Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D C Simonson

Publications and source records attributed to D C Simonson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Body fat distribution and insulin resistance in healthy Asian Indians and Caucasians.

Previous studies have shown that Asian Indians (AIs) are insulin resistant and at high risk for developing diabetes and coronary heart disease, compared with Caucasians. To examine whether differences in body fat distribution contribute to this risk, 12 healthy AIs and 12 Caucasians matched for age and body mass index (BMI) underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, 2-h euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, abdominal (L2-3) computed tomography scan, and fasting lipid and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels. Despite similar fasting plasma glucose levels, AIs exhibited fasting hyperinsulinemia (P = 0.001), higher glucose (P = 0.03) and insulin (P = 0.004) levels during the oral glucose tolerance test, and reduced glucose disposal rate (R(d)) (4.7 +/- 0.4 vs. 7.5 +/- 0.3 mg/kg per min, P < 0.0001) during the clamp. AIs had significantly lower high-density lipoprotein, higher low-density lipoprotein, and significantly higher PAI-1 levels (P = 0.01). Despite similar BMI, AIs had significantly greater total abdominal fat (P = 0.04) and visceral fat (P = 0.04). In all subjects, measures of fat mass were inversely correlated with R(d) during the clamp (r = -0.47 to -0.61, P < 0.01-0.001). Visceral fat mass was correlated with triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein (P < 0.002-0.0001). PAI-1 was inversely correlated with R(d) in AIs (r = -0.70, P < 0.01) and not in Caucasians (r = -0.24, P = 0.44). For comparable BMI and age, healthy AIs have physiologic markers for insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and increased cardiovascular risk, compared with Caucasians. Alterations in body fat distribution--particularly increased visceral fat--may contribute to these abnormalities.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed1999

The perception of safe driving ability during hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: Insulin-induced hypoglycemia and its sequelae of cognitive impairment may place patients with type 1 diabetes at risk when driving and when making decisions about driving. Little is known about the factors that influence judgments of safe driving ability during hypoglycemia in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty men and 30 women with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes (age [mean +/- SD] 33 +/- 9 years, duration 9 +/- 3 years, hemoglobin A1c level 8.7% +/- 1.0%) underwent a stepped hypoglycemic insulin clamp. Serum glucose levels were reduced from 120 mg/dL to 80, 70, 60, 50, and then 40 mg/dL during 190 minutes. At each glucose plateau, patients completed a symptom questionnaire and neuropsychological test, estimated their glucose level, and reported whether they could drive safely. RESULTS: The proportion of patients judging that they could drive safely decreased as serum glucose levels decreased from 70% at 120 mg/dL to 22% at 40 mg/dL. Men and middle-aged patients were more likely to consider it safe to drive during hypoglycemia than women and those under 25 years of age. Those who were symptomatic and those who recognized hypoglycemia were less likely to report safe driving ability during hypoglycemia. Most patients who were cognitively impaired appeared to recognize this and reported that they could not drive safely at a serum glucose level of 40 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with type 1 diabetes need educational reinforcement of safe driving habits, particularly to check glucose levels before driving. Glucose levels less than 70 mg/dL should be treated before driving. This information is as important for middle-aged, experienced drivers as it is for younger, inexperienced drivers.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Blood glucose awareness training and epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia during intensive treatment in type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of blood glucose awareness training (BGAT) on epinephrine and symptom responses to hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes enrolled in an intensive diabetes treatment (IDT) program. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 47 subjects with uncomplicated diabetes (duration 9 +/- 3 years: HbA1c 9.0 +/- 1.2%; reference range 4-6%) enrolled in a 4-month outpatient IDT program were randomized to classes in BGAT (n = 25) (BGAT group) or cholesterol awareness (n = 22) (control group). Subjects underwent stepped hypoglycemic clamp studies before and at completion of IDT. Plasma glucose was lowered from 6.7 mmol/l (baseline) to 4.4, 3.9, 3.3, 2.8, and 2.2 mmol/l over 190 min. Symptoms, counterregulatory hormones, and ability of the subject to estimate their glucose level were assessed at each plateau. At home, subjects used a handheld computer to first estimate and then measure and record blood glucose levels for 70 trials over a 4-week period immediately before IDT and again immediately following the educational intervention. RESULTS: HbA1c decreased in both BGAT group (9.1 +/- 1.4 to 7.9 +/- 1.1%; P < 0.001) and control group (9.0 +/- 1.1 to 7.8 +/- 0.8%; P < 0.001) (NS between groups). Frequency of hypoglycemia (< 3.9 mmol/l) increased in both groups, from 0.45 +/- 0.06 to 0.69 +/- 0.07 episodes per day (P < 0.001) in the BGAT group and from 0.50 +/- 0.08 to 0.68 +/- 0.06 episodes per day (P < 0.05) in the control group NS between groups). Epinephrine responses after IDT were greater in the BGAT group (repeated measure analysis of variance [ANOVA], F = 3.5, P < 0.05). A separate analysis of subjects n = 26) most at risk for hypoglycemia (HbA1c after IDT < 7.8% or an HbA1c improvement of > 2 percentage points) showed that frequency of hypoglycemia increased in both the groups: from 0.50 +/- 0.09 to 0.80 +/- 0.11 episodes per day (P < 0.01) in the BGAT group (n = 14) and from 0.43 +/- 0.11 to 0.75 +/- 0.07 episodes per day (P < 0.05) in the control group (n = 12) (NS between groups). However, the epinephrine response in control subjects decreased with IDT while the response in the BGAT subjects was preserved (repeated measure ANOVA, F = 4.4, P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: BGAT is a useful intervention to decrease blunting of counterregulatory responses associated with improved glycemic control and may modify the severity of hypoglycemia associated with improved glycemic control in type 1 diabetes.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed1998

