Biomedical subjects

D A Revicki

Publications and source records attributed to D A Revicki.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Integrating patient preferences into health outcomes assessment: the multiattribute Asthma Symptom Utility Index.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a brief, easy-to-administer symptom assessment scale for use as a preference-based outcome measure in clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies in asthma. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey with 2-week reproducibility assessment. SETTING: Ambulatory care: university asthma and allergy center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-one adults with asthma, 59% female, mean age 35+/-11 years. Mean FEV1 percent predicted was 86+/-17%. INTERVENTIONS: The 11-item Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Mean ASUI score for this sample was 0.71+/-0.23, with a range from 0.02 to 1.0. The ASUI was reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.74) and able to distinguish patients known to differ on disease severity according to clinician ratings (p < 0.001) and by an asthma disease severity scale score (p < 0.001). The instrument was also significantly correlated with FEV1 percent predicted (r = 0.27, p < 0.001), the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (r = 0.77, p < 0.001), and the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the reliability and validity of the ASUI, suggesting it will be a useful, complementary patient outcome measure for clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies comparing treatment alternatives for persons with asthma.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

A cost-effectiveness clinical decision analysis model for schizophrenia.

A model was developed to estimate the medical costs and effectiveness outcomes of three antipsychotic treatments (olanzapine, haloperidol, and risperidone) for patients with schizophrenia. A decision analytic Markov model was used to determine the cost-effectiveness of treatments and outcomes that patients treated for schizophrenia may experience over a 5-year period. Model parameter estimates were based on clinical trial data, published medical literature, and, when needed, clinician judgment. Direct medical costs were incorporated into the model, and outcomes were expressed by using three effectiveness indicators: the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, quality-adjusted life years, and lack of relapse. Over a 5-year period, patients on olanzapine had an additional 6.8 months in a disability-free health state based on Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores and more than 2 additional months in a disability-free health state based on quality-adjusted life years, and they experienced 13% fewer relapses compared with patients on haloperidol. The estimated 5-year medical cost associated with olanzapine therapy was $1,539 less than that for haloperidol therapy. Compared with risperidone therapy, olanzapine therapy cost $1,875 less over a 5-year period. Patients on olanzapine had approximately 1.6 weeks more time in a disability-free health state (based on Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores) and 2% fewer relapses compared with patients on risperidone. Sensitivity analyses indicated the model was sensitive to changes in drug costs and shortened hospital stay. Compared with both haloperidol and risperidone therapy, olanzapine therapy was less expensive and provided superior effectiveness outcomes even with conservative values for key parameters such as relapse and discontinuation rates.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed1998

Depression, health-related quality of life, and medical cost outcomes of receiving recommended levels of antidepressant treatment.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated depression severity, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and medical cost outcomes of primary care patients receiving recommended and less-than-recommended levels of antidepressant treatment. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of clinical trial data from primary care clinics in a staff-model managed care organization. The trial included patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised (DSM-III-R) criteria for major depression who were starting antidepressant treatment. The primary outcomes measures used were the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Hopkins Symptom Checklist depression scores, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) mental and physical component summary scores, and the total outpatient and inpatient medical costs. RESULTS: Of 358 patients starting antidepressant treatment, 195 (54.5%) received doses recommended by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research for 90 days or more. Mean HDRS score decreased from 14.1 to 8.8 in patients receiving less-than-recommended treatment and decreased from 13.8 to 8.9 in patients with minimum recommended treatment (P = .761). No significant differences in improvement of HRQL outcomes during 6 months were observed between patients receiving recommended or less-than-recommended antidepressant therapy. Mean total medical costs over 6 months for patients taking the recommended levels of antidepressant treatment were $1872 +/- 140 compared with $2622 +/- 413 for patients taking less-than-recommended treatment (P = .032). The differences in total medical costs were attributable to significantly lower nonmental health-related inpatient costs in the recommended antidepressant treatment group ($104 vs $785, P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving minimum recommended levels of antidepressant therapy for 3 months showed improvement in depression severity and HRQL comparable with patients receiving less-than-recommended treatment. Patients receiving minimum recommended treatment had lower total costs and nonmental health-related inpatient costs. Antidepressant treatment in primary care patients may have the greatest impact on the frequency of health care visits and on costs for medical conditions and impairments.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing.

