Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to D C Tormey.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
To investigate whether breast cancer cells with unusually high nuclear DNA content are associated with an adverse outcome, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group investigators selected breast cancer trial patients who suffered an early death (ED) within two years after diagnosis to compare with other trial patients who had a survival of at least 7.5 years. Paraffin blocks of primary breast cancers were obtained from 93 evaluable patients who had been enrolled in two surgical adjuvant trials for lymph node positive (LN+) disease (T1-3N1M0). Single cell monolayer preparations from these blocks were stained with acriflavine-Feulgen and analyzed by image analysis for DNA content with the automated Leiden Television Analysis System (LEY-TAS). Standard prognostic variables (estrogen receptor (ER) status, number of lymph nodes with metastases, and size of the cancer) were compared with three DNA content characteristics: DNA ploidy status, number of nuclei with > 5C DNA content, and percent of nuclei with > 5 C. Estimates of the odds ratio in multivariate comparisons showed that ER negativity was associated with ED (p = 0.0005) and an odds ratio estimate using negative/positive of 4.87. The number of positive lymph nodes associated with ED had a p-value of 0.0005 and an odds ratio estimate of 4.63 when comparing the > 3 nodes group to the 1-3 nodes group. In contrast, the strongest association for any of the DNA content characteristics with ED had a p-value of 0.017 and an odds ratio estimate of 2.76. This power of association disappeared when stratified on ER status.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
PURPOSE: This study analyzes the long-term results and causes of death in elderly women with node-positive breast cancer who participated in a double-blind adjuvant trial that compared tamoxifen with placebo to determine the benefit of 2 years of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-one women 65 to 84 years old were given 20 mg of tamoxifen or placebo daily for 2 years after stratification by estrogen receptor status, tumor size, and degree of lymph node involvement. Approximately 30% of patients were older than 70 years and 20% were older than 75 years. Eighty-five percent were estrogen receptor-positive. Median follow-up was 10 years. RESULTS: Among the 168 eligible patients, there have been 98 recurrences (59 placebo v 39 tamoxifen), with reduced distant and bone-only first sites in patients treated with tamoxifen. Median time to failure was 4.4 years for placebo versus 7.4 years for tamoxifen (log-rank P = .001). A similar number of new nonbreast cancers occurred in each arm (seven placebo v six tamoxifen), but a reduced number of opposite-breast cancers (five placebo v one tamoxifen) was noted. Overall, there were 102 deaths (57 placebo v 45 tamoxifen). Median survivals were 8.0 years with placebo and 8.5 years with tamoxifen (log-rank P = .063); 50% of the tamoxifen patients and 33% of the placebo patients are still alive. Sixty-one percent of the deaths were reported to have been caused by breast cancer recurrence, 4% by other cancers, and 22% by the sequelae of non-cancer-related illness, with equal distributions for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. There was no increase in the number of endometrial or other types of cancer, or thrombotic or orthopedic complications in this older group. CONCLUSION: Tamoxifen currently is the treatment of choice for elderly women with breast cancer. It extends the time to treatment failure by 3 years and reduces the number of recurrences, deaths, distant and bone-only first recurrences, and second breast cancers.
PURPOSE: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) entered 766 patients onto two prospectively randomized surgical adjuvant clinical trials for lymph node-positive breast cancer (T1-3N1M0). Ninety-five percent (n = 728) of eligible patients have complete information on the prognostic covariables under study (tumor necrosis [TN], tumor size, number of positive lymph nodes, age) and a median follow-up duration of 10.3 years. METHODS: TN was defined as confluent cell death in invasive areas of primary cancers, visible at 4 x objective lens magnification. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate presence versus absence of TN effects on clinical outcomes over full cross-stratification of variables, including delivery of chemotherapy versus observation only. Time-varying effects were modeled using spline functions of time, and by fixing proportional hazards models separately in the time periods 0 to 2 and 2+ years. RESULTS: Presence of TN was an independent predictor for time to recurrence (TTR) (P = .007) and for survival (P = .0003) in the overall 10-year follow-up period. Presence of TN was also an independent predictor for TTR and for survival (each P < .0001) in the period 0 to 2 years after diagnosis. Spline function time-modeling calculations showed different hazard ratios in the TN-present (TN+) versus TN-absent (TN-) groups for both TTR and survival (each P < .0001). This difference is changing over time (P = .0001 for TTR, P = .0005 for survival). Once a patient has been disease-free beyond 2 years after diagnosis, presence or absence of TN is irrelevant to future prognosis. CONCLUSION: Confluent TN of any dimension in invasive areas of lymph node-positive breast cancer is an independent predictor for early recurrence and death from the disease.
