Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Conklin

Publications and source records attributed to D Conklin.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1994

Knowledge discovery of multilevel protein motifs.

A new category of protein motif is introduced. This type of motif captures, in addition to global structure, the nested structure of its component parts. A dataset of four proteins is represented using this scheme. A structured machine discovery procedure is used to discover recurrent amino acid motifs and this knowledge is utilized for the expression of subsequent protein motif discoveries. Examples of discovered multilevel motifs are presented.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Representation for discovery of protein motifs.

There are several dimensions and levels of complexity in which information on protein motifs may be available. For example, one-dimensional sequence motifs may be associated with secondary structure identifiers. Alternatively, three-dimensional information on polypeptide segments may be used to induce prototypical three-dimensional structure templates. This paper surveys various representations encountered in the protein motif discovery literature. Many of the representations are based on incompatible semantics, making difficult the comparison and combination of previous results. To make better use of machine learning techniques and to provide for an integrated knowledge representation framework, a general representation language--in which all types of motifs can be encoded and given a uniform semantics--is required. In this paper we propose such a model, called a spatial description logic, and present a machine learning approach based on the model.

Amino Acids↗
PubMed1989

Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule.

The purpose of this study was to test the utility of the 10% rule in hand rehabilitation. The 10% rule states that the dominant hand possesses a 10% greater grip strength than the nondominant hand. This rule has been used for many years to assist therapists in setting strength goals for patients with injured hands. The sample for this study consisted of 310 male and female students, faculty, and staff from a small, private liberal arts college located in Pennsylvania. Grip strength was measured with a factory-calibrated Jamar dynamometer. Results showed an overall 10.74% grip strength difference between dominant and nondominant hands. This finding verified the 10% rule. However, when the data were separated into left-handed and right-handed subjects, a 12.72% difference for right-handed subjects and a -0.08% difference for left-handed subjects was found. In conclusion, this study showed that the 10% rule is valid for right-handed persons only; for left-handed persons, grip strength should be considered equivalent in both hands.

Adolescent↗