Health status assessment is frequently used to evaluate the combined impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease and its treatment on functioning and well-being from the patient's perspective. No single health status measure can efficiently cover the range of problems in functioning and well-being experienced across HIV disease stages. Item response theory (IRT), item banking and computer adaptive testing (CAT) provide a solution to measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across different stages of HIV disease. IRT allows us to examine the response characteristics of individual items and the relationship between responses to individual items and the responses to each other item in a domain. With information on the response characteristics of a large number of items covering a HRQoL domain (e.g. physical function, and psychological well-being), and information on the interrelationships between all pairs of these items and the total scale, we can construct more efficient scales. Item banks consist of large sets of questions representing various levels of a HRQoL domain that can be used to develop brief, efficient scales for measuring the domain. CAT is the application of IRT and item banks to the tailored assessment of HRQoL domains specific to individual patients. Given the results of IRT analyses and computer-assisted test administration, more efficient and brief scales can be used to measure multiple domains of HRQoL for clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗

PubMed1997

Evidence for reliability, validity and usefulness of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV).

The Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) is a brief, comprehensive measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) used extensively in human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS). The 35-item questionnaire includes ten dimensions (health perceptions, pain, physical, role, social and cognitive functioning, mental health, energy, health distress and quality of life (QoL) and takes approximately 5 minutes to complete. Subscales are scored on a 0-100 scale (a higher score indicates better health) and physical and mental health summary scores can be generated. The MOS-HIV has been shown to be internally consistent, correlate with concurrent measures of health, discriminate between distinct groups, predict future outcomes and be responsive to changes over time. Limited experience suggests acceptable reliability and validity in women, injecting drug users and African-American and lower socioeconomic status patients. The MOS-HIV is available in 14 languages and has been included as a secondary outcome measure in numerous clinical trials for all stages of disease. In several studies it has detected significant differences between treatments; in some cases concordant with conventional endpoints and, in others, discordant. The interpretation of scores is facilitated by an explanation in terms meaningful to the intended audience. Research is needed to compare the MOS-HIV to other strategies for HRQoL assessment in early HIV disease.

Female↗

PubMed1997

The effect of mode of administration on medical outcomes study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS.

Brief measures of health-related quality of life are being used with increased frequency in AIDS clinical trials. Self-administration of questionnaires can reduce costs in this setting because they require little time. However, the equivalence between self- and interview-administered responses in clinical trials is not known. We evaluated patient and proxy responses to the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) and the EuroQol. We randomized 68 patients with advanced HIV disease on (1) mode of administration (self vs. interview); (2) type of interview (face-to-face vs. telephone); (3) questionnaire order (MOS-first vs. EuroQol-first); and (4) 2- vs. 3-item response categories for physical limitations. There were few differences in scores between self and interview administration and type of interview. Proxy respondents viewed patients as more impaired than did patients themselves on subjective aspects of health including mental health (63.8 vs. 75.7, p < 0.001), health distress (67.3 vs. 77.1, p = 0.007), pain (64.4 vs. 70.0, p = 0.04), and vitality (48.4 vs. 55.5, p = 0.04). Results concerning questionnaire order and number of response categories were not conclusive. Our results suggest that for patients with advanced HIV disease, data from the MOS-HIV and the EuroQol collected using different modes may be pooled, but that proxy responses should be calibrated.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Acute medical costs of fluoxetine versus tricyclic antidepressants. A prospective multicentre study of antidepressant drug overdoses.