PURPOSE: To determine the response rate of postmenopausal breast cancer patients to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GN-RH) agonist, Zoladex (goserelin; ICI Pharma, Wilmington, DE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional single-agent trial in postmenopausal patients was conducted. Serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone, and estradiol were requested before and after Zoladex treatment. RESULTS: For estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) patients, the response rate was 11%, with one complete response (CR) and three partial responses (PRs) among 36 eligible patients. Responses were of short duration. There were no responses among 16 estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) patients. CONCLUSION: GN-RH agonists have activity in ER+ postmenopausal patients, but response rates are not as high as with other available endocrine therapies and the duration of response is short.
Previous studies have demonstrated continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (CI 5-FU) to be an active single-agent treatment for breast cancer without significant myelotoxicity. These qualities made CI 5-FU an attractive agent for combination with other effective but myelosuppressive agents. In this study we attempted to determine the maximal doses of CI 5-FU that could be added to a combination of agents known to be dose limited by myelotoxicity, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 day 2 and cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2 days 3-12 of a 28-day cycle. Patients who received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide alone developed significant myelotoxicity but did not develop stomatitis. The addition of 5-7 days of CI 5-FU at 200-300 mg/m2 was associated more closely with increased stomatitis (P = .11) than with increased granulocytopenia (P = .57). The stomatitis observed for low doses of CI 5-FU given with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide would not have been expected for these low doses of CI 5-FU given as a single agent. We conclude that the addition of CI 5-FU to myelotoxic doses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide is not a promising therapeutic strategy for significantly increasing the effectiveness of this combination of agents.
Using permanent-section immunohistochemistry, we investigated the role of HER-2/neu in the development and progression of human breast cancer by measuring its overexpression in a series of hyperplastic (n = 30), dysplastic (n = 15), and malignant neoplastic (n = 708) lesions of ductal epithelium and by evaluating the relationships between overexpression and clinicopathologic features known to have prognostic significance in these lesions. The neoplasms included pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; n = 59) and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC; n = 649). The latter were all node negative and stratified into IDC combined (n = 237) or not combined (n = 412) with a "significant amount" of DCIS (defined as DCIS greater than or equal to 10% of total tumor cellularity). Overexpression of HER-2/neu was not observed in any of the hyperplastic or dysplastic lesions. In contrast, it was present in 56% of pure DCIS and in 77% of the comedo subtype of this group. Only 15% of IDC overexpressed HER-2/neu. However, the rate of overexpression was significantly higher in the subset of IDC combined with DCIS compared with the subset of IDC not combined with DCIS (22% v 11%, respectively; P less than .0001). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that HER-2/neu plays a more important role in initiation than in progression of ductal carcinomas. They also suggest that overexpression decreases within individual tumors as they evolve from in situ to increasingly invasive lesions or, alternatively, that many invasive carcinomas arise de novo (ie, without progressing through a significant in situ stage) by mechanisms not involving HER-2/neu. In addition, overexpression of HER-2/neu was associated with several poor prognostic features (younger patient age, premenopause, negative estrogen receptor status, negative progesterone receptor status, and high nuclear grade) in the subset of IDC combined with DCIS. With one exception (negative estrogen receptor status) these associations were lost in IDC not combined with DCIS, also suggesting that the role of HER-2/neu changes during the progression of human breast cancer.
Interferons (IFNs)-alpha and -beta were administered to patients with metastatic sarcomas in two different Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group studies. In one study, patients received IFN-alpha 2b, 20 million units/m2 i.v. 5 days/week x 4, then 10 million units s.c.t.i.w. In the second study, patients received IFN-beta ser 180 million units t.i.w. Of 87 patients evaluable for response, there were three responses in 64 patients (5%) treated with IFN-alpha-2b and no responses in 23 patients treated with IFN-beta ser. Severe or life-threatening fatigue with decline in performance status complicated treatment of 37% of patients receiving IFN-alpha 2b and 17% of patients receiving IFN-beta ser. Further investigation of IFNs in sarcomas should depend on evidence from preclinical studies demonstrating synergistic effects of IFNs combined with a cytoreductive modality which has proven activity in these malignancies.
