofuran nucleus is bioisosteric with, and directly superimposable upon, the A, B, and C rings of LSD. This also implies, therefore, that the hallucinogenic phenethylamines cannot be directly superimposed on LSD in a common binding orientation for these two chemical classes, contrary to previous hypotheses.

Animals↗

Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of ring-methylated derivatives of 3,4-(methylenedioxy)amphetamine (MDA).

The three isomeric ring-methylated derivatives of the well-known hallucinogen and entactogen MDA (1a) were synthesized and evaluated for pharmacological activity as monoamine-releasing agents and as serotonin agonists. The 2-methyl derivative 2a and the 5-methyl derivative 2b were found to be more potent and more selective than the parent compound in inhibiting [3H]-serotonin accumulation in rat brain synaptosomal preparations. Their activity in vivo was confirmed in rats trained to discriminate serotonin-releasing agents and hallucinogens from saline. The results indicate that compounds 2a,b are among the most potent 5-HT-releasing compounds known and show promise as lead compounds in the search for antidepressant drugs that release serotonin rather than inhibit its uptake.

3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine↗

Drug discrimination studies of the interoceptive cues produced by selective serotonin uptake inhibitors and selective serotonin releasing agents.

MMAI (5-methoxy-6-methyl-2-aminoindan) is a nonneurotoxic, highly selective neuronal serotonin (5-HT) releasing agent. MMAI and other 5-HT releasing agents produce a robust discriminative cue in drug discrimination (DD) studies. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) sertraline and citalopram may also serve as discriminative stimuli, but acquisition of their discrimination required almost twice as much time as for MMAI. In vitro, 5-HT release by MMAI can be blocked by selective SSRIs. However, in the present DD studies, pretreatment with fluoxetine, sertraline, or citalopram 60 min before the training drugs MMAI or (+)-MBDB produced only partial inhibition of the discriminative cue. In substitution tests, sertraline and citalopram partially mimicked the training drugs, whereas only 40% substitution occurred with fluoxetine in MMAI or (+)-MBDB trained rats. In generalization tests, the tricyclic antidepressants imipramine and clomipramine partly substituted for the sertraline, citalopram, and MMAI stimuli. The increase in extracellular 5-HT produced by SSRIs leads to a subtle or feeble drug cue that is apparently difficult for an animal to recognize. This observation contrasts with the 5-HT releasing agents, which clearly produce robust cues that are easily recognized by the animals. However, mechanism(s) responsible for the discriminative stimulus effects of SSRIs and 5-HT releasing agents seem to be similar, at least in part.

3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine↗

Indan analogs of fenfluramine and norfenfluramine have reduced neurotoxic potential.

N-Ethyl-5-trifluoromethyl-2-aminoindan (ETAI) and 5-trifluoromethyl-2-aminoindan (TAI) were synthesized to examine the effects of side-chain cyclization on the pharmacology of the anorectic drugs fenfluramine (FEN) and norfenfluramine (norFEN), respectively. ETAI and TAI inhibited synaptosomal accumulation of 5-HT but were less effective at inhibiting catecholamine uptake than FEN or norFEN, respectively. In vivo, ETAI and TAI were less neurotoxic than FEN or norFEN; decreases in the number of [3H]paroxetine-labeled 5-HT uptake sites were 50% less than the decreases produced by FEN or norFEN. Rats treated with ETAI. TAI, FEN, and norFEN lost 10-15% of their pretreatment body weight over a 4-day period, while saline-treated control animals gained 8%. In two-lever drug discrimination (DD) assays in rats, TAI fully substituted for the 5-HT releaser/uptake inhibitor, (+)-MBDB [(+)-N-methyl-1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-aminobutane]. ETAI produced only partial substitution in this test. Neither TAI nor ETAI mimicked (+)-amphetamine in the DD assay. These studies demonstrate that incorporation of the side-chain of phenylisopropylamines into the five-membered ring of a 2-aminoindan changes both the molecular pharmacology and the neurotoxic profile of FEN and norFEN, but does not diminish the drugs' ability to reduce body weight.