Despite demonstrated differences in toxicity profiles between tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), no studies have examined hospital costs associated with acute antidepressant overdoses. Given the high incidence of such overdoses, it is important to examine treatment patterns and associated costs. This prospective, multicentre cohort study compared the hospital and physician costs associated with TCA and fluoxetine drug overdoses. Over a 30-month period, 622 consecutive patients with a fluoxetine or TCA overdose presented to the emergency departments, or were admitted to intensive care or medical units, of 9 participating medical centres across the US. Inclusion criteria were: ingestion of a single antidepressant (fluoxetine or a TCA), without clinically significant co-ingestants; laboratory confirmation of the overdose; and retrievable hospital bills. Patients were followed until discharge from the emergency department or hospital. Hospital and physician charges were collected from billing data. Hospital charges were adjusted using Health Care Financing Administration cost: charge ratios to estimate costs; physician charges were adjusted to estimate costs. Patient demographic and clinical data were prospectively gathered during the course of medical treatment. Clinical data recorded included level of consciousness, cardiopulmonary complications, vital sign or ECG abnormalities, agitation, seizures, CNS depression and death. 136 patients (121 with TCA overdose and 15 with fluoxetine overdose), representing 21.8% of the 622 patients entered, met the inclusion criteria. Mean length of stay varied from 0.73 [+/-standard error of the mean (SEM) 0.33] days for fluoxetine overdose patients to 3.59 (+/-SEM 0.48) days for TCA overdose patients (p = 0.038). Mean hospital costs were $US668 for patients with a fluoxetine overdose compared with $US4691 for those with a TCA overdose (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed between the TCA and fluoxetine overdose groups with regard to physician costs. Median hospital and physician costs increased from $US3029 to $US4396 from the first 15-month period of the study to the second 15-month period of the study for the TCA overdose group, but decreased from $US881 to $US396 for the fluoxetine overdose group. Patients with fluoxetine overdoses had lower hospital and total medical costs compared with patients with TCA overdoses. There was some evidence supporting a reduction in the medical costs of treating fluoxetine overdoses over the 30-month study period.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Cost-effectiveness of newer antidepressants compared with tricyclic antidepressants in managed care settings.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of newer antidepressants compared with tricyclic antidepressants in managed care organization settings. METHOD: We employed cost-utility analysis based on a clinical decision analysis model derived from published medical literature and physician judgment. The model, which represents ideal primary care practice, compares treatment with nefazodone to treatment with either imipramine or fluoxetine or to a step approach involving initial treatment with imipramine followed by nefazodone for treatment failures. The outcome measures were lifetime medical costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs per QALY gained. RESULTS: The base case analysis found that nefazodone treatment had $16,669 in medical costs, compared with $15,348 for imipramine, $16,061 for the imipramine step approach, and $16,998 for fluoxetine. QALYs were greatest for nefazodone (14.64), compared with 14.32 for imipramine, 14.40 for the step approach, and 14.58 for fluoxetine. The cost-effectiveness ratio comparing nefazodone with imipramine was $4065 per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness ratio comparing nefazodone with the step approach was $2555 per QALY gained. There were only minor differences in costs and outcomes between nefazodone and fluoxetine, with nefazodone resulting in $329 fewer costs and 0.06 more QALYs. The cost-effectiveness ratios comparing fluoxetine with imipramine and with the step approach were $6346 per QALY gained and $5206 per QALY gained, respectively. In the sensitivity analyses, the cost-effectiveness ratios comparing nefazodone and imipramine ranged from $2572 to $5841 per QALY gained. The model was most sensitive to assumptions about treatment compliance rates. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that nefazodone is a cost- effective treatment compared with imipramine or fluoxetine treatment for major depression. Fluoxetine is cost-effective compared with imipramine treatment, but is estimated to have slightly more medical costs and less effectiveness compared with nefazodone. The basic findings and conclusions do not change even after modifying key model parameters.

Antidepressive Agents↗

PubMed1997

Methods of pharmacoeconomic evaluation of psychopharmacologic therapies for patients with schizophrenia.

