Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D E Beaton

Publications and source records attributed to D E Beaton.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Steindler and pectoralis major flexorplasty: a comparative analysis.

Previously published studies on transfers to restore elbow flexion have rarely compared the outcomes among different techniques. We found no comparison between the Steindler procedure and pectoralis major tendon transfer. This study compared functional outcomes after these two types of elbow flexorplasty performed in conjunction with shoulder arthrodesis for patients with brachial plexus injuries. The same examiner assessed 14 patients who underwent shoulder fusion and elbow flexorplasty. Five had a pectoralis major tendon transfer, and nine underwent a modified Steindler procedure. All patients had brachial plexus lesions that were irreparable or had not responded to neurolysis, repair, or grafting. Average follow-up time was 60 months (range, 12 months-10 years). All patients completed a questionnaire (pain, function) and underwent an objective assessment of range of motion, isometric strength, isotonic power, grip, and pinch strength. The BTE Work Simulator (Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment, Hanover, MD) was used for muscle strength testing. Improvement was noted in daily activities including dressing and bilateral activities and was reflected in a significant improvement over preoperative function. No differences (at p = .05 level of significance) were found in objective tests between the pectoralis major transfer and the Steindler groups. In the patient requiring stabilization of the shoulder and flexorplasty, the pectoralis major tendon transfer was at least equivalent to the modified Steindler flexorplasty in terms of range of motion, strength, and subjective measures.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Interaction of glyceryl trinitrate and sodium nitroprusside with bovine pulmonary vein homogenate and 10,000 x g supernatant: biotransformation and nitric oxide formation.

The current proposed mechanism of action of nitrovasodilator drugs involves biotransformation to nitric oxide, which is postulated to be the active vasodilator substance. Our objective was to determine whether nitric oxide was formed from two prototype nitrovasodilator drugs, glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP), after incubation with bovine pulmonary vein (BPV) preparations. GTN or SNP was incubated in an argon atmosphere with phosphate buffer, BPV homogenate, or the 10,000 x g supernatant fraction of the homogenate. Nitric oxide formation, as determined by a chemiluminescence-headspace gas method, was measurable following the incubation of SNP with BPV homogenate and 10,000 x g supernatant. There was no detectable formation of nitric oxide from the incubation of GTN with the two BPV preparations, although GTN was biotransformed to glyceryl dinitrate, as determined by gas-liquid chromatography. There was decreased recovery of nitric oxide during the incubation of authentic nitric oxide with the two BPV preparations as compared with buffer. In conclusion, formation of nitric oxide was measured for the interaction of SNP, but not GTN, with BPV preparations. However, the data do not exclude the possible formation of nitric oxide from GTN, as nitric oxide was shown to be sequestered or transformed by the BPV preparations.

Animals↗

Measuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure.

OBJECTIVE: Many existing upper extremity outcome measures have been designed for a specific anatomic site (e.g., shoulder) or a specific disease entity (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome). The purpose of this paper is to examine whether questionnaire items taken from very specific measures are considered relevant only to that specific region or are applicable to the whole extremity. METHODS: Fifteen practicing clinicians categorized a sample of 132 items from existing questionnaires according to whether the items reflected disability specific to an anatomic site or were relevant to the whole extremity. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of the items were categorized as relevant to the extremity as a whole, while only 21% of the items were categorized as specific to an anatomic site. CONCLUSION: Items in existing specific upper extremity questionnaires are also relevant to other regions and conditions. This finding is in agreement with kinesiologic and biomechanical theories that the upper extremity acts as a single functional unit. Questionnaires designed for the whole extremity could provide a more practical and still valid measure of upper extremity disability.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Functional outcome after the L'Episcopo procedure.

A study was undertaken to assess functional outcome in 11 patients undergoing latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer (L'Episcopo procedure) for external rotation deficient shoulders. The mean age was 37 years (range 18 to 48 years). All of the patients had adult-onset brachial plexus injuries. The mean time for injury to operation was 32 months. Patients were evaluated by questionnaire, measurement of the range of motion, strength testing, and an overhead work simulation. Of the patients studied, 10 of the 11 patients were working (8 returned to their preinjury employment). The cumulative postoperative mean activities of daily living score was 20 (maximum possible 33) compared with 14 before surgery. No complications occurred. Ten patients reported confidence in the limb and believed the procedure was worthwhile. Mean active external rotation of the shoulder at 0 degrees and 90 degrees elevation was 28 degrees (range 15 degrees to 55 degrees and 36 degrees (range 0 degrees to 90 degrees), respectively. Postoperative external rotation strength was 0.32 that of the control side with the arm at the side. Seven of the nine patients tested were able to complete the Valpor overhead work simulation. The L'Episcopo muscle-tendon transfer reliably improves functional outcome in the late functional reconstruction of adult-onset brachial plexus lesions.

Adult↗

Functional outcome of acromioclavicular joint injury in polytrauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional outcome of displaced acromioclavicular (AC) injuries in polytrauma patients. DESIGN: A matched, case-control study using a prospectively gathered trauma database. METHODS: Twelve polytrauma patients with a concomitant displaced acromioclavicular joint injury were matched to polytrauma patients without an acromioclavicular joint injury and to patients with an isolated displaced acromioclavicular joint injury. They were evaluated with a series of five shoulder questionnaires and the SF-36 general health status questionnaire. RESULTS: Shoulder function in polytrauma/acromioclavicular joint injured patients was consistently worse than in control patients with an isolated acromioclavicular joint injury. In addition, the presence of an acromioclavicular joint injury in a polytrauma patient had a negative effect on several components of the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: A displaced acromioclavicular joint injury in a polytrauma patient has a greater effect on shoulder function than isolated acromioclavicular joint injuries when evaluated by both disease-specific and general health outcomes. Standard treatment methods may be inadequate for this group of patients.

Acromioclavicular Joint↗

Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity.

UNLABELLED: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure was developed to evaluate disability and symptoms in single or multiple disorders of the upper limb at one point or at many points in time. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the DASH in a group of diverse patients and to compare the results with those obtained with joint-specific measures. METHODS: Two hundred patients with either wrist/hand or shoulder problems were evaluated by use of questionnaires before treatment, and 172 (86%) were re-evaluated 12 weeks after treatment. Eighty-six patients also completed a test-retest questionnaire three to five days after the initial (baseline) evaluation. The questionnaire package included the DASH, the Brigham (carpal tunnel) questionnaire, the SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index), and other markers of pain and function. Correlations or t-tests between the DASH and the other measures were used to assess construct validity. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and other summary statistics. Responsiveness was described using standardized response means, receiver operating characteristics curves, and correlations between change in DASH score and change in scores of other measures. Standard response means were used to compare DASH responsiveness with that of the Brigham questionnaire and the SPADI in each region. RESULTS: The DASH was found to correlate with other measures (r > 0.69) and to discriminate well, for example, between patients who were working and those who were not (p<0.0001). Test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96) exceeded guidelines. The responsiveness of the DASH (to self-rated or expected change) was comparable with or better than that of the joint-specific measures in the whole group and in each region. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence was provided of the validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of the DASH. This study also demonstrated that the DASH had validity and responsiveness in both proximal and distal disorders, confirming its usefulness across the whole extremity.

Arm↗