Health economic benefits and quality of life during improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.

CONTEXT: Although the long-term health benefits of good glycemic control in patients with diabetes are well documented, shorter-term quality of life (QOL) and economic savings generally have been reported to be minimal or absent. OBJECTIVE: To examine short-term outcomes of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel trial. SETTING: Sixty-two sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 569 male and female volunteers with type 2 DM. INTERVENTION: After a 3-week, single-blind placebo-washout period, participants were randomized to diet and titration with either 5 to 20 mg of glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) (n = 377) or placebo (n = 192) for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change from baseline in glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and symptom distress, QOL, and health economic indicators by questionnaires and diaries. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, mean (+/-SE) HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels decreased with active therapy (glipizide GITS) vs placebo (7.5% 0.1% vs 9.3%+/-0.1% and 7.0+/-0.1 mmol/L [126+/-2 mg/dL] vs 9.3+/-0.2 mmol/L [168+/-4 mg/ dL], respectively; P<.001). Quality-of-life treatment differences (SD units) for symptom distress (+0.59; P<.001), general perceived health (+0.36; P= .004), cognitive functioning (+0.34; P=.005), and the overall visual analog scale (VAS) (+0.24; P=.04) were significantly more favorable for active therapy. Subscales of acuity (+0.38; P=.002), VAS emotional health (+0.35; P=.003), general health (+0.27; P=.01), sleep (+0.26; P=.04), depression (+0.25; P=.05), disorientation and detachment (+0.23; P= .05), and vitality (+0.22; P=.04) were most affected. Favorable health economic outcomes for glipizide GITS included higher retained employment (97% vs 85%; P<.001), greater productive capacity (99% vs 87%; P<.001), less absenteeism (losses = $24 vs $115 per worker per month; P<.001), fewer bed-days (losses = $1539 vs $1843 per 1000 person-days; P=.05), and fewer restricted-activity days (losses = $2660 vs $4275 per 1000 person-days; P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: Improved glycemic control of type 2 DM is associated with substantial short-term symptomatic, QOL, and health economic benefits.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1998

Acute hyperglycemia attenuates endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humans in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial function is impaired in patients with diabetes mellitus. However, the factors contributing to this defect are currently unknown. Hyperglycemia attenuates endothelium-dependent relaxation in normal rabbit arteries in vitro and rat arterioles in vivo. Accordingly, this study examined the effect of acute hyperglycemia on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in nondiabetic humans in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed through brachial artery infusion of methacholine chloride both before and during 6 hours of local hyperglycemia (300 mg/dL) achieved by intra-arterial infusion of 50% dextrose. Forearm blood flow was determined by plethysmography. In a group of 10 subjects, there was a trend toward attenuated methacholine-mediated vasodilation during hyperglycemia compared with euglycemia (P=.07 by ANOVA; maximal response, 13.3+/-2.8 versus 14.7+/-1.5 mL x min(-1) x 100 mL(-1), respectively). In these subjects, the systemic serum insulin levels increased significantly during the dextrose infusion (P<.001). To eliminate the confounding vasoactive effects of insulin, the protocol was repeated during systemic infusion of octreotide (30 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1)) to inhibit pancreatic secretion of insulin. In these subjects (n=10), hyperglycemia significantly attenuated the forearm blood flow response to methacholine (P<.01 by ANOVA; maximal response, 16.9+/-2.5 before versus 12.7+/-1.8 mL x min(-1) x 100 mL(-1) during hyperglycemia). Methacholine-mediated vasodilation was not attenuated by an equimolar infusion of mannitol (P>.40), nor did hyperglycemia reduce endothelium-independent vasodilation to verapamil (P>.50). CONCLUSIONS: Acute hyperglycemia impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilation in healthy humans in vivo. This finding suggests that elevated glucose may contribute to the endothelial dysfunction observed in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Glucagon increases glutamine uptake without affecting glutamine release in humans.

