Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D A H Laidlaw

Publications and source records attributed to D A H Laidlaw.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

How effective is macula-off retinal detachment surgery. Might good outcome be predicted?

PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with anatomical and functional outcomes of macula-off retinal detachment surgery in a modern vitreoretinal unit. METHODS: A retrospective casenote review of 185 patients presenting with macula-off retinal detachment was performed. Demographic and ocular characteristics were determined. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine (1) the effect of these factors on visual outcome and (2) their effect on primary and final anatomical success. RESULTS: Primary and ultimate anatomical success were achieved in 76 and 84% of cases. Patients with oil in at final follow-up were considered to be anatomical failures. Statistically significant factors predicting primary anatomical success using a multiple variable model were preoperative logMAR visual acuity, preoperative PVR and number of breaks. Preop logMAR visual acuity and duration of macular detachment were the statistically significant factors predicting ultimate success. In all, 44% of patients regained 6/12 Snellen or better with a median improvement of 0.78 logMAR. For prediction of visual outcome (in patients with no ocular comorbidity) only preoperative logMAR visual acuity achieved statistical significance (P=0.001) at the P=0.05 level. CONCLUSION: In all, 76% of macula-off detachments may be repaired with one operation and 44% of patients regain at least 6/12 Snellen. The median logMAR acuity increment of 0.78 far exceeds that seen in cataract surgery. Preoperative visual acuity is the most important factor predicting primary and final anatomical success as well as visual outcome. Preoperative PVR, number of breaks and duration of detachment also affect outcomes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Factors predicting outcome of vitrectomy for diabetic macular oedema: results of a prospective study.

AIM: To determine preoperative demographic, clinical, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) factors which might predict the visual and anatomical outcome at 1 year in patients undergoing vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane peel for diabetic macular oedema (DMO). METHODS: A prospective, interventional case series of 33 patients who completed 1 year follow up. Measurements were taken preoperatively and at 1 year. Outcome measures were logMAR visual acuity (VA) and OCT macular thickness. A priori explanatory variables included baseline presence of clinical and/or OCT signs suggesting macular traction, grade of diabetic maculopathy, posterior vitreous detachment, fluorescein leakage and ischaemia on angiography, presence of subretinal fluid, and peroperative indocyanine green (ICG) use. RESULTS: 33 patients completed 1 year follow up. On average VA deteriorated by 0.035 logMAR (p = 0.40). Macular thickness significantly improved by a mean of 139 microm (95% CI; 211 to 67, p<0.001). Patients with evidence of clinical and/or OCT macular traction significantly improved logMAR acuity (logMAR improvement = 0.08) compared with patients without traction (logMAR deterioration 0.11, p = 0.01). Presence of subretinal fluid significantly predicted worse postoperative result (p = 0.01) CONCLUSION: On average, patients showed a statistically significant improvement in central macular thickness following treatment but a marginal acuity worsening. Presence of subretinal fluid on OCT is hypothesised to be exudative rather than tractional in nature. The visual benefit of vitrectomy for DMO in this study was limited to patients who exhibit signs of macular traction either clinically and/or on OCT.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Outcomes of macular hole surgery: implications for surgical management and clinical governance.

PURPOSE: The optimal method and timing of the surgical treatment for idiopathic macular holes remains unknown. The aim of this retrospective study was to identify factors associated with anatomical and visual success in macular hole surgery. METHODS: Case records of 55 patients undergoing macular hole surgery at three units in the 2-year period up to July 2002 were reviewed to identify factors associated with anatomical and visual success. The following potential prognosticators were evaluated: patient age, hole stage, hole latency prior to surgery, preoperative acuity, simultaneous phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation, internal limiting membrane peeling with and/or without indocyanine green, and postoperative posturing. RESULTS: The duration of preoperative symptoms, indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling, hole stage, and better preoperative visual acuity were associated with both anatomical success and regaining a postoperative visual acuity of 6/12 or better. DISCUSSION: The closure rate in patients undergoing surgery within 1 year of onset was 94.0%, and in those waiting 1 year or more it was 47.4%. Clinical governance and quality issues should dictate that NHS macular hole surgery is available to all within 1 year of onset. This study showed no adverse effect of ICG dye retinal staining. The results support the use of a 'patient-friendly' approach of simultaneous cataract surgery with no prone postoperative posturing.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A randomised controlled feasibility trial of vitrectomy versus laser for diabetic macular oedema.

