Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D B Mark

Publications and source records attributed to D B Mark.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Economic assessment of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition for prevention of ischemic complications of high-risk coronary angioplasty. EPIC Investigators.

BACKGROUND: In the EPIC trial, c7E3 Fab, an antiplatelet IIb/ IIIa receptor antibody, reduced 30-day ischemic end points after high-risk coronary angioplasty by 35% and 6-month ischemic events by 23% but increased in-hospital bleeding episodes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 2099 patients randomized in EPIC, data were collected on 2038 (97%) for prospective hospital cost and major resources. Physician fees were estimated from the Medicare Fee Schedule. Regression analysis was used to examine the economic tradeoff between reduced ischemic events and increased major bleeding during the initial hospitalization. A potential cost savings of $622 per patient during the initial hospitalization from reduced acute ischemic events with c7E3 Fab was offset by an equivalent rise ($521) in costs as the result of an increase in bleeding episodes. Baseline medical costs for the bolus and infusion c7E3 Fab arm averaged $13,577 (exclusive of drug cost) compared with $13,434 for placebo (P = .42). During the 6-month follow-up, c7E3 Fab decreased repeat hospitalization rates by 23% (P = .004) and repeat revascularization by 22% (P = .04), producing a mean $1270 savings per patient (exclusive of drug cost) (P = .018). With a cost of $1407 for the bolus and infusion c7E3 Fab regimen, the cumulative net 6-month cost to switch from standard care to routine c7E3 Fab averaged $293 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk coronary angioplasty, aggressive platelet inhibition with c7E3 Fab, by significantly reducing ischemic events and repeat revascularization, recoups most of the cost of therapy and has the potential to pay for itself.

Abciximab↗
PubMed1996

Early discharge in the thrombolytic era: an analysis of criteria for uncomplicated infarction from the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to readdress the definition of uncomplicated myocardial infarction and to apply clinical criteria for early discharge of such patients in the thrombolytic era. BACKGROUND: Previous studies proposed early hospital discharge at day 7 to 10 after acute myocardial infarction. The potential for earlier discharge of patients with uncomplicated infarction after thrombolysis remains undemonstrated. METHODS: We defined "uncomplicated infarction" a priori as the absence of death, reinfarction, ischemia, stroke, shock, heart failure (Killip class > 1), bypass surgery, balloon pumping, emergency catheterization or cardioversion or defibrillation in the first 4 hospital days. We applied this definition to 41,021 patients in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial. We examined death at 30 days and 1 year and rates of in-hospital reinfarction, heart failure, recurrent ischemia, shock and stroke in the uncomplicated and complicated groups created by application of our definition. We also assessed lengths of hospital and cardiac care unit stay. RESULTS: Application of our clinical criteria yielded 23,497 (57.3%) patients in the uncomplicated group at day 4 with a very low risk of death and in-hospital complications: 30-day mortality 1%, reinfarction 1.7%, heart failure 2.6%, recurrent ischemia 6.7%, shock 0.4% and stroke 0.2%. One-year mortality was 3.6%. The median hospital stay was 9 days (7, 12 [25th, 75th percentiles, respectively]), and the median cardiac care unit stay 3 days (3, 5). CONCLUSIONS: Simple clinical characteristics can identify a very low risk post-myocardial infarction population by hospital day 4. Use of these criteria for early discharge planning could substantially reduce length of stay for patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Multivariable regression models are powerful tools that are used frequently in studies of clinical outcomes. These models can use a mixture of categorical and continuous variables and can handle partially observed (censored) responses. However, uncritical application of modelling techniques can result in models that poorly fit the dataset at hand, or, even more likely, inaccurately predict outcomes on new subjects. One must know how to measure qualities of a model's fit in order to avoid poorly fitted or overfitted models. Measurement of predictive accuracy can be difficult for survival time data in the presence of censoring. We discuss an easily interpretable index of predictive discrimination as well as methods for assessing calibration of predicted survival probabilities. Both types of predictive accuracy should be unbiasedly validated using bootstrapping or cross-validation, before using predictions in a new data series. We discuss some of the hazards of poorly fitted and overfitted regression models and present one modelling strategy that avoids many of the problems discussed. The methods described are applicable to all regression models, but are particularly needed for binary, ordinal, and time-to-event outcomes. Methods are illustrated with a survival analysis in prostate cancer using Cox regression.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1996

Impact of an interactive video on decision making of patients with ischemic heart disease.