The pharmacoeconomic evaluation of psychopharmacologic treatments for patients with schizophrenia requires attention to the clinical and quality of life effects of the therapy, as well as its impact on the use and cost of medical services. The results of pharmacoeconomic studies help clinicians and health care decision makers determine treatments that provide the most benefit to patient functioning and well-being at the most acceptable medical cost. Various research designs and methods have been used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs, including retrospective studies, prospective studies, and clinical decision analysis models. This article summarizes these research designs and their strengths and weaknesses in the evaluation of antipsychotic drugs for treating schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed1996

Initial antidepressant choice in primary care. Effectiveness and cost of fluoxetine vs tricyclic antidepressants.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical, functional, and economic outcomes of initially prescribing fluoxetine with outcomes of initially selecting imipramine or desipramine. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care clinics of a Seattle, Wash, area staff-model health maintenance organization from 1992 through 1994. PATIENTS: A total of 536 adults beginning antidepressant treatment for depression. INTERVENTION: Random assignment of initial antidepressant prescription (desipramine, fluoxetine, or imipramine). Subsequent antidepressant treatment (doses, medication changes or discontinuation, specialty referral) was managed by the primary care physician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments after 1, 3, and 6 months examined clinical outcomes (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the depression subscale of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist) and quality-of-life outcomes (Medical Outcomes Study SF-36). Medication use and health care costs were assessed using the health maintenance organization's computerized data. RESULTS: Patients assigned to receive fluoxetine reported fewer adverse effects, were more likely to continue the original medication, and were more likely to reach adequate doses than patients beginning treatment with either tricyclic drug. The fluoxetine group reported marginally better clinical outcomes after 1 month, but these differences were not statistically significant and disappeared by the 3-month assessment. Quality-of-life outcomes in the 3 groups did not differ. Total health care costs over 6 months were approximately equal for the 3 groups, with higher antidepressant costs in the fluoxetine group balanced by lower outpatient visit and inpatient costs. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes, quality-of-life outcomes, and overall treatment costs provide no clear guidance on initial selection of fluoxetine or tricyclic drugs. Thus, patients' and physicians' preferences are an appropriate basis for treatment selection.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Evaluating the psychometric characteristics of the Psychological General Well-Being Index with a new response scale.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of a revised version of the Psychological General Well-Being index (PGWB), the PGWB-R, using a standardized response option suitable for use in telephone surveys. Sixty patients (42 women and 18 men) from two gastroenterology specialty clinics participated in the study. Patients were administered the PGWB or PGWB-R and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) by telephone or face-to-face interview. Internal consistency reliability levels of the PGWB and PGWB-R were comparable, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients between 0.93-0.96 for the total scale across method of administration. Intraclass correlations between the two methods were high (0.66-0.84). Pearson correlations between the GSRS and the PGWB and PGWB-R were similar to one another and to coefficients reported in the literature. Results suggest the PGWB-R may be useful for studies requiring telephone interviews.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Work-related stress and psychological distress in emergency medical technicians.

Emergency medical technicians (N = 65) participated in a study on work environment characteristics, work-related stress, and psychological distress. Data were collected at baseline and 6 months. Work-related stress was associated with lower work group support and poor supervisory behavior. Work-related stress was strongly related to psychological distress. Changes in work-related stress were significantly related to changes in psychological distress. Findings support the work-related stress, psychological distress model.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Preferences for schizophrenia-related health states: a comparison of patients, caregivers and psychiatrists.

Health state preferences are important for evaluating the outcomes of medical treatment. This study examined preferences of patients for schizophrenia-related health states and compares patient preferences with those of caregivers and psychiatrists. Health-state descriptions were developed for five different outcomes likely to be experienced by schizophrenic patients. Forty-nine schizophrenic patients and their primary caregiver assigned preferences to the hypothetical states and the patient's current state using categorical rating scales and paired comparisons; physicians rated the states using the standard gamble and categorical rating scale. Mean standard gamble utilities for the patient's current health were 0.75, and ranged from 0.56 for the inpatient state to 0.83 for excellent function, outpatient. Mean categorical rating scale preferences for the patient's current health state were 0.67 for patients, 0.66 for caregivers and 0.66 for clinicians. Patient preferences were comparable with clinician and caregiver preferences for hypothetical health states. Patient preferences were correlated with clinician and caregiver preferences for current health. It was concluded that schizophrenic patients are able to complete categorical rating scales and paired comparisons, and patient preferences are associated with clinician and caregiver preferences.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Evaluating the quality of life associated with rifabutin prophylaxis for Mycobacterium avium complex in persons with AIDS: combining Q-TWiST and multiattribute utility techniques.

