Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D C Banks

Publications and source records attributed to D C Banks.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1991

A double blind comparative study of lisinopril and enalapril in patients with essential hypertension.

The efficacy and safety profiles of lisinopril (10-40 mg) and enalapril (5-20 mg) were compared in 169 hypertensive patients during 12 weeks' treatment in a randomised double-blind parallel group study. BP was measured hourly for the first 8 hours following the first dose of lisinopril 10 mg and enalapril 5 mg. The peak reduction in sitting systolic and diastolic BP occurred approximately 6 hours post dose in both groups. At 8 hours post dose lisinopril had reduced sitting systolic and diastolic BP by 2.9 mmHg and 3.5 mmHg (P = 0.02) respectively, more than enalapril with similar results for standing BP. One patient on enalapril developed first dose postural hypotension. After 12 weeks' therapy lisinopril produced a greater decrease (P less than 0.05) in BP than enalapril. Sitting BP decreased by 25/15 mmHg on lisinopril and 17/12 mmHg with enalapril. Standing BP decreased by 24/14 mmHg compared with 16/10 mmHg on enalapril. Eighteen patients did not complete the study, 8 on lisinopril (6 adverse events, 1 uncontrolled BP, 1 protocol violator) and 10 on enalapril (8 adverse events, 1 uncontrolled BP, 1 protocol violator). Overall, the results indicated that while both drugs are well tolerated, the dose range of lisinopril 10-40 mg may produce a greater antihypertensive effect than enalapril 5-20 mg.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

Trial of early nifedipine in acute myocardial infarction: the Trent study.

Over 30 months 9292 consecutive patients admitted to nine coronary care units with suspected myocardial infarction were considered for admission to a randomised double blind study comparing the effect on mortality of nifedipine 10 mg four times a day with that of placebo. Among the 4801 patients excluded from the study the overall one month fatality rate was 18.2% and the one month fatality rate in those with definite myocardial infarction 26.8%. A total of 4491 patients fulfilled the entry criteria and were randomly allocated to nifedipine or placebo immediately after assessment in the coronary care unit. Roughly 64% of patients in both treatment groups sustained an acute myocardial infarction. The overall one month fatality rates were 6.3% in the placebo treated group and 6.7% in the nifedipine treated group. Most of the deaths occurred in patients with an in hospital diagnosis of myocardial infarction, and their one month fatality rates were 9.3% for the placebo group and 10.2% for the nifedipine group. These differences were not statistically significant. Subgroup analysis also did not suggest any particular group of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction who might benefit from early nifedipine treatment in the dose studied.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1979

Effect of beta-blockers on arrhythmias during six weeks after suspected myocardial infarction.

Twenty-four-hour electrocardiographic tape-recording was used to investigate the incidence of arrhythmias in patients with suspected myocardial infarction who were receiving either propranolol, atenolol, or placebo. Recordings begun within 24 hours after admission to a coronary care unit showed that 76% of patients eventually found to have had a myocardial infarction had ventricular arrhythmias of a type generally regarded as serious, whereas of patients in whom myocardial infarction was not substantiated, only 24% had such arrhythmias. At one and six weeks after admission the incidence of arrhythmias ranged from 25% to 33% irrespective of diagnosis. Of patients monitored at both one and six weeks, however, only 5% had arrhythmias on each occasion. Patients treated with propranolol and atenolol showed a similar incidence of arrhythmias to those taking placebo. There was no difference in the incidence or type of arrhythmias recorded between patients who died and those who were still alive at six weeks.These results confirm that "serious" ventricular arrythmias occur in most patients during the acute phase of myocardial infarction and suggest that they do not constitute an independent risk factor. Beta-blockers showed little evidence of useful antiarrhythmic action in the dosage used, but increasing the dosage in suspected myocardial infarction is not practicable because of the risk of hypotension. The findings raise grave doubts about the value of studying arrhythmias to assess drugs intended to reduce mortality from myocardial infarction.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1979

The effect of beta-adrenoceptor blockade on factors affecting exercise tolerance in normal man.

1 We have studied the effects of single oral doses of 80 mg propranolol and 100 mg metoprolol on the cardiovascular and respiratory responses to progressive exercise in nine healthy men in double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment. As judged by their effects on exercise heart rate and cardiac output the doses of the two drugs used were equivalent. 2 Beta-adrenoceptor blockade reduced oxygen consumption by 3.5% over the whole work range with an increase in the respiratory exchange ratio of 0.056 units. Carbon dioxide production and exercise ventilation were unchanged. The two drugs had similar effects. Possible mechanisms for these observations are discussed. 3 Perceived exertion during exercise was increased by both the beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs and this may be of relevance to the symptom of fatigue reported by patients on these drugs. Endurance, assessed as either total work done or maximal work achieved, was reduced by 15%.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