Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

D D Bransfield

Publications and source records attributed to D D Bransfield.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Differences between black and white women with breast cancer in time from symptom recognition to medical consultation. Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Studies in the United States have reported that Black women have higher fatality rates than White women following a diagnosis of breast cancer and are more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage cancers. PURPOSE: To evaluate reasons for these racial differences, we explored the difference between Black and White women in the length of time from symptom recognition to initial medical consultation. We also evaluated the extent to which other factors related to the length of this interval might contribute to any observed racial difference. METHODS: As part of a collaborative study of differences in the survival rates of Black patients and White patients with cancer, we interviewed a sample of 410 Black women and 325 White women from Atlanta, New Orleans, and San Francisco/Oakland who were newly diagnosed in 1985 or 1986 with invasive breast cancer. Retrospective data were collected on symptoms, dates of symptom recognition and initial medical consultation, and several other factors which may affect the interval between symptom recognition and medical consultation. Data were analyzed as if from a follow-up study, using product limit procedures and proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: At diagnosis, Black women with breast cancer were two times more likely to have stage IV breast cancer and one and one-half times more likely to have stage III breast cancer than White women with breast cancer and were only approximately one-half as likely to have stage I breast cancer. Similarly, Black women were almost twice as likely as White women to have tumors that were larger than 5 cm or tumors that had extensions to the chest wall or skin at presentation. However, the average rate at which Black women with breast cancer obtained an initial medical consultation lagged behind that for White women by only a slight but statistically significant difference (15%). The median time between symptom recognition and medical consultation was slightly longer for Black women (16 days) than for White women (14 days) (P = .06). Adjustment for other characteristics predictive of the length of this interval had little effect on racial differences. The racial differences tended to vary somewhat by age and metropolitan area, suggesting that the results may not apply equally to all demographic subgroups and regions in the United States. CONCLUSION: This small difference in the time from symptom recognition to medical consultation is unlikely to account for the large racial differences in survival rates and in stage of disease at the time of diagnosis.

Adult

Patient acceptance and differential perceptions of quality of life measures in a French oncology setting.

A three-part study evaluated French cancer patients' acceptance of self-rated quality of life measures, the predictive value of these measures, and the agreement between patient and health provider ratings of patient quality of life. In part one, 93% of 137 patients indicated a willingness to complete the Qualite de la Vie-Questionnaire (QOL-Q) and Analogues Lineaires pour la Mesure de la Qualite de vie (LA), and 63.6% indicated a willingness to be interviewed by a psychologist. Willingness to complete the scales was related to hospitalization status and treatment modality. In parts two and three, 100 patients were asked to complete the QOL-Q, LA, the Karnofsky Index (KI) and a side-effects checklist, and to undergo a psychological interview. Following interview, a psychologist rated the patients using the QOL-Q, and classified patient level of emotional distress. Oncologists rated the patient using the KI and the side-effects checklist. The results indicate that the patients' ratings of their quality of life were higher than the psychologist's ratings, and that the QOL-Q has predictive value in identifying severe emotional distress. Low level of patient and physician agreement on the KI was partially explained by patient age and cancer site. A moderate level of agreement was found between patient and physician perceptions of side effects. The study suggests that the QOL-Q, not the LA, may be useful as a screening tool to identify patients with impaired quality of life, and that self-rated measures should be included in quality of life assessments.

Adult

Chain-chewin'.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chewing Gum

Health policy.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Health Policy