Glucagon causes transient hyperglycemia and persistent hypoaminoacidemia, but the mechanisms of this action are unclear. To address this question, the present study measured the effects of glucagon on glucose, leucine, phenylalanine, and glutamine kinetics. Seven healthy subjects each underwent three pancreatic clamp studies (octreotide 30 ng/kg/min, insulin 0.15 mU/kg/min, and glucagon 1.4 ng/kg/min) lasting 7 hours. During the last 3.5 hours of the studies, glucagon infusion was either unchanged (study 0) or increased to 4 and 7 ng/kg/min (studies 1 and 2). The higher glucagon infusion rates increased the glucagon concentration by 50% and 100%, respectively. [6,6-(2)H2]glucose, [2-(15)N]glutamine, 2H5-phenylalanine, and 2H3-leucine were infused to quantify the respective fluxes. Glucagon transiently increased glucose concentrations by stimulating glucose production, which peaked in 15 minutes to 3.82 +/- 0.36 and 4.21 +/- 0.33 mg/kg/min in studies 1 and 2 and then returned to the postabsorptive levels. Glucagon decreased the glutamine concentration (-10% +/- 2% and -22% +/- 2% in studies 1 and 2 v study 0, P < .05), because glutamine uptake became greater than glutamine release (balance from -1.9 +/- 0.9 in study 0 to -8.1 +/- 1.1 and -13.6 +/- 1.0 micromol/kg/h in studies 1 and 2, P < .01). Glucagon decreased the leucine concentration (-11% +/- 3% in study 2 v study 0, P < .02) and caused a small increment in proteolysis (+6% in study 2 v study 0, P < .01) that was related to the decrement in glutamine concentrations. Phenylalanine kinetics were not significantly affected. These results show that glucagon promotes the uptake of gluconeogenic substrates but does not increase their release, suggesting that glucagon-induced hyperglycemia is short-lived because glucagon fails to provide more fuel for gluconeogenesis. The small increase in proteolysis and the depletion of circulating glutamine prove that physiologic hyperglucagonemia can contribute to protein catabolism.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Recurrent hypoglycemia does not impair the cortisol response to adrenocorticotropin infusion in healthy humans.

Previous studies have shown that hypoglycemia may reduce counterregulatory responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in healthy subjects and in patients with diabetes. The effect of hypoglycemia on the hormonal response to a nonhypoglycemic stimulus is uncertain. To test the hypothesis that the cortisol response to corticotropin (ACTH) infusion is independent of antecedent hypoglycemia, 10 healthy subjects received a standard ACTH infusion (0.25 mg Cosyntropin [Organon, West Orange, NJ] intravenously over 240 minutes) at 8:00 AM on day 1 and day 3 and a hypoglycemic insulin clamp study (1 mU/kg/min) at 8:00 AM on day 2. During the hypoglycemic clamp, plasma glucose decreased from 5.0 mmol/L to 2.8 mmol/L for two periods of 120 minutes (mean glucose, 2.9 +/- 0.03 and 2.8 +/- 0.02 mmol/L, respectively) separated by a 60-minute interval of euglycemia (mean glucose, 4.7 +/- 0.01 mmol/L). Seven subjects also had paired control studies in random order during which a 330-minute euglycemic clamp (mean glucose, 5.0 +/- 0.11 mmol/L) instead of a hypoglycemic clamp was performed on day 2. Basal ACTH (4.6 +/- 0.7 v 2.6 +/- 0.4 pmol/L, P < .02) and basal cortisol (435 +/- 46 v 317 +/- 40 nmol/L, P < .02) both decreased from day 1 to day 3 following intervening hypoglycemia. In contrast, with intervening euglycemia, neither basal ACTH (5.9 +/- 1.5 v 4.5 +/- 1.0 pmol/L) nor basal cortisol (340 +/- 38 v 318 +/- 60 nmol/L) were reduced significantly on day 3 compared with day 1. Following interval hypoglycemia, the area under the curve (AUC) for the cortisol response to successive ACTH infusions was increased (4,734 +/- 428 nmol/L over 240 minutes [day 3] v 3,526 +/- 434 nmol/L over 240 minutes [day 1], P < .01). The maximum incremental cortisol response was also significantly increased (805 +/- 63 nmol/L (day 3) v 583 +/- 58 nmol/L (day 1), P < .05). In contrast, the AUC for the cortisol response to successive ACTH infusions with interval euglycemia (3,402 +/- 345 nmol/L over 240 minutes [day 3] v 3,709 +/- 391 nmol/L over 240 minutes [day 1] and the incremental cortisol response (702 +/- 62 nmol/L [day 3] v 592 +/- 85 nmol/L [day 1] were unchanged. Following exposure to intermittent hypoglycemia in healthy humans, fasting morning ACTH and cortisol levels are reduced and the incremental cortisol response to an infusion of ACTH is enhanced. The enhanced cortisol response to exogenous ACTH infusion after intervening hypoglycemia (but not intervening euglycemia) may reflect priming of the adrenal gland by endogenous ACTH produced during the hypoglycemia. These data suggest that adrenal function testing by exogenous ACTH administration is not impaired by prior exposure to hypoglycemia. Moreover, the reduced cortisol response to recurrent hypoglycemia in patients with well-controlled diabetes is not likely the result of impaired adrenal responsiveness.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed1998

Quality of life and calcium channel blockade with nifedipine GITS versus amlodipine in hypertensive patients in Spain. Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System.

