Biomedical subjects

D Ambrogetti

Publications and source records attributed to D Ambrogetti.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1991

[Diagnostic errors in mammography. I. False negative results].

The authors evaluate 1455 consecutive breast cancers detected 1985-1987, undergoing mammography 6 months before diagnosis at the most. One hundred and seventy-eight cases reported as negative/benign were assumed as false negatives. Overall sensitivity was 88%, and was influenced by tumor stage (TIS = 80%, T1 = 83%, T2 = 91%, T3-4 = 95%) and patients' age (less than 40 = 76%, 40-49 = 78%, 50-59 = 91%, greater than 59 = 94%). Sensitivity varied also with readers' experience full- or part-time involved in reading mammograms (total cases = 92% vs 88%, T1 cases = 86% vs 74%). No correlations were evidenced between mammographic sensitivity and histologic type of cancer. Palpation and cytology allowed the correct identification of 98% of mammographic false negatives. One hundred and seventy-eight false negatives and 142 more cases showing evidence of a mammographic error more than 6 months before diagnosis were reviewed to assess the most common types of radiologic fault. A benign-like lesion was the most frequent finding (49.4%), whereas suspicious signs were infrequent at review (16.6%). Failure to encompass the lesion in the mammographic field or poor technique accounted for 3.8 or 1.3% of cases, respectively. 29% of false-negative subjects (mostly young or with a dense breast) showed no lesion even at review. This study confirms the good sensitivity of mammography but suggests a less confident diagnostic approach in younger women, stresses the need for other tests whenever a minimal doubt is present, and encourages the radiologist's full-time involvement in mammography and breast diagnosis to achieve greater experience and improve his diagnostic sensitivity.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

[Role of magnetic resonance in the staging of endometrial carcinoma].

Biopsy is the technique of choice for the definitive diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. Since lymphatic tumor spread has been demonstrated to depend on the degree of myometrial involvement, the definition of the latter with imaging techniques may significantly affect both prognosis and therapy. We investigated, by means of MR imaging at 0.5 T, 14 patients with endometrial carcinoma, to assess both tumor stage and myometrial involvement. FIGO staging system was employed, and M parameter evaluated (M0 = no myometrial involvement; M1 = involvement confined to the inner third; M2 = involvement confined to the middle third; M3 = involvement of the whole myometrium). Another parameter was the characteristic high signal of the tumor on PD and T2W images. The patients were then operated and MR information was correlated with surgical findings. Overall diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging was 85.7% in tumor staging, and 92.2% in defining M parameter. Tumor spread into adnexa and into cervical canal was poorly demonstrated by MR imaging.

Aged↗

PubMed1990

Prognostic impact of early detection of contralateral primary breast cancer.

The authors report on a consecutive series of 175 contralateral metachronous breast cancers. Eighty-six cases detected in women self referring for cancer-related subjective symptoms were compared to 89 cases detected as asymptomatic at routine examination. Detection in the asymptomatic phase was associated with a more favorable stage, but no differences in survival rates were observed between asymptomatic or symptomatic cancers when survival was measured from the date of first cancer diagnosis, in order to adjust for lead time bias. The nodal status of the first or of the second cancer was the only variable of prognostic value on univariate analysis, whereas a significant association to prognosis was evidenced only for nodal status of the first cancer. The study suggests that routine clinico-mammographic check-up may achieve early detection of contralateral metachronous breast cancer in the asymptomatic phase, but this does not seem to have a relevant impact on prognosis. The occurrence of a second primary breast cancer seems to be an indicator rather than a determinant of a worse prognosis.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[The assessment of the impact of a double reading by expert readers in a mass mammographic study].

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of double reading of screening mammograms by expert radiologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the results of independent readings of a proficiency test of screening mammography (140 cases, 32 cancers) performed by four expert radiologists. Double reading was simulated by matching the four original readings in 6 possible combinations. The impact of double reading over single reading was evaluated in terms of increased sensitivity and increased recall rate. RESULTS: Of 32 carcinomas 22, 6, or 4 were identified by 4, 3, or 2 readers, respectively. Of 108 cases negative for cancer a recall for further investigations was suggested by 4, 3, 2, 1 or no reader(s) in 3, 3, 9, 14, or 79 cases, respectively. Inter-reader diagnostic repeatability was good (k = 0.65). Single readers achieved an average sensitivity of 89% (range 87.5-90.6%) and an average recall rate of 12.2% (range 7.4-16.6%). Simulated double reading achieved an average increase in sensitivity of 8.8% (range 6.2-10.95%) and an average increase of recall rate of 6.2% (range 3.8-8.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Even though the relative increase of recall rate is relevant (+53.2%), the corresponding gain in sensitivity justifies the use of double reading, which was confirmed to be worthwhile also when expert radiologists are involved. This study confirms the opportunity of adopting double reading as a routine procedure in mammographic screening.

Aged↗