An experimental pilot study using repeated measures to examine the impact of an interactive video program on the decision making of patients with ischemic heart disease was carried on at a tertiary care center and a Veterans Affairs hospital. The patients (n = 80, mean age 61.1 years, 77% male, 75% white, 26.7% with acute myocardial infarction), who had undergone diagnostic cardiac catheterization and were found to have significant coronary artery disease (> or = 75% stenosis in at least one vessel), watched the Shared Decision-Making Program (SDP) for Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD), a novel interactive video system designed to provide information necessary for patients to participate actively in decision making. This program compares medical therapy, angioplasty, and bypass surgery through a physician narrator, patient testimonials, and empirically-based, patient-specific outcome estimates of short-time complications and long-term survival. Before and after viewing the SDP, patients completed surveys containing multiple choice questions and Likert scales. They rated the program as more helpful than all other decision aids except the physician, and after viewing the SDP they expressed increased confidence in their treatment choice and decreased confidence in alternative options (p = .0001). The greatest effects appeared to be concentrated in those patients with less education (p = .04), and the program appeared to increase anxiety in nonwhite patients compared with white patients (p = 0.07).

Decision Making↗
PubMed1996

Implications of cost in treatment selection for patients with coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND: The growth of managed care and other types of capitated payment systems for medical care has forced cost into the therapeutic equation. The benefits of treatment must now be balanced against their costs. Clinicians are being challenged to prove that what they do has sufficient "value." Particular targets for these challenges are surgeons and interventional cardiologists who, in aggregate, perform expensive high-volume procedures. METHODS: A cost analysis of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, and medical management of coronary artery disease has been undertaken using the Duke University database of 4,000 patients. The costs of the three procedures were compared at several fixed time points. RESULTS: The costs for the three treatments are critically dependent on the time points selected for comparison. At 60 days, the cost of the medical group was about one quarter the cost of the bypass group, whereas the cost of the angioplasty group was on average 60% of that of the surgical group. By 1 year, the costs in the angioplasty group reached 66% of those in the bypass group, but both remained far above the costs of medical therapy alone. There is a significant cost gradient for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty as the extent of the disease increases, which is not apparent for coronary artery bypass grafting. CONCLUSIONS: Medical costs arise in a complex manner, and their prediction is difficult. Unexpected events during or after the initial treatment are a major cause of increased costs, and complications often cannot be predicted. Patient-related factors have only a small effect on costs in comparison with the choice of treatment. High-risk, high-cost patients tend to get the most benefit.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1996

Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term survival benefits of bypass surgery and angioplasty versus medical therapy in 9263 patients at Duke University Medical Center between 1984 and 1990 with coronary artery disease confirmed by cardiac catheterization to involve one, two, or three vessels. Clinical data were prospectively entered into an established cardiovascular database, and annual follow-up was 97% complete for a mean interval of 5.3 years and a maximal interval of 10 years. Outcomes were analyzed with the Coronary Artery Surgery Study "method A" to define patient groups treated by medicine (n = 2449), angioplasty (n = 2924), or bypass surgery (n = 3890). Differences among treatment groups in baseline characteristics were adjusted by Cox proportional hazard models. The anatomic severity of coronary artery stenosis best defined survival benefit from bypass surgery and angioplasty versus medical treatment. One or both interventional treatments provided better long-term survival than did medical treatment for all levels of disease severity. All patients with single-vessel disease, except those with at least 95% proximal left anterior descending stenosis, benefited from angioplasty versus bypass. All patients with three-vessel disease and those two-vessel patients with > or = 95% proximal left anterior descending stenosis benefited from bypass surgery versus angioplasty. All other patients with two-vessel disease and those with > or = 95% proximal left anterior descending stenosis only had similar survival with either interventional treatment. The absolute survival benefit was greatest for patients with severe three-vessel disease treated with bypass surgery.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1995

Frequency, significance, and cost of recurrent ischemia after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. TAMI Study Group.