AIM: (1) To evaluate whether vitrectomy is preferable to further macular laser in improving visual acuity and resolving retinal thickening in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO) despite previous laser and no macular traction. (2) To determine the feasibility of further trials in this population in terms of magnitude of comparative clinical effect, rate of recruitment, and loss to follow up. METHODS: A randomised controlled feasibility study. Patients with DMO and a visual acuity of 0.3 logMAR (6/12) or worse after one or more macular laser treatments were randomised on a 1:1 basis to either pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling or further macular laser. Patients with a posterior vitreous detachment, biomicroscopic evidence of retinal traction, or a taut thickened posterior hyaloid (TTPH) were excluded. Primary outcome measures were (1) best corrected logMAR visual acuity, (2) mean central macular thickness on optical coherence tomography, and (3) rate of recruitment and loss to follow up. Analysis was on an intention to treat basis. RESULTS: 19 patients were randomised to PPV and 21 to further macular laser. The mean baseline logMAR visual acuity was 0.65 (SD 0.28) for the group randomised to PPV and 0.60 (0.23) for the group randomised to laser. The mean change in best corrected visual acuity of the vitrectomy group was deterioration by 0.05 logMAR, while in the control group the mean change was an improvement of 0.03 logMAR. The median (interquartile range) baseline central macular thickness was 403 (337, 492) for the group randomised to PPV and 387 (298, 491) for the controls randomised to laser. The median change in central macular thickness from baseline to review in the vitrectomy group was a thinning by 73 mum (20%) and by 29 mum (10.7%) in the control laser group. This single centre was able to recruit 40 patients in 18 months with follow up of 82% at 1 year. CONCLUSION: A randomised controlled trial was found to be potentially feasible in this population, the rate of recruitment was however slow and one in five patients were lost to follow up because of death and ill health. These data provide little evidence in terms of visual acuity and macular thickness of any benefit of vitrectomy over further macular laser in patients with an attached hyaloid, DMO despite previous laser, and no clinically evident macular traction or TTPH.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.

AIMS: All visual acuity data are subject to test-retest variability (TRV). This measurement error obscures true clinical change and reduces the statistical power of clinical trials using acuity as a primary outcome measure. This study was designed to assess whether a computerised system can reduce TRV by taking repeated acuity measurements and averaging them. A computerised system (PC-test) was developed for this purpose and compared in terms of TRV with the current Gold Standard ETDRS logMAR chart. METHODS: A total of 19 subjects with a mean acuity of +0.16 logMAR (range +0.49 to -0.10 logMAR) were recruited. The performance of two computerised tests (one averaging 10 repeats and one five) was compared with that of the ETDRS logMAR chart in terms of TRV and agreement of acuity data. Results The 10 and five repeat computerised tests (PC-tests) produced a TRV of +/-0.11 and +/-0.10 logMAR, respectively, compared with +/-0.18 logMAR for the ETDRS chart. No significant bias was observed between PC-test and ETDRS acuities. CONCLUSIONS: A computerised system that takes repeated acuity measurements and averages them is subject to less TRV than a single ETDRS acuity measurement. A reduced TRV of visual acuity data allows earlier detection of true clinical change in individual patients. It also allows smaller differences between groups to be detected in clinical trials for a given degree of statistical confidence and power.

Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted↗
PubMed2003

Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate a new chart designed to improve the collection of visual acuity data in population-based surveys. The Reduced logMAR E chart (RLME) employs three letters per line, 'tumbling E' optotypes, and conforms to accepted contemporary design principles. METHODS: The performance of the chart was assessed within a population-based glaucoma survey in Thailand. Performance indices were test-retest variability (TRV) and agreement with acuity data measured using the ETDRS logMAR chart which acted as the 'gold standard'. RESULTS: The 95% confidence limits for TRV of RLME acuity data were +/-0.15 logMAR. This figure is consistent with published data on the TRV of acuities measured using five-letter-per-line logMAR charts. The mean difference between RLME and ETDRS acuity data was 0.00 logMAR (95% confidence intervals of +/-0.05 logMAR) indicating that RLME acuities agreed well with those of the ETDRS chart. The chart and its method of use was readily accepted by the local ancillary staff who required only minimal training before acuity measurement could be delegated to them. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the RLME chart is capable of accurate and repeatable acuity measurements. Certain aspects of the design of the RLME chart may be particularly pertinent to the measurement of vision in population-based surveys.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

The development and validation of a questionnaire to assess visual symptoms/dysfunction and impact on quality of life in cataract patients: the Visual Symptoms and Quality of life (VSQ) Questionnaire.