The design of combination hormonal and immunotherapeutic protocols for breast cancer patients may be facilitated by analysis of preclinical in vitro model systems. Estrogen receptor positive (ER+: MCF-7) and negative (ER-: MDA-MB-231) human breast cancer cell lines were utilized to evaluate the effects of tamoxifen (TAM) and estradiol (E2) on modulation of breast cancer target susceptibility to lysis by lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells. E2-stimulated ER+ cells were more susceptible to lysis by LAK cells than corresponding TAM-treated or control cells, while treatment of ER- cells with either E2 or TAM alone did not alter from control their susceptibility to this immune-mediated lysis. All ER+ and ER- cells tested remained sensitive after treatment with TAM to lysis by LAK cells. In addition, an adenocarcinoma reactive human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody (ING-1) was able to significantly boost in vivo generated LAK cell-mediated lysis of control, E2-treated, and TAM-treated ER+ and ER- cells. These in vitro results provide a preclinical rationale for in vivo testing of TAM, interleukin-2 (IL-2), and breast cancer reactive antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity facilitating antibody in patients with refractory or high risk breast cancer.
PURPOSE: A randomized trial was performed in premenopausal postoperative women with ipsilateral axillary node-positive (N+) breast carcinoma and known estrogen receptor (ER) status to assess the efficacy of an Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH)-based induction regimen and 5 or more years of tamoxifen (Tam). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received 12 28-day cycles of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8, prednisone 40 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, and Tam 10 mg orally twice daily (CMFPT), or the same regimen plus halotestin 10 mg orally twice daily (CMFPTH) alternating monthly with 22-day cycles of vinblastine 4.5 mg/m2 IV day 1, Adriamycin 45 mg/m2 IV day 1, thiotepa 12 mg/m2 IV day 1, halotestin, and Tam (ALTER). Prednisone in the ALTER regimen was stopped after the second CMFPTH cycle. After 12 cycles, patients were again randomized to stop or continue Tam. After 5 years, patients on Tam were again randomized to continue or stop Tam; the results from this randomization are still coded. Among 533 analyzed induction cases, 263 received CMFPT and 270 ALTER. Among 396 analyzed maintenance cases, 201 continued Tam and 195 were observed. Pretreatment characteristics were balanced among treatments. The median follow-up times are 5.1 years for induction and 4.1 years for maintenance. RESULTS: The time to relapse (TTR) was superior for the ALTER regimen (P = .04) and for the maintenance Tam (P = .05). Overall survival comparisons between the regimens are not statistically different. A longer TTR was associated with decreasing nodal involvement, ER+ status, and increasing age. The favorable effects of decreasing nodal involvement and ER+ status carried over to survival; a progesterone receptor-positive (PgR+) status and decreasing tumor size were also associated with longer survival. Development of amenorrhea was associated with improved TTR and survival. Toxicity was similar for the two induction regimens and for the two maintenance regimens. Overall relapse patterns were similar among the induction regimens, but continuing Tam led to fewer locoregional relapses. CONCLUSION: The results suggest significant overall TTR therapeutic benefits of an Adriamycin-containing alternating induction regimen and of continuing maintenance Tam therapy for at least 5 years.
PURPOSE: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from axillary node-negative breast cancer patients were analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were registered on a good-risk control arm of an intergroup clinical trial. They had small- to intermediate-sized (less than 3 cm), estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors and received no adjuvant therapy after modified radical mastectomy or total mastectomy with low axillary-node sampling. The median follow-up was 4.8 years. RESULTS: Assessable ploidy results were obtained from 92% of the 298 specimens studied (51% diploid, 49% aneuploid), and SPFs were assessable for 83% of the tumors. SPFs for diploid tumors ranged from 0.7% to 11.9% (median, 3.6%), compared with a range of 1.2% to 26.7% (median, 7.6%) for aneuploid tumors (P less than .0001). No significant differences in disease-free or overall survival were observed between patients with diploid and aneuploid tumors. Using different SPF cutoffs by ploidy status (4.4% for diploid, 7.0% for aneuploid), patients with low SPFs had significantly longer disease-free survival rates than patients with high SPFs (P = .0008). The actuarial 5-year relapse rates were 15% and 32% for patients with low (n = 142) and high SPFs (n = 105), respectively. Similar relationships between SPF and clinical outcome were observed for patients with diploid tumors (P = .053) and for patients with aneuploid tumors (P = .0012). CONCLUSION: S-phase fraction provides additional prognostic information for predicting disease-free survival for axillary node-negative breast cancer patients with small, ER-positive tumors.