OBJECTIVE: Compliance with hypertension treatment is affected by treatment-related factors (complexity, side effects), efficacy and compound-specific effects that impact on quality of life. This study examined the differences in quality of life produced by two once-daily calcium channel blockers using different delivery systems: nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and amlodipine. DESIGN: This was a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized clinical trial comparing nifedipine GITS (30 mg) and amlodipine (5 mg) for 24 weeks following a placebo run-in. Clinical, laboratory evaluations and quality-of-life data were assessed at screening, baseline randomization and three times during active therapy. SETTING: The study was conducted in 13 medical clinics in Spain. PATIENTS: The sample comprised 430 screened and 356 randomized patients with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 95-114 mmHg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and in health-related quality of life were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between active treatment groups in the blood pressure changes (systolic blood pressure: nifedipine GITS -15.5 mmHg; amlodipine -15.7 mmHg). Spontaneous adverse events consistent with calcium channel blockage were not different. The nifedipine GITS group improved in all quality-of-life measures except Sexual Symptom Distress and showed a significantly greater improvement than amlodipine in overall Quality of Life (P< 0.05), General Perceived Health (P < 0.026) and its subscale Vitality (P < 0.019). The amlodipine group declined in overall Quality of Life, General Perceived Health, Vitality and Sleep Disturbance, and significantly in Sexual Symptom Distress (P < 0.045). However, this group improved in self-reported Cognitive Functioning (P=0.036), Mental Acuity (P < 0.005) and Detachment/disorientation (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest compound-specific effects on quality of life that may be due to differences in the delivery system. Nifedipine GITS is short-acting (2 h half-life) and is delivered continuously over a 24 h period, while amlodipine has a half-life of 40 h, which may produce more sustained low-level effects. While a more beneficial profile was observed for nifedipine, amlodipine demonstrated potential positive effects on cognitive functioning.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Advantages of alpha-glucosidase inhibition as monotherapy in elderly type 2 diabetic patients.

The objective of this study was to determine the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol vs. the sulfonylurea glyburide in the treatment of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, inadequately controlled by diet alone. This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 1-yr trial of miglitol 25 mg TID and 50 mg TID compared with placebo and a titrated dose of glyburide in a parallel group comparison study conducted in 30 out-patient sites across the United States. Four hundred eleven (411) diet-treated patients age 60 yr or greater were randomized to receive either placebo TID (n = 101), miglitol 25 mg TID (n = 104), miglitol 50 mg TID (n = 102), or a once-daily dose of glyburide titrated based on fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (n = 104), for a period of 56 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting and post-meal glucose, insulin, and lipid levels, and by 24-h urinary excretion of glucose and albumin. Safety and tolerability were assessed by tabulation of adverse events, periodic laboratory determinations, and home blood glucose monitoring. HbA1c treatment effects (placebo-subtracted change in HbA1c from baseline) at the 1-yr endpoint were -0.49%, -0.40%, and -0.92% in the miglitol 25 mg TID, miglitol 50 mg TID, and glyburide groups, respectively (P < 0.05- 0.01 vs. placebo). Postprandial insulin levels were significantly greater than placebo and miglitol in the glyburide group (P < 0.01). Hypoglycemia, weight gain, and both routine and serious cardiovascular events were more frequent in the glyburide group (P < 0.05-0.01 vs. placebo or miglitol groups). Diarrhea (or soft stools) and flatulence were more common in both miglitol groups than in the other two groups in a dose-dependent manner, but resulted in relatively few study dropouts. Treatment with miglitol offers the elderly type 2 diabetic patient significant reductions in daylong glycemia as measured by HbA1c. The greater HbA1c reductions seen with once-a-day glyburide occurred at a cost of significant increases in weight, insulin levels, and the incidences of clinical and subclinical hypoglycemia, which did not occur in the miglitol groups. alpha-glucosidase inhibitors are a useful and relatively safe therapeutic option in the elderly patient with type 2 diabetes.

1-Deoxynojirimycin↗
PubMed1998

Valuing quality of life and improvements in glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes.

