Part II: The use of arthrocentesis for treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D E Frost.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the safety and efficacy of propofol combined with fentanyl as sedative agents during third molar outpatient surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A double-blind, prospective, randomized clinical trial involving 57 patients undergoing removal of third molars under intravenous sedation between November 1994 and December 1995 was performed. Patients randomly received either propofol and fentanyl (P + F, th = 24) or midazolam and fentanyl (M + F, M = 33). Patient demographics, Corah anxiety scores, and physiologic parameters were determined preoperatively. All medications were titrated to the same clinical end point for sedation. Intraoperative physiologic parameters, cooperation, alertness, and pain scores were assessed. Postoperative recovery and degree of amnesia also were determined. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in either patient demographics or surgical characteristics between groups. The P + F group was significantly less cooperative than the M + F group. Pain during injection of propofol was a significant adverse side effect. Both groups experienced a small percentage of apneic episodes, but mechanical ventilation was never required. There were no differences in recovery between groups as measured by the Treiger dot test and psychomotor recovery scores. The degree of anterograde amnesia was greater for the M + F group, although the difference was not statistically significant. Sedation was rated good to excellent by the patient, surgeon, and observer, and there were no statistically significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: Propofol appears to be a safe and efficacious drug for use during outpatient oral surgical procedures.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Insertional torque (IT), stripping torque (ST), and uniaxial pullout tests were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of six screw systems (Wurzburg, Techmedica, Synthes, Timesh, Steinhouser, Luhr) in thin porcine rib. The Timesh 2.2-mm self-tapping screw produced the largest insertional and stripping torque of all systems tested as well as the largest difference between the insertional and stripping torque. The Timesh emergency screw also had the largest insertional and stripping torque as well as the largest difference between the insertional and stripping torque. In pullout tests, the Timesh screw was found to be the most retentive. The overall data indicated that the ideal self-tapping screw should have the largest difference possible between drill size and external diameter, a channel, and at least three self-tapping threads for maximum retention.
This study investigates the retentive capacity of 2.0-mm self-tapping screws in porcine rib utilizing axial pull-out tests as well as torque measurements of insertion and stripping. These techniques have been performed independently; this analysis assesses the association between pull-out and torque values. The Goodman-Kruskel correlation coefficient between pull-out and insertional torque is 0.13, while the correlation between pull-out and stripping torque is 0.21. Partial correlation indexes control the thickness of bone, a confounding factor. Nonparametric analysis of covariance showed no significant difference between insertion of screws and pull-out of the screws, but stripping versus pull-out test was significant. Given these findings, it appears that insertional torque may be used as an alternative technique for screw retention analysis. Because insertional torque tests can be conducted in the operating room, results of clinical studies can be compared to laboratory analyses.
Clinicians continue to search for a rigid internal fixation system that will remain stable in thin bone, such as that found in the lateral walls of the maxilla. Insertion of a large-diameter screw in a pilot hole has been suggested to improve screw retention. This study evaluates insertional and stripping torque of six emergency screw systems placed in nonstripped pilot holes of porcine rib (thickness < or = 2 mm). The Timesh and Synthes emergency screws did not properly fit into the nonstripped pilot holes. The Techmedica emergency screw was the most retentive. The Luhr, Wurzburg, and Steinhouser emergency screws were less retentive. The Techmedica emergency screw had the greatest stripping torque in nonstripped pilot holes, but it was not significantly greater when compared to the stripping torque of identical screws placed in 2.0-mm stripped holes. The Luhr, Wurzburg, and Steinhouser emergency screws placed in 1.5-mm pilot holes had significantly less stripping torque when compared to identical screws placed in 2.0-mm stripped holes. It appears the Luhr, Wurzberg, and Steinhouser 2.0-mm self-tapping screws have a greater stripping torque than the corresponding emergency screw when placed in 1.5-mm pilot holes.