Animals↗

Molecular modeling study of tubulosine and other related ipecac alkaloids.

A molecular modeling study of two alkaloids, tubulosine and psychotrine, isolated from the sap of Pogonopus speciosus, and other related ipecac alkaloids, showed that these flexible alkaloids favor a nonplanar structure. The biologically active compounds had conformations with a similar angle between aromatic ring A, the nitrogen in ring B, and ring D. This angle was related to the biological activity reported for these compounds. Our results support the hypothesis of two different types of receptor interactions, one for the nonplanar compounds and another for the planar compounds.

Alkaloids↗

An integrated hypothesis for the serotonergic axonal loss induced by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine.

Administration of the street drug 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) to various experimental animals has been shown in several laboratories to induce selective damage to serotonergic axons and axon terminals. This review examines the current available evidence supporting the development of serotonin (5-HT) neurotoxicity in animals and humans. There are a plethora of hypotheses that attempt to explain the mechanisms involved in the development of this serotonergic neurotoxicity. An integrated hypothesis incorporating most of the speculated neurotransmitters theorized to be involved in the process is proposed. This hypothesis states that MDMA induces the following sequence of events resulting in the serotonergic neurotoxicity: 1. MDMA induces an acute release of 5-HT and dopamine (DA). 2. This acute release is followed by depletion of intraneuronal 5-HT stores. 3. The initially released 5-HT activates post-synaptic 5-HT2A/2C receptors located on GABA interneurons resulting in a decrease in GABAegic transmission and increased DA release and synthesis. 4. The excessive DA released then may be transported into the depleted 5-HT terminal. 5. The DA is then deaminated by monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) located within the 5-HT terminal. This results in free-radical formation and the selective degeneration of the serotonergic axons and axon terminals. While there is no clear evidence that human users of the drug are suffering a similar neurotoxicity, data are presented suggesting that there remains cause for concern.

Animals↗

Homologous desensitization of the D1A dopamine receptor: efficacy in causing desensitization dissociates from both receptor occupancy and functional potency.

The role of drug efficacy in agonist-induced desensitization was studied in C-6 glioma cells transfected with the monkey dopamine D1A (mD1A) receptor. Dopamine pretreatment for 2 hr produced greater than 80% loss of responsiveness in the stimulation of cAMP accumulation that was blocked by the D1 antagonist SCH23390. A series of full and partial D1 agonists from structurally dissimilar classes were then examined. Three full agonists (dihydrexidine, SKF82958, A77636) desensitized the receptor to the same extent as dopamine, whereas two other full agonists (dinapsoline and A68930) and all the partial agonists tested (SKF38393, pergolide and d-lysergic acid diethylamide tartrate) produced only partial desensitization (i.e., 50% that of dopamine). Whereas partial agonists (i.e., SKF38393, pergolide and d-lysergic acid diethylamide tartrate) caused no alteration in ligand-accessible mD1A receptors, four of the full agonists (dopamine, dihydrexidine, dinapsoline, A68930) caused a 30 to 40% reduction in receptor number. One full agonist, A77636, caused nearly an 80% decrease in receptor number, despite the fact that the degree of functional desensitization was similar to the other full agonists. The desensitization of the D1 receptor was homologous, not affecting beta-2 adrenergic receptors endogenous to C-6 cells. Neither incubation with cAMP analogs, nor inhibition of protein kinase A, affected dopamine-induced desensitization, suggesting a cAMP-independent mechanism in this cell line. Together, these data suggest that functional desensitization of the mD1A receptor expressed in C-6 glioma cells is a cAMP-independent mechanism, cannot be predicted reliably from agonist efficacy for stimulating adenylate cyclase and can occur in the absence of changes in receptor number.

Animals↗

Dihydrobenzofuran analogues of hallucinogens. 4. Mescaline derivatives.

