Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

D Auslander

Publications and source records attributed to D Auslander.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Structure and parameterization of pharmacokinetic models: their impact on model predictions.

There has been an increasing interest in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in the area of risk assessment. The use of these models raises two important issues: (1) How good are PBPK models for predicting experimental kinetic data? (2) How is the variability in the model output affected by the number of parameters and the structure of the model? To examine these issues, we compared a five-compartment PBPK model, a three-compartment PBPK model, and nonphysiological compartmental models of benzene pharmacokinetics. Monte Carlo simulations were used to take into account the variability of the parameters. The models were fitted to three sets of experimental data and a hypothetical experiment was simulated with each model to provide a uniform basis for comparison. Two main results are presented: (1) the difference is larger between the predictions of the same model fitted to different data sets than between the predictions of different models fitted to the dame data; and (2) the type of data used to fit the model has a larger effect on the variability of the predictions than the type of model and the number of parameters.

Animals

Modeling benzene pharmacokinetics across three sets of animal data: parametric sensitivity and risk implications.

Typically, the uncertainty affecting the parameters of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models is ignored because it is not currently practical to adjust their values using classical parameter estimation techniques. This issue of parametric variability in a physiological model of benzene pharmacokinetics is addressed in this paper. Monte Carlo simulations were used to study the effects on the model output arising from variability in its parameters. The output was classified into two categories, depending on whether the output of the model on a particular run was judged to be generally consistent with published experimental data. Statistical techniques were used to examine sensitivity and interaction in the parameter space. The model was evaluated against the data from three different experiments in order to test for the structural adequacy of the model and the consistency of the experimental results. The regions of the parameter space associated with various inhalation and gavage experiments are distinct, and the model as presently structured cannot adequately represent the outcomes of all experiments. Our results suggest that further effort is required to discern between the structural adequacy of the model and the consistency of the experimental results. The impact of our results on the risk assessment process for benzene is also examined.

Animals