Our objective was to evaluate the effect of rifabutin prophylaxis in patients with AIDS and CD4 counts of less than 200 per cubic millimetre using a combination of Q-TWiST (quality-adjusted time without symptoms and toxicity) and multiattribute health utility assessment. The design consisted of a secondary analysis of two previously reported multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials conducted in 78 academic, community and Department of Veterans Affairs HIV centres and private practices. 542 patients with AIDS and CD4 counts of less than 200 per cubic millimetre were assigned to rifabutin 300 mg/day and 562 were assigned to a placebo. A modified Q-TWiST approach was used for comparing treatments based on the occurrence and duration of time with and without severe symptoms and clinical endpoints. Health states were constructed to represent combinations of clinical events experienced by study patients. Five physicians assigned utilities for health states using a six-attribute health classification system. These utilities were used to adjust survival for QOL. The rifabutin and placebo groups were compared using estimated quality-of-life-adjusted days. The incidence of MAC was 9% for the rifabutin group and 18% for the placebo group (p < 0.001). Differences, although not statistically significant, were observed for rates of survival and hospitalization. The rifabutin group experienced less anaemia (p < 0.02), and fever and night sweats (p < 0.02) than the placebo group. Average Q-TWiST days were 325 for the rifabutin group and 309 for the placebo group (p < 0.05). Q-TWiST days were significantly lower for patients with MAC bacteraemia (p < 0.04) and hospitalizations (p < (0.003). Rifabutin prophylaxis resulted in fewer MAC infections and greater quality-of-life-adjusted days of survival compared to no rifabutin. Quality-of-life-adjusted survival, based on a combination of the Q-TWiST and multiattribute health utility index, is a feasible approach for evaluating the outcomes of medical treatment. Future studies should, however, use patient-assigned utility weights to compute Q-TWiST scores, since physician generated utilities may differ significantly from those of patients.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

PubMed1995

Health-related quality of life associated with recombinant human erythropoietin therapy for predialysis chronic renal disease patients.

The investigators evaluated the impact of recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in predialysis chronic renal disease patients with anemia. Eighty-three patients were entered into a randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial with follow-up evaluations over 48 weeks. Forty-three patients were assigned to r-HuEPO treatment, and 40 patients were assigned to an untreated control group. Hematocrit levels were measured at baseline and monthly. HRQL was assessed at baseline and at weeks 16, 32, and 48. The HRQL assessment included measures of physical function, energy, role function, health distress, cognitive function, social function, home management, sexual dysfunction, depression, and life satisfaction. Significant improvements in hematocrit levels were observed in the r-HuEPO-treated group (P < 0.0001), and no changes were seen in the untreated group. Correction of anemia (hematocrit > or = 36) occurred in 79% of r-HuEPO-treated patients and 0% of control patients. Significant improvements in assessments of energy (P < 0.05), physical function (P < 0.05), home management (P < 0.05), social activity (P < 0.05), and cognitive function (P < 0.05) were found for the r-HuEPO-treated group. No changes were observed in the control group, except for a decrease in physical function (P < 0.05). Between-group differences favoring the r-HuEPO-treated group were found for energy (P < 0.05) and physical functioning (P < 0.05). In patients receiving r-HuEPO, significant improvements were seen in hemotocrit levels, and these increases resulted in improvements in HRQL.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Modelling the cost effectiveness of antidepressant treatment in primary care.