Early postinfarction angina implies an unfavorable prognosis. Most published information on this outcome represents data collected in the prethrombolytic era, in which definitions and populations differed considerably. Our purpose was to evaluate the incidence and importance of recurrent ischemia after administration of thrombolytic therapy. We studied patients enrolled in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction studies. Patients were enrolled into 5 studies with similar entry criteria; 552 patients were treated with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), 293 were treated with urokinase, and 385 received both thrombolytic agents. Recurrent ischemia was defined as symptoms in association with electrocardiographic changes; reinfarction was defined as a reelevation of creatine kinase myocardial band isoenzyme in an appropriate clinical setting. Both recurrent ischemia and reinfarction occurred in 42 patients (3.4%), recurrent ischemia alone occurred in 226 (18%), whereas neither occurred in 964 (78%). Although baseline characteristics were similar among the 3 groups, in-hospital cardiac events (total 73 deaths, 253 heart failure episodes) were not: in-hospital mortality in patients with reinfarction was 21%; with recurrent ischemia, 11%; and with neither event, 4% (p < 0.0001). The in-hospital heart failure rate of patients with reinfarction was 50%; with recurrent ischemia alone, 31%; and with neither event, 17% (p < 0.0001). As expected, median in-hospital costs were highest in patients with reinfarction ($26,802), intermediate for those with recurrent ischemia alone ($18,422), and lowest in patients with neither event ($15,623). Recurrent myocardial ischemia after thrombolytic therapy is a frequent, important, and expensive adverse clinical outcome, making it a critical target for therapeutic intervention.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Better functional status in American than Canadian patients with heart disease: an effect of medical care?

OBJECTIVES: This study compared functional status in Americans and Canadians with and without prior symptoms of heart disease to separate the effects of medical care from nonmedical factors. BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography and revascularization are used more often in the United States than in Canada, yet rates of mortality and myocardial infarction are similar in the two countries. Recent data suggest that functional status after myocardial infarction is better among Americans than Canadians, but it is uncertain whether this difference is due to medical care or nonmedical factors. METHODS: Quality of life was measured in patients enrolled in seven American and one Canadian site in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation. Prior symptoms of heart disease were defined as angina, myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure before the episode of illness leading to randomization. Functional status was measured with the Duke Activity Status Index and overall emotional and social health using Medical Outcome Study measures on the basis of patient status before the index episode of acute ischemic heart disease. RESULTS: Quality of life was generally better in the 934 Americans than in the 278 Canadians, with overall health rated as excellent or very good in 30% of Americans versus 20% of Canadians (p = 0.0001), higher median Duke Activity Status Index scores (16 vs. 13.5, p = 0.03) but equivalent emotional health (76 vs. 76, p = 0.74) and social health scores (100 vs. 80, p = 0.07). Among the 350 patients without prior symptoms of heart disease, Americans and Canadians had similar overall health, Duke Activity Status Index and emotional and social health scores. However, of the 860 patients with previous symptoms of heart disease, Americans had higher overall health (p = 0.0001) and Duke Activity Status Index scores (p = 0.0008) but similar emotional and social health scores. The results were essentially unchanged after statistical adjustment for potential confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: The functional status of patients without prior symptoms of heart disease is similar in Americans and Canadians. However, among patients with previous symptomatic heart disease, functional status is higher in Americans than in Canadians. This difference may be due to different patterns of medical management of heart disease in the two countries.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 24,461 patients aged 80 years or older.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery is increasingly common in patients of age > or = 80 years. Single-institution reviews have cited a wide range of mortality results after bypass surgery in this age group, in part because of limited sample sizes. Using claims data, we examined recent national trends in the use and outcomes of bypass surgery in the very elderly. METHODS AND RESULTS: From an examination of Medicare data from 1987 through 1990, we identified 24,461 patients of age > or = 80 years who underwent bypass surgery. We compared surgical outcomes in these patients with those in Medicare patients of age 65 to 70 years. We found that the national use of bypass surgery in patients of age > or = 80 years increased 67% between 1987 and 1990. Compared with patients of age 65 to 70 years, the very elderly had significantly longer postoperative hospital stays (mean, 14.3 versus 10.4 days), higher charges (mean, $48,200 versus $38,000), and greater costs (mean, $27,200 versus $21,700). In-hospital (11.5% versus 4.4%), 1-year (19.3% versus 7.9%), and 3-year mortality rates (28.8% versus 13.1%) after bypass surgery were also significantly higher in patients of age > or = 80 years compared with younger patients. Although their initial surgical risk was high, octogenarians who underwent bypass surgery had a long-term survival rate similar to that of the general US octogenarian population. CONCLUSIONS: The use of bypass surgery in patients of age > or = 80 years in increasing. These very elderly patients face high surgical risks and accumulate significant hospital expenses. Further research is indicated to determine whether the long-term benefits from bypass surgery in the very elderly outweigh the increased procedural risks.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1995