Outcomes research is used increasingly for assessing the health economic benefits of new therapeutic programs and interventions. The measurement properties of the outcomes assessment tools are important. If overlooked, they can mislead health care administrators and caregivers regarding the importance and value of these programs and interventions. We reviewed the literature and conducted two analyses to determine the absolute, relative, and operative quality-of-life ranges for people with type 2 diabetes. Quality of life and fasting blood glucose and HbA1c concentrations were measured at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment in 569 men and women randomized to either glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) or placebo in a double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. A subgroup of 290 patients completed a diabetes-specific health states questionnaire at endpoint (week 12 or early termination) rating 10 health-state descriptions on a health thermometer scale ranging from 0 (death) to 100 (full health). Health losses at the higher end of the scale had a greater negative utility than did comparable losses at lower health states, indicating patients' strong preferences for maintaining asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic conditions. Patients rated their current health state at 83.4 +/- 0.8% of full health and indicated that a loss of 27 points below this value would prevent them from living and working as they currently do. The calibration analysis applied to the quality-of-life scales suggested that the targeted range for clinical investigation and quality-of-care evaluation must be more narrowly focused. Effect sizes as seemingly small as 2% (0.25 responsiveness units) on the absolute scale can correspond to quality-of-life losses of 15-20% on the personal operative scale. Differences in glycemic control clearly affected quality of life. Those patients with the best HbA1c responses (decreasing 1.5% or more from baseline) versus those with the worst responses (increasing 1.5% or more from baseline) were separated by 0.6 responsiveness units for the overall quality-of-life summary measure. The calibration analysis suggested that this degree of better glycemic control provides a nearly 50% gain in quality of life according to personal expectations within the operative range. In conclusion, general measures of quality of life may be too crude and insensitive to capture the important gains in health outcomes due to new therapeutic interventions and programs in diabetes. Quality-of-care evaluations for diabetes are at risk of favoring inferior programs with lower costs simply because gains or losses in health outcomes go undetected.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Effect of glycemic control on glucose counterregulation during hypoglycemia in NIDDM.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of glycemic control of NIDDM on counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia and compared the effect with that seen in patients with IDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven subjects with NIDDM and eight age- and weight-matched control subjects and ten subjects with IDDM and ten age- and weight-matched control subjects were studied. All subjects underwent a stepped hypoglycemic-hyper-insulinemic clamp study during which plasma glucose levels were lowered in a stepwise manner from 5.0 to 2.2 mmol/l in steps of 0.6 mmol/l every 30 min. Counterregulatory hormones (epinephrine, norepinephrine, glucagon, ACTH, cortisol, and growth hormone [GH]) were measured, and a symptom survey was administered during the last 10 min of each 30-min interval. RESULTS: The threshold for release of epinephrine, norepinephrine, ACTH, and cortisol occurred at higher plasma glucose levels in NIDDM than in IDDM patients (P < 0.05-0.01). The glucose threshold for release of epinephrine and norepinephrine correlated with glycemic control as measured by glycosylated hemoglobin (P < 0.05-0.01). However, for a given level of glycemic control, the threshold for release of epinephrine and norepinephrine occurred at a higher glucose level in NIDDM versus IDDM patients (P < 0.05-0.01). At the nadir level of hypoglycemia, glucagon, ACTH, and cortisol levels were all higher in NIDDM compared with IDDM subjects, whereas GH levels were lower. CONCLUSIONS: Glycemic control alters counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in NIDDM as has been previously reported in IDDM. However, at similar levels of glycemic control, NIDDM patients release counterregulatory hormones at a higher plasma glucose level than patients with IDDM. In addition, subjects with NIDDM maintain their glucagon response to hypoglycemia. These data suggest that patients with NIDDM may be at reduced risk of severe hypoglycemia when compared with a group of IDDM patients in similar glycemic control, thus providing a more favorable risk-benefit ratio for intensive diabetes therapy in NIDDM.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed1997

Studies on the mass action effect of glucose in NIDDM and IDDM: evidence for glucose resistance.