Human cadaver hemimandibles were subjected to sagittal split ramus osteotomy, and the cortical thickness of each mandible was then measured in several areas. A measurable difference in morphology was found in the proximal segment of the mandible. Because cortical bone thickness is directly related to bone-screw holding strength, these results have important implications for the use of rigid internal fixation. The results suggested that the areas that coincide with the most anterior and superior extent of the osteotomy would be the ideal locations for screw placement.
Multiple systems for internal screw fixation are presently in use in oral and maxillofacial surgery. These systems differ in screw diameter, material, and design. This study evaluated the uniaxial pullout strength of five screw systems. Two-millimeter, 2.7-mm, and 3.5-mm screws were initially evaluated for pullout strength. Pretapped and self-tapped screws were then inserted into the same hole multiple times before pullout testing. Results of pullout testing revealed no significant difference in pullout strength of pretapped and self-tapped screws of equal diameter (P greater than .05). Increased screw diameter produced increased pullout strength. No significant difference in pullout strength was noted in pretapped or self-tapped screws inserted into the same hole one, two, or three times before pullout testing (P greater than .05).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Multiple techniques of internal screw fixation are being used in clinical oral and maxillofacial surgery. This study evaluated the uniaxial pull-out strength of five commonly used screws and Kirschner pins placed by five different techniques. The pull-out strength of the Kirschner pins was significantly less (P greater than .0001) than that of the screws. The screw techniques did not differ significantly.
Multiple screw placement patterns and techniques have been described for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. This study evaluated transverse strength (rigidity) of six groups of simulated sagittal osteotomies fixed with different screw patterns and placement techniques. Osteotomies fixed with screws placed in an inverted L pattern were significantly more rigid than those fixed with screws placed in a linear pattern or K-wires placed in a triangular pattern (P less than .05). No significant difference in rigidity was noted between compression and bicortical screws placed in identical patterns.
Twelve adult mongrel dogs were used to evaluate the use of hydroxylapatite (HA) in the closure of alveolar clefts. Bilateral alveolar clefts were surgically created in each animal. After healing, they were implanted randomly with either HA or particulate cancellous bone and marrow (PCBM). The results were evaluated clinically, radiographically, and histologically for healing, acceptance of the implant, closure of the fistula, and bony ingrowth. The results show that HA was as successful in closure of the fistulas and re-establishing an intact maxilla as PCBM. Minimal osteoid and bone was interspersed in the HA implant sites. No complications resulted from the HA graft.
In a double-blind, randomized plan of drug administration, nalbuphine, fentanyl, and a placebo were compared for efficacy in sedation and analgesia during third molar removal. Fifty-eight patients participated in this study. Using accepted intravenous sedation and surgical techniques, fentanyl and nalbuphine were found to be better than placebo for anxiety and pain control in third molar surgery. Fentanyl had a longer duration of pain relief postoperatively than did nalbuphine. The study confirmed the need for a narcotic supplement to sedation techniques for third molar surgery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Ultrasonographic examination of masses in the neck can be a valuable diagnostic aid. It has the advantages of being noninvasive, rapid, easily repeated, and relatively inexpensive. Ultrasound is also a particularly convenient means of localizing lesions for percutaneous biopsy and for serially monitoring the response of a lesion to therapy. As experience increases and equipment improves, ultrasound will gain an even greater role as a diagnostic aid. A case is reported in which a mucus-retention phenomenon was evaluated, managed, and followed with the aid of B-scan ultrasonographic and real-time imaging.
Of 1587 mandibular fractures, 75 (4.7 per cent) were treated by open reduction with metacarpal bone plates. The plated fractures were reviewed and evaluated for failure. Seventeen plates of the 96 placed were removed (17.7 per cent). Infection was the major cause of failure (9.4 per cent). Operator error played a role in the failure of eight out of 17 plates (47.1 per cent). Various aspects were studied in order to find the significant factors present, and these are discussed.
A technique involving a bone plating system for stabilization of the maxilla in simultaneous surgery on both upper and lower jaws is presented. The alternatives to this method of stabilization are discussed. The literature on the use of miniplates in midface surgery is reviewed. The use and adaptation of readily available orthopedic metacarpal plates is discussed. Familiarization with this system is recommended.