Regional variation across the United States in the management of acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-1 Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction have been reported among countries, but few studies have investigated this issue in regions of the United States. METHODS: We compared the management of acute myocardial infarction among census regions across the United States, using data from the first Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries trial (GUSTO-1) comprising 21,772 patients, and from the American Hospital Association. RESULTS: We found substantial regional variation in the management of acute myocardial infarction in the United States. Beta-blockers (prescribed for a range of 55 to 81 percent of patients in the various regions), nitrates (prescribed for 61 to 77 percent), and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (prescribed for 18 to 23 percent) were used most often in New England, whereas calcium-channel blockers (31 to 42 percent) and lidocaine (14 to 43 percent) were used least often there. Similarly, the proportion of patients undergoing various cardiac procedures differed among regions (range for angiography, 52 to 81 percent of patients; angioplasty, 22 to 35 percent; and coronary-artery bypass surgery, 9 to 17 percent) and was lowest in New England. The regional use of cardiac procedures was closely related to their availability, except in New England. After the analysis was adjusted for clinical and hospital variables, patients in New England were found to be less likely to undergo angiography than patients in the other regions (odds ratio, 0.37; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.42). There was no apparent relation between the use of cardiac procedures and rates of recurrent infarction or death at 30 days or 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial regional variation in the use of cardiac medications and procedures to manage acute myocardial infarction in the United States. The use and availability of cardiac procedures are closely related. The management of acute myocardial infarction in New England is atypical in that the relatively limited availability of cardiac procedures does not account for their relatively low use in that region.

Angioplasty↗
PubMed1995

Job strain and the prevalence and outcome of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that jobs that have both high psychological demands and low decision latitude ("job strain") can lead to coronary disease. The objective of this study was to test whether job strain was correlated with the presence of coronary disease at angiography or with long-term outcome in patients with angiographic coronary disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Employed patients under the age of 65 years undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography completed a self-administered questionnaire about their job duties and work environment. Job strain was measured by the method of Karasek. Patients were separated into three groups, based on extent of coronary disease: significant disease (> or = 75% stenosis), insignificant disease (> 0% but < 75% stenosis), and normal coronary arteries. Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression and the Cox proportional hazards model. The 1489 patients enrolled had a median age of 52 years; 76% were male and 88% were white. By design, all patients were employed, 60% in white-collar jobs and only 16% in jobs requiring heavy labor. Traditional cardiac risk factors were most prevalent in the 922 patients with significant coronary artery disease, at intermediate levels in the 204 patients with insignificant disease, and least prevalent in the 363 patients with normal coronary arteries (all P < .01). Job strain was actually more common in patients with normal coronary arteries (35%) than in patients with insignificant (26%) or significant disease (25%, P < .002). In a multivariate analysis, job strain was not significantly correlated with the presence of coronary disease. Job strain was not correlated with angina frequency at the time of angiography. Job strain was not a predictor of cardiac events (cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Job strain was not correlated with the prevalence or severity of coronary artery disease in a cohort of patients undergoing coronary angiography. The outcome of patients with angiographically defined coronary disease was not affected by the level of job strain as measured by the method of Karasek.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Importance of baseline functional and socioeconomic factors for participation in cardiac rehabilitation.