Dihydrobenzofuran and tetrahydrobenzodifuran functionalities were employed as conformationally restricted bioisosteres of the aromatic methoxy groups in the prototypical hallucinogen, mescaline (1). Thus, 4-(2-aminoethyl)-6,7-dimethoxy-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran hydrochloride (8) and 1-(8-methoxy-2,3,5,6-tetrahydrobenzo[1,2-b:5,4-b']difuran-4-yl)-2- aminoethane hydrochloride (9) were prepared and evaluated along with 1 for activity in the two-lever drug discrimination (DD) paradigm in rats trained to discriminate saline from LSD tartrate (0.08 mg/kg). Also, 1, 8, and 9 were assayed for their ability to displace [3H]ketanserin from rat cortical homogenate 5-HT2A receptors and [3H]8-OH-DPAT from rat hippocampal homogenate 5-HT1A receptors. In addition, these compounds were evaluated for their ability to compete for agonist and antagonist binding to cells expressing cloned human 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C receptors. Finally, agonist efficacy was assessed by measurement of phosphoinositide hydrolysis in NIH 3T3 cells expressing the rat 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptors. Although 1 fully substituted for LSD in the DD assays (ED50 = 33.5 mumol/kg), neither 8 nor 9 substituted for LSD, with just 50% of the rats administered 8 selecting the drug lever, and only 29% of the rats administered 9 selecting the drug lever. All of the test compounds had micromolar affinity for the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors in rat brain homogenate. Curiously, the rank order of affinities of the compounds at 5-HT2A sites was opposite their order of potency in the behavioral assay. An evaluation for ability to stimulate phosphoinositide turnover as a measure of functional efficacy revealed that all the compounds were of approximately equal efficacy to serotonin in 5-HT2C receptors. At 5-HT2A receptors, however, 8 and 9 were significantly less efficacious, eliciting only 61 and 45%, respectively, of the maximal response. These results are consistent with the proposed mechanism of action for phenethylamine hallucinogens, that such compounds must be full agonists at the 5-HT2A receptor subtype. In contrast to the 2,5-dimethoxy-substituted phenethylamines, where rigidification of the methoxy groups had no deleterious effect on activity, the loss of activity in the 3,4,5-trioxygenated mescaline analogues may suggest that the 3 and 5 methoxy groups must remain conformationally mobile to enable receptor activation.

3T3 Cells↗

Further definition of the D1 dopamine receptor pharmacophore: synthesis of trans-6,6a,7,8,9,13b-hexahydro-5H-benzo[d]naphth[2,1-b]azepines as rigid analogues of beta-phenyldopamine.

In an effort to define further the active geometry of the beta-phenyldopamine pharmacophore of certain dopamine D1 agonists, the title compounds have been synthesized as conformationally restricted homologues of the potent benzophenanthridine dopamine D1 agonist dihydrexidine 4a. The dihydroxy secondary amine 5b was evaluated as a potential agonist, whereas the N-methyl compounds 5a and 5c were hypothesized to be antagonists. Surprisingly, none of the three compounds had high affinity for dopamine D1 or D2 receptors. A comparison of the low-energy conformations of these molecules shows that the pendant phenyl ring of 5b is twisted about 28 degrees relative to that of the corresponding ring of 4a. Further, the additional methylene used to expand the C ring of 5b projects toward the alpha face of the molecule, perhaps suggesting that steric protrusion in this region of the molecule is not tolerated. Finally, the phenethylamine fragment incorporated into these molecules deviates about 30 degrees from the antiperiplanar conformation postulated to be necessary for agonist activity. On the other hand, the potential antagonist molecules 5a and 5c were compared with the dopamine D1 antagonist SCH 39166 2. The conformations of the former two structures differ quite dramatically from that of 2. The most notable differences lie in the relative orientations of the pendant phenyl rings in the two series, as well as the fact that the ethylamine fragment in 2 approximates a gauche conformation, while the comparable orientation in 5a and 5c more nearly approaches an antiperiplanar conformation. These findings will be used to refine further the model of the dopamine D1 agonist receptor that we have previously developed.