UNLABELLED: The ability of hyperglycaemia to enhance glucose uptake was evaluated in 9 non-insulin-dependent (NIDDM), 7 insulin-dependent (IDDM) diabetic subjects, and in 6 young and 9 older normal volunteers. Following overnight insulin-induced euglycaemia, a sequential three-step hyperglycaemic clamp (+ 2.8 + 5.6, and + 11.2 mmol/l above baseline) was performed with somatostatin plus replacing doses of basal insulin and glucagon, 3-3H-glucose infusion and indirect calorimetry. In the control subjects as a whole, glucose disposal increased at each hyperglycaemic step (13.1 +/- 0.6, 15.7 +/- 0.7, and 26.3 +/- 1.1 mumol/kg.min). In NIDDM (10.5 +/- 0.2, 12.1 +/- 1.0, and 17.5 +/- 1.1 mumol/kg.min), and IDDM (11.2 +/- 0.8, 12.9 +/- 1.0, and 15.6 +/- 1.1 mumol/kg.min) glucose disposal was lower during all three steps (p < 0.05-0.005). Hepatic glucose production declined proportionally to plasma glucose concentration to a similar extent in all four groups of patients. In control subjects, hyperglycaemia stimulated glucose oxidation (+4.4 +/- 0.7 mumol/kg.min) only at +11.2 mmol/l (p < 0.05), while non-oxidative glucose metabolism increased at each hyperglycaemic step (+3.1 +/- 0.7; +3.5 +/- 0.9, and +10.8 +/- 1.7 mumol/kg.min; all p < 0.05). In diabetic patients, no increment in glucose oxidation was elicited even at the highest hyperglycaemic plateau (IDDM = +0.5 +/- 1.5; NIDDM = +0.2 +/- 0.6 mumol/kg.min) and non-oxidative glucose metabolism was hampered (IDDM = +1.8 +/- 1.5, +3.1 +/- 1.7, and +4.3 +/- 1.8; NIDDM = +0.7 +/- 0.6, 2.1 +/- 0.9, and +7.0 +/- 0.8 mumol/kg.min; p < 0.05-0.005). Blood lactate concentration increased and plasma non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) fell in control (p < 0.05) but not in diabetic subjects. The increments in blood lactate were correlated with the increase in non-oxidative glucose disposal and with the decrease in plasma NEFA. IN CONCLUSION: 1) the ability of hyperglycaemia to promote glucose disposal is impaired in NIDDM and IDDM; 2) stimulation of glucose oxidation and non-oxidative glucose metabolism accounts for glucose disposal; 3) both pathways of glucose metabolism are impaired in diabetic patients; 4) impaired ability of hyperglycaemia to suppress plasma NEFA is present in these patients. These results suggest that glucose resistance, that is the ability of glucose itself to promote glucose utilization, is impaired in both IDDM and NIDDM patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Efficacy, safety, and dose-response characteristics of glipizide gastrointestinal therapeutic system on glycemic control and insulin secretion in NIDDM. Results of two multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. The Glipizide Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, safety, and dose-response characteristics of an extended-release preparation of glipizide using the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) on plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and insulin secretion to a liquid-mixed meal in NIDDM patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trials were performed in 22 sites and 347 patients with NIDDM (aged 59 +/- 0.6 years; BMI, 29 +/- 0.3 kg/m2; known diabetes duration, 8 +/- 0.4 years) were studied. Each clinical trial had a duration of 16 weeks with a 1-week washout, 3-week single-blind placebo phase, 4-week titration to a fixed dose, and 8-week maintenance phase at the assigned dose. In the first trial, once-daily doses of 5, 20, 40, or 60 mg glipizide GITS were compared with placebo in 143 patients. In the second trial, doses of 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg of glipizide GITS were compared with placebo in 204 patients. HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin, C-peptide, and glipizide levels were determined at regular intervals throughout the study. Postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), insulin, and C-peptide also were determined at 1 and 2 h after a mixed meal (Sustacal). RESULTS: All doses of glipizide GITS in both trials produced significant reductions from placebo in FPG (range -57 to -74 mg/dl) and HbA1c (range -1.50 to -1.82%). Pharmacodynamic analysis indicated a significant relationship between plasma glipizide concentration and reduction in FPG and HbA1c over a dose range of 5-60 mg, with maximal efficacy achieved at a dose of 20 mg for FPG and at 5 mg for HbA1c. PPG levels were significantly lower, and both postprandial insulin and C-peptide levels significantly higher in patients treated with glipizide GITS compared with placebo. The percent reduction in FPG was comparable across patients with diverse demographic and clinical characteristics, including those with entry FPG > or = 250 mg/dl, resulting in greater absolute decreases in FPG and HbA1c in patients with the most severe hyperglycemia. Despite the forced titration to a randomly assigned dose, only 11 patients in both studies discontinued therapy because of hypoglycemia. Glipizide GITS did not alter lipids levels or produce weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: The once-daily glipizide GITS 1) lowered HbA1c, FPG, and PPG over a dose range of 5-60 mg, 2) was maximally effective at 5 mg (using HbA1c) or 20 mg (using FPG) based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships, 3) maintained its effectiveness in poorly controlled patients (those with entry FPG > or = 250 mg/dl), 4) was safe and well tolerated in a wide variety of patients with NIDDM, and 5) did not produce weight gain or adversely affect lipids.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Prolactin and beta-endorphin responses to hypoglycemia are reduced in well-controlled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Several pituitary hormones, including corticotropin (ACTH), growth hormone (GH), prolactin, and beta-endorphin (but not thyrotropin, follicle-stimulating hormone, or luteinizing hormone), are released in response to hypoglycemia in normal subjects. In patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), the degree of glycemic control is known to alter ACTH and GH responses to hypoglycemia. The current study was performed to examine the effect of glycemic control on prolactin and beta-endorphin responses to hypoglycemia in subjects with IDDM. We performed 3-hour stopped hypoglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp studies (12 pmol/kg/min) during which plasma glucose was decreased from 5.0 mmol/L to 2.2 mmol/L in steps of 0.6 mmol/L every 30 minutes in 20 subjects with uncomplicated IDDM (12 males and eight females; age, 26 +/- 2 years; IDDM duration, 10 +/- 1 years; body mass index, 23.6 +/- 0.6 kg/m2) and 10 healthy subjects (five males and five females aged 30 +/- 1 years). The 10 diabetic subjects in good glycemic control (mean hemoglobin A1 [HbA1], 7.5% +/- 0.3%; normal range, 5.4% to 7.4%) were compared with the 10 poorly controlled patients (mean HbA1, 12.6% +/- 0.5%; P < .001 v well-controlled diabetic group). During hypoglycemia, prolactin levels in the well-controlled diabetic group did not change (7 +/- 1 microgram/L at plasma glucose 5.0 mmol/L to 9 +/- 2 micrograms/L at plasma glucose 2.2 mmol/L), whereas prolactin levels increased markedly in the poorly controlled diabetic group (7 +/- 2 micrograms/L to 44 +/- 17 micrograms/L) and healthy volunteers (12 +/- 2 micrograms/L to 60 +/- 19 micrograms/L, P < .05 between IDDM groups). The plasma glucose threshold required for stimulation of prolactin secretion was 2.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/L in well-controlled IDDM, 3.0 +/- 0.4 mmol/L in poorly controlled IDDM, and 2.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/L in healthy subjects (P < .05 between IDDM groups). Responses in males and females were similar. The increase in beta-endorphin levels was also attenuated in well-controlled IDDM patients (4 +/- 1 pmol/L at plasma glucose 5.0 mmol/L to 11 +/- 4 pmol/L at plasma glucose 2.2 mmol/L) versus poorly controlled IDDM patients (5 +/- 1 pmol/L to 26 +/- 7 pmol/L) and healthy subjects (8 +/- 1 pmol/L to 56 +/- 13 pmol/L). The plasma glucose threshold required for stimulation of beta-endorphin release was again lower in well-controlled IDDM versus poorly controlled IDDM patients (2.2 +/- 0.1 v 3.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/L) and healthy subjects (2.5 +/- 0.4 mmol/L, P < .05 between IDDM groups). In conclusion, prolactin and beta-endorphin responses to a standardized hypoglycemic stimulus (plasma glucose, 2.2 mmol/L) are reduced and plasma glucose levels required to stimulate release of prolactin and beta-endorphin are lower in well-controlled IDDM compared with poorly controlled IDDM and healthy subjects. Thus, stress hormones not previously considered to have a primary role in plasma glucose recovery from hypoglycemia are affected by glycemic control, suggesting a more generalized alteration of hypothalamic-pituitary responses to hypoglycemia in IDDM patients with strict glycemic control.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Evidence for a hypothalamic-pituitary versus adrenal cortical effect of glycemic control on counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