The aim of the study was to develop a new questionnaire to assess visual symptoms/dysfunction and impact on vision-specific quality of life for those undergoing second eye cataract extraction. Items for the VSQ questionnaire were devised with reference to existing literature and following consultation with eye care experts (n = 18) and interviews with cataract patients (n = 40). Piloting work conducted with 53 patients indicated that the questionnaire was promising, with a high level of internal consistency, low levels of missing data and indications that it was responsive to surgery. A modified version of the questionnaire was completed by 105 patients having received 'early' surgery and 103 scheduled for routine surgery within a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of second eye cataract surgery. Analyses showed that the internal consistency of both the visual symptoms/dysfunction and quality of life areas was high (Cronbach's alpha 0.82 and 0.83, respectively). Highly significant improvements were found for early surgery patients (p < 0.0001), with little change among routine surgery patients. Two final versions of the VSQ questionnaire have been produced for future use in assessing visual symptoms/dysfunction and impact on vision-specific quality of life: a scoreable short form and more detailed and sensitive long form.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: performance of the "compact reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart in amblyopic children.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The "compact reduced logMAR" (cRLM) chart is being developed as a logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart. It is closer spaced and has fewer letters per line than conventional logMAR charts. Information regarding the performance of such a chart in amblyopes and children is therefore required. This study aimed to investigate the performance of the cRLM chart in amblyopic children. METHODS: Timed test and retest measurements using two versions of each chart design were obtained on the amblyopic eye of 43 children. Using the methods of Bland and Altman the agreement, test-retest variability (95% confidence limits for agreement, TRV) and test time of the cRLM and the current clinical standard Snellen chart were compared to the gold standard ETDRS logMAR chart. RESULTS: No systematic bias between chart designs was found. For line assignment scoring the respective TRVs were 0.20 logMAR, 0.20 logMAR, and 0.30 logMAR. Single letter scoring TRVs were cRLM (95% CL 0.17) logMAR, ETDRS (95% CL 0.14) logMAR, and Snellen (95% CL 0.29) logMAR. Median testing times were ETDRS 60 seconds, cRLM 40 seconds, Snellen 30 seconds. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity to change of the cRLM equalled or approached that of the gold standard ETDRS and was at least 50% better than that of Snellen. This enhanced sensitivity to change was at the cost of only a 10 second time penalty compared to Snellen. The cRLM chart was approximately half the width of the ETDRS chart. The cRLM chart may represent a clinically acceptable compromise between the desire to obtain logMAR acuities of reasonable and known sensitivity to change, chart size, and testing time.

Amblyopia↗
PubMed2003

Disease laterality, eye dominance, and visual handicap in patients with unilateral full thickness macular holes.

AIM: To investigate the association between visual handicap, laterality, and historical eye dominance in patients presenting with unilateral full thickness macular holes (FTMH). METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with unilateral FTMH and no other visually significant ocular pathology including abnormalities of binocular vision were included. A questionnaire and case note review were performed to determine the mode of presentation, presence of symptomatic binocular interference, historically dominant eye, and whether they elected to undergo surgery. RESULTS: 44 eyes of 44 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 21 (48%) affected eyes were right sided and 56% of FTMH were in the historically dominant eye. 76% of FTMH in historically dominant eyes presented symptomatically compared to 36% in non-dominant eyes (p= 0.003). 72% of patients with FTMH affecting their historically dominant eye were aware of binocular interference in day to day binocular viewing compared with 21% when the FTMH was in the non-dominant eye (p= 0.001). 23 (52%) patients elected to undergo surgery, of whom 18/23(78%) had FTMH in their historically dominant eye (p= 0.0003). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that eye dominance may be an important determinant of the visual handicap suffered by patients with unilateral FTMH.

Aged↗