PURPOSE: Amplification and/or overexpression of the HER-2/neu oncogene have been shown to correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer. In contrast, the prognostic significance of HER-2/neu in node-negative disease is controversial. This study was undertaken to evaluate further the relationship between HER-2/neu and clinical outcome in node-negative disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overexpression of HER-2/neu was evaluated by permanent-section immunohistochemistry in tumors from 613 patients with long-term clinical follow-up enrolled in the Intergroup Study 0011. Patients were stratified into low-risk (n = 307) and high-risk (n = 306) groups on the basis of tumor size and estrogen-receptor (ER) status. Low-risk patients were defined as having small (less than 3 cm), ER-positive tumors and were observed without additional treatment after initial surgery. High-risk patients had either ER-negative or large (greater than or equal to 3 cm), ER-positive tumors and were randomized to be observed (n = 146) or to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 160) after surgery. RESULTS: The rate of HER-2/neu overexpression was 14.3% in all tumors combined and was higher in invasive carcinomas with (21.5%) than without (11.2%) a significant noninvasive or in situ histologic component (P less than .0001). There was no relationship between overexpression and clinical outcome in the natural history setting of combined low-risk and high-risk patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (n = 453). Based on the reasoning that the influence of HER-2/neu may have been obscured by high-risk features and/or the presence of noninvasive carcinoma, we also analyzed the subset of patients with low-risk lesions not containing a significant in situ component (n = 179). Patients of this group with HER-2/neu-positive tumors showed only 40% disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years, compared with over 80% in patients with HER-2/neu-negative tumors (P less than .0001). A similar inverse correlation was observed between overexpression and overall survival in the same group of patients (P = .0001). In a separate analysis involving patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, those with HER-2/neu-negative tumors showed significantly improved DFS in response to therapy compared with patients with HER-2/neu-positive tumors. CONCLUSION: Overexpression of HER-2/neu is associated with poor clinical outcome in a subset of node-negative patients with small, ER-positive, predominantly invasive tumors and may play a role in resistance to adjuvant chemotherapy.
An ancillary study (INT 0076) to the Intergroup clinical trial of node-negative breast cancer patients (INT 0011) was performed to retrospectively evaluate DNA flow cytometry measurements of ploidy (DNA content) and proliferative capacity (S-phase fraction) for their ability to predict time to recurrence. Of the 915 patients eligible for the clinical trial, 788 were registered for the ancillary flow cytometry study (INT 0076). Four hundred and three of these patients [estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, tumor size less than 3 cm] had been registered to the observation arm of the clinical trial and 385 (ER-negative and/or tumor size greater than or equal to 3 cm) had been randomly assigned to adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and prednisone for six cycles) or to observation. Paraffin blocks from 95% (748 of 788) of these patients were obtained, 712 of which had sufficient cancer tissue to be evaluable for the flow cytometric assay. DNA ploidy status (DNA diploid vs DNA aneuploid) was evaluable for 565 (79%) specimens, 64% of which were aneuploid. Proliferative capacity was estimated by the percentage of cells having an S-phase DNA content, using a trapezoidal modeling algorithm(s) as previously described. The median S-phase value for the entire group (both registered and randomly assigned patients) was 6.97%, which defined the cutoff for interpretation of high or low S-phase values. With a median follow-up time of 4.55 years, S-phase fraction, but not ploidy status, is a significant predictor for time to recurrence in both the randomly assigned and the untreated population (observed registered group and observed randomly assigned group).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Postoperative women with breast cancer but without histopathological evidence of metastases to the axillary lymph nodes or clinical evidence of metastases were studied. Six hundred fifty-five "good-risk" patients who were estrogen receptor positive (ER+) with primary tumors less than 3 cm were registered for observation. Twenty-four of these patients were treated with chemotherapy. Five hundred thirty-six "poor-risk" patients who were either ER+ with primary tumors greater than or equal to 3 cm or estrogen receptor negative (ER-) with any primary tumor size were randomly assigned between chemotherapy and observation. Randomization was stratified by type of surgical procedure, number of lymph nodes examined, menopausal status, tumor size, and ER status. The chemotherapy (CMFP) consisted of six 4-week cycles of cyclophosphamide, 100 mg/m2 orally days 1-14; methotrexate, 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8; fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8; and prednisone, 40 mg/m2 orally days 1-14. Treatment arms in the randomly assigned patients were balanced with respect to pretreatment characteristics. This analysis