The epinephrine and cortisol responses to hypoglycemia are reduced in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients in strict glycemic control. However, it is not known whether these abnormalities are mediated at a central (hypothalamic-pituitary) or peripheral (adrenal) level. To examine this question, we measured counterregulatory hormone secretion during a 3-h hypoglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (12 pmol/kg.min) that lowered glucose from 5.0 to 2.2 mmol/L in steps of 0.55 mmol/L every 30 min in 13 well controlled IDDM subjects (hemoglobin A1, 7.8 +/- 0.2%), 14 poorly controlled IDDM subjects (hemoglobin A1, 12.3 +/- 1.5%), and 20 healthy volunteers. Basal levels of ACTH, cortisol, and epinephrine were similar in all 3 groups before hypoglycemia. At the nadir glucose level (2.2 mmol/L), ACTH, cortisol, and epinephrine levels were significantly lower in well controlled IDDM compared to healthy controls, and the glucose levels required for significant secretion of ACTH, cortisol, and epinephrine also were lower in well controlled IDDM compared to those in both poorly controlled IDDM and healthy volunteers (P < 0.05). During hypoglycemia, ACTH levels were significantly correlated with cortisol levels (r = 0.43; P < 0.05). Because adrenomedullary epinephrine synthesis is partially dependent on adequate adrenocortical function, we also determined whether the blunted epinephrine response might result from the reduced cortisol secretion. Eleven of the control subjects underwent a second identical insulin clamp study during which metyrapone was administered to produce adrenal cortical blockade. Despite higher basal ACTH levels after metyrapone and sustained elevations in ACTH during hypoglycemia, the cortisol response was abolished during metyrapone treatment, indicating effective blockade. However, epinephrine responses did not differ during hypoglycemia with or without metyrapone treatment. We conclude that 1) ACTH, cortisol, and epinephrine responses during hypoglycemia are reduced in IDDM patients in strict glycemic control; 2) the lower cortisol response is correlated with reduced ACTH levels; and 3) in healthy subjects, the cortisol response to hypoglycemia is abolished by adrenocortical blockade with metyrapone, whereas the epinephrine response to hypoglycemia remains intact. These data suggest that central adaptations in hypothalamic-pituitary responses to hypoglycemia rather than alterations in adrenal gland function per se underlie the reduced counterregulatory responses seen in IDDM subjects in strict glycemic control.