Animals↗

Locomotor inhibition, yawning and vacuous chewing induced by a novel dopamine D2 post-synaptic receptor agonist.

The N-n-propyl analog of dihydrexidine ((+/-)-trans-10, 11-dihydroxy-5,6,6a,7,8,12b-hexahydrobenzo[a]phenanthridine) is a dopamine receptor agonist with high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors (K0.5 = 26 and 5 nM, respectively). Members of the hexahydrobenzo[a]phenanthridine structural class are atypical because they display high intrinsic activity at post-synaptic dopamine D2 receptors, but low intrinsic activity at dopamine D2 autoreceptors. The present study examined the effects of (+/-)-N-n-propyl-dihydrexidine on unconditioned behaviors in rats. The most striking results observed were large, dose-dependent decreases in locomotor activity (e.g., locomotor inhibition), and increases in vacuous chewing; yawning was also increased at the highest dose of (+/-)-N-n-propyl-dihydrexidine. The locomotor inhibition and yawning induced by (+/-)-N-n-propyl-dihydrexidine were blocked by pre-treatment with (-)-remoxipride (S(-)-3-bromo-N-((1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-methyl)-2, 6-dimethoxybenzamide), a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, but not by the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist (+)-SCH23390 (R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1 H-3-benzazepine). Vacuous chewing was decreased by both (-)-remoxipride and (+)-SCH23390. These data support the hypothesis that a subpopulation of post-synaptic dopamine D2 receptors has a critical role in decreases in locomotor activity and induction of vacuous chewing and yawning.

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists↗

5-HT2A/2C receptor agonists potentiate the discriminative cue of (+)-amphetamine in the rat.

The possible effect of 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonists on an amphetamine-induced behavioral response was examined using the two-lever drug discrimination paradigm. The experiments were designed to investigate an interaction of the hallucinogenic 5-HT2A/2C agonists lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), with the discriminative stimulus elicited by a relatively low dose of (+)-amphetamine (1.35 micromol/kg, 0.25 mg/kg, which produced approximately 50% selection of the drug lever). DOI and LSD did not produce amphetamine-like responding at any dose tested or time of administration. However, LSD alone was able to induce a drug-appropriate response in two of nine amphetamine-trained rats. Simultaneous administration of DOI or LSD with amphetamine was not significantly different from the response produced by amphetamine alone. Pre-administration of DOI (3 hr) or of LSD (2 hr) before amphetamine, however, evoked significant enhancement of the amphetamine cue. The results suggest that the enhanced behavioral response to amphetamine may be due either to an increased sensitivity of dopaminergic neurons in the mesolimbic area, or to an enhanced release of dopamine by amphetamine.

Amphetamine↗

Studies on the mechanism of p-chloroamphetamine neurotoxicity.

Studies were conducted to investigate the sensitivity of p-chloroamphetamine (PCA)-induced neurochemical changes to various pharmacological manipulations known to block the neurochemical effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). The monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitor L-deprenyl (2 mg/kg) given 4 hr before a nonneurotoxic dose of PCA (2 mg/kg) was shown not to alter the amount of [3H]paroxetine bound to serotonin (5-HT) uptake sites 7 days after treatment. L-Deprenyl 4 hr before a neurotoxic dose of PCA (10 mg/kg) did not change the acute hyperthermia. Further, neither L-deprenyl nor another selective MAO-B inhibitor, MDL-72,974 (1.25 mg/kg), given 30 min before or daily for 4 days before a single dose of PCA attenuated or potentiated the decrease in the number of [3H]paroxetine binding sites measured 7 days after PCA treatment. The combination of the MAO-A inhibitor clorgyline (2.5 mg/kg) or a nonspecific dose of L-deprenyl (10 mg/kg) with the selective 5-HT releasing agent 5,6-methylenedioxy-2-aminoindan did not lead to changes in the levels of 5-HT, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid or dopamine 7 days after treatment. Finally, the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL-11,939 (5 mg/kg) did not protect against the neurotoxicity of PCA. By comparing the present work with previous studies of MDMA, these results can be interpreted to suggest that the mechanism of the neurotoxicity induced by PCA is not identical to that induced by MDMA. The relationship of these results to the neurotoxicity induced by MDMA is also discussed.

