Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D E Draper

Publications and source records attributed to D E Draper.

82 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Secondary structure of a 345-base RNA fragment covering the S8/S15 protein binding domain of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA.

A technique for isolating defined fragments of a large RNA has been developed and applied to a ribosomal RNA. A section of the Escherichia coli rrnB cistron corresponding to the S8/S15 protein binding domain of 16S ribosomal RNA was cloned into a single-stranded DNA phage; after hybridization of the phage DNA with 16S RNA and digestion with T1 ribonuclease, the protected RNA was separated from the DNA under denaturing conditions to yield a 345-base RNA fragment with unique ends (bases 525-869 in the 16S sequence). The secondary structure of this fragment was determined by mapping the cleavage sites of enzymes specific for single-stranded or double-helical RNA. The fragment structure is almost identical with that proposed for the corresponding region of intact 16S RNA on the basis of phylogenetic comparisons [Woese, C. R., Gutell, R., Gupta, R., & Noller, H. (1983) Microbiol. Rev. 47, 621-669]. We conclude that this section of RNA constitutes an independently folding domain that may be studied in isolation from the rest of the 16S RNA. The structure mapping experiments have indicated several interesting features in the RNA structure. (i) The largest bulge loop in the molecule (20 bases) contains specific tertiary structure. (ii) A region of long-range secondary structure, pairing bases about 200 residues apart in the sequence, can hydrogen bond in two different mutually exclusive schemes. Both appear to exist simultaneously in the RNA fragment under our conditions. (iii) The long-range secondary structure and one adjacent helix melt between 37 and 60 degrees C in the absence of Mg2+, while the rest of the structure is quite stable.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Detection of high-affinity intercalator sites in a ribosomal RNA fragment by the affinity cleavage intercalator methidiumpropyl-EDTA-iron(II).

The affinity cleavage reagent methidiumpropyl-EDTA (MPE) [Hertzberg, R. P., & Dervan, P. B. (1982) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 313-315] intercalates between base pairs in helical DNA and, when complexed with Fe(II), cleaves the DNA by oxidative degradation of the deoxyribose. We find that this reagent is useful for mapping structure in some RNA molecules. The reagent binds to poly(A)-poly(U) with the same or slightly lower affinity as the related ethidium intercalator, selectively binds double-helical in preference to single-stranded RNA, and when complexed with Fe(II) readily cleaves the RNA backbone. The reagent binds to three or four helical locations in tRNAPhe with an affinity of 10(5)-10(6) M-1 (0.1 M Na+, pH 7.6, 37 degrees C). With a 345-base RNA fragment covering the S8/S15 protein binding region of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA, MPE-Fe(II) intercalates strongly at two helical sites: one is located at or near a single base bulge and the other at the end of a helix. Intense cutting is also seen in a region that is not part of a Watson-Crick helix. Ethidium bromide binds at these sites with high affinity (about 10(7) M-1 at 0.1 M Na+, pH 7.6, 37 degrees C). The sites are all clustered in a region of the RNA thought to bind S15. Tertiary folding of the RNA may distort helices in the molecule to create sites with particularly high affinities for intercalators; such sites may have functional significance in protein recognition or RNA-RNA interactions.

Base Sequence↗

On the coordination properties of Eu3+ bound to tRNA.

The luminescence properties of Eu3+ have been used to investigate the binding and coordination properties of the ion with tRNA, as an attempt to resolve the discussion of whether metal ions bind to tRNA in solution only by Debye-Hückel screening, or whether direct coordination to specific sites may occur. Binding studies with Escherichia coli tRNAmet/f (taking advantage of 4-thiouracil-sensitized Eu3+ emission) distinguish three classes of binding affinities. Two of these are single sites with affinities approx. 10(4) and approx. 10(3) tighter than the nonspecific affinity of Eu3+ for native DNA. Mg2+ competes for binding at both these sites. Measurement of the lifetime and excitation spectrum of Eu3+ bound to the highest affinity site shows that the ion has two to five non-phosphate ligands in its inner coordination sphere. The existence of this coordinated site demonstrates that electrostatic screening is not the only mechanism for metal ion interaction with tRNA. The coordination properties of the high-affinity Eu3+ site do not agree with the properties of any of the metal ion sites found in the two tRNAphe crystal forms. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed; it may be that ions bind differently to isolated molecules in solution than to molecules packed in a crystal lattice.

Binding Sites↗

Attachment of reporter groups to specific, selected cytidine residues in RNA using a bisulfite-catalyzed transamination reaction.

Bisulfite catalyzes transamination of cytidine at the N4 position; the suitability of this reaction for attaching reporter groups to selected cytidine residues in RNA molecules has been investigated. Poly(C) is nearly quantitatively converted to the poly (N4 aminoethyl-C) derivative after 3 hrs at 42 degrees C with ethylene diamine (pK1 = 7.6) and bisulfite. This derivative reacts quantitatively with N-hydroxysuccinimide esters; the linkage of a fluorescent dye, nitrobenzofurazan, to cytidine by this reaction is demonstrated. To direct the bisulfite reaction to selected cytidines within a large RNA molecule, the RNA is hybridized to complementary DNA containing a deletion. Only the cytidines in the single strand RNA loop (corresponding to the DNA deletion) are reactive. Two cytidines in the middle of a 340 base RNA fragment from 16S ribosomal RNA have been modified by this technique.

Amines↗

Interaction of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 with ribosomes.

The binding affinity of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 for 30S ribosomal particles has been determined by a sucrose gradient band sedimentation technique; the association constant (K) for the binding of one S1 protein per active 30S ribosomal subunit is approximately 2 X 10(8) M-1. The involvement of the two polynucleotide binding sites of S1 protein (site I binding single-stranded DNA or RNA, and site II binding single-stranded RNA only) in the S1--ribosomal interaction have been examined by competition experiments with polynucleotides of known affinity for the two sites. We find that site I does not contribute to the interaction; site II binding appears to provide a major part of the binding free energy, presumably by interaction of S1 with the 16S rRNA of the 30S particle. The remaining binding free energy is probably derived from the interaction of S1 protein with other proteins of the 30S subunit. The affinity of S1 for 70S ribosomes is about the same as that for the 30S subunit; the affinity of S1 for 50S subunits is much less. Binding affinities and stoichiometries of S1 protein with "inactive" 30S ribosomal subunits have also been examined.

Binding, Competitive↗

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 has two polynucleotide binding sites.

The interaction of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 with a variety of RNA and DNA oligomers and polymers has been studied, using both a sedimentation technique and the quenching of intrinsic protein fluorescence upon nucleic acid binding to obtain equilibrium binding parameters. Two polynucleotide binding sites have been detected on S1: site I binds either single-stranded DNA or RNA and does not discriminate between adenine- and cytidine-containing polynucleotides, while the II binding is highly specific for RNA over DNA and shows a marked preference for cytidine polynucleotides over the corresponding adenine-containing species. On the basis of the binding properties of S1 to denatured DNA cellulose and poly(rC)-cellulose, it is demonstrated that every S1 molecule carries both a site I and a site II. Some possible implications of these results for mechanisms of protein synthesis and phage Qbeta replication are briefly considered.

Bacterial Proteins↗