Enrollment in cardiac rehabilitation has been reported to improve exercise capacity, psychological well-being, and survival. However, participation rates are low and the reasons for nonparticipation have not been adequately defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the major correlates of nonparticipation and to examine the level of participation of patients who stand to benefit most on the basis of preenrollment functional status and health behaviors. Three hundred ninety-three patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (1) had baseline functional status and quality-of-life data collected, and (2) were recruited for participation in the Duke Center for Living comprehensive 3-week post-coronary bypass surgery rehabilitation program. Baseline demographic, clinical, catheterization, functional status, psychological status, and health behavior descriptors were analyzed to identify univariate and multivariable correlates of a patient's decision to participate in the program. At baseline, most clinical factors were similar in participants (n = 52) and nonparticipants (n = 341), but the nonparticipants were more often women (26% vs 12%, p = 0.02). Participants were also more likely to be employed (63% vs 45%, p = 0.02) and had a higher education and income distribution than nonparticipants (both p = 0.001). On 2 separate scales, nonparticipants had significantly more baseline functional impairment than participants (both p = 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the independent correlates of higher participation rates were: higher education (college graduates 71% more likely to participate than high school graduates) and better baseline Duke Activity Status Index (patients with mild functional impairment were at least 42% more likely to participate than patients with moderate impairment).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator as compared with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated with accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) (given over a period of 1 1/2 hours rather than the conventional 3 hours, and with two thirds of the dose given in the first 30 minutes) had a 30-day mortality that was 15 percent lower than that of patients treated with streptokinase in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) study. This was equivalent to an absolute decrease of 1 percent in 30-day mortality. We sought to assess whether the use of t-PA, as compared with streptokinase, is cost effective. METHODS: Our primary, or base-case, analysis of cost effectiveness used data from the GUSTO study and life expectancy projected on the basis of the records of survivors of myocardial infarction in the Duke Cardiovascular Disease Database. In the primary analysis, we assumed that there were no additional treatment costs due to the use of t-PA after the first year and that the comparative survival benefit of t-PA was still evident one year after enrollment. RESULTS: One year after enrollment, patients who received t-PA had both higher costs ($2,845) and a higher survival rate (an increase of 1.1 percent, or 11 per 1000 patients treated) than streptokinase-treated patients. On the basis of the projected life expectancy of each treatment group, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio--with both future costs and benefits discounted at 5 percent per year--was $32,678 per year of life saved. The use of t-PA was least cost effective in younger patients and most cost effective in older patients. At all ages, the use of t-PA in patients with anterior infarctions yielded more favorable cost-effectiveness values. In our secondary analyses, the cost-effectiveness values were most sensitive to a lowering of the projected long-term survival benefits of t-PA and to moderate or greater increases in the projected medical costs for patients in the t-PA group after the first year. In contrast, our results were not sensitive to even very unfavorable assumptions about the additional costs associated with the higher rate of disabling stroke that was noted in patients treated with t-PA in the GUSTO study. CONCLUSIONS: The cost effectiveness of treatment with accelerated t-PA rather than streptokinase compares favorably with that of other therapies whose added medical benefit for dollars spent is judged by society to be worthwhile.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Distinguishing between early and late responders to symptoms of acute myocardial infarction.

The present study identified factors that distinguish early responders (i.e., requested medical assistance < 60 minutes after the onset of acute myocardial infarction [AMI] symptoms) from late responders (i.e., request made > or = 60 minutes after symptom onset). A questionnaire developed to assess demographic characteristics, contextual factors, antecedents to symptom onset, and behavioral, affective, and cognitive responses was administered in the hospital to 501 patients with documented AMI. Patients who believed that their symptoms were cardiac in nature were more likely to be early responders, whereas patients who attributed their symptoms to indigestion, muscle pain, fatigue, or another cause responded later (p < 0.0009). Early responders believed their symptoms to be more serious (p < 0.0001), felt more comfortable seeking medical assistance (p < 0.0001), were more anxious or upset when they first noticed symptoms (p = 0.0118), and perceived that they had less control of their symptoms (p < 0.0001) than late responders. A stepwise multiple regression analysis further suggested that unmarried patients responded significantly later than married patients, and patients who first experienced their symptoms at work responded significantly later than those who first experienced their symptoms outside of the home but not at work. These results suggest that situational and psychological variables are important determinants of lengthy decision delays in responding to symptoms of AMI.