Animals↗

5-HT2A receptor antagonists inhibit potassium-stimulated gamma-aminobutyric acid release in rat frontal cortex.

Several drugs selective for the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor were tested for their effects on spontaneous and K(+)-evoked [3H] gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release from slices of rat frontal cortex. Under K+ stimulation, the antagonists ketanserin, spiperone, R-(+)-alpha-(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-[2-(4-fluorophenethyl)]- 4-piperidinemethanol (MDL 100,907) and ritanserin inhibited GABA release by 12-31%. Rats were treated with the serotonin-depleting agent para-chlorophenylalanine and with the serotonergic neurotoxin para-chloroamphetamine. In para-chlorophenylalanine-treated animals, stimulated GABA release in the presence of ketanserin remained depressed. In animals treated with both para-chlorophenylalanine and para-chloroamphetamine, ketanserin or the hallucinogenic agonist (2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminoethane (2C-I) each appeared to decrease stimulated GABA release but this was not significant. However, when ketanserin and 2C-I were both present in the superfusion buffer an additive inhibitory effect was observed, and GABA release was decreased 30%. These results suggest that serotonin facilitates GABA release in cortex via 5-HT2A receptors and that the functional response of this system is resistant to serotonin depletion.

Animals↗

Dihydrobenzofuran analogues of hallucinogens. 3. Models of 4-substituted (2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)alkylamine derivatives with rigidified methoxy groups.

Tetrahydrobenzodifuran functionalities were employed as conformationally restricted bioisosteres of the aromatic methoxy groups in prototypical hallucinogenic phenylalkylamines 1 and 2. Thus, a series of 8-substituted 1-(2,3,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']difuran-4-yl)-2-aminoal kanes (7a-e) were prepared and evaluated for activity in the two-lever drug discrimination paradigm in rats trained to discriminate saline from LSD tartrate (0.08 mg/kg) and for the ability to displace [3H]ketanserin from rat cortical homogenate 5-HT2A receptors and [3H]-8-OH-DPAT from rat hippocampal homogenate 5-HT1A receptors. In addition, 1-(8-bromo-2,3,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']difuran-4-yl)-2-am inopropane (7b), which was found to be extremely potent in the rat in vivo assays, was evaluated for its ability to compete with [125I]DOI and [3H]ketanserin binding to cells expressing cloned human 5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C receptors. All of the dihydrofuranyl compounds having a hydrophobic substituent para to the alkylamine side chain had activities in both the in vitro and in vivo assays that equaled or surpassed the activity of the analogous conformationally flexible parent compounds. For example, 7b substituted for LSD in the drug discrimination assay with an ED50 of 61 nmol/kg and had Kj values in the nanomolar to subnanomolar range for the displacement of radioligand from rat and human 5-HT2 receptors, making it one of the most potent hallucinogen-like phenylalkylamine derivatives reported to date. The results suggest that the dihydrofuran rings in these new analogues effectively model the active binding conformations of the methoxy groups of the parent compounds 1 and 2. In addition, the results provide information about the topography and relative orientation of residues involved in agonist binding in the serotonin 5-HT2 receptors.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

9-Dihydroxy-2,3,7,11b-tetrahydro-1H-naph[1,2,3-de]isoquinoline: a potent full dopamine D1 agonist containing a rigid-beta-phenyldopamine pharmacophore.