includes 445 eligible patients entered in the registration arm and 425 eligible patients entered into the randomized treatments. The median follow-up is 4.5 years in the randomly assigned cohort and 4.8 years in the registered cohort. The overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) among the randomly assigned patients was 83% with CMFP and 61% with observation (P less than .0001). A DFS treatment benefit was observed in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients as well as in patients with ER+ or ER- tumors. There were fewer local-regional and distant relapses among the CMFP-treated patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (CI 5-FU) and the combination of cisplatin (CDDP) plus etoposide (VP-16) have emerged as salvage regimens for metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC). In this study, 18 patients (15 with MBC) were entered into a Phase I study to determine the maximum intermittent doses of CDDP and VP-16 that could be added to 200 mg/m2/d CI 5-FU. The maximum tolerated dose of the combination was 40 mg/m2 of CDDP and 60 mg/m2 of VP-16 weekly for the first 8 weeks and every other week thereafter. The dose-limiting toxicities of the regimen were myelosuppression and thrombocytopenia. Two complete responses (both patients had received no previous chemotherapy) and one partial response were noticed. This regimen at the doses described here is appropriate for Phase II trials as an alternative to doxorubicin-based regimens for MBC.
Tamoxifen is used to treat selected patients at each stage of breast cancer. Although most clinical experience has been obtained with postmenopausal women, increasing numbers of premenopausal women will be treated with 5 or more years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy following surgery. Indeed, the proposed use of tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer in high-risk women could result in its extended use during the childbearing years. We have monitored the changes in circulating hormone levels from the ovary and pituitary gland in premenopausal (41-47 years old) women with stage I or II breast cancer during adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen as the single agent for 4-72 months following a mastectomy. Each patient (total eight) continued to menstruate, and ovulation occurred. Circulating levels of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone (except in one woman) remained in the normal range (determined in 12 regularly menstruating women in a control group). The levels of estradiol, estrone, and progesterone were elevated onefold to threefold. Prolactin levels decreased by 30%-40%, but the levels of sex hormone binding-globulin were unaffected. These data demonstrate that premenopausal women taking tamoxifen are potentially at risk for pregnancy and must be counseled about barrier contraception. Furthermore, the impact of many years of ovarian stimulation by tamoxifen must be evaluated, especially in women with node-negative disease or in healthy women in whom tamoxifen is used to prevent breast cancer.
The execution of cancer clinical therapy trials has evolved over the past 45 years and is centered in the Clinical Oncology Group mechanism. The organization, statistical and administrative support, protocol development, and quality control systems have been worked out well and can be described in detail through the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Prevention trials, on the other hand, are larger and fewer and take longer to complete. They involve people who are healthy or not as motivated to take pills or change lifestyle habits as those who are ill. The problems of compliance, toxicity, and costs become major issues. The practice of medicine is organized to take care of sick people and not healthy volunteers. We describe potential roles for Clinical Oncology Groups. These include preliminary tests of prevention agents for safety and toxicity much like Phase 1 trials with cytotoxic agents. A second important possible involvement would be to provide patients at high risk for developing second cancers, treatment- or non-treatment-induced, for prevention trials. A third set of individuals that can be recruited through current group resources are relatives of cancer patients who themselves might be highly motivated to participate in prevention trials. While the Clinical Oncology Groups may not have primary roles in prevention trials, they do represent a resource that has trial discipline and willingness and could facilitate the research efforts in chemoprevention.
Long-term survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated on two prospective stratified randomised trials has been analysed. Patients on study B122 received either cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CAF). On study B141 patients received CAF or mitolactol (dibromodulcitol), doxorubicin and vincristine alternating after every three cycles with three cycles of CMF (DAV/CMF). Long-term follow-up of 172 patients showed no significant survival difference (in multivariate regression models) for treatment with either CMF vs. CAF or CAF vs. DAV/CMF. The difference in median survival times between CMF and CAF showed a trend in favour of CAF. Advances in the management of metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women obtained by doxorubicin regimens have had a small but measurable impact on survival, but known patient discriminants were not overridden by the treatment regimens investigated in these studies.