Affect↗
PubMed1995

Characteristics and consequences of myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT).

OBJECTIVES: We examined the results of the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT) to determine the characteristics and consequences of creatine kinase (CK) and creatine kinase, MB myocardial isoenzyme fraction (CK-MB) elevations after percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Enzyme elevations after interventional procedures have usually been thought to be without long-term clinical consequences. However, recent preliminary reports have suggested that there are important long-term clinical sequelae in patients with even mild enzyme elevations after coronary procedures. METHODS: Patients with new native lesions undergoing coronary intervention at 35 clinical sites were randomized to undergo percutaneous coronary angioplasty (n = 500) or directional coronary atherectomy (n = 512). Cardiac enzyme levels were measured 12 and 24 h after the interventional procedure and when clinically indicated for recurrent myocardial ischemia. Enzyme profiles were analyzed using a ratio that compared the peak enzyme level and the local laboratory upper limit of normal. Standard 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) recorded before and after the procedure were interpreted by two independent readers who had no knowledge of the randomization data. Postprocedural myocardial infarction was defined as the appearance of new Q waves on the ECG, CK-MB levels three or more times the upper limit of normal or a total CK concentration two or more times the upper limit of normal when CK-MB levels were unavailable. Regression models were used to evaluate the predictive significance of a postintervention myocardial infarction with respect to clinical outcomes at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: There were 78 myocardial infarctions in the atherectomy group and 34 in the angioplasty group (15.2% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.001). Patients with a myocardial infarction more often had a repeat intervention or emergency coronary artery bypass surgery. Hospital length of stay was increased among patients with an infarction, as were mean hospital costs ($17,340.65 vs. $11,308.47, p = 0.0003). Postprocedural myocardial infarction was highly predictive of mortality, bypass surgery or repeat intervention within 30 days (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial infarction occurred commonly after coronary intervention in CAVEAT and was associated with a worse clinical outcome. Although the incidence of myocardial infarction was higher with atherectomy than with angioplasty, the baseline characteristics and consequences of the infarctions were similar between the treatments with regard to 30-day outcome. Myocardial enzyme elevations after an otherwise successful interventional procedure may identify a population at risk for a future cardiac event.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1995

Baseline and 6-month costs of primary angioplasty therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results from the primary angioplasty registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the economic outcomes from a prospective multicenter registry of primary coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Interest in coronary angioplasty without preceding thrombolytic therapy as a primary reperfusion strategy has increased as a result of three recent randomized trials showing outcomes equivalent to or better than standard thrombolytic therapy. METHODS: The Primary Angioplasty Registry enrolled 270 patients with acute myocardial infarction at six private tertiary care medical centers. Baseline and follow-up medical costs and counts of resources consumed were collected from enrollment to the 6-month follow-up visit. Correlates and predictors of cost were identified with multivariable linear regression modeling. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of patients had a revascularization procedure during the baseline hospital period: 85% had coronary angioplasty only; 4% had coronary bypass surgery only; 6% had both procedures. The total mean baseline hospital cost (not charge) was $13,113, with mean physician fees of $5,694. During the follow-up period, repeat coronary angiography was performed in 21% of patients, whereas 13% had repeat angioplasty and 3% bypass surgery. Mean hospital follow-up costs were $3,174, with mean physician fees of $1,443. Independent correlates of higher baseline hospital costs included older age (p = 0.049), anterior infarction (p = 0.03), initial Killip class (p < 0.0001), more severe coronary disease (p = 0.0015), need for bypass surgery alone or in addition to angioplasty (p < 0.0001) and recurrent ischemia (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Costs of primary angioplasty for patients with acute myocardial infarction eligible for thrombolysis were strongly influenced by infarction- and procedure-related complications but only modestly influenced by patient selection factors.

Adult↗