The present work reports the synthesis and preliminary pharmacological characterization of 8,9-dihydroxy-2,3,7,11b-tetrahydro-1H-naph[1,2,3-de] isoquinoline (4, dinapsoline). This molecule was designed to conserve the essential elements contained in our D1 agonist pharmacophore model (i.e., position and orientation of the nitrogen, hydroxyls, and phenyl rings). It involved taking the backbone of dihydrexidine [3; (+/-)-trans-10, 11-dihydroxy-5,6,6a,7,8,12b-hexahydrobenzo[a] phenanthridine], the first high-affinity full D1 agonist, and tethering the two phenyl rings of dihydrexidine through a methylene bridge and removing the C(7)-C(8) ethano bridge. Preliminary molecular modeling studies demonstrated that these modifications conserved the essential elements of the hypothesized pharmacopore. Dinapsoline 4 had almost identical affinity (KI = 5.9 nM) to 3 at rat striatal D1 receptors and had a shallow competition curve (nH = 0.66) that suggested agonist properties. Consistent with this, in both rat striatum and C-6-mD1 cells, dinapsoline 4 was a full agonist with an EC50 of ca. 30 nM in stimulating synthesis of cAMP via D1 receptors. The design and synthesis of dinapsoline 4 provide a powerful test of the model of the D1 pharmacophore we have developed and provide another chemical series that can be useful probes for the study of D1 receptors. An interesting property of 3 is that it also has relatively high D2 affinity (K0.5 = 50 nM) despite having an accessory phenyl ring usually though to convey D1 selectivity. Dinapsoline 4 was found to have even higher affinity for the D2 receptor (K0.5 = 31 nM) than 3. Because of the high affinity of 4 for D2 receptors, it and its analogs can be powerful tools for exploring the mechanisms of "functional selectivity" (i.e., that 3 is an agonist at some D2 receptors, but an antagonist at others). Together, these data suggest that 4 and its derivatives may be powerful tools in the study of dopamine receptor function and also have potential clinical utility in Parkinson's disease and other conditions where perturbation of dopamine receptors is useful.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗

Conformational analysis of D1 dopamine receptor agonists: pharmacophore assessment and receptor mapping.

Compute-aided conformational analysis was used to characterize the agonist pharmacophore for D1 dopamine receptor recognition and activation. Dihydrexidine (DHX), a high-affinity full agonist with limited conformational flexibility, served as a structural template that aided in determining a molecular geometry that would be common for other more flexible, biologically active agonists. The intrinsic activity of the drugs at D1 receptors was assessed by their ability to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity in rat striatal homogenates (the accepted measure of D1 receptor activation). In addition, affinity data on 12 agonists including six purported full agonists (dopamine, dihydrexidine, SKF89626, SKF82958, A70108, and A77636), as well as six less efficacious structural analogs, were obtained from D1 dopamine radioreceptor-binding assays. The active analog approach to pharmacophore building was applied as implemented in the SYBYL software package. Conformational analysis and molecular mechanics calculations were used to determine the lowest energy conformation of the active analogs (i.e., full agonists), as well as the conformations of each compound that displayed a common pharmacophoric geometry. It is hypothesized that DHX and other full agonists may share a D1 pharmacophore made up of two hydroxy groups, the nitrogen atom (ca. 7 A from the oxygen of m-hydroxyl) and the accessory ring system characterized by the angle between its plane and that of the catechol ring (except for dopamine and A77636). For all full agonists (DHX, SKF89626, SKF82958, A70108, A77636, and dopamine), the energy difference between the lowest energy conformer and those that displayed a common pharmacophore geometry was relatively small (< 5 kcal/mol). The pharmacophoric conformations of the full agonists were also used to infer the shape of the receptor binding site. Based on the union of the van der Waals density maps of the active analogs, the excluded receptor volume was calculated. Various inactive analogs (partial agonists with D1 K0.5 > 300 nM) subsequently were used to define the receptor essential volume (i.e., sterically intolerable receptor regions). These volumes, together with the pharmacophore results, were integrated into a three-dimensional model estimating the D1 receptor active site topography.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