Adrenal Cortex↗
PubMed1996

Retinal blood flow changes in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and no diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: The authors investigated retinal blood flow changes in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and no diabetic retinopathy compared to age-matched subjects without diabetes. They also investigated whether blood glucose levels could modulate retinal blood flow in these patients with diabetes and whether this modulation would impact retinal blood flow data used in cross-sectional studies assessing changes in retinal blood flow. METHODS: Retinal blood flow was measured using video fluorescein angiography, and blood glucose levels were manipulated using glucose clamp methodologies with continuous basal insulin replacement. Blood glucose levels were clamped at 100, 200, and 300 mg/dl. Retinal blood flow measurements were performed at each blood glucose level after subjects had been stabilized for an hour at each of the different blood glucose levels. RESULTS: Retinal blood flow was found to be significantly decreased (P< 0.01) in the group of patients with no diabetic retinopathy (19.4 +/- 4.6 arbitrary units [AU]) compared to retinal blood flow in subjects without diabetes (28.7 +/- 6.4 AU). During glucose clamp adjustment of blood glucose levels, it was found that as blood glucose levels were increased from euglycemia (100 mg/dl) to 200 mg/dl and to 300 mg/dl, retinal blood flow was significantly increased at the 200 mg/dl level (21.5 +/- 4.7 AU, P < 0.05) and at the 300 mg/dl level (25.9 +/- 8.8 AU, P <0.01) compared to the 100 mg/dl level (16.3 +/- 3.8 AU). In addition, the retinal blood flow at the 100 and 200 mg/dl levels was significantly reduced (P < 0.01) compared to nondiabetic retinal blood flow (28.7 +/- 6.4 AU). CONCLUSIONS: Retinal blood flow was found to be decreased in patients with IDDM with no diabetic retinopathy, and acute elevations in blood glucose levels resulted in increased retinal blood flow in these patients. The acute modulation of retinal blood flow by blood glucose levels should be considered in cross-sectional studies investigating retinal blood flow changes in patients with diabetes. The results from this study indicate that if blood glucose levels are not accounted for in the analyses, larger populations would have to be studied to demonstrate statistically significant differences between groups with and without diabetes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Blood glucose estimation and symptoms during hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: To investigate hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic symptoms, accuracy of estimating blood glucose, and their relation to glycemic control and counterregulatory hormone levels in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During randomly ordered stepped hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic insulin clamps on two separate days, 42 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus rated the intensity of 40 moods and symptoms when glucose was 8.9, 5.6 and 2.2 mmol/L, and 8.9, 14.4 and 21.1 mmol/L. The subjects were blinded to their actual glucose levels and asked to estimate them at each step. Epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol, growth hormone, and glucagon were measured at each glucose plateau. RESULTS: Cluster analysis yielded five symptom groups during hypoglycemia: autonomic symptoms, negative moods, positive moods, feeling weak/dizzy, and feeling relaxed. At 2.2 mmol/L, mean scores for all five symptom groups and 11 of 17 unclustered symptoms differed from those reported at the baseline glucose of 8.9 mmol/L (P < or = 0.05), but 34% of patients reported no awareness of autonomic symptoms. The intensity of autonomic symptoms correlated positively with HbA1 (r = .43, P < 0.01), epinephrine (r = .59, P < 0.001), norepinephrine (r = .45, P < 0.01) and cortisol (r = .62, P < 0.001), and negatively with glucose estimation error (r = -.45, P = 0.01). Six patients (15%) were unaware of both autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms during hypoglycemia. At 21.1 mmol/L, only 5 of 40 symptoms differed (P < 0.05) from baseline. Seventeen percent of subjects made potentially serious errors when estimating glucose at 2.2 mmol/L, and 66% at 21.1 mmol/L. Many patients experienced symptoms different from those they reported as their usual manifestations of changing glucose levels. CONCLUSIONS: Since the majority of patients made clinically serious errors in glucose estimation, and many used symptoms that did not discriminate hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, individualized training to increase awareness of glucose-related symptoms and glucose levels may help patients reduce the frequency or severity of hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic events.

Adult↗