The aim of this study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of nefazodone compared with imipramine or fluoxetine in treating women with major depressive disorder. Clinical decision analysis and a Markov state-transition model were used to estimate the lifetime health outcomes and medical costs of 3 antidepressant treatments. The model, which represents ideal primary care practice, compares treatment with nefazodone to treatment with either imipramine or fluoxetine. The economic analysis was based on the healthcare system of the Canadian province of Ontario, and considered only direct medical costs. Health outcomes were expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs were in 1993 Canadian dollars ($Can; $Can1 = $US0.75, September 1995). Incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated comparing the relative lifetime discounted medical costs and QALYs associated with nefazodone with those of imipramine or fluoxetine. Data for constructing the model and estimating necessary parameters were derived from the medical literature, clinical trial data, and physician judgement. Data included information on: Ontario primary care physicians' clinical management of major depression; medical resource use and costs; probabilities of recurrence of depression; suicide rates; compliance rates; and health utilities. Estimates of utilities for depression-related hypothetical health states were obtained from patients with major depression (n = 70). Medical costs and QALYs were discounted to present value using a 5% rate. Sensitivity analyses tested the assumptions of the model by varying the discount rate, depression recurrence rates, compliance rates, and the duration of the model. The base case analysis found that nefazodone treatment costs $Can1447 less per patient than imipramine treatment (discounted lifetime medical costs were $Can50,664 vs $Can52,111) and increases the number of QALYs by 0.72 (13.90 vs 13.18). Nefazodone treatment costs $Can14 less than fluoxetine treatment (estimated discounted lifetime medical costs were $Can50,664 vs $Can50,678) and produces slightly more QALYs (13.90 vs 13.79). In the sensitivity analyses, the cost-effectiveness ratios comparing nefazodone with imipramine ranged from cost saving to $Can17,326 per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness ratios comparing nefazodone with fluoxetine ranged from cost saving to $Can7327 per QALY gained. The model was most sensitive to assumptions about treatment compliance rates and recurrence rates. The findings suggest that nefazodone may be a cost-effective treatment for major depression compared with imipramine or fluoxetine. The basic findings and conclusions do not change even after modifying model parameters within reasonable ranges.

Antidepressive Agents↗

PubMed1995

The use of decision analysis in the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of an antidepressant: a cost-effectiveness study of nefazodone.

A decision model can be a useful tool for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a drug during research and development, before the drug is marketed. Decision analysis provides a structured process for comparing the costs and consequences of a new drug with those of standard drug therapy. This article introduces the use of a decision model and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of such a model. A cost-utility study of nefazodone, a new antidepressant, illustrates the application and interpretation of decision models. Decision analyses using data from clinical trials are a great potential source of information on the economic impact of new drugs. However, the development and use of such models require tolerance of uncertainty, the ability to represent complex relationships accurately, awareness of all factors that might influence the results, and a willingness to validate the model to the extent that validation is possible. The disadvantage of clinical decision models is that the findings are only as reliable as the information on which the model is based. Nevertheless, sensitivity analyses can be used to vary any information in question and assess the impact of that variation on the findings of the analyses. The advantage of clinical decision models is that they encourage the consideration and explicit representation of all pertinent inputs and outcomes. They clearly differentiate knowledge supported by data from assumptions, and compel assessment of the effect of those assumptions on the findings. The cost-effectiveness of nefazodone relative to standard treatment for major depression was evaluated using a decision model that simulated the lifetime direct medical costs and health outcomes associated with nefazodone and two comparators, imipramine and fluoxetine. The model included the possible clinical management pathways and the use of medical resources in treating major depression from early adulthood until death. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the impact of variation in model parameters on the results of the model. Using the base case assumptions of the model, which included parity of pricing with fluoxetine, nefazodone was found to be a cost-effective treatment for major depression.

Antidepressive Agents↗

PubMed1995

Abdominal pain in an HMO.

BACKGROUND: Previous surveys have found that 14%-25% of the population report abdominal pain. Only one study examined the age-gender specific prevalence of abdominal pain in the population, and no study has examined the self-reported causes of abdominal pain. METHODS: To describe the epidemiology of abdominal pain in a large health maintenance organization population, 6,199 randomly selected members were contacted and interviewed by telephone about the occurrence of abdominal pain and related health care in the past year. RESULTS: Of those interviewed, 27% reported abdominal pain in the past year, while 38% of those individuals saw a physician for their pain. Women were more likely than men to have had pain and to have seen a physician for their pain. Fewer older individuals reported abdominal pain, but when pain occurred, they sought medical care more often than younger individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Women and younger individuals report abdominal pain more frequently. Women and older individuals are more likely to seek care for their pain.

Abdominal Pain↗